Log in

View Full Version : Chantelle and Preston get engaged


James
12-04-2006, 12:43 AM
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41550000/jpg/_41550686_chantelle_pa_203long.jpg
Chantelle hopes she will wed Preston this year

Celebrity Big Brother winner Chantelle Houghton has announced her engagement to fellow ex-housemate Preston Samuel.

The couple met on the Channel 4 series in January when she was planted as a "fake celebrity" ordered to convince the housemates she was famous.

She said Preston, lead singer with the Ordinary Boys, had given her his mother's ring.

The Essex model, 22, announced the engagement at the New Woman Beauty Awards at London's Dorchester Hotel.

Champagne celebration

"It was as much unexpected for me as it was for him," she said.

"He asked for his mum to send the ring over and he asked me.

"I just want to marry him.

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41550000/jpg/_41550700_ring_pa_203.jpg
The ring belonged to Preston's mother

"I've had a really long day today but I don't feel tired and I'm just dying to get home to see him."

She said she had already told friends and family: "I rang my mum and everyone and we went to get a bottle of champagne and we celebrated."

She added that she was on "cloud nine" and hoped they would marry later this year. She did not say how the singer had proposed.

The couple's on-screen chemistry was the subject of speculation during the Celebrity Big Brother series - despite the existence of Preston's now ex-girlfriend, Camille Aznar.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4901556.stm

Corkie
12-04-2006, 10:46 AM
arrrr good for them!

BB-Rocks
12-04-2006, 10:50 AM
I think their rushing it a bit but if their happy .. good luck

Ruth
12-04-2006, 11:40 AM
I hate to put a dampener on things, but I can't see this lasting. They've only been together for three months, and for much of that time, they haven't been able to have a lot of privacy. Add to that the fact that at the age of 25(?) Preston has now been engaged to three women, and it starts to look a bit worrying. He seems the type to fall hard and fall quickly, but that doesn't always make for a lasting relationship.

Don't get me wrong, I wish them the best of luck and all that, but I don't get why they're rushing into things so quickly.

babybay
12-04-2006, 11:45 AM
I love Preston and Chantelle - but they have rushed it.

As Ruth said - they have been going out since leaving the since and they have had the press and cameras following them everywere! I don't think it makes sence

Esperanto
12-04-2006, 12:32 PM
I say good luck to them.

I really do think they have rushed it, I mean they have only known each other for a few months, just as long as they are doing it for the right reasons!

I personally think they are in love and make a great couple, best of British to them.

mattice
12-04-2006, 01:34 PM
Do you think they rush it because Chantelle is pregnant ?

Or is there something else underneath ?

www.chantellepreston.com


Originally posted by Esperanto
I say good luck to them.

I really do think they have rushed it, I mean they have only known each other for a few months, just as long as they are doing it for the right reasons!

I personally think they are in love and make a great couple, best of British to them.

Esperanto
12-04-2006, 01:53 PM
My Girlfriend told me that rumour today that Chantelle is expecting. I don't want to sound to cynical or anything because I really do like them as a couple, but if they are doing it to advance there publicity or something like that well it's just not a healthy situation. Just in this world for them to have another motive for getting hitched it wouldn't surprise me. :rolleyes:

chantellebb
12-04-2006, 01:57 PM
Yes cynical you are :)

www.chantelle.tv and chantellepreston.co.uk

Originally posted by Esperanto
My Girlfriend told me that rumour today that Chantelle is expecting. I don't want to sound to cynical or anything because I really do like them as a couple, but if they are doing it to advance there publicity or something like that well it's just not a healthy situation. Just in this world for them to have another motive for getting hitched it wouldn't surprise me. :rolleyes:

Siouxsie
12-04-2006, 02:47 PM
Well as you all know i am not a fan of chantelle but good luck cos she is going to need it. They really dont know eachother that well. Not in such a short time. IMPOSSIBLE.Like her dress

Di2001
12-04-2006, 05:57 PM
:love::love: This is great news. I think they make a great couple :love::love:

Chocolate
12-04-2006, 07:11 PM
i might b a bit of a kill joy but i bet it wont last

cc100
12-04-2006, 07:19 PM
Originally posted by Di2001
:love::love: This is great news. I think they make a great couple :love::love:

Exactly!!! Well said Di.


