Playboy

[Kerry]

Should it be a 'brand' for children? The stationary and clothing is all over the place - should it be readily available (for kids) given it's foundations?

I'm no prude but Playboy outfits for 5 year olds? No

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

i dont think kids actually know what it is though, they just think its some cute bunny thing i doubt they will know about the magazine :p

so yeah its ok imo

[GypsyGoth]

I think there is really something wrong with parents who get playboy stuff for their kids. The children might be better in foster homes.

[Twilight]

I don't see the problem, its not like any kids who wears it are gonna end up being in the magazine, i had something with playboy on it and i'm fine.

[Kerry]

i dont think kids actually know what it is though, they just think its some cute bunny thing i doubt they will know about the magazine :p

so yeah its ok imo

When my daughter started secondry I told her exactly what it was. (women getting naked for money) and she was disgusted

[Kerry]

I don't see the problem, its not like any kids who wears it are gonna end up being in the magazine, i had something with playboy on it and i'm fine.

Good for you

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

yes but the 'brand' is sort of seperate from the mag isnt it :L

the clothing/stationary brand is basically a rabbit lol it doesnt mean anything

[Kerry]

yes but the 'brand' is sort of seperate from the mag isnt it :L

the clothing/stationary brand is basically a rabbit lol it doesnt mean anything

No, it represents Playboy. The soft porn magazine

[Twilight]

Good for you
God..
I shouldn't have bothered saying anything. :joker:

[Twilight]

No, it represents Playboy. The soft porn magazine

Its still different though, imo :L

[Kerry]

God..
I shouldn't have bothered saying anything. :joker:

I just said good for you :conf:

My problem isn't at it beING aimed at teens so much. It's the merchandise being aimed at little kids. The pencils and folders and pencil cases right next to 'Hello Kitty' in WH Smiths (example)

[Kerry]

Its still different though, imo :L

So it'd be fine to have "big tits and arses weekly" on some kids jeans?

[Zippy]

What kind of stupid parent would think a porn company logo was suitable for their child? That said, there are some spectacularly stupid irresponsible parents out there so doesn't surprise me at all.

They shouldnt even be selling it in childrens outlets. If they are.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

because its just a bunny :conf2:

infract most of the merchandise doesnt even say playboy, its just a bunny :bawling:

i can see why you would be against kids using the 'playboy' brand the bunny thing is different imo D:

[Kerry]

What kind of stupid parent would think a porn company logo was suitable for their child? That said, there are some spectacularly stupid irresponsible parents out there so doesn't surprise me at all.

They shouldnt even be selling it in childrens outlets. If they are.

They are

[Kerry]

because its just a bunny :conf2:

infract most of the merchandise doesnt even say playboy, its just a bunny :bawling:

i can see why you would be against kids using the 'playboy' brand the bunny thing is different imo D:

A Playboy bunny! What everyone knows what it means!

[Zippy]

because its just a bunny :conf2:



doesn't matter what it is...its a symbol for a porn company. Everybody recognises it. And if the child isn't aware of it then they should be told. Otherwises they are endorsing a product unwittingly.

[Angus]

Anyone who thinks that a well known and unmistakeable soft porn logo is appropriate for children because it's "just a bunny" and kids don't know the connection, are missing the point entirely. It's yet another instance of the sexualization of children - paedophiles certainly know what the brand logo denotes, and in their sick and twisted minds they convince themselves that kids are as sexually available as adults. Why not just give the kid a T shirt with "Come and Get Me" printed on it?

Parents who dress their daughters like LA hookers are particularly vile. I blame the likes of hip hop videos that portray all blokes as powerful, macho types, and the women as begging for it *****s. The likes of Christina Aguilera and Britney Spears are now the role models for little girls:rolleyes: And don't try and tell me that kids aren't influenced by pop culture - it's the job of a parent to protect and guide, not be a kid's "friend" by allowing them to wear crap like this.

[Patrick]

Should it be a 'brand' for children? The stationary and clothing is all over the place - should it be readily available (for kids) given it's foundations?

I'm no prude but Playboy outfits for 5 year olds? No

Its not even that big anymore the way it use to be, hardly all over the place.


I don't see the problem, its not like any kids who wears it are gonna end up being in the magazine, i had something with playboy on it and i'm fine.

This.

When my daughter started secondry I told her exactly what it was. (women getting naked for money) and she was disgusted

God I would kill myself if I was as unfortunate as your daughter to have a dull boring mother like you.


Good for you

She was only giving her opinion which YOU asked for. Jesus.

[MTVN]

I've always found it a bit strange that Playboy was such a popular brand among 12/13 year old girls, but I suppose it doesnt carry the same associations as it does for most adults

[Shasown]

Should it be a 'brand' for children? The stationary and clothing is all over the place - should it be readily available (for kids) given it's foundations?

I'm no prude but Playboy outfits for 5 year olds? No

Got to love the voice of the moral majority, I would be more intent on bannning products that sexualise young children. Padded bras for primary school children etc.

Do you also advocate the boycotting of all of Katie Prices products, her perfume, toys and books as well as childrens clothing, given she was a topless model and has appeared in her own porn movies (somewhat harder porn than the average playboy magazine)?

[arista]

Should it be a 'brand' for children? The stationary and clothing is all over the place - should it be readily available (for kids) given it's foundations?

I'm no prude but Playboy outfits for 5 year olds? No



Of Course it should not be for Children.


but shops that did sell it stopped after the papers showed them up.


Is this in the UK you are talking about?

[arista]

because its just a bunny :conf2:

infract most of the merchandise doesnt even say playboy, its just a bunny :bawling:

i can see why you would be against kids using the 'playboy' brand the bunny thing is different imo D:



The Bunny that has a Political meaning.


Like Hot Sex.

[arista]

I think there is really something wrong with parents who get playboy stuff for their kids. The children might be better in foster homes.



No.

[Beastie]

A part of me thinks.. Oh it's just a bunny logo.. why should it matter? But suppose the meaning behind it does matter. Imagine being at school with your playboy pencil case. One of your teachers is probably perving over you even more. Ridiculous when I was at school. The "popular" girls with too much makeup and sh!t and trying to bum a teacher who was apparently good looking. I reckon the so called "good looking" teacher wouldn't say no to an offer of a 15 year old girl showing a bit of cleavage!

Anyway.. these products should not even be sold in the children's department. Some merchandising companies may think "oh we are just pinching the logo" but others will think deeper.

I watched a show last night about kids having it all too young. Was on repeat. Oh with the padded bras thing for year 5's to 6's... an argument for it was.. padded bras actually give you more protection to cover up. To protect your breasts more. I can see where that is coming from. I suppose if you put a strappy top and all that underneath people won't notice as much you have bigger breasts. If you put more lairs on then you will just look to have a bigger body rather than bigger breasts.

Anyway children should be children for as long as possible.

[Beastie]

Got to love the voice of the moral majority, I would be more intent on bannning products that sexualise young children. Padded bras for primary school children etc.

Do you also advocate the boycotting of all of Katie Prices products, her perfume, toys and books as well as childrens clothing, given she was a topless model and has appeared in her own porn movies (somewhat harder porn than the average playboy magazine)?

Mmm a part of me thinks Jordan's topless modelling and her coming out with a perfume etc.. are two different things?

I don't think children under the age of 16 should really look up to Jordan. Children under 16 should not think.. "when I am older I want to be a wag and take my clothes off". They should have other ambitions. Once they get to like the age of 18.. then well you are an adult and can do what you want. If they then want to take their clothes off for a living then they can do so if they wish. Just that at a young age they shouldn't be contemplating about all this. Like I said they should be left as children for as long as possible. Blockage of porn sites and that for children living in a household who are under the age of 16 should happen!!

[arista]

Its not for sale for Kids here , now


Maybe this is a Irish problem

[Niamh.]

Its not for sale for Kids here , now


Maybe this is a Irish problem

What's an Irish problem?

[arista]

What's an Irish problem?



All the UK Stock sold dirt cheap to Ireland
Tax Free.

[Niamh.]

