[arista]

BBC News Text:
[Dr Sophie Chandauka's claims about
Prince Harry also lead The Sunday Telegraph.
The broadsheet reports Dr Chandauka
has also told the Financial Times
that she was asked to publicly
defend Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex,
and that she had refused to
"become and extension of
the Sussex PR machine".]

[Mystic Mock]

Well the great Eric Cartman does say that "gingers have no souls."

And maybe he is right.

[arista]

The Lady Boss and her legal Adviser
are now on SkyNewsHD

Trevor Phillips show

[Cherie]

What's the old saying, what goes round, comes round

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Well the great Eric Cartman does say that "gingers have no souls."

And maybe he is right.

After anniek is finished with you
You will have no balls

[bots]

i don't believe this charity boss is a particularly trustworthy witness

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by bots

i don't believe this charity boss is a particularly trustworthy witness

It doesn't matter really, Harry and Megs were very happy to accuse people of all sorts, just heard some woman on LBC saying Harry would be very hurt by these accusations, like I say you reap what you sow

[thesheriff443]

If you can treat your own family as the enemy it’s hardly surprising how he will treat people he doesn’t know or give a fcuk about

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Cherie

It doesn't matter really, Harry and Megs were very happy to accuse people of all sorts, just heard some woman on LBC saying Harry would be very hurt by these accusations, like I say you reap what you sow

Exactly....getting a taste of their own medicine.

[user104658]

Well he was raised by bullies and his big brother is a known bully so yeah on balance I wouldn't be all that surprised if he has some bully-tendencies. Probably inevitable when you allow the "born-better" Royal narrative.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Quantum Boy

Well he was raised by bullies and his big brother is a known bully so yeah on balance I wouldn't be all that surprised if he has some bully-tendencies. Probably inevitable when you allow the "born-better" Royal narrative.

Diana was a bully? who knew

[bots]

all the royals and high nobility use their position to coerce. They have always done it. Princess Di didn't become a champion for aids or land mines by being a meek and timid little girl like she portrayed for effect. She used her position and privilege to brow beat others into submission

[Livia]

Using the excuse that the royals are all bullies, so what chance did poor Harry have is a proper cop-out. Megan's not royal yet she's been accused of bullying. You get bullies in all stages if society. No one on here has the first idea of what the royals are really like. I do know this though, I've always found old money to be much nicer and more approachable than new money and the upper class far more grounded and unpretentious than the middle class.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Livia

I do know this though, I've always found old money to be much nicer and more approachable than new money and the upper class far more grounded and unpretentious than the middle class.

Thats sooo true....

[rusticgal]

I think if I remember correctly, the woman at the top in that photo was pushed to one side by Meghan for the photo...

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by bots

all the royals and high nobility use their position to coerce. They have always done it. Princess Di didn't become a champion for aids or land mines by being a meek and timid little girl like she portrayed for effect. She used her position and privilege to brow beat others into submission

I disagre
Charities get royals and famous people on board to use their clout to get the charity exposure and investment

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Diana was a bully? who knew

They were young when she died, a lot of this formative stuff comes in the teens. Also while she was evidently a gentler parent, I don't think Diana's noted as having done all that much to counter the "Special Boys" narrative, in fact I believe some of the quotes both spoken/written from her suggest the opposite. Diana was a Spencer and thus also "of the aristocracy", at the end of the day.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Quantum Boy

They were young when she died, a lot of this formative stuff comes in the teens. Also while she was evidently a gentler parent, I don't think Diana's noted as having done all that much to counter the "Special Boys" narrative, in fact I believe some of the quotes both spoken/written from her suggest the opposite. Diana was a Spencer and thus also "of the aristocracy", at the end of the day.

I think you are just generalising too much. Diana was a very compassionate person...its why she was called the Peoples Princess. People related to her for her compassion and natural behaviour...how she interacted with her children in front of the camera..she was just a natural and caring woman and they adored her. You never saw or witnessed or heard of any pomp or aristocratic behaviour from her.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I think you are just generalising too much. Diana was a very compassionate person...its why she was called the Peoples Princess. People related to her for her compassion and natural behaviour...how she interacted with her children in front of the camera..she was just a natural and caring woman and they adored her. You never saw or witnessed or heard of any pomp or aristocratic behaviour from her.

All I mean is that as part of the aristocracy (and even in her latter, more sceptical days, not someone who rebelled against the concept of aristocracy) she didn't counter the "Royal Idea" (which is at it's core, that some people are born special/have a special bloodline).

That's a heavily loaded idea and one that can't possibly have "no effect" on young people growing up in that environment, it's a superiority complex by definition, if there's nothing superior about "Royal Blood" then there is no Monarchy. Charles, William, Harry, et al. are all fundamentally raised with that belief system... it will have an effect, and one of those effects is likely to be a feeling of "automatic authority". That attitude - when encountered by anyone who isn't deferent and doesn't buy into the whole thing - is going to come off as "bullying".

[Maru]

It really takes very little to get labeled a bully these days so when I saw it I took it with a huge grain of salt. Everyone at this point knows the couple are PR crazy and are known to make stunts, so why would someone sign up to get on board with it if that is not what they are about? H&M can't keep staff either so apparently not easy to work with... (there are other things but yeah)

[Maru]

Originally Posted by Cherie

It doesn't matter really, Harry and Megs were very happy to accuse people of all sorts, just heard some woman on LBC saying Harry would be very hurt by these accusations, like I say you reap what you sow

Yes and my feeling, especially in recent years, is that celebrity in the US particularly has declined. Maybe even it has lost all meaning since professionalism has gone out the window. I would speculate, yeah, it is Hollywood dynamics at play there where people betray one another all to draft a headline.. and yes, reaping what one sows is true, but I think more literal than we may even think, as they worked and played the game to get where they are. This is the game they signed up to play. I suspect there is no authenticity here. From all parties.

[arista]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...CHARD-KAY.html

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]