Log in

View Full Version : Siavash basically made a fool of BB


Sir_Diary_of_Roomus
18-08-2009, 08:57 PM
Nominations have been unfairly decided since week one, apart from when BB has intervened a couple of times. When somebody has total control over 5-6 thick idiots and essentially you can pick off who you want to go up for eviction, the game is no longer a game, it's a shambles.
If I was in there, I'd tell BB to shove their noms up their arse aswell. Why should I sit and adhere to their rules every week only to get *****d over week by week by a faction that has dominated this series and has seen minimal intervention.

santaa
18-08-2009, 08:58 PM
Originally posted by Sir_Diary_of_Roomus
Nominations have been unfairly decided since week one, apart from when BB has intervened a couple of times. When somebody has total control over 5-6 thick idiots and essentially you can pick off who you want to go up for eviction, the game is no longer a game, it's a shambles.
If I was in there, I'd tell BB to shove their noms up their arse aswell. Why should I sit and adhere to their rules every week only to get *****d over week by week by a faction that has dominated this series and has seen minimal intervention.


Well said

pixee
18-08-2009, 08:59 PM
Because they wouldn't dare not do as they are told? does that not concern you about people?

Tom
18-08-2009, 09:00 PM
I think BB actually shown Siavash who is the boss by nominating for him (as much as I disagree with intervention). Siavash didn't get his own way for the whole house to be up

JTM45
18-08-2009, 09:14 PM
BB have been making fools out of the viewing public for years now by setting up nominations and making rules so things go the way they want to get the most people voting so it's about time someone made a fool of them in return!:thumbs:

If everyone did exactly what they were told to by authority figures we might as well just live in a dictatorship.

People should ALWAYS question authority and if they don't agree with what they're being told to do then they shouldn't do it.

It's called freedom of choice people!

shirl1
19-08-2009, 01:18 PM
here,here:hello:

Arneldo
19-08-2009, 01:21 PM
Siavash is just an attention seeker. Everyone was talking about Bea, and he wanted some attention and thats why he didn't nominate.

ange7
19-08-2009, 01:23 PM
awwww dry your eyes.
You all sound like Rodrigo. "waaaaa THEY ALL MUST FOLLOW THE RULES!!!"
zzzz

MissKittyFantastico
19-08-2009, 01:26 PM
I actually agree with Siavash's reasons for not nominating this week.

There are people in there who are **** scared about going up for the public vote, and nobody should get a free ride to the final. He assumed the whole house, or at least HE would be put up for not nominating.

BB have made a joke of the whole thing anyway by letting them discuss nominations, as well as nominating being a fundamental rule, so is the NON DISCUSSION of who you plan on nominating, but BB have changed that so people can for all intents and purposes, gang up and pick off certain people. That's not fair. And that was the point Siavash was making when he said Bea was negative last week but people supported her, because it suited them, they wanted Freddie out. Now he's gone, they don't need Bea anymore, and all of a sudden she is a negative person, so they'll nominate her.

I see where he is coming from totally. I don't agree that he has an ego, or is trying to protect himself at all, he just thinks it would be fairer for everyone to be up, seeing as the whole nomination thing has become a total joke now they are allowed to discuss them!

CaudleHalbard
19-08-2009, 01:29 PM
BB is unwittingly creating its own demise.

I am now having doubts whether BB11 will actually happen, although Endemol have the rights to do a show in 2010.

ange7
19-08-2009, 01:30 PM
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
I actually agree with Siavash's reasons for not nominating this week.

There are people in there who are **** scared about going up for the public vote, and nobody should get a free ride to the final. He assumed the whole house, or at least HE would be put up for not nominating.

BB have made a joke of the whole thing anyway by letting them discuss nominations, as well as nominating being a fundamental rule, so is the NON DISCUSSION of who you plan on nominating, but BB have changed that so people can for all intents and purposes, gang up and pick off certain people. That's not fair. And that was the point Siavash was making when he said Bea was negative last week but people supported her, because it suited them, they wanted Freddie out. Now he's gone, they don't need Bea anymore, and all of a sudden she is a negative person, so they'll nominate her.

I see where he is coming from totally. I don't agree that he has an ego, or is trying to protect himself at all, he just thinks it would be fairer for everyone to be up, seeing as the whole nomination thing has become a total joke now they are allowed to discuss them!
:eureka: FTW!

