Bring back 'vote to save' campaign!!

[JPG2502]

time to find out what the hell is going on.

the only decent change channel 5 made when they took over the show, now they have blown it.
spam them.

post any contact details on this thread of who to complain to....

bigbrotheruk@channel5.com

[Livia]

I prefer vote to evict, actually.

[billy123]

Vote to evict is far better.

[JPG2502]

Vote to evict is far better.

house full of bores.com

[Macie Lightfoot]

Vote to save (coupled with low ratings and a psychotic fan base with no shame in creating multiple FB accounts) made Aaron win BB12 so it really is flawed.

[CallumJoshuaSturt]

Makes NO DIFFERENCE AT ALL

[FacelessME]

@ troynuncdicit

Would you have to pay credits or whatever to vote on FB?

Granted Aron should not had won, but the bores will remain till the end this year because of the "Vote to Evict". The likes of Wolfie, The Twins, DAN...DAN? WTF!

SERIOUSLY, Ima switch off or throw something at the TV if that lot remain.

[Jord]

Vote to save is better for getting rid of deadweight when more than 2 hm's are up which is why it should have stayed.

[JPG2502]

@ troynuncdicit

Would you have to pay credits or whatever to vote on FB?

Granted Aron should not had won, but the bores will remain till the end this year because of the "Vote to Evict". The likes of Wolfie, The Twins, DAN...DAN? WTF!

SERIOUSLY, Ima switch off or throw something at the TV if that lot remain.

there is no logic in vote to evict. im flabberghasted

[DanielLuis]

If vote to save didn't exist in the last CBB Speidi would have been evicted the first time they went up. How entertaining would it be with all the other housemates in the house withouth them? All the others literally added nothing to the show.
And yet there are people who can't understand the difference. And yet C5, who pushed to save them, are bringing VTE back. I just can't understand it.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Speidi didn't add anything either because they just sat in the corner by themselves and grumbled about everyone else and never actually started any drama so that's a moot point. Especially since CBB11 was the worst series ever because it was all about Speidi.

[JPG2502]

Speidi didn't add anything either because they just sat in the corner by themselves and grumbled about everyone else and never actually started any drama so that's a moot point. Especially since CBB11 was the worst series ever because it was all about Speidi.

They brought in viewers. Without viewers the show will be axed.

[billy123]

They brought in viewers. Without viewers the show will be axed.Only two series of celebrity big brother have ever being lower in the ratings in 11 series of CBB.

spiteful wanker housemates do not attract viewers despite what some claim.

[Macie Lightfoot]

They brought in viewers. Without viewers the show will be axed.

BB's at the lowest point right now and only the dedicated viewers are left watching, they really didn't bring in anyone.

[Maneki-neko]

its never gonna happen

[JPG2502]

Well expect more manipulation from now on to keep in the entertaining ones

[Livia]

Only two series of celebrity big brother have ever being lower in the ratings in 11 series of CBB.

spiteful wanker housemates do not attract viewers despite what some claim.

Near-perfect post.

[Marc]

I prefer vote to evict, actually.

This

[JPG2502]

This

i shall not be detterred !!
the entertainment crushers shall not win

[Black Dagger]

lol at people wanting vote to evict, I can't...

One of them being Troy, who's favourites in BB10 were David and Lisa, that in it'self should be why vote to save >>>

[CaudleHalbard]

The "save your fave" thing always sounded a bit odd, when in reality you might be voting for someone you hate the least of those nommed! :D

Vote to evict feels right and is within the traditions of BB. It's not perfect but, on balance, it's the better system, IMO.

[sampvt]

IMO there are 3 types of voters.

1. The ones that like conflict and love to see the wankers stay in so the program runs hot with conflict for as long as possible and they prefer the vote to save.

2. The ones that like to see the wankers thrown out as early as possible so they cant build a future cash cow for themselves and they like the vote to evict.

3. People like myself that like to see a bit of conflict as long as it does not go over the line and people that like to laugh at the antics of these lab rats that make us all feel better about our own boring lives.....We like the vote to evict as its cheaper and more effective.

[psychtracker]

Is the 'vote to evict' confirmed for the whole season?

[Black Dagger]

Is the 'vote to evict' confirmed for the whole season?

Yep...

So get excited for Jack and Joe eating crisp and Sophie making the odd dumb comment xo

[sampvt]

Is the 'vote to evict' confirmed for the whole season?

The tossers that ruin or run the programme, change their minds as often as I change my channels on the remote. They seem to think messing with the programs ethos is their given right and they keep on searching for the perfect solution and after all these yrs, they are no nearer finding anything better that what ch4 had in the beginning and they cant or wont accept it.

There are too many chiefs and not enough Indians and these decisions are always a test probe but never work.

[Black Dagger]

If they decided next week once Gina goes they realise they can't lose anymore characters and decide VTS slays I'd die :love:

Alas, it isn't meant to be.

[JPG2502]

Yep...

So get excited for Jack and Joe eating crisp and Sophie making the odd dumb comment xo

dont forget callum doing, errr whatever callum does :hugesmile:

[psychtracker]

Yep...

