FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
20-12-2016, 07:04 PM | #1 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
If there are language problems as well their chances of getting jobs decrease and our chances of paying more taxes increase. |
||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 08:02 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Queen of Walford
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 08:11 PM | #3 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
Well 17.4 million made their feelings on that nonsense quite clear. |
||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 08:17 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
No longer on this site. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 08:34 PM | #5 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
Didn't you say that you don't even live in Britain, if so then no wonder you aren't too bothered by that. Last edited by Brillopad; 20-12-2016 at 08:53 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 08:17 PM | #6 | |||
|
||||
Queen of Walford
|
Quote:
I take far more of an issue with people born here who chose not to work because they are lazy than I do somebody who could be in the processes of bettering themselves.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 08:20 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Queen of Walford
|
I had to single this out because it's laughable - I know people who voted NO and their reasons were not to 'stop the foreigners!!!'
__________________
Last edited by Amy Jade; 20-12-2016 at 08:20 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 08:28 PM | #8 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
21-12-2016, 03:27 AM | #9 | |||
|
||||
Queen of Walford
|
I do. It's no more of a reach than you trying to insinuate every voter wanted them out at least.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 08:39 PM | #10 | |||
|
||||
Withano
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 08:52 PM | #11 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
So every time we have an election in the future - if the losing side don't want to accept it we just do it again. Then what best of 3, 4 5. |
||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 09:05 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
Withano
|
Quote:
Real question is: if we excluded votes from the people who genuinely believed 350m would go to the NHS, or mass-immigration would be lessened.. how much would Remain have won by? Second question is, would remainers want a re-refferendum at all if inaccurate posts like yours above werent flooding social media?
__________________
Last edited by Withano; 20-12-2016 at 09:07 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 09:21 PM | #13 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
Remainers are trying to convince everyone that a considerable number would change their vote if given the chance, but then they would. Equally I would imagine many who voted to remain out of fear of change and seen the 'predicted' doom and gloom drop in our economy has not occurred and/or those so disgusted with the behaviour of the dictorial sore losers may change their votes. All very hyperthetical. Whatever the vote occurred and the decision was made. Last edited by Brillopad; 20-12-2016 at 09:26 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 10:04 PM | #14 | |||
|
||||
Right Flower
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-12-2016, 09:00 PM | #15 | ||
|
|||
-
|
For the same reasons that I pay for the Royal Family, nuclear warheads, and nonsense vanity projects like HS2 I suppose? Sadly we don't get to pick'n'choose where our tax money goes, so yeah, we all end up paying for things that we "might not believe in".
|
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|