Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 17-03-2008, 06:51 AM #1
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,264


Sticks Sticks is offline
Cyber Warrior
Sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 10,264


Default Children and Annimals do not have rights - Discuss

This is an odd one I picked up from some place in the dim and distant past.


The argument goes like this

You can not have rights without responsibilities.

Since animals and young children do not have responsibilities in law, then children and animals do not have any rights whatsoever.

Adults may have a duty of care, but that is a different matter.

Anyone else heard of this argument?

Does it philosophically hold water?
Sticks is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
annimals, children, discuss, rights


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts