FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
17-05-2015, 12:20 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Now the 2 Josh's on here
would do great in National Service not sure about Scott, though Feel The Force http://news.sky.com/story/1485474/ha...e-without-army [Bring back National Service - I've said that before," he said. "But I put my hand up, as I said to the kids today, you can make bad choices, some severe, some not so severe.] Last edited by arista; 17-05-2015 at 12:22 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 12:24 PM | #2 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
From what I heard many people who it was thought would do badly being 'called up' actually did very well in the end.
It would need to be from 16 to 18 to be right, to do it now,however with the cuts this govt; has made to the armed forces,I cannot see how it could be affordable now. Is it a good idea, maybe, however the people who should be consulted as to it are the people it would affect, the young. Last edited by joeysteele; 17-05-2015 at 12:32 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 12:31 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
All hail the Moyesiah
|
It's a very oppressive thing for a government to impose on its citizens imo. I can see the benefits of it creating a sense of identity and being a coming-of-age thing but I don't agree with it being a compulsory commitment
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 12:31 PM | #4 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Terrible idea, not everyone's suited to the Military and they shouldn't be forced into doing it.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 12:33 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 12:35 PM | #6 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Shut up Harry you berk, just because it kept you from running round china whites dressed as a nazi.
I don't think the experience for the rest of the nation would be quite so positive.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 12:37 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
x
|
Horrid idea, basically slavery to some extent. Not everyone is suited to it and I'd hate to be around war/fighting or even holding guns, the thought angers me. The government has enough control over peoples lives.
He hasn't exactly had the normal experience of being in the army either, considering he's a royal.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 12:43 PM | #8 | |||
|
||||
.
|
Absolutely not.
Nobody should be forced to support the army. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 12:50 PM | #9 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
Abolish the monarchy, says Jack_.
I would sooner kill myself than do national service. No thank you. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 12:51 PM | #10 | |||
|
||||
folklore
|
No thanks.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 02:18 PM | #11 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
This is the one thing that I believe would immensely benefit Britain.
If any of you have ever watched 'Bad Lad's Army', you will know what I mean. They took 20 odd tearaways and put them through 3 months of basic training. Very few actually quit. Quite a few went on to join the regular army, but the vast majority benifitted in lots of ways and almost all were better men after than they were before. Young men, who for whatever reason have lost their way, or just taken the wrong path, can benefit from discipline and pushing themselves further than they ever thought possible. It's doable and I would much rather see our young doing national service than just being on the scrap heap. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 03:16 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
The peoples princesses
|
Sadly I agree with your last part.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 03:47 PM | #13 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
RIP Pyramid, Andyman ,Kerry and Lex xx https://www.facebook.com/JamesBulgerMT/?fref=photo "If slaughterhouses had glass walls, most people would be vegetarian" |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 03:58 PM | #14 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
Last edited by Tom4784; 17-05-2015 at 08:01 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 04:05 PM | #15 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 04:06 PM | #16 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
Quote:
I wouldn't support it being brought back in any way myself. The overwhelming opinions against it on this thread make the strongest arguments for sure. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 04:26 PM | #17 | ||
|
|||
-
|
If it was made an option at 16 for anyone who wanted to take it up then fine. Not the same as joining the army, they would have to take anyone who wanted to do it, and it would be for 2 years flat with then the best being offered an actual place in the military and the rest simply "graduating" hopefully having learned a skill or two. That might be an OK alternative to continuing in education, for some.
However... compulsory? No no no. Nooo. Never. Some people are not cut out for the military. Some people are not destined to blindly bow down to authority. Some people also are - quite rightfully - ideologically opposed to the military and everything they stand for. Those things should never be taken away from anyone. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 04:38 PM | #18 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Nowadays people are allowed to get away with almost anything, because they don't know the first thing about respect or self discipline. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 04:48 PM | #19 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
It is also a little rich for someone like Prince Harry to advocate this and say he doesn't know where he would be today without the army.
Well, that is easy, no matter what he did, he would be still be 5th in line to the throne, he would have endless opportunities presented to him on a plate. Whether he took them or not would be down to him. He is a really pleasant guy but his world is still a whole other world away from the vast majority of those he would be advocating likely army life for. |
||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 04:50 PM | #20 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
..do you not think though, Jenny...that 'back in the day' in schools etc ..it wasn't about respect, it was more about fear and fear stifles people ..and I just think that there are many things now/historical crimes and abuses etc that show that there were many problems and issues back in the day as well, and not really that much self discipline but more fear ..but now in schools, children from a very early age can be encouraged to express themselves in who they are...and doing that isn't just letting them do whatever with no discipline because that is also there but I think in a much more effective way which doesn't involve hitting/caning them which was done back in the day..and yeah that may have made them seem 'better behaved' but fear will do that for you, not respect...if they respect at school then they don't want to disappoint by breaking rules which then creates self discipline...
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 04:58 PM | #21 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Yes JJ if only Dezzy could see the bigger picture |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 04:58 PM | #22 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 05:12 PM | #23 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
"doesn't involve hitting/caning them which was done back in the day.."
Sure Ammi But the Army is pushing the Young to get better and Teaching them Security Skills Engine Skills and good solid management skills, You need a Ex Army man at your school teaching the young his wisdom Feel The Force. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 05:17 PM | #24 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
Quote:
..teaching them his wisdom for them to choose if they want to..not taking choices away through National Service... |
|||
Reply With Quote |
17-05-2015, 05:18 PM | #25 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|