[Killian]

Personally, I think that a vote to save rather than to evict this series would be so much better. It would get rid of the dull characters early on.

[thisisme2008]

yeah i think it should start that way this year. some of the awful and boring and forgotten ones would go.

[Kate..]

Yeah i love vote to save!

[Jay]

Yeah that way the entertaining ones would stay and the boring ones would go.

[Indierock&roll]

yes!!
that way it keeps the more entertaining ones in because all the good ones end up going even if you hate them its more entertaining to keep them in

[Jack_]

Yeah, it is.

Like you said it would get boring housemates out quicker.

I'm not sure if they're going to introduce it this year though, we'll just have to see.

[Spike]

I want vote to save
If they pass the task and vote to save is used a boring housemate will be out
but if it is vote to evict is used a entertaining housemate will be out, probably Alex or Sylvia

[dylissimo]

Definitely!

The public always get rid of the people that actually make the show interesting!

I hope this happens!

[JeanP!]

I'd prefer a vote to save and a vote to evict, like BBAU

[CassetteFinger]

Yeah, with a 'vote to save' alot of the bigger character's will stay like Alex, Kat, Sylvia, Dennis.....etc.

[dotcom]

this would be great coz the boring hms like: mohamed, darnell, luke, rex and michael could leave in the first six weeks or so. vote to evict gets rid of the bigger characters.

[Sam]

Yeah, I think the voting is stupid. IT should be vote to stay so that people don't vote out good characters .

[xDramatick]

I think it should be.
I could vote for Dennis then and not let the vultures get him ;D

[CallumJoshuaSturt]

LIKE: Luke, Rex, Mohamed, Darnell, Stephanie
OK: Lisa, Mario, Rachel, Sylvia
Dislike: Dale, KATHREYA, Rebecca, Dennis, Jennifer, Alexandre and micheal

[Bells]

It's miles better! Big characters tend to form split views - people who love them, but then those who can't stand them really can't stand them! As a result, with vote to evict, it's far more likely that people will bother to pick up their phones to vote for their eviction. And we're left with them gone, and a less entertaining house. Voting to save would counteract this problem, because fanbases of bigger BB personalities would vote to save them.

[Sam!]

Michael will go much earlier if its a vote to save.

[marctierman]

jeez these are repetitive posts

they do sometimes do vote to save don't they?

[_Seth]

Very true point!

Can't really say much more than that, lol.

[dylissimo]

No never.

[marctierman]

oh fair dues lmao
weel they shoul alternate then (:

[Robyn.]

I think they have used it once?
But yeah I would prefer vote to save.

[stephanieisstunning]

NO.

[stonedape]

they should've switched to vote to save ages ago...and if they do this year, it will help the series. It did wonders for BBAU, that's for sure.

[Arneldo]

I would like to see it, but vote to save doesnt necesarly mean the best characters will stay. In CBB3 they had a vote to save, and it really didnt help the show IMO they same people would have gone had it been a vote to evict.

The only way a save votes works is if you have t least three nominees. If you have just two, then it a backwards evict vote. For example if BB8's Charley & Tracey were up against each other in a save vote, then all the Charley haters would just vote to save Tracey and Charley would be evicted.

[stonedape]

Not necessarily. Even if it's two, if it's a close matchup (not tracey and charley) it could make all the difference and keep in the more interesting one.