View Full Version : So is being ugly now the new disability?
Angus
10-07-2010, 08:50 AM
The immediate reaction of everyone was to comment on Andrew's looks and make some really off colour assumptions about him based purely on that. It seems that good looking people are immediately accepted without even trying, whilst ugly people have a massive barrier of prejudice and discrimination to overcome before anyone gives them the time of day.
Perhaps ugliness needs to be elevated to the status of a disability since it clearly inhibits people from progressing in life generally due to the unreasonable and unjustified prejudice of shallow people who think being "fit" is the be all and end all of everything.
Orvakki
10-07-2010, 08:51 AM
No, look at how many followers Josie has. (no offense)
fruit_cake
10-07-2010, 08:53 AM
people who judge only on looks always end up losing in the long term because they lose out on people who might have made really good friends
starry
10-07-2010, 08:54 AM
I haven't commented on his looks really. Just that he looks geeky, but that was relating to the information we were given about him as well.
troy4783
10-07-2010, 08:54 AM
No, look at how many followers Josie has. (no offense)
i actually think josie is quite hot just fat
Orvakki
10-07-2010, 08:55 AM
i actually think josie is quite hot just fat
yeah thats what i mean, it doesnt matter what you look like
(yeah she is hot)
smudgie
10-07-2010, 08:56 AM
He seems to be a canny lad. Nobody is perfect. Beauty comes from within, and so does true ugliness.
stonedape
10-07-2010, 08:56 AM
Good looks help with first impressions but it will cause friction when it comes to a competition like this. Andrew won't be seen as a threat, the other two are going to have problems long term.
Angus
10-07-2010, 08:57 AM
yeah thats what i mean, it doesnt matter what you look like
(yeah she is hot)
I wish that were true, but there have been plenty of threads on here that comment purely on her looks. I don't like her for a variety of reasons, but how she looks isn't one of them.
Kazanne
10-07-2010, 08:58 AM
The immediate reaction of everyone was to comment on Andrew's looks and make some really off colour assumptions about him based purely on that. It seems that good looking people are immediately accepted without even trying, whilst ugly people have a massive barrier of prejudice and discrimination to overcome before anyone gives them the time of day.
Perhaps ugliness needs to be elevated to the status of a disability since it clearly inhibits people from progressing in life generally due to the unreasonable and unjustified prejudice of shallow people who think being "fit" is the be all and end all of everything.
I agree Angus ,I posted a thread 'Poor Lad' and no one hardly agrred,and people call housemates bitches,you couldn't write it could you?:xyxwave:
WOMBAI
10-07-2010, 09:01 AM
The immediate reaction of everyone was to comment on Andrew's looks and make some really off colour assumptions about him based purely on that. It seems that good looking people are immediately accepted without even trying, whilst ugly people have a massive barrier of prejudice and discrimination to overcome before anyone gives them the time of day.
Perhaps ugliness needs to be elevated to the status of a disability since it clearly inhibits people from progressing in life generally due to the unreasonable and unjustified prejudice of shallow people who think being "fit" is the be all and end all of everything.
This! It has become really tedious listening to the shallow judgements of the idiots on this forum!
Bet most are far from being oil paintings themselves - and it simply makes them, and their insecurities, feel better - putting someone else's appearance down in this way!
Julie10
10-07-2010, 09:03 AM
Society has caused people to think that way. Fat, ugly and the disabled are not acceptable that is why people say it without thinking they have offended anyone it just rolls off the tongue.
WOMBAI
10-07-2010, 09:03 AM
I haven't commented on his looks really. Just that he looks geeky, but that was relating to the information we were given about him as well.
'Geeks' usually end up doing very well for themselves, with good, well paid jobs - and comfortable lifestyles. Give me geeks to jerks any day!
starry
10-07-2010, 09:10 AM
'Geeks' usually end up doing very well for themselves, with good, well paid jobs - and comfortable lifestyles. Give me geeks to jerks any day!
I definitely prefer people who have some intelligence to those who just think they are cool.
Angus
10-07-2010, 09:12 AM
I definitely prefer people who have some intelligence to those who just think they are cool.
Yes I agree. As the saying goes "Beauty fades, Dumb is forever".
stonedape
10-07-2010, 09:17 AM
Yes I agree. As the saying goes "Beauty fades, Dumb is forever".
I thought it was "Intelligence fades, ugliness is forever"? But I guess there's plastic surgery.
WOMBAI
10-07-2010, 09:19 AM
I definitely prefer people who have some intelligence to those who just think they are cool.
