FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Steph going is such a let down! Why the hell didn't Lisa go?
Oh yeah... it's because it's vote out the biggest character, not the one who deserves to go the most... Big Brother should seriously start making it vote to save; that way we woud keep all the entertaining housemates and not let all the bores stay (Lisa, Tracey BB8, Carol etc. etc. the list goes on for pages and I can't actually be bothered). All the bigger personalities are naturally going to have more "haters" simply because they're bigger characters. I would have bet my entire life that Steph wouldn't have been evicted if it was vote to save, rather than to evict. Lisa would be the one out, which she deserves to be. She adds nothing, where as Steph actually did. Get my theory? If it was vote to save the bores would automatically be dropped because they have little/no fans (which means they deserve to go more in my opinion anyway). So... should it be changed to vote to save to KEEP the bigger and more interesting characters? To KEEP the entertainment and to KEEP the people with the bigger fan base? They deserve to stay over someone that adds nothing! Example: Shabnam got voted out over Tracey BB8. WHY?! Shabnam, even though was annoying to some, added more than Tracey did despite the fact that Shabnam was evicted first and Tracey stayed until the end. Shabnam did not deserve to go. It's like Big Brother are shooting themselves in the foot. They want newspaper antics and general pulicity. Why not just change it to vote to save and keep in the more interesting characters? I mean Charley last series had a lot of people hating her, but also a lot liking her. She probably would have stayed over someone like Carol for more votes to keep in anyway, so Big Brother wouldn't have had to bother doing all the lying to keep her in for another week and stuff. You get my point! ETC. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|