Possible Twist On The Twist?

[Colbert-Bump]

Could it be that the 2 housemates Jay & Anton put up for eviction, aren't up but instead they will be the people who decide who leaves(Jay & Anton) the house on Friday?:conf:

[chuff me dizzy]

OK TV just confirmed Jay,Anton CAN change nominations bang out of order .no mater whos up i will not vote this week

[Visage]

But that won't generate any voting revenue, would they really throw that away ?

[BBFan Jay16]

OK TV just confirmed Jay,Anton CAN change nominations bang out of order .no mater whos up i will not vote this week

WOW - that's it!! I'm off!! How infuriating!!!

How on earth can they screw with viewers like this?!! :bawling:

[Suze]

Wasn't going to post on this section anymore, just read sometimes. But changing their noms, wouldn't that mean Aaron would have three and Alex two, meaning that Anton and Jay would still be up then?

[In the Drunk Tank]

OK TV just confirmed Jay,Anton CAN change nominations bang out of order .no mater whos up i will not vote this week

Was the Save and Replace in BB11 "bang out of order"?

[Suze]

Was the Save and Replace in BB11 "bang out of order"?

I didn't like save and replace either, but at least there the nominated housemates got to do a fair challenge against each other to have a chance to replace just 'one' of them. How is the latest fair?

[Visage]

Was the Save and Replace in BB11 "bang out of order"?

The S & R was different though. Here we are seeing two housemates have total control against other housemates that don't have a clue what is going on.

The S & R was fair in that all housemates get to play their part. This twist is one sided.

From what I've read so far.

[In the Drunk Tank]

Are you trolling? You have copied and pasted the above in loads of threads. You remind me very much in your posting style of a recently banned member who said they would re join if banned to wind Aaron fans up.

MTVN, is there any way to check if a banned member rejoins do you know?

Err there is but it's problematic, this isn't who you are thinking of though, but tonyface do please stop pasting the same post in numerous threads

I didn't like save and replace either, but at least there the nominated housemates got to do a fair challenge against each other to have a chance to replace just 'one' of them. How is the latest fair?

Well we don't really know what it is yet tbh so it's hard to compare, but I was more talking about the principle of messing with the nomination process, it's not really anything new

The S & R was different though. Here we are seeing two housemates have total control against other housemates that don't have a clue what is going on.

The S & R was fair in that all housemates get to play their part. This twist is one sided.

From what's I've read so far.

Hmm well we don't know that for certain yet but I see your point, people don't like that we might not get the housemates who were actually nominated up for eviction though and that was what was happening with the S&R even if it was done in a less secretive manner. Also in this years CBB we had Pamela have complete control over who'd be facing the vote after she was evicted from the house

[the-gaffer]

It's one thing to mess with the contestants but to blatently cheat the paying public is a disgrace, how can C5 ask anyone else to pay for evictions is beyond me

[Suze]

Thanks for the reply MTVN.