Since coming on this forum I have come to detest the word 'cool' as it is just used to justify people's shallowness! Being nasty and bitchy is apparently, to some, being 'cool' as is having a certain look and/or image! If you don't fit a certain image - then you are not 'cool' - got no time for that nonsense. In my book - the people that use the word 'cool' to describe people - are not cool!
Braden
10-07-2010, 09:20 AM
I like Andrew, I think he will make a great housemate imo.
WOMBAI
10-07-2010, 09:23 AM
I thought it was "Intelligence fades, ugliness is forever"? But I guess there's plastic surgery.
How can intelligence fade if you never had it in the first place! :hugesmile: Definitely a case of either you do or you don't! Inner ugliness is usually forever!
setanta
10-07-2010, 09:51 AM
Excellent post Angus and yes, I do believe that our society is way too wrapped up in looks and all that superficial nonsense. It's actually quite depressing that it still has such a profound influence on how we view others and live our lives, but sure that will never change.
Livia
10-07-2010, 09:58 AM
The immediate reaction of everyone was to comment on Andrew's looks and make some really off colour assumptions about him based purely on that. It seems that good looking people are immediately accepted without even trying, whilst ugly people have a massive barrier of prejudice and discrimination to overcome before anyone gives them the time of day.
Perhaps ugliness needs to be elevated to the status of a disability since it clearly inhibits people from progressing in life generally due to the unreasonable and unjustified prejudice of shallow people who think being "fit" is the be all and end all of everything.
Only the very shallowest and most immature are rocked by someone's looks without taking anything else into account, and they'll battle at length to convince you they're right. Empty vessels, and all that. These people aren't going to be young and beautiful forever and in a few years they'll have nothing to offer. Beauty fades, but stooopid is forever.
Shiner
10-07-2010, 09:59 AM
The immediate reaction of everyone was to comment on Andrew's looks and make some really off colour assumptions about him based purely on that. It seems that good looking people are immediately accepted without even trying, whilst ugly people have a massive barrier of prejudice and discrimination to overcome before anyone gives them the time of day.....
Absolutely. Look how long, despite many eviction attempts, it's taken not so bonny Dave to be not put up for eviction. JJ acts like an arse but it's all forgotten because he's pretty.
Shiner
10-07-2010, 09:59 AM
I definitely prefer people who have some intelligence to those who just think they are cool.
You'd love me, I'm both. :joker:
Livia
10-07-2010, 09:59 AM
Yes I agree. As the saying goes "Beauty fades, Dumb is forever".
LOL... Oops! Soz Angus for appearing to have copied you!
Kaaarenn!
10-07-2010, 10:16 AM
No, look at how many followers Josie has. (no offense)
Josie isn't even ugly. I think she's really pretty.
eye sea
10-07-2010, 10:20 AM
The immediate reaction of everyone was to comment on Andrew's looks and make some really off colour assumptions about him based purely on that. It seems that good looking people are immediately accepted without even trying, whilst ugly people have a massive barrier of prejudice and discrimination to overcome before anyone gives them the time of day.
Perhaps ugliness needs to be elevated to the status of a disability since it clearly inhibits people from progressing in life generally due to the unreasonable and unjustified prejudice of shallow people who think being "fit" is the be all and end all of everything.
I give you five stars for this thread. ;)
starry
10-07-2010, 10:21 AM
I think Josie has the girl next door look which some of the female audience find attractive as they find it non-threatening. So I think her looks do have an influence on voters in a way. I don't find her that interesting though.
Chuckyegg
10-07-2010, 10:32 AM
welcome to the world
delnaja
10-07-2010, 10:33 AM
This! It has become really tedious listening to the shallow judgements of the idiots on this forum!
Bet most are far from being oil paintings themselves - and it simply makes them, and their insecurities, feel better - putting someone else's appearance down in this way!
Well said.
stonedape
10-07-2010, 10:42 AM
You can sit on your high horse and pretend like you've never given preferential treatment to someone because they looked nice or had an uncomfortable shock when you see someone with a disfigurement. We all do it. Best we accept it and move along...pretty people have problems too, especially on a show like this.
CaudleHalbard
10-07-2010, 10:45 AM
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder!
I do not find JJ physically appealing and it baffles me why so many do. Andrew I don't find ugly - not gorgeous either. Just average.
Stacey.
10-07-2010, 10:50 AM
But your first-impressions are always based on looks. Nothing to say that once we get to know them, our opinions won't change.
starry
10-07-2010, 10:55 AM
pretty people have problems too, especially on a show like this.
Very true, particularly women who aren't thought to be average enough in their looks or character.
Livia
10-07-2010, 10:58 AM
You can sit on your high horse and pretend like you've never given preferential treatment to someone because they looked nice or had an uncomfortable shock when you see someone with a disfigurement. We all do it. Best we accept it and move along...pretty people have problems too, especially on a show like this.
I have no problem with people who are good looking, so long as that's not all they have to offer.
Angus
10-07-2010, 10:59 AM
But your first-impressions are always based on looks. Nothing to say that once we get to know them, our opinions won't change.
I agree to some extent, but there are always people who will forgive others any outrageous behaviour so long as they're perceived as "fit", and will patronise and belittle others because they're perceived as ugly, even if they're actually nice people.
This! It has become really tedious listening to the shallow judgements of the idiots on this forum!
Bet most are far from being oil paintings themselves - and it simply makes them, and their insecurities, feel better - putting someone else's appearance down in this way!
which, of course, you just have.:nono:
And just to add, all the so called attractive housemates were boooed on the way in!
WOMBAI
10-07-2010, 11:16 AM
You can sit on your high horse and pretend like you've never given preferential treatment to someone because they looked nice or had an uncomfortable shock when you see someone with a disfigurement. We all do it. Best we accept it and move along...pretty people have problems too, especially on a show like this.
Simply accepting it and, therefore, condoning it is not the way forward! If we just accepted racism, sexism, homophobia etc and moved along - where would we be! Silly comment!
WOMBAI
10-07-2010, 11:19 AM
which, of course, you just have.:nono:
And just to add, all the so called attractive housemates were boooed on the way in!
It was necessary to make a point!
It was necessary to make a point!
It mutes your point.:sleep:
stonedape
10-07-2010, 11:22 AM
I have no problem with people who are good looking, so long as that's not all they have to offer.
And the same goes for people who are bad looking.
Simply accepting it and, therefore, condoning it is not the way forward! If we just accepted racism, sexism, homophobia etc and moved along - where would we be! Silly comment!
Straw men sure are easier to knock down than real ones.
WOMBAI
10-07-2010, 11:32 AM
It mutes your point.:sleep:
No it doesn't - as it is probably true that those that judge so harshly do so due to their own insecurities about their own looks - and it makes them feel better to belittle the looks of others! It is a valid point, applicable to the subject matter. Not exactly rocket science!
No it doesn't - as it is probably true that those that judge so harshly do so due to their own insecurities about their own looks - and it makes them feel better to belittle the looks of others! It is a valid point, applicable to the subject matter. Not exactly rocket science!
so what's your excuse for belittling those who belittle?
WOMBAI
10-07-2010, 11:56 AM
so what's your excuse for belittling those who belittle?
I have already made that point - if you haven't grasped it - your problem! :sleep:
-Sue-
10-07-2010, 12:00 PM
Nice thread OP - far too many people these days 'judge a book by it's cover' and don't bother to see what's inside..so much more to a person than how they look
I have already made that point - if you haven't grasped it - your problem! :sleep:
Then it mutes your point.:spin:
WOMBAI
10-07-2010, 12:07 PM
Then it mutes your point.:spin:
Think I'll mute you! :xyxwave:
Think I'll mute you! :xyxwave:
at last.:joker::xyxwave:
setanta
10-07-2010, 12:10 PM
Think I'll mute you! :xyxwave:
Lol. Oh, I love when you get all fiery.
WOMBAI
10-07-2010, 12:15 PM
Lol. Oh, I love when you get all fiery.
:blush::joker:
rusticgal
10-07-2010, 12:28 PM
People are always quick to judge a book by its cover.... whether you are deemed good looking or not.... Thats what makes shows like this interesting because we do get to see what people are like underneath.
cazzy555
10-07-2010, 12:31 PM
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder!
I do not find JJ physically appealing and it baffles me why so many do. Andrew I don't find ugly - not gorgeous either. Just average.
I agree with this - the problem is society elevates our perception of people on tv so average suddenly becomes too ugly for TV. It's a shame that this is what society has come to that beauty is seen above intelligence I hope its something were able to get over or we'll evolve into a species of beauties but so dumb we'll never advance.
It has already happened with the music industry - It used to be all about the talent and not looks and now it all pretty people singing covers.
Captain.Remy
10-07-2010, 12:31 PM
Being ugly is in at the moment.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.