[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Samwell

They also sponsored last years BB. Has there been unusual evicitions the last two years, and not earlier?

I said the fact dexter was a well known poker player and media ***** was a bit sus when he was consistently saved last year.
I say danielle is a plant.

[BigBuk]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I said the fact dexter was a well known poker player and media ***** was a bit sus when he was consistently saved last year.
I say danielle is a plant.

Dexter was consistently saved last year as he had a big fan base, thus finishing second, nothing suspicious about that.

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

99% of people discussing Matthews eviction are claiming its a voting fix not manipulation of editing that's not the main talking point.

You cannot say 100% fact they are mipulating the show as there is no live feed.

Its depressing how serious people get into their conspiracy theories actually its embarrassing.

No one has proof of anything and never will so may aswell just shut up talking about it.

But manipulation of editing etc.. still = a fix

And I'm not getting into any conspiracy theories, I never claimed they did rig the votes...

This is a forum dear, people generally discuss things

Originally Posted by Verbal

Could you explain to me what selective editing is and why they would do that?

You really have to be told what selective editing is?

Originally Posted by Verbal

At least you concede that your argument is pointless

As are your comments, didn't stop you from making them though

[Verbal]

Originally Posted by flamingGalah!

But manipulation of editing etc.. still = a fix

And I'm not getting into any conspiracy theories, I never claimed they did rig the votes...

This is a forum dear, people generally discuss things



You really have to be told what selective editing is?



As are your comments, didn't stop you from making them though

Yes I need it explaining, I wouldn't have asked otherwise.

Jesus.

[Yaki da]

I can't believe they'd do any of that as the trouble it would get them in for so little reason it would be absurd

But I have never seen the poll results so far out of whack with the actual result. They sometimes get it wrong, but I've never seen them get it THAT wrong. Crazy stuff. Maybe the vote freeze changed things. And I really think they should announce the percentages.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Josy

Sigh.

The votes are monitored.
Neither the channel or producers would risk doing something so pointless and stupid.
People spent more to evict Matthew than ash

Seriously all you have to do is checkout ashs Twitter to see how much his fans were voting they even posted screenshots of their vote confirmation.

Exactly this!

I expressed on here my absolute cast iron certainty that Ash wouldn't go, and almost everyone said I was out of my mind

I think not leetle puppies!

Ash will win! don't doubt me again

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by Verbal

Yes I need it explaining, I wouldn't have asked otherwise.

Jesus.

Well I would have thought it was pretty obvious, but anyway... Selective editing is when they "cherry pick" certain things to show someone in either a good or bad light or don't show things for the same reason. It can also mean things are shown out of context so someone comes across bad. They sometimes also hardly show someone at all, even though they could have been involved in arguments etc.. This is what manipulates the viewers as we don't see the whole picture & arguments can seem one sided & can make housemates seem like miserable sods, when they could actually be having a laugh for much of the time, but they choose not to show it...

[Verbal]

Originally Posted by flamingGalah!

Well I would have thought it was pretty obvious, but anyway... Selective editing is when they "cherry pick" certain things to show someone in either a good or bad light or don't show things for the same reason. It can also mean things are shown out of context so someone comes across bad. They sometimes also hardly show someone at all, even though they could have been involved in arguments etc.. This is what manipulates the viewers as we don't see the whole picture & arguments can seem one sided & can make housemates seem like miserable sods, when they could actually be having a laugh for much of the time, but they choose not to show it...

Thank you for the explanation. Turns out it is the paranoid rubbish I thought it was and I didn't need an explanation after all.

But thank you again.

[flamingGalah!]

Originally Posted by Verbal

Thank you for the explanation. Turns out it is the paranoid rubbish I thought it was and I didn't need an explanation after all.

But thank you again.

It isn't paranoid rubbish, it is fact

Big Brother has always had selective editing & if you really think they don't then I have no words...