[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

Even if he did mean 'sham', I would completely understand why he'd say that. Afterall, Alex said on national telly that she'd split the £30k and she didn't. Bit of a sham that isn't it?!

Oh I agree 100%, it's a sham alright

Originally Posted by Niamh.

You got all that from a smiley?

Because I fail to see how not staying in touch is a "sham" that doesn't even make sense. Shame does. Simples.

No.... I got it from the part where you said, rather caustic in tone,

Nope, it's an indication that I agree with MTVNs view, is that alright with you?

Because his comment was less to do with people staying in touch (ie due to frienship)... I feel it was more to do with staying in touch - to share the winnings.... hence why he said SHAM.

As for saying 'sham' doesn't even make sense - it appears even the fm, Jo1791 even is prepared to accept that what Jay said, could have been meant as in SHAM, not SHAME.

I find it quite strange that you cannot accept another fms opinion, even though you may not agree with it.
.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Oh I agree 100%, it's a sham alright




Because his comment was less to do with people staying in touch (ie due to frienship)... I feel it was more to do with staying in touch - to share the winnings.... hence why he said SHAM.

As for saying 'sham' doesn't even make sense - it appears even the fm, Jo1791 even is prepared to accept that what Jay said, could have been meant as in SHAM, not SHAME.

I find it quite strange that you cannot accept another fms opinion, even though you may not agree with it.
.

Do you now.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Do you now.

yes. After all, I did think that it was regarded very much that we can disagree till the cows come home, but that other fms opinions were still to be respected - whether those opinions are shared or not.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

yes. After all, I did think that it was regarded very much that we can disagree till the cows come home, but that other fms opinions were still to be respected - whether those opinions are shared or not.

Indeed.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Indeed.

Nice to see that we do agree on that.

[MTVN]

Your opinion was being challenged and scrutinised, it's called debate, you were not being disrespected

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Nice to see that we do agree on that.

Oh, you crack me up Pyramid.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Your opinion was being challenged and scrutinised, it's called debate, you were not being disrespected

I disagree. It was very clear that far from being challenged (far less scrutinised!!) - it was simply being dismissedl, riduculed and regarded as all that you posted earlier. Let's not dwell though.

'sham really' - I agree with Jay 100% in what he tweeted.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Oh, you crack me up Pyramid.

Eggcellent.

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I disagree. It was very clear that far from being challenged (far less scrutinised!!) - it was simply being dismissedl, riduculed and regarded as all that you posted earlier. Let's not dwell though.

'sham really' - I agree with Jay 100% in what he tweeted.

Can I suggest you don't take things so personally and sensitively in future then

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Can I suggest you don't take things so personally and sensitively in future then

Can I suggest you accept other's opinions without attempting to berate and dismiss said opinions in future then.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Eggcellent.

[fruit_cake]

Pyramid at the centre of a huge argument, nothing new here lol

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Was gonna put up a cracked up Humpty Dumpty but thought you might take it as though I was insinutating you were a 'very round lady' and didn't want to offend !!

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Can I suggest you accept other's opinions without attempting to berate and dismiss said opinions in future then.

Tbf, you are just as guilty for dismissing other's opinions, even when they are based on fact

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

Respect is earned by being a respectful person.

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Actually you'll find the rules of the forum state respect is to be given.

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

I'm not talking about the forum.

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

So let me get this right. You come into a thread, select one part of a comment, make a reply on that single part, which you know are admitting that it had nothing to do with the forum (which encompassess threads, comments, posts, etc) - for what purpose exactly Fruitcake?

If you have nothing to add to the thread and it's subject matter - why have you posted?

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

If I'd been in the house I'd never have let Alex get the 30k

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

How would you have done that exactly?

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

none of your business.

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

Pyramid at the centre of a huge argument, nothing new here lol

I'll let all of the above posts speak for themselves.

I at least have kept to the topic of the the thread and the conversation re the Jay/Alex the money etc.....

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

Tbf, you are just as guilty for dismissing other's opinions, even when they are based on fact

Not at all. I am happy to accept another viewpoint. Not agreeing with it is an entirely different matter altogether.

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Not at all. I am happy to accept another viewpoint. Not agreeing with it is an entirely different matter altogether.

But not agreeing with your view point is seen as dismissing it?

I have no problem accepting other's opinions over my own when the evidence is staring at me in the face.

[fruit_cake]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

I'll let all of the above posts speak for themselves.

I at least have kept to the topic of the the thread and the conversation re the Jay/Alex the money etc.....

oh Pyramid, give it a rest.. you always seem to take things the wrong way even when they are meant to be nice to you imo

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by jo1791

But not agreeing with your view point is seen as dismissing it?

I have no problem accepting other's opinions over my own when the evidence is staring at me in the face.

Talking of evidence staring people in the face..... that word.. 'SHAM' - that's a perfect example of my very point - and one in which you alluded to yourself. so yes, even when there is very clear evidence staring at me, that evidence being what Jay himself tweeted, I can accept other may feel Jay mistyped and actually meant SHAME. That's plausible. My view is as equally plausible.

[MachoPoodle]

Where can I learn the art of advanced smiley-reading as mentioned earlier in this thread? It sounds like a good cash cow to me, and much more modern than crystal balls and tarot and all that old hat stuff. Certified courses only please, otherwise not worth my time.

Oh, and shamE on Alex for keeping all the money!

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

Pyramid at the centre of a huge argument, nothing new here lol

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

oh Pyramid, give it a rest.. you always seem to take things the wrong way even when they are meant to be nice to you imo

I must have missed the nicety in all the posts of yours that I quoted just a few minutes ago.

Can you at least try to stick to the topic Fruitcake?

[thesheriff443]

there was a time i thought i was perfect!,
now i dont think that word is good enough for me,

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by MachoPoodle

Where can I learn the art of advanced smiley-reading as mentioned earlier in this thread? It sounds like a good cash cow to me, and much more modern than crystal balls and tarot and all that old hat stuff. Certified courses only please, otherwise not worth my time.

Oh, and shamE on Alex for keeping all the money!

You need to actually read the words, and not rely on the smileys.....

Surely your little Merlin wizard chappy in your avatar might have been able to help you !!

I love the BIB.

shame indeed but good for her all the same.

[jo1791]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Talking of evidence staring people in the face..... that word.. 'SHAM' - that's a perfect example of my very point - and one in which you alluded to yourself. so yes, even when there is very clearl evidence staring at me, that evidence being what Jay himsef tweeted, I can accept other may feel Jay mistyped and actually meant SHAME. That's plausible. My view is as equally plausible.

No I didn't allude to it, read my post and I started with 'Even if'. 'Shame' makes more sense.

And there have been other quibbles on here where you have been faced with facts and you still won't accept that your opinion might be wrong..when you yourself cannot back up your opinions...