Slothy
19-08-2009, 01:42 PM
Originally posted by ange7
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
I actually agree with Siavash's reasons for not nominating this week.

There are people in there who are **** scared about going up for the public vote, and nobody should get a free ride to the final. He assumed the whole house, or at least HE would be put up for not nominating.

BB have made a joke of the whole thing anyway by letting them discuss nominations, as well as nominating being a fundamental rule, so is the NON DISCUSSION of who you plan on nominating, but BB have changed that so people can for all intents and purposes, gang up and pick off certain people. That's not fair. And that was the point Siavash was making when he said Bea was negative last week but people supported her, because it suited them, they wanted Freddie out. Now he's gone, they don't need Bea anymore, and all of a sudden she is a negative person, so they'll nominate her.

I see where he is coming from totally. I don't agree that he has an ego, or is trying to protect himself at all, he just thinks it would be fairer for everyone to be up, seeing as the whole nomination thing has become a total joke now they are allowed to discuss them!
:eureka: FTW!

Double FTW (:
People will twist any situation against a housemate they don't like. I know I do the same. Siavash has more balls for doing it, not knowing what the outcome is going to be. Even though Lisa isn't as bad now, she has always stuck to every rule, quite boring to watch when people do that. Her reason was to avoid an eviction completely.

google
19-08-2009, 02:38 PM
Originally posted by Slothy
Originally posted by ange7
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
I actually agree with Siavash's reasons for not nominating this week.

There are people in there who are **** scared about going up for the public vote, and nobody should get a free ride to the final. He assumed the whole house, or at least HE would be put up for not nominating.

BB have made a joke of the whole thing anyway by letting them discuss nominations, as well as nominating being a fundamental rule, so is the NON DISCUSSION of who you plan on nominating, but BB have changed that so people can for all intents and purposes, gang up and pick off certain people. That's not fair. And that was the point Siavash was making when he said Bea was negative last week but people supported her, because it suited them, they wanted Freddie out. Now he's gone, they don't need Bea anymore, and all of a sudden she is a negative person, so they'll nominate her.

I see where he is coming from totally. I don't agree that he has an ego, or is trying to protect himself at all, he just thinks it would be fairer for everyone to be up, seeing as the whole nomination thing has become a total joke now they are allowed to discuss them!
:eureka: FTW!

Double FTW (:
People will twist any situation against a housemate they don't like. I know I do the same. Siavash has more balls for doing it, not knowing what the outcome is going to be. Even though Lisa isn't as bad now, she has always stuck to every rule, quite boring to watch when people do that. Her reason was to avoid an eviction completely.

Agree Vash to win!

UglyBaby
19-08-2009, 02:45 PM
He's a sneaky, disingenuous BS-er. He should have been kicked out long since for constantly going against the rules. Why is he on the show if he doesn't want to play the game? Nominating people is the core of the show and the part viewers enjoy most. It's just arrogant of him to think he can play by his own rules. And his reasons are PATHETIC. Totally so.

Kick him out! How anyone could think that mumbling sloth deserves to win astounds me.

Zien
19-08-2009, 02:46 PM
He made a fool out of himself - a tw*t through and through and now closer to losing ha-ha:xyxwave:

google
19-08-2009, 02:56 PM
Vash is a legend :thumbs:

BitterFruit
19-08-2009, 03:06 PM
Originally posted by JTM45
BB have been making fools out of the viewing public for years now by setting up nominations and making rules so things go the way they want to get the most people voting so it's about time someone made a fool of them in return!:thumbs:

If everyone did exactly what they were told to by authority figures we might as well just live in a dictatorship.

People should ALWAYS question authority and if they don't agree with what they're being told to do then they shouldn't do it.

It's called freedom of choice people!

when I catch my nephew cheating at Monopoly next Xmas, I must remember he's striking a blow against capitalistic society and the unfair yoke that is property ownership

who'd have thought :rolleyes:

MargeryFan
19-08-2009, 03:11 PM
Well put.

bbisfun
19-08-2009, 04:03 PM
Originally posted by JTM45
BB have been making fools out of the viewing public for years now by setting up nominations and making rules so things go the way they want to get the most people voting so it's about time someone made a fool of them in return!:thumbs:

If everyone did exactly what they were told to by authority figures we might as well just live in a dictatorship.