All the UK Stock sold dirt cheap to Ireland
Tax Free.

stock of what? I haven't seen kids with Playboy stuff over here and It was an English person started this thread btw:conf:

[InOne]

Niamh I think he is winding you up, calm down :tongue: I know how you get when it comes to English/Irish stuff

http://smartassradio.com/wp-content/gallery/site-images/irish.gif

[Niamh.]

lmao, nice Leprechaun Joe

[arista]

stock of what? I haven't seen kids with Playboy stuff over here and It was an English person started this thread btw:conf:



It was in UK Tesco's
and other stores
it went in National papers
and on UK News.


All Stock was deleted.


Deleted Stock is then sold off very cheap.

Many Irish Dealers buy cheap Deleted Stock
and the sell for more in Ireland.

[Niamh.]

It was in UK Tesco's
and other stores
it went in National papers
and on UK News.


All Stock was deleted.


Deleted Stock is then sold off very cheap.

Many Irish Dealers buy cheap Deleted Stock
and the sell for more in Ireland.

But it's not an Irish problem though, saying "Many Irish Dealers buy cheap Deleted Stock
and the sell for more in Ireland" Isn't proof that it's an Irish problem, I haven't seen or heard anything about Playboy products being sold to kids here:conf:

[arista]

Playboy Stationery Written Off

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/WH-Smith-Playboy-Stationery-Gets-Pulled/Article/200902215220212


Furious vicar clears shelves at local shop of Playboy stationery 'targeted' at children

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1020689/Furious-vicar-clears-shelves-local-shop-Playboy-stationery-targeted-children.html#ixzz1B0rQXTgc

[arista]

"Playboy products being sold to kids here"


Thats good in your area then.


Life In The City.

[LemonJam]

Ignorance is bliss I guess, but when you do know what playboy is you can't help but think that the little girl in possession of said pencilcase etc doesn't have high ambitions.

[Beastie]

Ignorance is bliss I guess, but when you do know what playboy is you can't help but think that the little girl in possession of said pencilcase etc doesn't have high ambitions.

They will have high ambitions. I am just saying children nowadays whether they have a playboy pencil case or not.. most of their ambitions is to become famous, be a topless model or a wannabe wag. If you choose to do that at 18 then fair enough. We are in a recession and people should be more open minded when it comes to career choices.

To be fair most with playboy pencil cases probably don't know the meaning. Depending on their age.

[arista]

"recession "


No we are in Hard Times now
but we are out of that.

[Beastie]

"recession "


No we are in Hard Times now
but we are out of that.

Are you sure?

Also a playboy pencil case.. it is a fashion statement more than anything else for children.

[arista]

Are you sure?

Also a playboy pencil case.. it is a fashion statement more than anything else for children.


But for 4 year olds
thats when it got banned here





Are you sure?

Yes.

[lostalex]

Playboy is no more perverse or inappropriate than showing kids ancient greek and roman statues of nude models. Playboy never shows any kind of sex, they never show any kind of insertion or masterbation. They simple show nude models.

Playboy get's lumped in with other porn mags such as hustler or penthouse, but they arn't anything like those other porn mags.

You all sound like the same prudes that made complaints to the FCC about Janet Jackson's Super Bowl "wardrobe malfunction".

Why is the human body offensive??? It's NOT. imho.

[Beastie]

Playboy is no more perverse or inappropriate than showing kids ancient greek and roman statues of nude models. Playboy never shows any kind of sex, they never show any kind of insertion or masterbation. They simple show nude models.

Playboy get's lumped in with other porn mags such as hustler or penthouse, but they arn't anything like those other porn mags.

You all sound like the same prudes that made complaints to the FCC about Janet Jackson's Super Bowl "wardrobe malfunction".

Why is the human body offensive??? It's NOT. imho.

It's not offensive when you are an adult and have the right to show your vagina off in porn mags. However children are not allowed to do that and should not be thinking of stuff like that as a child.

[Locke.]

Maybe this is a Irish problem


God I would kill myself if I was as unfortunate as your daughter to have a dull boring mother like you.

:joker: The two best posts on here for ages.


And no, don't really see the problem. Playboy (the magazine) isn't even popular in this country is it.. have never seen it in the shop. It's unlikely the kids are gonna know what it is. And i've never seen playboy clothes getting sold anywhere anyway...