So get excited for Jack and Joe eating crisp and Sophie making the odd dumb comment xo

Great, ok.
I've been advocating for about the last 10 years, that they should do away with nominations. Have the public do a weekly vote on their Fav housemate, then the 3x with the least votes are nominated. Then a 'vote to save'. That's the best way i can think to prevent a 'Jack and Joe' crisp eating finale! ;-)

[CaudleHalbard]

However mildly entertaining it might be, should people be rewarded for bad behaviour by being saved?

That's the underlying philosophical question, I guess.............

[JPG2502]

However mildly entertaining it might be, should people be rewarded for bad behaviour by being saved?

That's the underlying philosophical question, I guess.............

Yes.

[The Human Santapede]

BB will make more money from vote to evict, so they won't change it back.

[YodaBB]

I prefur vote to save :(

[Black Dagger]

However mildly entertaining it might be, should people be rewarded for bad behaviour by being saved?

That's the underlying philosophical question, I guess.............

It depends what you class as 'bad behaviour' Conor last year going in a VTE would have been brilliant, somebody having a couple of arguments and trying to keep the series alive, no they deserve to stay, vote to evict is ridiculous and will kill any potential this series has.

[Vladimir]

BB will make more money from vote to evict, so they won't change it back.

yeah, but they'll lose viewers when all entertaining housemates leave

[Yayita]

Vote to evict is MUCH MUCH Better!!!

[JPG2502]

It depends what you class as 'bad behaviour' Conor last year going in a VTE would have been brilliant, somebody having a couple of arguments and trying to keep the series alive, no they deserve to stay, vote to evict is ridiculous and will kill any potential this series has.

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/big_brother_2013

[Patrick]

I'm actually laughing at people that are defending the vote to evict option - you lot actually contribute nothing, or know nothing about creating a good series.

In reply to the OP - whilst I admire your spunk and fight, campaigns like this are so 2010, they never work anymore. It's not as big a show, and in Channel 5's eyes they really couldn't give two ******s about what we want, as long as Natalie Cassidy is still shining on the health lottery every week, then they're content.

lol at people wanting vote to evict, I can't...

One of them being Troy, who's favourites in BB10 were David and Lisa, that in it'self should be why vote to save >>>

:joker::joker:

[Roy Mars III]

yeah, but they'll lose viewers when all entertaining housemates leave

Gina isn't entertaining though

[Black Dagger]

Gina isn't entertaining though

Not just Gina tho... anybody who does anything of note will go.

[Roy Mars III]

If they bring back Vote To Save it must be a rule that at least 3 people are up at all times, or else it's just the same as Vote to Evict

[flamingGalah!]

Vote to evict is MUCH better...

[Ramsay]

If they bring back Vote To Save it must be a rule that at least 3 people are up at all times, or else it's just the same as Vote to Evict

That is true

[Lewarse]

Vote to evict is MUCH better...



Why is it MUCH better? I haven't seen a single good argument for Eviction over vote to Save.

Vote to Save preserves the most compelling housemates. Evict gets rid of them.

[Headie]

If they decided next week once Gina goes they realise they can't lose anymore characters and decide VTS slays I'd die :love:

Alas, it isn't meant to be.

The odds are getting closer between her and Dexter.

Gina 1/2
Dexter 9/4
Sallie 5/1

If we all voted multiple times to evict Dexter (i.e. more than once) then I think we could actually get him evicted this week and Gina and Sallie would be saved.

[Livia]

I'm actually laughing at people that are defending the vote to evict option - you lot actually contribute nothing, or know nothing about creating a good series........................



Well I guess we haven't all got your vast wealth of life experience, Patrick. What are you now... 16?

[fingers]

Vote to evict, it's all the same to Desmond, so long as you pay he's happy.

[Macie Lightfoot]

lol at people wanting vote to evict, I can't...

One of them being Troy, who's favourites in BB10 were David and Lisa, that in it'self should be why vote to save >>>

If you could point out where I said I want vote to evict, please let me know because all I said was that VTS ultimately didn't make the difference it was expected to make.

And IDK why you're so hung up on my BB10 opinions. Is it that hard to believe not everyone liked Freddie/Marcus/Siavash? BB10 was **** anyways so who cares

[Macie Lightfoot]

Well I guess we haven't all got your vast wealth of life experience, Patrick. What are you now... 16?

SHOTS FIRED!!!

[Good King Glennceslas]

It's been a vote to save since C5 took over Big Brother. The end result is no different.

Don't get the problem tbh.

[evanshil]

Vote to evict isn't better, all of the entertaining housemates will get evicted and the boring ones will stay

[Good King Glennceslas]

But that happened when it was a vote to save?

[cheeky_monkey]

I think vote to save is more better because the entertaining and most talked about housemates stay longer! :D

Hope it goes back to Vote to save when CBB starts :D

[Marcus.]

yesssssssssssssss

[Videostar]

Vote to evict is far better.

No it's clearly not.

Vote to evict protects the boring HM's.

[Macie Lightfoot]

C4 series were great and they were vote to evict :shrug: people get so worked up about VTE vs. VTS but in the grand scheme of things I still don't think it makes a huge difference.

[billy123]

The amount of pissing and moaning by the usual suspects about how dumb the public are (which they dont seem to realise they are part of) didnt decrease at all with vote to save so it cant have been any better.
Some people just like being whiny i suppose.

[JTM45]

Vote to Evict worked perfectly well for many years and it's how it should be.
Vote to Save was a failed experiment in manipulation of the result and raising more revenue.