What is so hard to believe about two kids falling in love and wanting to be together? Its their lives and if its a mistake then its up to them them, but we should cut them some slack and just wish them the best.

All relationships are different and move at different paces. I know a couple who got married after a month together and they are still very happy 15 years later.

Good luck to Preston and Chantelle.

BB-Rocks
12-04-2006, 07:20 PM
I said good lcuk to them, but they are rushing. Yeah their in love - but i mean you would think they would a while. The cameras ahve been around them mostly all the time, and they have hardly any 'Prestelle' time

x-heather-x
12-04-2006, 07:24 PM
Im really happy for both of them. Im lovin Chantelle's ring!:spin2::colour:

krissybabe06
12-04-2006, 07:29 PM
good luck to them! yeah her ring's exclusive like i want LOL

cc100
12-04-2006, 07:48 PM
True love or publicity stunt?

Vote here:

http://vote.sparklit.com/poll.spark?pollID=977217

krissybabe06
12-04-2006, 07:51 PM
hey it wont let me vote!

BB-Rocks
12-04-2006, 07:51 PM
Same

Siouxsie
12-04-2006, 08:49 PM
they havent ben together for half the time they say they have because of work gigs etc .Hardly seen each other really . How come they know each other that well. Infactuation. (I was right about stu and michelle I gave them a year together) but well you never can tell

cc100
12-04-2006, 08:50 PM
Try this link:

http://www.freewebtown.com/men4women/vote.html

Sticks
12-04-2006, 09:05 PM
This reminds me of the old joke

Q. What did you give the bride and groom

A. Oh about three months.

:rolleyes:

Siouxsie
12-04-2006, 09:05 PM
Ive voted thanks for that

chick
12-04-2006, 11:19 PM
It would be to soon for me .

x-heather-x
12-04-2006, 11:34 PM
I wouldnt have got engaged so soon.....but i am happy for Preston and Chantelle:elephant:

rachb
13-04-2006, 06:24 AM
I'm with CC on this one,i know a few people that have married very early and are still together years later.I've also got friends who were together for years,lived together and then married and divorced withinn 6 months.
i think it depends on the individual relationship.
I'm very happy for them and hope they have a long and happy future together:love:

krissybabe06
13-04-2006, 11:24 AM
yeah im happy for themx

cc100
13-04-2006, 07:58 PM
We should all just wish them the best and hope they will be happy, instead of being bitter and jealous that someone else is very happy.

xWee-Babezx
15-04-2006, 12:11 AM
woohoo!! i love prestelle!!their amde for each other

im so happy for them

krissybabe06
15-04-2006, 10:20 AM
definately, theyre deffo going to become the new celeb couple!!

amobatty
15-04-2006, 02:33 PM
I think they are a nice couple but going on preston's record i don't think they will last. I wish them both luck

babybay
15-04-2006, 04:03 PM
I am so happy for them!

cc100
15-04-2006, 08:13 PM
Originally posted by amobatty
I think they are a nice couple but going on preston's record i don't think they will last. I wish them both luck

A bit harsh.

True, 'nine2five' is hardly a classic but its a good little pop tune.

Its only a filler until the new album out in the autumn.

chilledbootz
15-04-2006, 08:58 PM
Originally posted by cc100
Originally posted by amobatty
I think they are a nice couple but going on preston's record i don't think they will last. I wish them both luck

A bit harsh.

True, 'nine2five' is hardly a classic but its a good little pop tune.

Its only a filler until the new album out in the autumn.

LOL, I think they meant Preston's track record with women? Not his actual record :joker:

BB-Rocks
15-04-2006, 09:24 PM
I think he knows that ..

babybay
16-04-2006, 12:05 AM
nin2five is a clasic!!lol

krissybabe06
16-04-2006, 03:04 PM
lol

James
16-04-2006, 06:46 PM
6 April 2006

EXCLUSIVE: CHANTELLE'S A RINGER FOR PRESTON EX

EXCLUSIVE SHE GETS SAME LOVE TOKEN

By Grant Hodgson

PRESTON has given Chantelle Houghton the SAME engagement ring he gave to his French girlfriend just two months ago.

The 24-year-old Ordinary Boys singer handed Chantelle, 22, the gold family heirloom, set with six diamonds last week.

