[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

...so all newbies are under a dark cloud of suspicion

Always beware those that feign innocence and call for the banning of other members. There are usually two sides to every story but only one gets an airing. They are rarely as innocent as they claim.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

NO it isn’t - their politics and who they ‘befriend’ has a considerable part to play. If what you say were true why are you still here given your constant baiting.

It never ceases to amaze me how some of the biggest baiters on here are the same ones who get all holier than thou about banned members. Never quite sure if it is pure cockiness or such people are so completely lacking in self-awareness they simply cannot see the wood for the trees.

Best post from page 1

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Twosugars

...so all newbies are under a dark cloud of suspicion

Only this years models that think they spk for the rest of the forum about an already established member.

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Quality of members - who makes that decision those that believe themselves to be a ‘quality member’. Besides people have often been banned unfairly - so unless people know their facts, to make such sweeping statements is based on pure ignorance.

Wow looks like I touched a nerve

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by jet

I know, he wisely removed himself from the toxicity.

Then leave?

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by jet

Well Kirk isn't back unfortunately, his style would be spotted right away. I miss him, and I even miss The Truth. This forum has a way of killing off the characters.

Yep,totally agree here Jet there definately are certain people who think THEY own the forum and know better than everyone else and how it should be run, some banned members who are genuinely sorry for what they were banned for should be allowed back,and why dont some people want banned members allowed back? maybe because those members challenged their opinions !! The forum has lost so many good members,now it is just a group of people who seem to like to throw one liners around,so not that interesting anymore,I liked Kirk aswell but he was driven off ,as for brillo being named,I have no idea who they were and really don't care,she is a really nice member who gets a hard time on here by some,the forum belongs to the owner,not us we should all be adult enough to be able to share it.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Then leave?

Maybe you should follow your own advice rather than suggest others do so.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Wow looks like I touched a nerve

Only an annoyance with those who think they shouldn't be banned when others would see it differently. Fed up with those that hide behind others. Do you have reason to think you are in the know then. All fluff and nonsense.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Only this years models that think they spk for the rest of the forum about an already established member.

who are you on about, I only know of two regularly-posting-multi's. One is completely lovely, and you have applauded the other in this thread.

[Underscore]

This forum is a community forum so therefore I think people should be able to air their suggestions on moderation...

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

NO it isn’t - their politics and who they ‘befriend’ has a considerable part to play. If what you say were true why are you still here given your constant baiting.

It never ceases to amaze me how some of the biggest baiters on here are the same ones who get all holier than thou about banned members. Never quite sure if it is pure cockiness or such people are so completely lacking in self-awareness they simply cannot see the wood for the trees.

Can you name a member who is banned because of their politics please? This sounds more like paranoia.

I'll ignore paragraph 2, theres several rulebreaks there. Does seem as if you lack a basic understanding of the rules and maybe thats why you're showing yourself to be confused and angry in this thread perhaps?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

Can you name a member who is banned because of their politics please? This sounds more like paranoia.

I'll ignore paragraph 2, theres several rulebreaks there. Does seem as if you lack a basic understanding of the rules and maybe thats why you're showing yourself to be confused and angry in this thread perhaps?

Do you bait so regularly because you understand or fail to understand the rules. We no doubt all have our opinion on that. Such an innocent non-rule breaker that you are trying to imply you are. It would be rather underhand to say the least then to then report someone else - agendas all over the place with some though.

As for the paranoia - I doubt it and most know it - but it suits some to imply it - those pesky agendas again. Play the innocent, although of course it doesn't suit. You are after all on the 'right' side of politics so are stating the expected parrot fashion. You are fooling only yourself.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Do you bait so regularly because you understand or fail to understand the rules. We no doubt all have our opinion on that. Such an innocent non-rule breaker that you are trying to imply you are. It would be rather underhand to say the least then to then report someone else - agendas all over the place with some though.

As for the paranoia - I doubt it and most know it - but it suits some to imply it - those pesky agendas again. Play the innocent, although of course it doesn't suit. You are after all on the 'right' side of politics so are stating the expected parrot fashion. You are fooling only yourself.

I never know when to take you seriously or not. This response is so absurd, it's difficult to believe you're trying to communicate.