People should ALWAYS question authority and if they don't agree with what they're being told to do then they shouldn't do it.

It's called freedom of choice people!

Lol you ****ing noob, freedom of choice was discarded the moment that wanker Saivash adhered to BB terms and conditions before entering the house.

lavabird
19-08-2009, 04:03 PM
i think hes just making himself look weak and stupid ,play the game or go home:shrug:

HarryRag
19-08-2009, 04:13 PM
Originally posted by google
Vash is a legend :thumbs:

thats what you think. he never did anything

UglyBaby
19-08-2009, 04:17 PM
His principals are all over the place. he nominated early on but is now plucking pathetic excuses out of his hairy ass. Why?

For ATTENTION. Simple as.

I pity the fools who buy his muddled brand of BS. He doesn't even make sense half the time!

Wilton_Shagpile
19-08-2009, 04:20 PM
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
I actually agree with Siavash's reasons for not nominating this week.

There are people in there who are **** scared about going up for the public vote, and nobody should get a free ride to the final. He assumed the whole house, or at least HE would be put up for not nominating.

BB have made a joke of the whole thing anyway by letting them discuss nominations, as well as nominating being a fundamental rule, so is the NON DISCUSSION of who you plan on nominating, but BB have changed that so people can for all intents and purposes, gang up and pick off certain people. That's not fair. And that was the point Siavash was making when he said Bea was negative last week but people supported her, because it suited them, they wanted Freddie out. Now he's gone, they don't need Bea anymore, and all of a sudden she is a negative person, so they'll nominate her.

I see where he is coming from totally. I don't agree that he has an ego, or is trying to protect himself at all, he just thinks it would be fairer for everyone to be up, seeing as the whole nomination thing has become a total joke now they are allowed to discuss them!
Agree totally:thumbs:
I wish the whole voting was down to the public every week

let them talk about what they like, leave the voting to us, they normally nominate the wrong ones anyway....WTF do they know:spin:

Wilton_Shagpile
19-08-2009, 04:22 PM
Originally posted by HarryRag
Originally posted by google
Vash is a legend :thumbs:

thats what you think. he never did anything
He doesn't need to he is just "Siavash":thumbs:

oh.really
19-08-2009, 04:31 PM
He doesn't nominate because he sees how it's a case of being picked off one by one and just doesn't want to be one of them. Self preservation man :laugh:

NettoSuperstar!
19-08-2009, 04:32 PM
Originally posted by Sir_Diary_of_Roomus
Nominations have been unfairly decided since week one, apart from when BB has intervened a couple of times. When somebody has total control over 5-6 thick idiots and essentially you can pick off who you want to go up for eviction, the game is no longer a game, it's a shambles.
If I was in there, I'd tell BB to shove their noms up their arse aswell. Why should I sit and adhere to their rules every week only to get *****d over week by week by a faction that has dominated this series and has seen minimal intervention.

Yeh exactly, its all bloody tactics, noone nominates for genuine reasons, its just excuses. I dont blame Siavash at all, BB has turned into a ridiculous farce

MaratSafinForever
19-08-2009, 04:32 PM
He is making a fool of himself.

UglyBaby
19-08-2009, 04:37 PM
All these Siavash fans making pathetic excuses for his pathetic excuses!

Funny how you seem to be reading his motives differently too! There is no excuse. Play the game or get out the door. He's not there against his will.

mangasatsuma
19-08-2009, 04:43 PM
He seems like a nice guy, but I have got seriously bored of his aimless indulgent witterings. I do like that he never guesses correctly what BB will do with him. So they have repeatedly made a fool of him! He has made the mistake of taking himself and BB way too seriously. If he doesn't like the way people vote in packs and change their minds every ten minutes then he should get a bit agro with the wankers and earn his keep.

I suspect Siavash has rather masochistic tendencies and screws with the rules partly to get a telling off from everyone.

meadow
19-08-2009, 05:06 PM
Originally posted by JTM45
BB have been making fools out of the viewing public for years now by setting up nominations and making rules so things go the way they want to get the most people voting so it's about time someone made a fool of them in return!:thumbs:

If everyone did exactly what they were told to by authority figures we might as well just live in a dictatorship.