In February he gave the ring - once owned by his great gran Sybil Grey - to Camille Aznar to end rumours he was getting close to Celebrity Big Brother housemate Chantelle, but they split a few days later.

Chantelle's pal said: "After breaking off his engagement to Camille, Preston begged her to give him the ring back. She didn't want it if they weren't to be together.....


Sunday Mirror - Full Article here (http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/news/tm_objectid=16952567%26method=full%26siteid=62484-name_page.html)


Preston and Chantelle larked around like love-sick puppies at a French market near their Brighton lovenest. We wouldn’t be surprised to hear the patter of tiny feet soon.

Last week the 22-yearold Essex lass revealed she hopes to become a young mum and the couple then announced their engagement.

They certainly seemed happy about something.

One shopper said: "They are a greatlooking couple and seemed so in love. They had fun and said hello to everyone."

Ordinary Boys frontman Preston, 24, who fell for Essex model Chantelle, 22, on reality TV show Celebrity Big Brother, just couldn’t stop grinning as he went from stall to stall with Chantelle on his back.

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10504/thumb_Preston-Chantelle-shopping.jpg (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/gallery/displayimage.php?pos=-5773) http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10504/thumb_Preston-Chantelle-piggyback.jpg (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/gallery/displayimage.php?pos=-5772)


Click on thumbnails to enlarge. From Daily Star.

cc100
16-04-2006, 06:57 PM
Originally posted by BB-Rocks
I think he knows that ..

Ooooops!!!!:blush::blush:

I genuinely read that post wrong!!

Sorry! I wasnt being sarky!:xyxwave:

chilledbootz
16-04-2006, 07:18 PM
I LOVE that piggy back pic!!

No probs cc100:wink:

cc100
16-04-2006, 07:26 PM
The same ring? Why not?

It means a lot to his family, so hes not going to just disregard it, is he?

(Thanks chilledbootz)

chilledbootz
16-04-2006, 07:28 PM
Exactly. And to be honest, if I were Chantelle and he didn't give me that ring? I'd be thinking I wasn't worthy of wearing it. I'm sure Chantelle' s the kind of girl that would appreciate how special it is anyway

I'm not following you honest cc :joker:

cc100
16-04-2006, 08:15 PM
Originally posted by chilledbootz
Exactly. And to be honest, if I were Chantelle and he didn't give me that ring? I'd be thinking I wasn't worthy of wearing it. I'm sure Chantelle' s the kind of girl that would appreciate how special it is anyway


Thats right, Chantelle is normal lass and would understand.

Originally posted by chilledbootz
I'm not following you honest cc :joker:

Ive always wanted my own stalker!!

CharlotteSometimes
17-04-2006, 06:11 PM
Originally posted by cc100

What is so hard to believe about two kids falling in love and wanting to be together?

They're hardly 'kids', but if that's how you view them, then surely they're not mature enough to be making such a commitment, anyway?


Originally posted by cc100

We should all just wish them the best and hope they will be happy, instead of being bitter and jealous that someone else is very happy.

Or rather we should all be entitled to our own opinions, rather than having them dictated to us. Some people are just fed up to the back teeth of seeing Chantelle and Preston pretty much everywhere. It's almost impossible to pick up a newspaper or magazine at the moment that hasn't got her Disaster Barbie adventures spread across umpteen pages. There's nothing wrong with celebrity in my book, when it's deserved. But a mediocre (at best) 'musician' and a bimbo that's contributed nothing of even fleeting importance to the world in her entire life are hardly deserving.

To dismiss those who don't find this obsession with dim-witted bimbos at all interesting as 'bitter and jealous' isn't fair at all. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, whether they're a fantasist or a realist. That comment is just 'my dad is bigger than yours' in different words, after all.

rachb
17-04-2006, 06:32 PM
I can't understand why people that are fed up with them end up in threads about them:sad:
Not really getting at you CharlotteSometimes but I read the threads about them on different forums and most of the posts are by people that are sick of them.Maybe I'm missing the point but if I was fed up with them then I'd just avoid them as much as possible.
I understand that they're in the papers most days but that's because lots of people do still enjoy reading about them.Lets face it it's a nice change from Jade!:mad:
There are so many more people that are in the papers even more Kerry Katona springs to mind or Jordan but I just avoid reading about them as I have no interest and wouldn't waste any time or effort moaning about them-oops I just did :laugh:
At least Chantelle won BB and every other winner has been in the papers for a while so I think millions of people think she deserved her fame.She now has her own show which like it or not means she'll be around for a while longer so she's making every effort to earn her celebrity status for something other than BB.

