View Full Version : Should eviction this week have been scrapped?
Marmalite
26-10-2011, 05:27 PM
Now that the wicked witch has left the building, should eviction this Friday have been scrapped? Or were BB right to put Harry, Faye and Jay up with 2 1/2 days to go to eviction?
My feeling is that they should have either scrapped it or Jems' boyfriends vote should now be null and void and therefore Harry wouldn't be up.
Alernatively, I think the whole house should have been up to make it more fair to all and to get rid of the dead wood and less deserving HMs.
Instead, all they've done is give Tom, Louise and Alex a free ride to the final.
billy123
26-10-2011, 05:30 PM
Scrapping it would be the norm but with it being so near the end it would be a bit of a waste of a weekend.
Im not liking it only being 9 weeks.
Callum
26-10-2011, 05:33 PM
No it shouldn't have been scrapped but the whole house should have been up instead.
ibkaz
26-10-2011, 05:43 PM
Now that the wicked witch has left the building, should eviction this Friday have been scrapped? Or were BB right to put Harry, Faye and Jay up with 2 1/2 days to go to eviction?
My feeling is that they should have either scrapped it or Jems' boyfriends vote should now be null and void and therefore Harry wouldn't be up.
Alernatively, I think the whole house should have been up to make it more fair to all and to get rid of the dead wood and less deserving HMs.
Instead, all they've done is give Tom, Louise and Alex a free ride to the final.
I didn't know about changes made over Jem leaving till, just now. I think her boyfriends noms should have been void Especially as Jem had threatened to walk over last few days.
luminoussun
26-10-2011, 05:45 PM
whole house up.
It's a chance to remove deadwood
Jesus.
26-10-2011, 05:46 PM
Either all up, or none up. I'd like to see an everyone up policy whenever there is a walker.
Jackie
26-10-2011, 05:48 PM
No Jay needs to go
Ramsay
26-10-2011, 05:48 PM
Should of been the whole house up
No Jay needs to go
I would love to see Jay go, but not this way. As one of the two up for eviction walked, the fair thing to do would have been just to cancel this weeks eviction or just put the whole house up. As much as I dislike some in there, all the four up now deserved to make the final regardless of my feelings towards some of them.
C5 have absolutely no idea this series at all, let's hope though doubtful, that they learn by these mistakes for the next series of BB if there is one.
Razor
26-10-2011, 06:14 PM
Either all up, or none up. I'd like to see an everyone up policy whenever there is a walker.
+1
ibkaz
26-10-2011, 06:25 PM
So they put all those up that had a nom, Alex, Tom and Louse immune as they had no votes, seems a fairish way to go about it.
I'm sure in bb 1 two were up the week nasty nick was kicked out, and I'm sure the one left was just evicted come the friday
Vicky.
26-10-2011, 06:29 PM
Now that the wicked witch has left the building, should eviction this Friday have been scrapped? Or were BB right to put Harry, Faye and Jay up with 2 1/2 days to go to eviction?
My feeling is that they should have either scrapped it or Jems' boyfriends vote should now be null and void and therefore Harry wouldn't be up.
Alernatively, I think the whole house should have been up to make it more fair to all and to get rid of the dead wood and less deserving HMs.
Instead, all they've done is give Tom, Louise and Alex a free ride to the final.
They did, thats why Its Aaron(who had the most) and faye/harry/jay(who had 2 each after jems BFs votes were discounted) are up :tongue:
Yes, we've had one housemate leave this week now, no need to make it two
Should have been the whole house but I hope Faye goes and I'm an Aaron fan
Jords
26-10-2011, 06:55 PM
Nope.
RichardG
26-10-2011, 06:58 PM
No, one more going means one less in the final which means the final will be calmer and people will have a little more interview time. :) unless they were planning a double before the final and now they've changed that to a single, in which case it doesn't really matter.
No, one more going means one less in the final which means the final will be calmer and people will have a little more interview time. :) unless they were planning a double before the final and now they've changed that to a single, in which case it doesn't really matter.
Ahh, yes, we haven't had a double yet, so maybe we won't now then.
Jordan.
26-10-2011, 07:10 PM
No I like they way they've done it.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.