People should ALWAYS question authority and if they don't agree with what they're being told to do then they shouldn't do it.

It's called freedom of choice people!

freedom of choice is good but not for a game show. breaking the rules once is ok and entertaining, cointinuously breaking rules then all is lost

this years hm's have broken big brother it could never be the same again.

Tom4784
19-08-2009, 05:12 PM
He made more of a fool of himself really. I was watching thinking he was being completely transparent. He so desperately wants to be seen as a martyr by not nominating, at least Sophie was more upfront about it.

iluvyuusivash
19-08-2009, 05:37 PM
Originally posted by Wilton_Shagpile
Originally posted by HarryRag
[quote]Originally posted by google
Vash is a legend :thumbs:

thats what you think. he never did anything
He doesn't need to he is just "Siavash":thumbs:

esactlly he is just siavash the legend vash tuu win:lovedup:

iluvyuusivash
19-08-2009, 05:40 PM
[quote]Originally posted by UglyBaby
All these Siavash fans making pathetic excuses for his pathetic excuses!

Funny how you seem to be reading his motives differently too! There is no excuse. Play the game or get out the door. He's not there against his will.

well if everyone stuck to the rules it would be boring and its funny how no1 is saying anything about sophie not nominating

iluvyuusivash
19-08-2009, 05:42 PM
everyone just stop picking on him:mad:

and if siavash is trying to get attention then so is sophie

Zizz6
19-08-2009, 05:59 PM
Originally posted by Dezzy
He made more of a fool of himself really. I was watching thinking he was being completely transparent. He so desperately wants to be seen as a martyr by not nominating, at least Sophie was more upfront about it.

This was the second time and therefore they should've give him two choices: either nominate or get out of the house.

CaPPa
19-08-2009, 09:43 PM
Originally posted by Dezzy
He made more of a fool of himself really. I was watching thinking he was being completely transparent. He so desperately wants to be seen as a martyr by not nominating, at least Sophie was more upfront about it.

Yes because Sophie could not think of a single person that she didn't like? Funny that she had nominated Marcus continually then all of a sudden can't find a reason. :rolleyes:

Of course people can excuse Sophie because she's 'dumb' and a 'sheep'. Wonder how that defence would work if you broke the law outside "sorry officer but I'm stupid and was just copying everyone else", "oh that's ok then, besides you have big boobs and seem cute".

Nominations have been a travestry all series. Had it not been for Kris getting himself up for eviction then Lisa's group would have easily picked off all the individuals.

Tom4784
19-08-2009, 09:47 PM
Originally posted by CaPPa
Originally posted by Dezzy
He made more of a fool of himself really. I was watching thinking he was being completely transparent. He so desperately wants to be seen as a martyr by not nominating, at least Sophie was more upfront about it.

Yes because Sophie could not think of a single person that she didn't like? Funny that she had nominated Marcus continually then all of a sudden can't find a reason. :rolleyes:

Of course people can excuse Sophie because she's 'dumb' and a 'sheep'. Wonder how that defence would work if you broke the law outside "sorry officer but I'm stupid and was just copying everyone else", "oh that's ok then, besides you have big boobs and seem cute".

Nominations have been a travestry all series. Had it not been for Kris getting himself up for eviction then Lisa's group would have easily picked off all the individuals.

No she made it obvious that she didn't nominate because she didn't want to, she was probably gonna nominate until she heard what the punishment was. Plus she's not making out like she's some sort of messiah figure for not taking part. She didn't nominate and then let it go, Siavash went on like he did some great act of heroism.

She didn't nominate because she didn't have to, Siavash didn't nominate so he could continue with his martyr act.

IndigoJo
19-08-2009, 09:54 PM
Originally posted by Tom
I think BB actually shown Siavash who is the boss by nominating for him (as much as I disagree with intervention). Siavash didn't get his own way for the whole house to be up

TRUE!!!!

Except that I think he wanted the end result to be that BEA would be up, no matter how many others were, too.

So THAT is a win-win situation for him, if that's the case. And for us!

:dance::dance::cheer::dance:

vladicus
19-08-2009, 10:22 PM
the whole house should be up from now