jrc
17-04-2006, 06:43 PM
I'm happy for them but I also think it's too soon. By the way, when Chantelle and Preston do get married, Chantelle's name will be 'Chantelle Preston,' as it's his surname. That would be kind of strange lol.

cc100
17-04-2006, 08:01 PM
Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
Originally posted by cc100

What is so hard to believe about two kids falling in love and wanting to be together?

They're hardly 'kids', but if that's how you view them, then surely they're not mature enough to be making such a commitment, anyway?


Originally posted by cc100

We should all just wish them the best and hope they will be happy, instead of being bitter and jealous that someone else is very happy.

Or rather we should all be entitled to our own opinions, rather than having them dictated to us. Some people are just fed up to the back teeth of seeing Chantelle and Preston pretty much everywhere. It's almost impossible to pick up a newspaper or magazine at the moment that hasn't got her Disaster Barbie adventures spread across umpteen pages. There's nothing wrong with celebrity in my book, when it's deserved. But a mediocre (at best) 'musician' and a bimbo that's contributed nothing of even fleeting importance to the world in her entire life are hardly deserving.

To dismiss those who don't find this obsession with dim-witted bimbos at all interesting as 'bitter and jealous' isn't fair at all. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, whether they're a fantasist or a realist. That comment is just 'my dad is bigger than yours' in different words, after all.

I used the word 'kids' just as a casual word- dont take everything literally.

You do seem rather bitter and argumentative- see LINK (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=39822)

Are jealous that someone else is happy?

Surely Im allowed an opinion, even if you strongly disagree?

glitter
17-04-2006, 08:19 PM
as every1 is entiteled to their opinion theres nothin wrong with people comin and sayin they r fed up on here! so what if they say it! and it is true every single magazine u pick up has them in it! whats so entertaining about dumb bimbo and some guy with incredibly bad fashion?!
:elephant:

cc100
17-04-2006, 08:27 PM
I love people having differing opinions- its when they cant accept others views that riles me.:sleep:

CharlotteSometimes
17-04-2006, 08:50 PM
Originally posted by rachb

I can't understand why people that are fed up with them end up in threads about them:sad:
Not really getting at you CharlotteSometimes but I read the threads about them on different forums and most of the posts are by people that are sick of them.Maybe I'm missing the point but if I was fed up with them then I'd just avoid them as much as possible.

I understand that they're in the papers most days but that's because lots of people do still enjoy reading about them.

Lets face it it's a nice change from Jade!:mad:
There are so many more people that are in the papers even more Kerry Katona springs to mind or Jordan but I just avoid reading about them as I have no interest and wouldn't waste any time or effort moaning about them-oops I just did :laugh:

At least Chantelle won BB and every other winner has been in the papers for a while so I think millions of people think she deserved her fame.She now has her own show which like it or not means she'll be around for a while longer so she's making every effort to earn her celebrity status for something other than BB.

Take a look at the amount of threads that have been posted on this section of the forum - there's even a thread about them buying a cup of coffee. If you can't see why some would find that facile, then nothing I say in reply to your post is going to penetrate. I'm a fan of BB, and as such find the fact that it has been hijacked by the most vacuous people imaginable extremely annoying. So as such, replying to threads about them is entirely justified. A forum is about exchanging opinions, not about the blind leading the blind. As a mod, that's something I would've expected you to appreciate.

That's debatable. The blanket coverage is such that it's not practical to go with an alternative at the moment, because there really isn't any. I enjoy flicking through magazines as much as anyone else, but I'd rather not have to encounter these pointless individuals every other page.

Jade was quite entertaining on Davina's chat show last week. At least she's done well on her own merit, and now runs her own business, too. She still has a tendency to spout nonsense, but she's far more deserving of celebrity status than Chantelle will ever be - and ditto Kerry Katona.

