[Kerry]

Should it be a 'brand' for children? The stationary and clothing is all over the place - should it be readily available (for kids) given it's foundations?

I'm no prude but Playboy outfits for 5 year olds? No

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

i dont think kids actually know what it is though, they just think its some cute bunny thing i doubt they will know about the magazine

so yeah its ok imo

[Kerry]

Originally Posted by Scott

i dont think kids actually know what it is though, they just think its some cute bunny thing i doubt they will know about the magazine

so yeah its ok imo

When my daughter started secondry I told her exactly what it was. (women getting naked for money) and she was disgusted

[GypsyGoth]

I think there is really something wrong with parents who get playboy stuff for their kids. The children might be better in foster homes.

[arista]

Originally Posted by GypsyGoth

I think there is really something wrong with parents who get playboy stuff for their kids. The children might be better in foster homes.

No.

[GypsyGoth]

Originally Posted by arista

No.

Yes!!!!

You know if I ran this world it'd be a much better place.

[Twilight]

I don't see the problem, its not like any kids who wears it are gonna end up being in the magazine, i had something with playboy on it and i'm fine.

[Kerry]

Originally Posted by Twilight

I don't see the problem, its not like any kids who wears it are gonna end up being in the magazine, i had something with playboy on it and i'm fine.

Good for you

[Twilight]

Originally Posted by ~Kerry~

Good for you

God..
I shouldn't have bothered saying anything.

[Kerry]

Originally Posted by Twilight

God..
I shouldn't have bothered saying anything.

I just said good for you

My problem isn't at it beING aimed at teens so much. It's the merchandise being aimed at little kids. The pencils and folders and pencil cases right next to 'Hello Kitty' in WH Smiths (example)

[Patrick]

Originally Posted by ~Kerry~

Should it be a 'brand' for children? The stationary and clothing is all over the place - should it be readily available (for kids) given it's foundations?

I'm no prude but Playboy outfits for 5 year olds? No

Its not even that big anymore the way it use to be, hardly all over the place.

Originally Posted by Twilight

I don't see the problem, its not like any kids who wears it are gonna end up being in the magazine, i had something with playboy on it and i'm fine.

This.

Originally Posted by ~Kerry~

When my daughter started secondry I told her exactly what it was. (women getting naked for money) and she was disgusted

God I would kill myself if I was as unfortunate as your daughter to have a dull boring mother like you.

Originally Posted by ~Kerry~

Good for you

She was only giving her opinion which YOU asked for. Jesus.

[Kerry]

Originally Posted by Patrick

God I would kill myself if I was as unfortunate as your daughter to have a dull boring mother like you.

She was only giving her opinion which YOU asked for. Jesus.

She adores me. Feel sorry for your family TBH

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

yes but the 'brand' is sort of seperate from the mag isnt it :L

the clothing/stationary brand is basically a rabbit lol it doesnt mean anything

[Kerry]

Originally Posted by Scott

yes but the 'brand' is sort of seperate from the mag isnt it :L

the clothing/stationary brand is basically a rabbit lol it doesnt mean anything

No, it represents Playboy. The soft porn magazine

[Twilight]

Originally Posted by ~Kerry~

No, it represents Playboy. The soft porn magazine

Its still different though, imo :L

[Kerry]

Originally Posted by Twilight

Its still different though, imo :L

So it'd be fine to have "big tits and arses weekly" on some kids jeans?

[Zippy]

What kind of stupid parent would think a porn company logo was suitable for their child? That said, there are some spectacularly stupid irresponsible parents out there so doesn't surprise me at all.

They shouldnt even be selling it in childrens outlets. If they are.

[Kerry]

Originally Posted by Zippy

What kind of stupid parent would think a porn company logo was suitable for their child? That said, there are some spectacularly stupid irresponsible parents out there so doesn't surprise me at all.

They shouldnt even be selling it in childrens outlets. If they are.

They are

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

because its just a bunny

infract most of the merchandise doesnt even say playboy, its just a bunny

i can see why you would be against kids using the 'playboy' brand the bunny thing is different imo

[Kerry]

Originally Posted by Scott

because its just a bunny

infract most of the merchandise doesnt even say playboy, its just a bunny

i can see why you would be against kids using the 'playboy' brand the bunny thing is different imo

A Playboy bunny! What everyone knows what it means!

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by Scott

because its just a bunny

doesn't matter what it is...its a symbol for a porn company. Everybody recognises it. And if the child isn't aware of it then they should be told. Otherwises they are endorsing a product unwittingly.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Scott

because its just a bunny

infract most of the merchandise doesnt even say playboy, its just a bunny

i can see why you would be against kids using the 'playboy' brand the bunny thing is different imo

The Bunny that has a Political meaning.


Like Hot Sex.

[Angus]

Anyone who thinks that a well known and unmistakeable soft porn logo is appropriate for children because it's "just a bunny" and kids don't know the connection, are missing the point entirely. It's yet another instance of the sexualization of children - paedophiles certainly know what the brand logo denotes, and in their sick and twisted minds they convince themselves that kids are as sexually available as adults. Why not just give the kid a T shirt with "Come and Get Me" printed on it?

Parents who dress their daughters like LA hookers are particularly vile. I blame the likes of hip hop videos that portray all blokes as powerful, macho types, and the women as begging for it *****s. The likes of Christina Aguilera and Britney Spears are now the role models for little girls And don't try and tell me that kids aren't influenced by pop culture - it's the job of a parent to protect and guide, not be a kid's "friend" by allowing them to wear crap like this.

[MTVN]

I've always found it a bit strange that Playboy was such a popular brand among 12/13 year old girls, but I suppose it doesnt carry the same associations as it does for most adults

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by ~Kerry~

Should it be a 'brand' for children? The stationary and clothing is all over the place - should it be readily available (for kids) given it's foundations?

I'm no prude but Playboy outfits for 5 year olds? No

Got to love the voice of the moral majority, I would be more intent on bannning products that sexualise young children. Padded bras for primary school children etc.

Do you also advocate the boycotting of all of Katie Prices products, her perfume, toys and books as well as childrens clothing, given she was a topless model and has appeared in her own porn movies (somewhat harder porn than the average playboy magazine)?