FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Celebrity Hijack Discuss Big Brother: Celebrity Hijack shown on E4 in January 2008. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Hes got an advantage because of him being the center of attention on lauch and people know him more.and hes now the bookies favourite.so do you think hell win?
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
|
|||
Nah
|
This is hard to tell because he may be immune but it doesn't mean he will be that popular. As he won't be up for the public vote, it will be hard to tell how things are going to be.
And I don't trust the bookies anymore after Samanda losing. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I really don't think he will win.
Victor will win! |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
i think if he keeps it up he has a good chance, hes my fav. so far, but you never know who will shine and who will mess up.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Maybe I Still ThinkIts Anyones Game!
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
can't nobody hold us down
|
Depends on if he has any more great moments throughout the show. If not, then probably not. Someone else might shine.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
He's not female and therefore already has a strong chance of winning.
He also has an advantage because he was center of attention on the launch. But maybe he has peaked to soon and someone else will shine. It's unlikely that he's be the favourite throughout the whole show. I think he'll definitely be in the top 2 though. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
No hes to boring
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
no i think amy will win
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Whos knows, it could all change, people are fickle, their favs change all the time.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I don't think he will win, and I hope he doesn't either... but I think he'll be second or third, something like that, anyway.
![]() |
||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|