I'll take it as a no, you don't know of anybody who is banned because of their political persuasion, and your classic 'I know you are but what am I' in regards to rules. That was a zinger when I was a kid at school.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

I never know when to take you seriously or not. This response is so absurd, it's difficult to believe you're trying to communicate.

I have no real desire to communicate with you but you just keep flapping around. Go communicate with someone else.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

who are you on about, I only know of two regularly-posting-multi's. One is completely lovely, and you have applauded the other in this thread.

Are you accusing me of being a multi? Oh dear you really don't know your facts do you. Take it up with admin if that is what you really believe rather than just trying to have a desperate dig. No baiting here then. Sigh - so predictable.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Are you accusing me of being a multi? Oh dear you really don't know your facts do you. Take it up with admin if that is what you really believe rather than just trying to have a desperate dig. No baiting here then. Sigh - so predictable.

...Your first banned account, Wombai, was permabanned.. what do you think a multi is?

Although the thread has derailed, it was supposed to be about this (you and some others)

Originally Posted by parmnion

I am a bit suspicious of people being banned parmniontly but managing to make another account or people managing to make accounts for off season or on season.....


Whats folks views on this?

You should have a pretty unique and interesting response to the thread, if you actually bother taking part in them instead of just angrily replying to people inside them.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

...Your first banned account, Wombai, was permabanned.. what do you think a multi is?

A multi means two accounts running at once. I only have one account. FAIL mate. Has your little friend been tittle tattling to you? You need to know all the facts before you try to act as though you know it all - and you clearly don't.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

A multi means two accounts running at once. I only have one account. FAIL mate. Has your little friend been tittle tattling to you? You need to know all the facts before you try to act as though you know it all - and you clearly don't.

Nobody thinks you have two accounts running at the same time, if thats what your mad about. I've never known anyone to use multi in that context either. Do you wanna respond to thread or na?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

...Your first banned account, Wombai, was permabanned.. what do you think a multi is?

Although the thread has derailed, it was supposed to be about this (you and some others)



You should have a pretty unique and interesting response to the thread, if you actually bother taking part in them instead of just angrily replying to people inside them.

I only reply to those who are worth the effort in my opinion. You keep trying though.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I only reply to those who are worth the effort in my opinion. You keep trying though.

Why come on to a thread if you dont want to respond to it. Why only come on to a theead to angrily reply to those inside of it?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Withano

Nobody thinks you have two accounts running at the same time, if thats what your mad about. Do you wanna respond to thread or na?

To thread yes, to you NA.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

To thread yes

Well ffs, you made about 20 odd posts that werent to do with the thread, is there a quota you must meet or something?

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

NO it isn’t - their politics and who they ‘befriend’ has a considerable part to play. If what you say were true why are you still here given your constant baiting.

It never ceases to amaze me how some of the biggest baiters on here are the same ones who get all holier than thou about banned members. Never quite sure if it is pure cockiness or such people are so completely lacking in self-awareness they simply cannot see the wood for the trees.

Brillo quite rightly calling out the hypocrisy

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Withano

who are you on about, I only know of two regularly-posting-multi's. One is completely lovely, and you have applauded the other in this thread.

One is probably 'completely lovely' because she holds the same views as you' lol ,I find brillo completely lovely too, was she really Wombai,i hope so because I liked her too, maybe you should be calling all the banned members out who have rejoined,not just brillo!!! personally I see no reason why they are not allowed back,they do not need a pass from a certain few.It's the mods/admins decisions not ours, and as long as they follow the rules what's the problem ?

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

One is probably 'completely lovely' because she holds the same views as you' lol ,I find brillo completely lovely too, was she really Wombai,i hope so because I liked her too, maybe you should be calling all the banned members out who have rejoined,not just brillo!!! personally I see no reason why they are not allowed back,they do not need a pass from a certain few.It's the mods/admins decisions not ours, and as long as they follow the rules what's the problem ?

Originally Posted by Withano

Tbh, although there should be some definite rule, like '6 months before your multi', if the multi is still a twat, they'd get banned all over again so its not much of an issue to me.

I dont know what her views are (maybe we're thinking of different people), and as I've said, these are the only two 'rejoining' members that i know of, so it would be difficult for me to 'call all the banned members out'.. obviously.
But it looks like we're thinking on a similar line, Kaz. You were a bit too eager to fight there