[lostalex]

It's not offensive when you are an adult and have the right to show your vagina off in porn mags. However children are not allowed to do that and should not be thinking of stuff like that as a child.


Playboy doesn't show the vagina though in the way yur implying. they don't do close ups of the vagina. They don't do "spread-eagle" shots. You obviously have never read playboy.

You are lumping playboy in with most of the other "porn mags" and they really shouldn't be put in the same catagory.

Playboy is a lifestyle magazine more than a porn magazine. imho.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

^ gurl change ya sig it scares me

[Beastie]

Playboy doesn't show the vagina though in the way yur implying. they don't do close ups of the vagina. They don't do "spread-eagle" shots. You obviously have never read playboy.

You are lumping playboy in with most of the other "porn mags" and they really shouldn't be put in the same catagory.

Playboy is a lifestyle magazine more than a porn magazine. imho.

A lifestyle magazine of young women "selling themselves". Children should not be into this at a young age.

[arista]

A lifestyle magazine of young women "selling themselves". Children should not be into this at a young age.



Its no good Yanks are in another World
worse that here

[Beastie]

Its no good Yanks are in another World
worse that here

No excuse.

[Kazanne]

Should it be a 'brand' for children? The stationary and clothing is all over the place - should it be readily available (for kids) given it's foundations?

I'm no prude but Playboy outfits for 5 year olds? No

I think it is wrong,it's in their faces all the time as it is,I'de rather just buy them a T.shirt with a proper bunny on if they want one.

[Angus]

:joker: The two best posts on here for ages.


And no, don't really see the problem. Playboy (the magazine) isn't even popular in this country is it.. have never seen it in the shop. It's unlikely the kids are gonna know what it is. And i've never seen playboy clothes getting sold anywhere anyway...

Of course the kids themselves won't be aware of the connotations attached to the brand logo, but the stupid parents and other adults sure are - that's the point. Why would you want to dress your child in anything that had any connection to a lad's mag?:confused:

[Niamh.]

Of course the kids themselves won't be aware of the connotations attached to the brand logo, but the stupid parents and other adults sure are - that's the point. Why would you want to dress your child in anything that had any connection to a lad's mag?:confused:

Yeah, it's a bit strange, I'd be mortified if my 10 year old daughter was walking around wearing playboy stuff

[Sunday]

Yeah, it's a bit strange, I'd be mortified if my 10 year old daughter was walking around wearing playboy stuff


I agree, no way would I have let my kids wear that kind of stuff, or g-strings, they have them for small girls, its wrong.
Now to be blunt, I only see the chavvy families let their kids wear them sort of clothes.

[Stephanie]

i've never seen playboy clothing or anything sold before.

[Sunday]

i've never seen playboy clothing or anything sold before.



They have clothes , bags and jewelry all with the playboy sign on, designed to attaract young girls, some too young though.

[arista]

They have clothes , bags and jewelry all with the playboy sign on, designed to attaract young girls, some too young though.


Yes thats why there were Deleted
and Shipped to other places

[Shasown]

I think it is wrong,it's in their faces all the time as it is,I'de rather just buy them a T.shirt with a proper bunny on if they want one.

Thats a great idea.


But......


What do you use to keep the rabbit on the tee shirt? I have tried nails staples and superglue all to no avail.

[Crimson Dynamo]

the whole Payboy brand is a fail

look at that paedo old guy in his jamas for fk sake

lol

[Sunday]

the whole Payboy brand is a fail

look at that paedo old guy in his jamas for fk sake

lol


He is a right old perve with all those young girls and yet hardly anyone thinks its wrong, even had their own tv program!! He has made so much money out of that rabbit though.

[bananarama]

I have mixed feelings on this issue....First reaction is it seems a no brainer in other words NO Children should not be exposed to the brand name of Playboy even if they don't know what it means but some day they will find out.....

Second train of thought is that here in Britain we are plagued by prudish mentalities and censorship mania......Most of which is not any where near as harmfull as some usually of a religious source claim........Take a look at many countries which are far more anti censorship than Britain and their children seem to grow up perfectly stable an unharmed compared to Britain with its high abortion rates and sexual activity of the underaged......

