Is it fair that Gina and Dexter may get immuned two weeks in a row?

[Jemal]

Is it fair?
I dont think it is fair lol. They shouldn't be allowed to live in the luxury house again or get immuned again. That's just my opinion.

[Brother Leon]

Not if the public are voting to give them that privilege...

[Im_Juz_ChiLLin]

Is it fair?
I dont think it is fair lol. They shouldn't be allowed to live in the luxury house again or get immuned again. That's just my opinion.

Its public who decide we get a chance to vote... if you dont want them in you have the chance to vote, fair is fair.... :joker:

[Niamh.]

They're not my favourites but if the public give it them then that's fair, surely?

[chuff me dizzy]

How can anyone think it is fair ? it says more about if they do

[Vicky.]

Yeah, as its the public choosing. If BB was just putting them in then I would have a problem

Its not their fault the HMs block nominated them last week so they had a chance to go in :tongue:

[Jemal]

But should they even be given the chance to be put in the house again lol.

[Cherie]

If it were BB handing out the priviledge for a second week running then no...but given it is Joe Public voting then I don't have a problem with it, let the most popular couple win..it might not be Dexter or Gina at any rate.

[MrWong]

Yes it is.

[Chuck]

Yes it is.

[Niamh.]

How can anyone think it is fair ? it says more about if they do

It really doesn't Chuff, it's just a different opinion to yours

[Marc]

No it's not.. BB just rigging it to save them

[Fosse]

What exactly would be unfair about it?

[Withano]

I love these results. As if you'd all be saying the same thing if Wolfy and Jemima had two weeks in luxury, immune. You guys.

[Jemal]

I love these results. As if you'd all be saying the same thing if Wolfy and Jemima had two weeks in luxury, immune. You guys.

Lmao this.

[reece(:]

Of course it is if the public are deciding..... :crazy:

[smeagol]

im suprised its a immunity thing . i thought theyd just put the survirors in and gina etc not allowed so sort of. but given its the public choice then no.
they shouldnt do every wek though that would be crazy

[Patricia4]

Yes its fair.

[Blink_Me]

I think it is fair. All the other housemates are more bitchy than those two.

[Maneki-neko]

yes because they're both great housemates

[Jords]

If the public are voting or they win it in a task all HMs are set, of course its fair.

[armand.kay]

Yes because it's not as if big brother chose then specifically they all had a chance of going in last week and they all have a chance this week.

[Shaun]

you can't get fairer than a public vote...

[DanielLuis]

Most people would be saying it wasn't, if it was the twins being chosen in a row. But as it is Dexter and Gina, it's ok for most. And they're actually my two favourites.

[Niamh.]

Most people would be saying it wasn't, if it was the twins being chosen in a row. But as it is Dexter and Gina, it's ok for most. And they're actually my two favourites.

Not really, I'm not a fan of either of those two, but how can anyone argue about fairness if the public decide? Also, it won't be both of them because they've not been paired together

[Benjamin]

Is it fair?
I dont think it is fair lol. They shouldn't be allowed to live in the luxury house again or get immuned again. That's just my opinion.

It's fair if the viewers decide it, lol.

[Spoon]

Nothing about the game is fair per se. Considering that, sure, it's no more or less fair.

[PInternet]

A. They shouldn't have pre-chosen the pairs. This is obviously a ploy to get Dexter and Charlie or Daley and Hazel alone in a bedroom.
B. The two chosen housemates should not be allowed to leave the safe house. Again, thus the only thing that changes from living in the regular house (from the viewer's perspective) is that the two chosen housemates get to be alone at night. Again, Dexter and Charlie or Daley and Hazel ploy. If Dan and Gina (or most anyone else) are voted into the safe house, they will just go in to get treats and then spend the rest of the time back in the regular house before going to sleep at night. What's the point?

I really don't like it when Channel 5 'fixes' the dynamics of the house.

[12bigbrother12]

Yes it is fair, because it is the VIEWERS making them safe.

What isn't fair is what happened in CBB in January, where BB chose to move Speidi into a secret house and BB made Speidi safe.

[Vicky.]

Saying no is quite like saying its unfair to have vote to save and the same person being save every week :laugh:

The only unfair thing about this is the pre-picking of the pairs (which has happened both weeks)

[Jemal]

Jesus. What Im saying is they shouldn't even be allowed to be voted for. Take gina and dexter out of it. And just do a dan and Charlie. They shouldn't be given the chance imo again.

[bez87]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nk_gL1GEYGE&list=UUOIeG57ze1ZVvfpyJIloNrw

hahahahaha just love gina's reaction to the news, it's an absolute classic, she really thought that big brother thought highly of her to keep her in hahahahaha she even starts shaking at some point.

i don't think it's fair to allow them back in, but they have split them up in the pairings, seriously let them pair em up like that, it's ment to be entertaining thats the whole point and it will be. about time channel 5 got some balls and made it entertaining.

[EzzaB]

I don't think they should be given the option tbh, even though I love them both lol.