Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 15-03-2008, 01:20 PM #1
~Kizwiz~ ~Kizwiz~ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rutland
Posts: 13,822


~Kizwiz~ ~Kizwiz~ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rutland
Posts: 13,822


Default Madeleine McCann & Scarlett Keegan Parents negligent?

I have been wondering something over the last couple of days. I dont think its wrong to ask this question but its borderline but if I dont its going to niggle in my mind.

It seems that Scarlett Keegan mother may now face charges for negligence under the Goa Children's Act for leaving her 15 year old daughter in someone else's care.

I personally think this is unsubstantiated but if this is the case then surely the McCann's have done worse?

They didnt leave their children with anyone.

I know that Scarlett's mother is being investigated under an Indian law and Madeleine went missing in Portugal but is there any difference?
~Kizwiz~ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 15-03-2008, 01:43 PM #2
bridge7too7far bridge7too7far is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
bridge7too7far bridge7too7far is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
Default

Depends wether Indian law isdifferent to portguese law, I'd say they perobably are very different
bridge7too7far is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 15-03-2008, 02:12 PM #3
~Kizwiz~ ~Kizwiz~ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rutland
Posts: 13,822


~Kizwiz~ ~Kizwiz~ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rutland
Posts: 13,822


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bridge7too7far
Depends wether Indian law isdifferent to portguese law, I'd say they perobably are very different
I think you missed my point.

I stated that the law was different but what I was asking was should they be different?

They technically both left their kids..... so why have they both been treated so differently?
~Kizwiz~ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 15-03-2008, 03:06 PM #4
bridge7too7far bridge7too7far is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
bridge7too7far bridge7too7far is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ~kizwiz~
Quote:
Originally posted by bridge7too7far
Depends wether Indian law isdifferent to portguese law, I'd say they perobably are very different
I think you missed my point.

I stated that the law was different but what I was asking was should they be different?

They technically both left their kids..... so why have they both been treated so differently?
Oh I undrstand what you meen now can someone in power this country get in touch wth someone in power in India nd sort it out for her. From the outcom it really unfair that a parent shud face chrges over that
bridge7too7far is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 15-03-2008, 03:10 PM #5
Scarlett.'s Avatar
Scarlett. Scarlett. is offline
Senior Moment
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 40,621

Favourites (more):
BB2023: Henry
BB7: Nikki


Scarlett. Scarlett. is offline
Senior Moment
Scarlett.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 40,621

Favourites (more):
BB2023: Henry
BB7: Nikki


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ~kizwiz~
I have been wondering something over the last couple of days. I dont think its wrong to ask this question but its borderline but if I dont its going to niggle in my mind.

It seems that Scarlett Keegan mother may now face charges for negligence under the Goa Children's Act for leaving her 15 year old daughter in someone else's care.

I personally think this is unsubstantiated but if this is the case then surely the McCann's have done worse?

They didnt leave their children with anyone.

I know that Scarlett's mother is being investigated under an Indian law and Madeleine went missing in Portugal but is there any difference?
Well to be honest 15 is an age where you can look after yourself, so if anything the parents where being more than careful by leaving her in someone elses care, but for Maddy, she was 3 and left with no one, that is neglegance
Scarlett. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 15-03-2008, 03:13 PM #6
bridge7too7far bridge7too7far is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
bridge7too7far bridge7too7far is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Chewy
Quote:
Originally posted by ~kizwiz~
I have been wondering something over the last couple of days. I dont think its wrong to ask this question but its borderline but if I dont its going to niggle in my mind.

It seems that Scarlett Keegan mother may now face charges for negligence under the Goa Children's Act for leaving her 15 year old daughter in someone else's care.

I personally think this is unsubstantiated but if this is the case then surely the McCann's have done worse?

They didnt leave their children with anyone.

I know that Scarlett's mother is being investigated under an Indian law and Madeleine went missing in Portugal but is there any difference?
Well to be honest 15 is an age where you can look after yourself, so if anything the parents where being more than careful by leaving her in someone elses care, but for Maddy, she was 3 and left with no one, that is neglegance
Indian portugese law may not see it the way you 2 do. 3 or 15 may be com under sam jurasdiction as
bridge7too7far is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 15-03-2008, 04:46 PM #7
~Kizwiz~ ~Kizwiz~ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rutland
Posts: 13,822


~Kizwiz~ ~Kizwiz~ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rutland
Posts: 13,822


Default

I wasnt trying to debate if the judicial system of the countries are right I was trying to debate if there was a difference in what they have done.

Chewy, your right in saying that leaving a 15 year old in the care of someone and a 3 year old alone with her younger siblings are kind of incomparable because of their ages but what I am trying to say is that why has the 15 year olds mother been summand for leaving her child in someone else's care and the McCann havent?

I understand the difference in law due to the countries but shoudlnt they be the same? Why having the McCann been investigated for leaving their 3 year old
~Kizwiz~ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 15-03-2008, 05:20 PM #8
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun Shaun is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 106,245

Favourites (more):
BB2023: Yinrun
RPDR UK 2: Tayce


Shaun Shaun is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 106,245

Favourites (more):
BB2023: Yinrun
RPDR UK 2: Tayce


Default

I agree, Kiz. It's a much worse situation that Madeliene was left in. The daughter of the Goa woman was at the age where she was able to look after herself, albeit not legally.
Shaun is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 16-03-2008, 11:56 AM #9
Sunny_01's Avatar
Sunny_01 Sunny_01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North East
Posts: 8,796


Sunny_01 Sunny_01 is offline
Senior Member
Sunny_01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North East
Posts: 8,796


Default

I think they are 2 very different situations.

Madeline was a small child who in my opinion should never have been left un-supervised. Her parents were negligent.

Scarlett was a 15 year old girl approaching an age where she would be classed as a young adult. I personally would allow my 15 year old to spend a little time with new friends she met on holiday. We have to at some point allow our children to explore the world.
Sunny_01 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-03-2008, 06:01 PM #10
Jake! Jake! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 2,512
Jake! Jake! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 2,512
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ~kizwiz~
I have been wondering something over the last couple of days. I dont think its wrong to ask this question but its borderline but if I dont its going to niggle in my mind.

It seems that Scarlett Keegan mother may now face charges for negligence under the Goa Children's Act for leaving her 15 year old daughter in someone else's care.

I personally think this is unsubstantiated but if this is the case then surely the McCann's have done worse?

They didnt leave their children with anyone.

I know that Scarlett's mother is being investigated under an Indian law and Madeleine went missing in Portugal but is there any difference?
This was my point back last May. If it was avarage joe, lets say the mother of Shannon Matthews, she would've had her kids taken away from her and she would be sent to prison and hated by the general public. It annoys that stories keep coming out like this, and the McCannsare just avoiding the fact they left three infants in a STRANGE place to them by them self's for a couple of hours. Thank you for bringing this up!
Jake! is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
keegan, madeleine, mccann, negligent, parents, scarlett


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts