FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
The X Factor 2004-'08 [S1-5] Discussion of previous series (2004-2008) and the contestants. Winners were Steve Brookstein, Shayne Ward, Leona Lewis, Leon Jackson and Alexandra Burke. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Should Sharon be allowed to join onto another mentor (most likely Louis) and help them with their acts? It would be better than her just being sat there like a spare part. Someone on another forum suggested that Hope should be axed, and Phoebe should become a solo artist and work with Sharon for the rest of the competition.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
No she shouldnt.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
By the way, I don't mean be an official mentor and come out with that category on results show, I mean a second opinion type thing
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
She lost...
Any changes would just be in a bid to make her feel better. Where's the logic in that? It's like having a race and someone losing, so we take the actual winner out of the competition so the loser can win/still have a chance >_< sounds rather stupid if you ask me? Avoids the entire point in a competition perhaps? Im thinking so. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
She already is a second opinion, as she's still a judge? =/ she'll have nothing better to do than walk around observing the acts and making comments.
Attaching her onto an act/acts she's had nothing to do with will just give them a free vote to stay in. Also, her helping acts from someone elses category gives them an unfair advantage of having two people who know what they're doing, instead of one. Not to mention she might get in the way, and conflict with the original mentors style/approach. Not that they'd want someone who LOST helping them? as she obviously did an awful job this year. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Z
|
No. And the person who suggested Hope should be dismantled should be shot.
![]() Sharon has no acts left. The position she's in now is actually very useful, she's got no bias whatsoever, in fact, the remaining acts will want to chum up to her so they can get her vote if they're in the bottom two. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
No, Sharon has lost its her own fault there's no need for her to help mentor another category her job now is to give an opinion on a Saturday night.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
No way. She lost. Maybe not fairly, because the depature of Emily was not her fault but still she lost and shouldnt be allowed to join another group.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
no because she lost and all the others have mentors anyway. Plus as some1 said they will want to chum up to her as she has potential to hold a key casting vote
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
|
|||
Nah
|
She lost, end of. Her group was rubbish this year actually.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
No, she should remain impartial now. She should've chosen better acts and worked better with them if she still wanted to be in the competition.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||
|
||||
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
Quote:
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Axe Hope and put Phoebe in the girls category
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |||
|
||||
Loving Lucien!
|
I think Sharon should remain an "impartial" judge, Hope are doing well as they are and shouldn't be split up. I agree she's been the unluckiest judge this year and didn't have any chance of winning with Alisha, all the others have strong acts left in the contest (i.e. Rhydian, Beverley and Hope).
Sharon will most likely have the deciding vote when it comes to the bottom 2 before the decision is based on public vote alone. |
|||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|