In Britain polititions love to blame the sex industry for children going wild.........I bet any amount of money that if it were possible to ban all forms of porn off the internet and other media. The children of Britain would still be as some are now experimenting with sexual activity far to young.

When I was 12 years old a long long time ago with no internet and no porn available to the young (It was a crime to own in those days). Guess what children were experimenting with sex at the back of the old bike sheds or where ever......Girls got pregnant but were hidden away.........It all happened just like now but was not seen

Our political moralists who think nudity and a bit of erotics is harmful had better look elsware as for decades they have and are barking up the wrong tree....

The main moral decline attitudes does not come about as a result of porn it come from TV soaps and series that broadcast story lines with one night stands and swapping partners at will. Broadcast before the watershed for all ages to pick up the moral attitudes portraid as being the way life should be.......That is where the bloody harm to our youngsters really comes from.......

Footnote: Families who are genuin nudists raise their children to accept nudity as perefectrly normal and not disgusting.......

Now the problem with the playboy brand is that it can be relatively mild pinup stuff right up to down right hard core.......

[Shaun]

Ignoring the morality, I just find the brand tacky. I don't think girls buy it because it's dirty, but because it's cool. It's a sign of the glamourisation of adulthood towards children (seen in makeup, padded bras, I think poledancing classes...) - sad, tacky but not the root of the problem.

[bananarama]

Ignoring the morality, I just find the brand tacky. I don't think girls buy it because it's dirty, but because it's cool. It's a sign of the glamourisation of adulthood towards children (seen in makeup, padded bras, I think poledancing classes...) - sad, tacky but not the root of the problem.


Its a matter of personal perception. I find football sad and tacky but it would be wrong of me to claim that is actually is.....It's just my perception like your feelings towards playboy is your perception but like my perception cannot be claimed as a fact...........Each to their own really.....

[lostalex]

Playboy is not porn. You guys have topless models in your MAINSTREAM magazines. At least Playboy is only sold to 18+.

You guys prolly consider Michelangelo a pedo.

The human body is art. (well...some human bodies. Less and less these days with the obesity epidemic)

http://www.florencetattooconvention.com/2010/images/stories/firenze/DaviddiMichelangelo.jpg

[GypsyGoth]

No.

Yes!!!!

You know if I ran this world it'd be a much better place.

[lostalex]

http://politicalsex.me/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Silvio-Berlusconi.jpg

[GypsyGoth]

Playboy is not porn. You guys have topless models in your MAINSTREAM magazines. At least Playboy is only sold to 18+.

You guys prolly consider Michelangelo a pedo.

The human body is art. (well...some human bodies. Less and less these days with the obesity epidemic)

http://www.florencetattooconvention.com/2010/images/stories/firenze/DaviddiMichelangelo.jpg

There is very big difference between magazines sold to over 18s and Michelangelo's David.

[lostalex]

^ gurl change ya sig it scares me



I think it's beautiful.

[lostalex]

There is very big difference between magazines sold to over 18s and Michelangelo's David.


What kind of pictures do you think Michelangelo would take if cameras were invented? You think he'd be photographing flowers or mountains?? i don't think so.

[Kerry]

God I would kill myself if I was as unfortunate as your daughter to have a dull boring mother like you.

She was only giving her opinion which YOU asked for. Jesus.

She adores me. Feel sorry for your family TBH

[Kerry]

Note - serious debates

[lostalex]

oops, we've been TOLD.

[Kerry]

oops, we've been TOLD.

Just you

[lostalex]

Just you

forgive me?

[arista]

Ignoring the morality, I just find the brand tacky. I don't think girls buy it because it's dirty, but because it's cool. It's a sign of the glamourisation of adulthood towards children (seen in makeup, padded bras, I think poledancing classes...) - sad, tacky but not the root of the problem.


some Young girls dids buy it though
then WH Smiths withdrew all Stock
after the Newspapers and News had a go at them.

[Shasown]

Playboy is not porn. You guys have topless models in your MAINSTREAM magazines. At least Playboy is only sold to 18+.

You guys prolly consider Michelangelo a pedo.