No other winner of BB has had anything like this amount of attention. There's a difference between coverage and overkill, after all. As for having 'her own show', it's essentially Davina's Streetmate with a few frills added here and there. And the fact that she's making such an inept job of it on a minority channel with a tiny audience would suggest that she's not making quite as much 'effort' as you suggest. She's merely taking the pay-cheque that's been offered - she didn't come up with the format of the show, and you won't find her name in the production credits for that matter, either. Celebrity should have creativity, talent and ability as its bedrock, but Chantelle doesn't possess any of those qualities.


Originally posted by cc100

I used the word 'kids' just as a casual word- dont take everything literally.

You do seem rather bitter and argumentative- see LINK (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=39822)

Are jealous that someone else is happy?

Surely I'm allowed an opinion, even if you strongly disagree?

The usage of the term suggests that you're of a more senior generation, although I seem to recall you've mentioned your age here before, and you're not too far from Preston's age yourself. Therefore, it is indeed questionable.

LOL! That's really quite pathetic! You don't like the fact that anyone else has a valid point that differs from your own, so you accuse them of looking for an argument! :joker: What you really mean, of course, is that it's easier to make fatuous accusations than it is to construct a reasoned, rational point of view. I suggest you look at your link once again, and see whom it really applies to. :wink:

Why would I be jealous of your perception of happiness? Mine is entirely different to a candy floss world of deception and greed, but if that's what you enjoy, then you're welcome to it.

See, there you go again. Nobody is saying that you're not entitled to your opinion, yet you quite willingly make ludicrous accusations suggesting that people are being argumentative, just because they disagree with you. Why not try and construct a viable rebuttal, rather than trying to claim some sort of non-existent moral high ground?

cc100
17-04-2006, 09:06 PM
Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
Originally posted by rachb

I can't understand why people that are fed up with them end up in threads about them:sad:
Not really getting at you CharlotteSometimes but I read the threads about them on different forums and most of the posts are by people that are sick of them.Maybe I'm missing the point but if I was fed up with them then I'd just avoid them as much as possible.

I understand that they're in the papers most days but that's because lots of people do still enjoy reading about them.

Lets face it it's a nice change from Jade!:mad:
There are so many more people that are in the papers even more Kerry Katona springs to mind or Jordan but I just avoid reading about them as I have no interest and wouldn't waste any time or effort moaning about them-oops I just did :laugh:

At least Chantelle won BB and every other winner has been in the papers for a while so I think millions of people think she deserved her fame.She now has her own show which like it or not means she'll be around for a while longer so she's making every effort to earn her celebrity status for something other than BB.

Take a look at the amount of threads that have been posted on this section of the forum - there's even a thread about them buying a cup of coffee. If you can't see why some would find that facile, then nothing I say in reply to your post is going to penetrate. I'm a fan of BB, and as such find the fact that it has been hijacked by the most vacuous people imaginable extremely annoying. So as such, replying to threads about them is entirely justified. A forum is about exchanging opinions, not about the blind leading the blind. As a mod, that's something I would've expected you to appreciate.

That's debatable. The blanket coverage is such that it's not practical to go with an alternative at the moment, because there really isn't any. I enjoy flicking through magazines as much as anyone else, but I'd rather not have to encounter these pointless individuals every other page.

Jade was quite entertaining on Davina's chat show last week. At least she's done well on her own merit, and now runs her own business, too. She still has a tendency to spout nonsense, but she's far more deserving of celebrity status than Chantelle will ever be - and ditto Kerry Katona.

No other winner of BB has had anything like this amount of attention. There's a difference between coverage and overkill, after all. As for having 'her own show', it's essentially Davina's Streetmate with a few frills added here and there. And the fact that she's making such an inept job of it on a minority channel with a tiny audience would suggest that she's not making quite as much 'effort' as you suggest. She's merely taking the pay-cheque that's been offered - she didn't come up with the format of the show, and you won't find her name in the production credits for that matter, either. Celebrity should have creativity, talent and ability as its bedrock, but Chantelle doesn't possess any of those qualities.


Originally posted by cc100

I used the word 'kids' just as a casual word- dont take everything literally.

You do seem rather bitter and argumentative- see LINK (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=39822)

Are jealous that someone else is happy?

Surely I'm allowed an opinion, even if you strongly disagree?

The usage of the term suggests that you're of a more senior generation, although I seem to recall you've mentioned your age here before, and you're not too far from Preston's age yourself. Therefore, it is indeed questionable.

