[sweet66]

lol it did.
its a good game but it was so obvious theyd share thats what made it boring!!
in golden balls people often steal but in olden balls they `1. arent friends or know each other. 2.dont have to live with the person they stole off for afew days. 3. dont have to face the reaction of the house or public whowould hate them for it.
i think they should have made them play a game and winner wins all the cash instead of this sharing thing. it would be more interesting cos the loser would have to live with the winner.

however i have wanted bb to start using twists etc and it finally has!

[Conor]

Thats exactly what I was thinking! They should have done only the steal or a walk with nothing option.

If one steals and one walks then the 'Stealer' gets the 50k
If both walk no one wins.
If both steal no one wins.

Makes much better viewing and a much harder decision.

Would have been even funnier if it was Sara v Darnell

[Noots]

Jasper Carrot scares me anyway.

He reminds me of that old guy off the Saw films.

[jonsep]

not realy that format for a game is years old

[Noots]

Originally posted by Conor
Thats exactly what I was thinking! They should have done only the steal or a walk with nothing option.

If one steals and one walks then the 'Stealer' gets the 50k
If both walk no one wins.
If both steal no one wins.

Makes much better viewing and a much harder decision.

Would have been even funnier if it was Sara v Darnell

Think about it.

You're not gonna walk, because you'll get neither the 50k, or the 100k BB prize money.

They would both steal, because even if they don't get the 50k prize money, one of them would still have a shot at the 100k.

[BigOz]

It's not a copy. It's just borrowed. I just found on wikipedia that Golden Balls was produced by Endemol UK, the same compayn which produces Big Brother so...