The human body is art. (well...some human bodies. Less and less these days with the obesity epidemic)

http://www.florencetattooconvention.com/2010/images/stories/firenze/DaviddiMichelangelo.jpg

Irony, somehow I dont think so

Juxtaposition, definately not.

[lostalex]

Irony, somehow I dont think so

Juxtaposition, definately not.
Well i'd rather look at David over Jordan any day. But the fascination is the same i think.

[Twilight]

I actually agree with lostalex, on this one.

[Shasown]

Well i'd rather look at David over Jordan any day. But the fascination is the same i think.



Whooooooooooosh!!!!!!!!!

[lostalex]

Whooooooooooosh!!!!!!!!!

you want proof?


slut or muse? who's to say?

http://www.artquotes.net/masters/warhol_andy/turquoise-marilyn-62.jpg

[lostalex]

First Cover model on Playboy????

Marilyn Monroe.

Look it UP. google it.

[Shasown]

you want proof?


slut or muse? who's to say?



Proof of what?

No I dont want proof from you, the whooosh was the sound of my point flying right over your head, go back and read!

Then look up juxtaposition and see if the point slips home.

Then come back and I will explain it, I promise I will type slowly just for you.

[Jords]

The parents who get their children playboy stuff are crack in the head I tell ya!

[Kerry]

Methinks someones missed the point....

[lostalex]

http://click.si.edu/images/upload/Images/pn_2897_Image_playboy_first_cover.jpg

[Kerry]

Oooops sorry Jords, was aimed at lost-the-plot

[lostalex]

Oooops sorry Jords, was aimed at lost-the-plot

That's incredibly rude. You seem to have the power to decide what is suitible or not suitible on this site. IS mocking someone's name in such a childish, bullying manner acceptable??

so if i call you Kerry-Kocksucker, that's okay too then?

[Kerry]

That's incredibly rude. You seem to have the power to decide what is suitible or not suitible on this site. IS mocking someone's name in such a childish, bullying manner acceptable to you??

Is insulting me acceptible to you?

[lostalex]

Is insulting me acceptible to you?

I have not insulted you personally ONCE. I've asked a very relevant question.

[Kerry]

That's incredibly rude. You seem to have the power to decide what is suitible or not suitible on this site. IS mocking someone's name in such a childish, bullying manner acceptable??

so if i call you Kerry-Kocksucker, that's okay too then?

I have not insulted you personally ONCE. I've asked a very relevant question.

Um....

[lostalex]

IF you are so quick to censor this site, then shouldn't you hold yourself to the same standards??

Obviously not.

[lostalex]

Um....

are you not paying attention? i asked that question directly AFTER you mocked my name.

You still havn't answered.

[Kerry]

IF you are so quick to censor this site, then shouldn't you hold yourself to the same standards??

Obviously not.

Eh? How can I censor the site?

[Kerry]

are you not paying attention? i asked that question directly AFTER you mocked my name.

You still havn't answered.

Not to you, no

[Shasown]

IF you are so quick to censor this site, then shouldn't you hold yourself to the same standards??

Obviously not.

Would you be happier if we referred to you as "lost another point" then?

Are the decorators in this week?

[lostalex]

Eh? How can I censor the site?

the same way you did it before in the "posh" thread.

[Kerry]

the same way you did it before in the "posh" thread.

I have no power to 'censor' the site

[lostalex]

Would you be happier if we referred to you as "lost another point" then?




No i'd be happy if you referred to me by my name. eigther Lost or Alex, or lostalex will do just fine.

[lostalex]

I have no power to 'censor' the site


well someone complained, and yu just happened to be there i guess. *rolls eyes*

[Kerry]

well someone complained, and yu just happened to be there i guess. *rolls eyes*

Sorry, no.

[lostalex]

Anyways (mmhmmmm), back on topic...... I wouldn't allow my children to wear playboy logos or disney logos.

[Kerry]

Anyways (mmhmmmm), back on topic...... I wouldn't allow my children to wear playboy logos or disney logos.

Not even sure what posh thread you mean.....

[lostalex]

Not even sure what posh thread you mean.....

it doesn't matter. I'm not gonna waste the effort. peace and love. peace and love.

[Kerry]

it doesn't matter. I'm not gonna waste the effort.

