[Scarlett.]

The target of an alleged blackmail plot against the Royal Family was not a senior figure, the BBC understands.
Buckingham Palace has refused to discuss the report in the Sunday Times, which said the case involved allegations of drugs and sex.

But the BBC understands the claims relate to a member of the family with a low public profile.

Police said two men appeared before magistrates on 13 September accused of blackmail and were remanded in custody.

The men, aged 30 and 40, appeared before City of Westminster magistrates They will appear at the Old Bailey in December.

A Palace spokesperson would only say it was a police matter and Scotland Yard was investigating.

'Cocaine envelope'

The Sunday Times says two men contacted a member of the royal staff and demanded £50,000, threatening to go public with video recordings involving sex and drugs if their demand was not met.

It's taken six weeks for it to come to light, so how serious is the allegation?

Dickie Arbiter
Former Palace spokesman

The paper alleges that the extortion attempt was launched on 2 August when a man telephoned the Royal Family member's office and said he had evidence that they had supplied an aide with an envelope containing cocaine.

According to the Sunday Times, the caller then claimed that he had a video tape showing the aide performing oral sex on someone, whom the alleged blackmailer indicated was the Royal Family member.

During further calls, one of the men said that he had footage of an aide snorting cocaine, the paper adds.

The report alleges that a detective posing as a member of the royal's staff arranged a meeting at the Hilton hotel on London's Park Lane on 11 September, where parts of the video were shown.

But Scotland Yard detectives who had been secretly filming the meeting from an adjacent room then arrested the two suspects, it continues.

A Scotland Yard spokeswoman said the magistrates' hearing had been held "in camera", or in private, and that reporting restrictions had been imposed to prevent the victim or witnesses from being identified.

'Vast family'

Former Palace spokesman Dickie Arbiter said royal officials would have carried out their own inquiry into the validity of the Sunday Times story, but that it was unlikely that the name of the Royal Family member would be revealed.

"It's a vast family, there are nearly 40 members... We don't know, we won't know, until the case comes to trial at the Old Bailey in December, and we might not even know then, which member of the Royal Family [it is]."

Mr Arbiter added that he was surprised by how long it had taken for the story to break.

"It's taken six weeks for it to come to light, so how serious is the allegation?

"It's interesting too, that it's come out in the Sunday Times and not one of the usual tabloid scoops.

"So it's going to take the due process of the law to determine was this true or was this just another fake sting?"

BBC News

[J.C.]

I feel sure that we will never know who 'The Royal' is, and that is exactly how it should be, imo. If it were to become public knowledge it would send a signal out that it is better to be blackmailed than go to the police, something no society should want.

I suspect that the Royal in question will get a cocaine caution or perhaps something a little stronger, and that part will probably be public knowledge but obviously not the identity.

It is a bit sad that this level of privacy cannot always be applied to everyone
in such circumstances, but that says more about our press mob than our justice system.

In any event I'm sure experience has also something to do with these matters, as there has probably been an entire history of Sex, Drugs and Rock'n Royaling.