LOL! That's really quite pathetic! You don't like the fact that anyone else has a valid point that differs from your own, so you accuse them of looking for an argument! :joker: What you really mean, of course, is that it's easier to make fatuous accusations than it is to construct a reasoned, rational point of view. I suggest you look at your link once again, and see whom it really applies to. :wink:

Why would I be jealous of your perception of happiness? Mine is entirely different to a candy floss world of deception and greed, but if that's what you enjoy, then you're welcome to it.

See, there you go again. Nobody is saying that you're not entitled to your opinion, yet you quite willingly make ludicrous accusations suggesting that people are being argumentative, just because they disagree with you. Why not try and construct a viable rebuttal, rather than trying to claim some sort of non-existent moral high ground?

Yeah, Im 24 the same as Preston. The word 'kids' was really thrown in casually- dont fret over that. Its hadrly worth it.:sleep:

I just its a bit of an elaborate plan to stage a wedding just to get a bit of cash. Im really going on the experience of Helen and Paul from BB2. They were slated constantly and the majority of the press (apart from Heat), gave them 3 months- theyve now been together 5 years!

Maybe Ill be proved wrong, but I just like a bit of romance.

Dont be so cynical and cold.

James
17-04-2006, 09:23 PM
Hopefully someone will say the words 'I think we'll just need to agree to disagree' soon.

Yeah?

:hugesmile: :wink:

CharlotteSometimes
17-04-2006, 09:31 PM
Originally posted by cc100

Yeah, I'm 24 the same as Preston. The word 'kids' was really thrown in casually- dont fret over that. Its hadrly worth it.:sleep:

I just its a bit of an elaborate plan to stage a wedding just to get a bit of cash. I'm really going on the experience of Helen and Paul from BB2. They were slated constantly and the majority of the press (apart from Heat), gave them 3 months- theyve now been together 5 years!

Maybe Ill be proved wrong, but I just like a bit of romance.

Dont be so cynical and cold.

I'm not 'fretting' at all, I just found it highly amusing.

But there's really no comparison. Helen was a lovely girl with no sides to her. Chantelle seemed to be the same at first, but as time went on, the fact that she's really just a money-grabbing bimbo became more and more obvious. Paul again had no sides to him, and was already financially secure, in any case. Preston is a player, and he'll play anyone, anything, or indeed any situation for his own personal gain. So again, there's really no comparison. And as I think Rach has pointed out several times elsewhere on this forum, they didn't really sell-out - at least to nothing like the degree that Chantelle and Preston have. They fell in love with each other, not with cash, material gain and celebrity status.

That all depends on how long the gravy train runs for. And romance is fine, when it's real.

I'd rather be cynical and form my own opinions, rather than have them dictated to me by the media, thanks all the same.

rachb
18-04-2006, 05:37 AM
I'm not going to argue with you Charlottesometimes but all I will say is you obviously weren't around to see this forum when Helen and Paul were first together:laugh:
You think you're fed up of the threads on Chantelle & Preston but I can tell you you'd have been hard pushed to find a thread that didn't talk about Helen and Paul.
Some of us 5 years on still look out for any news on them so be warned you might be in for a long battle with Chantelle & Preston.
Now onto your other point as a 'mod' I think I have as much right to express my opinion as you have yours.I was not telling you which threads to post in simply saying that I'd seen this happening alot over different forums.I just couldn't make sense of the fact that people that don't enjoy reading about them would want to read a thread about them getting engaged.I'm not telling you not to read it or not to post in it,I'm just saying if I were you I'd want to avoid the threads how ever many there are.
I have said before on previous threads that I respect your opinion as I do everyone on the forum.
You of course have the right to disagree with those that like certain housemates it wouldn't be an interesting forum if we all liked the same people,but please let people enjoy the threads about the housemates they like and you enjoy yours:thumbs:

Ruth
18-04-2006, 04:52 PM
When I heard they were getting engaged, I did think it would all come to grief. I didn't think for one minute - and still don't - that it is a publicity stunt. But the fact that Preston has now been engaged to three different girls does not bode well. I'm not a big fan of either of them - BUT I have nothing against either of them either, and I wish them well for the future, and hope that they are happy together.