Small mercies

[lostalex]

Small mercies


bless you. May only good things befall you.

[Kerry]

bless you. May only good things befall you.

If you have a problem, PM me. Otherwise, keep ontopic. Thanks

[Shasown]

it doesn't matter. I'm not gonna waste the effort. peace and love. peace and love.

Well now thats damned decent of you given Kerry didnt censor you on the posh man thread, did she?

Just like the rest of your arguments, baseless inaccurate ramblings.

[lostalex]

If you have a problem, PM me. Otherwise, keep ontopic. Thanks


If you have no power, then DON'T TELL me what to do. Thanks. :blush:

[Kerry]

Well now thats damned decent of you given Kerry didnt censor you on the posh man thread, did she?

Just like the rest of your arguments, baseless inaccurate ramblings.

I don't even know the thread he/she means

[Kerry]

If you have no power, then DON'T TELL me what to do. Thanks. :blush:

What power do you think I have? I don't get it :conf:

[lostalex]

is anyone else bored?

[Shasown]

I don't even know the thread he/she means

Neither does she, I think, a typical tactic from her, when she loses an argument on in the wrong, throw some other garbage out to the forum.

[Kerry]

Bloody hell I only asked this thread was kept on topic as it's in serious debates. Talk as much crap as you like elsewhere. And no, I never asked for anything to be deleted

[lostalex]

Neither does she, I think, a typical tactic from her, when she loses an argument on in the wrong, throw some other garbage out to the forum.


I'm sorry which argument did i lose? if this was a real conflict you'd already be destroyed.

We arn't arguing. You seem hell-bent on tryna start one though.

[Kerry]

lostalex - stop baiting and find another thread or something

[Shasown]

I'm sorry which argument did i lose? .

Would it upset you tremendously if I said all of them?

It would? In that case all of them!


if this was a real conflict you'd already be destroyed.


Dream on sugarlips.

[lostalex]

I don't have access to all of the posts deleted. And i'm in no position to question the judgement of those posts being censored.

So because neigther of us have access to the original conflict in the "posh" threat, i said i dropped it.

[lostalex]

lostalex - stop baiting and find another thread or something

LMAO. I'M the one that's baiting??? now THAT's funny.

[lostalex]

Would it upset you tremendously if I said all of them/


.


It wouldn't upset me at all, because i'm used to you making no sense.

[Kerry]

LMAO. I'M the one that's baiting??? now THAT's funny.

I seriously have no idea what you're on about with this 'posh' thing and what do you think I am, a mod?? Why would I have access to anything?? I'm a regular user. And as I've said, take it to PM!!!!!!

[Jords]

wtf is all I gotta say.

[Kerry]

I've got more interesting things to do. Like gouge my eyes out with a spoon.....

[lostalex]

I seriously have no idea what you're on about with this 'posh' thing and what do you think I am, a mod?? Why would I have access to anything?? I'm a regular user. And as I've said, take it to PM!!!!!!

I'm not "on about it" I mentioned it once, and when you denied it, i dropped it. It seems that it's YOU who is "on about it".

[lostalex]

I've got more interesting things to do. Like gouge my eyes out with a spoon.....


Prove it. Live on cam plzzzz.

[MTVN]

wtf is all I gotta say.

I concur.

[Kerry]

Would help if people elaborated on "wtf"

[lostalex]

I concur.
make it three.

[Tom4784]

I don't think it matters really. It's just a fashionable logo that doesn't mean anything in that form, It reminds me of those Che Guevara bags and such from a few years ago, most people that wore them didn't really care about him beyond simple fashion so the imagery didn't hold any meaning. Most people I knew that wore them didn't know who he was nevermind the history behind him.

[Livia]

The Playboy brand for kids is ridiculous. Unless you want people perving after your kids, which I'm guessing no one wants. Kids are sexualised too early.

[Grimnir]

damn, i thought this thread was gonna be about the playboy magazine and all the playboy models, complete with lots of hot pics :sad:

[lostalex]

damn, i thought this thread was gonna be about the playboy magazine and all the playboy models, complete with lots of hot pics :sad:


it was for a while... but then they got deleted and i got an infraction. :(