About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

BapStar · 09-08-2008, 01:48 AM

I see lots of threads on her about new hms, And if they should win or get 3rd ect.

And it really annoys me how some people just say, no they didnt come in at the start so therefore no.

IMO I dont think it should matter to much aslong as it isnt like really far in !

p.s this post does not include Nicole

Princess · 09-08-2008, 01:49 AM

No! Stu and Sara have been there long enough and are both really good housemates. Brian won last year,why can't they win this year?

Locke. · 09-08-2008, 01:50 AM

I think it does. Yes. I think that the winner should have the full-length experience.

Sam1994 · 09-08-2008, 01:50 AM

I agree to an extent. If the housemates was really REALLY entertaining (which Sara and Stuart are not, not really) then they would deserve to win. But on the other hand, they have not lasted as long as the originals, so don't deserve to win. I'm torn between the two.

Benjamin · 09-08-2008, 01:51 AM

but in all honesty none of the housemates are that interesting compared to previous ones. but yeah new should be eligible (not Nicole)

GlitterEyes · 09-08-2008, 01:52 AM

I think it depends on the housemate. If they have been entertaining, fun, showed all sides to them etc. A new housemate could be a worthy winner if they tick all the right boxes but if another housemate also ticks them then for me it would come down to time in the house.

BapStar · 09-08-2008, 01:53 AM

Lets face it a new hm aint gunna win if there not entertaining

SlickCornFlake · 09-08-2008, 02:07 AM

Yes, a new housemate could be a worthy winner. Although they haven't been in the house as long as the originals, they have to deal with the disadvantage of coming in whenever the original housemates already have a fanbase. So, if a new housemate is able to overcome this disadvantage, they must be a worthy winner.