I wasn't around here when Helen and Paul got together, but I do remember all the press speculation about them, and nobody (in the press I mean) seemed to want to believe that they could be for real. Every story was either saying that Paul would dump Helen as soon as she got out of the house, or vice versa, or that either or both of them were just doing it for a publicity stunt. I'm glad the papers were proved wrong about them.

cc100
18-04-2006, 08:42 PM
Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
I'm not 'fretting' at all, I just found it highly amusing.

But there's really no comparison. Helen was a lovely girl with no sides to her. Chantelle seemed to be the same at first, but as time went on, the fact that she's really just a money-grabbing bimbo became more and more obvious. Paul again had no sides to him, and was already financially secure, in any case. Preston is a player, and he'll play anyone, anything, or indeed any situation for his own personal gain. So again, there's really no comparison. And as I think Rach has pointed out several times elsewhere on this forum, they didn't really sell-out - at least to nothing like the degree that Chantelle and Preston have. They fell in love with each other, not with cash, material gain and celebrity status.

That all depends on how long the gravy train runs for. And romance is fine, when it's real.

I'd rather be cynical and form my own opinions, rather than have them dictated to me by the media, thanks all the same.

Well, Im glad we agree on Helen and Paul being decent, dare I say, kids. You are correct in saying they were honest and straightforward people who genuinely fell in love and, presumably are still happy together.

I just prefer to see the best in people, so Im happy for Chantelle and Preston, even though they arent in the same league as Helen and Paul in our affections on this board(certainly amongst the veterans on here).

I also think that Preston was pretty well off before hand, with a well-to-do family, and his own flat by the age of 24.

BusyBee
19-04-2006, 07:44 PM
Well CC as one of the 'veterans' on here, I wish Chantelle and Preston luck. As Rach says - anyone who thinks the comments on those two are over the top should go back a few years when every other thread was about Helen and Paul. They really had a tough time of it from the press who tried to break them up at every opportunity. Still they proved the critics wrong. Lets hope that Preston and Chantelle do so too.

However Preston seems to get engaged at the drop of a hat doesnt he? They are both young, havent known one another for very long and Chantelle, in particular, is living a life she never thought possible. BB relationships that last seem to be those that go the 'little publicity' route rather than the lets spread it over every magazine possible.

I'll compare them with Helen and Paul when they have been together for almost five years. Marry in haste, repent in leisure - hope that isnt something that will be used to describe Chantelle and Preston in the future. When in the house it was obvious there was something between them let's hope it does last.

cc100
19-04-2006, 07:52 PM
Well said there Busy Bee.:thumbs:

Ig
23-04-2006, 12:16 AM
Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
Take a look at the amount of threads that have been posted on this section of the forum - there's even a thread about them buying a cup of coffee. If you can't see why some would find that facile, then nothing I say in reply to your post is going to penetrate.
The point being, if you find the subject matter of certain threads facile, give them a miss. :rolleyes: It's really that simple. Does that sound too condescending? Good, because so does "then nothing I say in reply to your post is going to penetrate":mad:

Originally posted by CharlotteSometimesI'm a fan of BB, and as such find the fact that it has been hijacked by the most vacuous people imaginable extremely annoying. So as such, replying to threads about them is entirely justified. A forum is about exchanging opinions, not about the blind leading the blind. As a mod, that's something I would've expected you to appreciate.
Exactly the same thing could be said of your hijacking of this thread and using it as an excuse to criticise and belittle some long-serving and respected members who have obviously irritated you. Yes, a forum is about exchanging opinions, but with the attitude you have displayed in this thread you will very soon be talking to yourself. Just as you have taken exception to an imagined instruction not to read or post in certain threads, I have taken exception to you telling all and sundry what they can and cannot discuss. It's your choice not to read threads which you know are going to annoy you. I reiterate - it's really that simple.

Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
Jade was quite entertaining on Davina's chat show last week. At least she's done well on her own merit, and now runs her own business, too. She still has a tendency to spout nonsense, but she's far more deserving of celebrity status than Chantelle will ever be - and ditto Kerry Katona.
And what "merit" would that be? The press have allowed her to exploit their guilt at the treatment they gave her during BB3. They could just as soon take it all away again when they decide en masse they've made sufficient amends. As for her "own show" - see your comments about Chantelle's "own show". The same argument could apply there - although I confess I've never actually checked to see if Jade's name appears in any of the production credits. :shocked: Some arguments are just too vapid and pointless for me to bother "constructing a viable rebuttal" I'm afraid. Life's too short.

