View Full Version : Minimum of 2 or 3 up?
Do you prefer there to be a minimum of 2 up for eviction or a minimum of 3?
Vicky.
22-06-2013, 11:04 PM
With vote to evict, 2. As with 3+, the quietest one(s) tends to stay easily
Vote to save, as many as possible.
Sophiee
23-06-2013, 12:05 AM
3+ with a vote to save. with a vote to evict it doesn't matter much either way.
Marcus.
23-06-2013, 12:08 AM
3 hm up
Munchkins
23-06-2013, 12:11 AM
3 Housemates :)
Patrick
23-06-2013, 12:13 AM
Half and Half.
VTS - Yes all the time.
VTE - ONLY, if they added Save and Replace. It would of been brilliant.
But no, they're only making it 3 to lure in as much money as they can from the retarded public who still haven't clicked on.
So if they had of used it in say, BB11? Then yes 110% - but because Channel 5 are using it for their own selfish and quite pathetic, money making scheme? Then they can suck my dick to be frank.
CaudleHalbard
23-06-2013, 12:16 AM
It surely depends how the HMs' voting goes?
If they each nominated a different person the whole house would be up! :D
Tulin
23-06-2013, 12:24 AM
In Australia it has always been three up.
Two up is SO freakin weird!!!
aj2463
23-06-2013, 10:36 AM
I've always thought there should be more up
joeysteele
23-06-2013, 10:51 AM
Minimum of 3 but now we have the awful vote to evict it might just as well be 2.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.