Originally posted by CharlotteSometimesCelebrity should have creativity, talent and ability as its bedrock, but Chantelle doesn't possess any of those qualities.
You are contradicting yourself. You cite Jade as an example of someone who has done well "on her own merit", yet their circumstances are virtually the same apart from Chantelle actually being a BB WINNER. Everything Jade has done has been reality-tv based, whereas Chantelle is presenting her own show. Badly, I agree, but that isn't really the point when comparing her to Jade who has never done any paid tv work.



Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
LOL! That's really quite pathetic! You don't like the fact that anyone else has a valid point that differs from your own, so you accuse them of looking for an argument! :joker: What you really mean, of course, is that it's easier to make fatuous accusations than it is to construct a reasoned, rational point of view. I suggest you look at your link once again, and see whom it really applies to. :wink:

Why would I be jealous of your perception of happiness? Mine is entirely different to a candy floss world of deception and greed, but if that's what you enjoy, then you're welcome to it.

See, there you go again. Nobody is saying that you're not entitled to your opinion, yet you quite willingly make ludicrous accusations suggesting that people are being argumentative, just because they disagree with you. Why not try and construct a viable rebuttal, rather than trying to claim some sort of non-existent moral high ground?

At the risk of being fatuous - "pot ... kettle ....":bored:

One last point - BB has been hijacked by vacuous people? Derek Quinnell! I've heard some pretentious claptrap in my time, but that has to be the funniest comment yet! Wake up and smell the Fair Trade Rich Roast lovey - we're talking Endemol, not Chekov!:laugh:

And now to my own views on the engagement. I thought the relationship in the house was genuine and that there could easily have been a romance if not for Preston's girlfriend. When I heard he had got engaged to Camille I was pleased, but with a tinge of disappointment that the BB romance was all in my head. It's all very quick and too much in the public eye for my liking, but for me the look on Preston's face at the end of CBB when he was watching Chantelle waving at the crowd on the catwalk said it all. We call it "hiraeth" in these yer parts!! It absolutely cannot be faked. Good luck to them, I hope it lasts, and if it doesn't, I hope they'll have made such an obscene amount of money it will help to heal their broken hearts.:tongue: So there. Yah boo sucks. End of.


[/facile][/vacuous][/fatuous]:laugh::devil:

chick
23-04-2006, 03:57 PM
WOW,WOW ,WOW .

cc100
23-04-2006, 07:37 PM
Great post there Ig, couldnt agree more.

Some believe them, some dont- thats ok.

Lets hope thats the end of it.

Lance
24-05-2006, 01:46 PM
It's good to see that they are still together after a lot of pesimism from some people.

I hope it lasts for them forever.

cc100
24-05-2006, 02:18 PM
Well said Lance.

I think they'll be alright.:thumbs:

booty-full
19-06-2006, 09:14 PM
I am sorry but it disturbs me a little that the general public could have been so supportive straight away of a relationship that started whilst Preston was in a relationship....and then they got engaged just a short while after he split from his OTHER fiancee Camille (a much better catch). Then Chantelle gets her own dating show to help girls find love - it should say to teach girls how to steal another's man!!!
I find it hard to condone such a thing! Morals guys!!

Princess
19-06-2006, 09:39 PM
Originally posted by booty-full
I am sorry but it disturbs me a little that the general public could have been so supportive straight away of a relationship that started whilst Preston was in a relationship....and then they got engaged just a short while after he split from his OTHER fiancee Camille (a much better catch). Then Chantelle gets her own dating show to help girls find love - it should say to teach girls how to steal another's man!!!
I find it hard to condone such a thing! Morals guys!!

For one it did not start while he was still going out with Camille. They spilt up before him and Chantelle got together.He proposed to Camille the night BB finished as a spur of the moment thing anyway. They decided it wasn't right. And then after all that him and Chantelle got together. I think he and Chantelle would have got engaged eventually anyway so why wait if it felt right.And Chantelle's show was work nothing really to do with her or Preston.

Bells
24-06-2006, 09:25 PM
No surprise there really. Hope it all works out! :thumbs: