PDA

View Full Version : Confirmed- Emma to interview Daley on BOTS tonight!


*mazedsalv**
16-07-2013, 10:57 AM
bbspy ‏@bbspy 9m
Confirmed: Emma Willis will interview Daley about his removal from the Big Brother house on tonight's Bit On The Side, 11pm, Channel 5 #bbuk

steviebhoy
16-07-2013, 10:59 AM
At least he'll get a chance to set the record straight!!!

Fosse
16-07-2013, 11:01 AM
At least he'll get a chance to set the record straight!!!

The video already 'set the record straight'.

Bridget51
16-07-2013, 11:02 AM
Good, hope he keeps it real about Hazel and tells all the sordid truth. Thank God they did not leave the interviewing to Rylan and AJ, what a mess up that would have been

Gypsy
16-07-2013, 11:05 AM
wanna see his reaction to his GF interview ahah

smeagol
16-07-2013, 11:06 AM
if he has any sence he will just admit it and say sorry he went to far,
wish they'd let it drop though. im bored of it. more over reactions will be coming form all quarters

steviebhoy
16-07-2013, 11:06 AM
The video already 'set the record straight'.

Not for me it hasn't, the fact that BB allowed him to go stay and stay WITH Hazel until the following morning leaves a lot unanswered in my opinion,

The selective editing and Daley's reaction in the DR to the 'aggressive' behaviour also leads me to believe there is more to it!!

CaudleHalbard
16-07-2013, 11:08 AM
wanna see his reaction to his GF interview ahah

Yes I do hope at least some of the relevant bits are played.

I'll bet Emma is being briefed by Endemol's lawyers: they can't afford (literally can't afford!) any cockups which could lead to them being sued.

bez87
16-07-2013, 11:09 AM
I honestly can't believe people are even questioning things. Daley over stepped the mark, he threatened another HM, he basicly tried to control Hazel, no matter if Hazel pushed him, he was in the wrong. Yes he should of gone straight away, i'm not sure why he went back, but from what i watched, i was terrified for the poor girl, and i have been for a couple of days, something didn't seem right. when he looks at what he said and did, if he denies it or questions it, then what little of a man he is.

Tregard
16-07-2013, 11:10 AM
Seems like a bad idea, ejected housemates should be removed from the show entirely :/

M X
16-07-2013, 11:22 AM
Hmm this shall be interesting.

If I was Emma I'd have extra security at the sides.

CaudleHalbard
16-07-2013, 11:35 AM
If I was Emma I'd have extra security at the sides.

Don't be daft. :D

Wouldn't be surprised if Daley goes into weepy mode - as he did at the start of the series. ;)

Also wouldn't be surprised if he announces he and Katie have made up..............

jackc1806
16-07-2013, 11:37 AM
Give him his interview but he should not be allowed to be a guest on the panel like the other evicted housemates

Gypsy
16-07-2013, 11:38 AM
if rylan were interviewing him daley would knock his teeth out

BigBrotherfan4ever
16-07-2013, 11:43 AM
I honestly can't believe people are even questioning things. Daley over stepped the mark, he threatened another HM, he basicly tried to control Hazel, no matter if Hazel pushed him, he was in the wrong. Yes he should of gone straight away, i'm not sure why he went back, but from what i watched, i was terrified for the poor girl, and i have been for a couple of days, something didn't seem right. when he looks at what he said and did, if he denies it or questions it, then what little of a man he is.

Your dead right, I knew this would end in tears, BB have a lot to answer for this, putting them as a pair in the 1st place for the safe house, when a few days before they were, interviewing his girlfriend & saw how upset she was.

emmetmcl
16-07-2013, 11:51 AM
Is BOTS recorded tonight?

If so we'll probably get a very watered down interview

smudgie
16-07-2013, 11:52 AM
I don't think he should be allowed his " right to reply"
He had his chance to explain himself in the dr.
BBOTS will do anything for viewing figures, having his girlfriend on the show proved that.
I like BBOTS but it is turning into a low budget version of The Jeremy Kyle show.

CaudleHalbard
16-07-2013, 12:00 PM
There is a danger Daley could end up as being seen as the victim of unfair treatment and gain public sympathy.

But on balance I feel it's right he should be allowed to have his say when he is sober, rather than drunk.

Can't help feeling lawyers are behind this.

user104658
16-07-2013, 12:13 PM
He will have had legal advice and they will have told him to say that it was role play that we t too far, that he didn't realise she was scared at the time but he does now, and that he's sorry.

Anything other than that would be absolutely awful PR for him.

I do also feel that it's mainly accurate... not sure if he really does think she was scared and he didn't realise, but the rest is true of what happened. Role play that went too far because of a build up oc testosterone and frustration. Whether she was scared or not though, it's right that he went... he took it "too far for TV", and should have realised that it was a step beyond most peoples comfort zone.

I dont know why people are so bothered that she hugged him afterwards, that she was allowed to go back to the room with him, etc... it's not like he tried to stab her. I believe that he scared her with his actions - that doesn't mean she's scared of him as a person or dislikes him. or that she was at any risk after they were called away.

CaudleHalbard
16-07-2013, 12:22 PM
right that he went... he took it "too far for TV", and should have realised that it was a step beyond most peoples comfort zone.

I dont know why people are so bothered that she hugged him afterwards, that she was allowed to go back to the room with him, etc... it's not like he tried to stab her. I believe that he scared her with his actions - that doesn't mean she's scared of him as a person or dislikes him. or that she was at any risk after they were called away.

Well put.

"Too far for TV" is about right. I wouldn't be totally shocked if they got together for mag deals etc after Hazel is evicted.

Depends how far she wants to go with playing the victim. Her carefree demeanour today suggests not very far at all! ;)

bananarama
16-07-2013, 12:28 PM
The video already 'set the record straight'.

Agreed. There is no justification for his behavour. If a man feels provoked by a woman then a man would walk away. All he had to do was say to big brother "I want to cool off and get sober away from Hazel"

Daley was abusive at all levels. Physical and mental. I do hope Emma does not shower him with sympathy. The mental stress he has caused his girfriend is also a disgrace.....

LikeABoatOnWater
16-07-2013, 12:32 PM
I hope he doesn't smack her one :sad:

user104658
16-07-2013, 12:33 PM
Well put.

"Too far for TV" is about right. I wouldn't be totally shocked if they got together for mag deals etc after Hazel is evicted.

Depends how far she wants to go with playing the victim. Her carefree demeanour today suggests not very far at all! ;)

I don't think she sees herself as a victim or would want to play the victim role, to be honest. It wouldn't fit with what we've seen of her so far. So far she seems to have said "he has a different side to him I'm not sure about, he took something a bit too far and scared me" which is probably accurate. He HAS let a few strange attitudes slip before this happened; a bit jealous, a bit insecure, a bit controlling. And he did take it too far and showed another side of himself because, even if it was completely consentual role-playing, it was at least obvious that it's a role he LIKES to play and was very comfortable playing. Definitely didn't seem like he was treading new ground for him. Which as I've said in another thread, is fine between consenting adults... but, it does demonstrate that he enjoys consentual dominance over women which is a side of him we hadn't seen and something that not everyone is on board with.

I feel sorry for her really, she's on a but of a tightrope with the situation regarding her status in the house, the sort of person she sees herself as out of the house, and her true feelings on that matter. When they were announcing it it was like she wanted to pretend it wasn't happening and sweep it under the carpet. She does not want to come out of that house as "Hazel, victim of intimidation".

user104658
16-07-2013, 12:38 PM
Agreed. There is no justification for his behavour. If a man feels provoked by a woman then a man would walk away. All he had to do was say to big brother "I want to cool off and get sober away from Hazel"

Daley was abusive at all levels. Physical and mental. I do hope Emma does not shower him with sympathy. The mental stress he has caused his girfriend is also a disgrace.....

I very much doubt she'll show much overt sympathy... like I said I think the interview will most likely have been heavily scripted by lawyers to be funtional on her side, and for him to say he thought it was just playing, now realises it went way too far, isn't really like that, and is sorry.

He has supporters who believe he did nothing wrong but also, plenty of viewers will be seeing him as an abuser. Ch5 / the producers know this, it would be suicide to have Emma be overly sympathetic or make excuses for him.

rionablue
16-07-2013, 12:46 PM
Daley should in NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM be granted an interview. He was booted out of the house in disgrace. I think walkers and people who are ejected from the house have no right to the limelite in this way and I am DISGUSTED that they are granting him an interview. Im willing to bet that he will lay blame at Hazels feet considering what he said about her before he left the house. VILE VILE VILE

Livia
16-07-2013, 12:49 PM
At least he'll get a chance to set the record straight!!!

Haha... yes. You mean he will have been briefed by the lawyers and the PR team about what to say. How he doesn't condone violence to women, that he was drunk, that he regrets it, that it was a moment of madness... I could write the bloody script myself.

He struck a woman and grabbed her round the threat telling her to "respect her elders" while the camera recorded it. Don't see what you're imagining he can "set straight".

CaudleHalbard
16-07-2013, 01:03 PM
It is unfortunate that so many TiBB members see things in black and white terms, i.e. it's all one person's fault or the other's.

I guess it's a consequence of the age profile on here- heavily weighed towards the lower end of the scale.

The world is not black and white, as many will eventually learn. You could almost say it is........ 50 shades of grey! ;)

Fosse
16-07-2013, 01:10 PM
Yes, he's a vile thug..wonder if he will take anything positive from his pointless month in the BB house.

user104658
16-07-2013, 01:14 PM
It is unfortunate that so many TiBB members see things in black and white terms, i.e. it's all one person's fault or the other's.

I guess it's a consequence of the age profile on here- heavily weighed towards the lower end of the scale.

The world is not black and white, as many will eventually learn. You could almost say it is........ 50 shades of grey! ;)

I agree, also the reason that a lot of people seem to rewrite history to suit whoever they're a fan of... it's a very "young" thing to do, to see a situation based on who your friends are, rather than look objectively even if it means saying that a friend (or in this case, a housemate you like) has done something wrong even if it's against someone you dislike.

I'm actually really enjoying this year because I'm NOT picking sides and I'm not a huge fan of any of them. it makes it much more interesting, seeing a whole unbiased range of motivations and things they're experiencing in there. Hazel is often fake and nasty, but that doesn't mean she never has a real emotion and doesn't deserve any empathy, at the end of the day she's just a person too.

I mean... I like Dexter a lot, I find him hilarious, but I wouldn't trust the little bugger as far as I could throw him! he's very open about being a manipulator... which is oddly endearing.

I dint like Dan much but I can see that it's just how he is, a bit bitchy, a bit paranoid and he has his good moments too. funnily enough even though he's older, he does play the "taking sides" game where his friends are automatically in the right always. He's quite immature in many ways.

I can come up with positives and negatives for all of them, which I haven't been able to do in previous years, as I always "picked a camp" and rooted for them.

Raph
16-07-2013, 01:36 PM
I'm very happy to hear this. Whilst he clearly stepped over the mark, I hope he exposes Hazel for what she is on his interview tonight on BOTS. She deserved to be ejected just as much as he did.

Livia
16-07-2013, 01:41 PM
It is unfortunate that so many TiBB members see things in black and white terms, i.e. it's all one person's fault or the other's.

I guess it's a consequence of the age profile on here- heavily weighed towards the lower end of the scale.

The world is not black and white, as many will eventually learn. You could almost say it is........ 50 shades of grey! ;)

I don't think you have any idea of the age profile of TiBB. And what's more, age doesn't always bring wisdom, sadly. I can tell you that in this case, from a legal point of view, it is very much a black and white issue. Clear cut and irrefutable thanks to the video evidence.

Livia
16-07-2013, 01:42 PM
I'm very happy to hear this. Whilst he clearly stepped over the mark, I hope he exposes Hazel for what she is on his interview tonight on BOTS. She deserved to be ejected just as much as he did.

Clearly not. Whatever you think she did, it wasn't assault. If she had done something to warrant being ejected, she would be out now.

joeysteele
16-07-2013, 02:04 PM
Haha... yes. You mean he will have been briefed by the lawyers and the PR team about what to say. How he doesn't condone violence to women, that he was drunk, that he regrets it, that it was a moment of madness... I could write the bloody script myself.

He struck a woman and grabbed her round the threat telling her to "respect her elders" while the camera recorded it. Don't see what you're imagining he can "set straight".

I 100% agree with all you say Livia, of course it will be that old excuse in the main, I was drunk as if that should ever be a valid excuse for anything,never mind actually assaulting someone and further saying they will 'finish them' or that they will 'nut them'.

I am not expecting this to be a particularly good interview and frankly see no reason why it should even be done either.

Cherie
16-07-2013, 02:10 PM
I 100% agree with all you say Livia, of course it will be that old excuse in the main, I was drunk as if that should ever be a valid excuse for anything,never mind actually assaulting someone and further saying they will 'finish them' or that they will 'nut them'.

I am not expecting this to be a particularly good interview and frankly see no reason why it should even be done either.

They gave his girlfriend a platform, they have to give him the right to reply, it would be fairly biased otherwise, even those who commit the most henious of crimes get the right to defend themselves. I'm looking forward to seeing him squirm I must admit.

susie q
16-07-2013, 02:12 PM
I hope that the audience get a chance to question him. After that he should just disappear
and not be allowed back to the panel, or any of the otherr events.

user104658
16-07-2013, 02:12 PM
I can tell you that in this case, from a legal point of view, it is very much a black and white issue.

This isn't quite accurate, there's plenty of legal scope for shades of grey here. That he was in the wrong is not disputable... however the fact that she was initially a willing participant would be taken into account in a court of law. Not making him "innocent", but probably resulting in a less harsh response than, say, if he had done and said the same things to someone who had been obviously intimidated from the start.

Razor
16-07-2013, 02:16 PM
I hope she gives him a hard time.

joeysteele
16-07-2013, 02:19 PM
I 100% agree with all you say Livia, of course it will be that old excuse in the main, I was drunk as if that should ever be a valid excuse for anything,never mind actually assaulting someone and further saying they will 'finish them' or that they will 'nut them'.

I am not expecting this to be a particularly good interview and frankly see no reason why it should even be done either.

They gave his girlfriend a platform, they have to give him the right to reply, it would be fairly biased otherwise, even those who commit the most henious of crimes get the right to defend themselves. I'm looking forward to seeing him squirm I must admit.

Hi Cherie,personally, I think he lost his right to reply by his actions in the house. However I can take what you say on board too and like you said it will be interesting to see him squirm,if he does.

Samuel.
16-07-2013, 02:27 PM
I hope he doesn't smack her one :sad:

#pray4emma

mr rochester
16-07-2013, 02:28 PM
Seems like a bad idea, ejected housemates should be removed from the show entirely :/

I completely agree ! He has disgraced himself - he clearly had no idea he was being abusive so why give the thug a voice? It is totally irrelevant what he thinks about being sent home - we saw the film. Why support men like this and give them a platform? Ten to one his GF takes him back and he will somehow make this whole thing her fault and she will be found in a heap somewhere after he smashes her to bits. H should be arrested NOT invited onto TV programmes. He had his day - made a total idiot of himself and now what...Has Emma been given a bodyguard? What is wrong with this production team?

Ramsay
16-07-2013, 02:29 PM
i hope when she introduces him, no one claps or boos..just silence

mr rochester
16-07-2013, 02:43 PM
It is unfortunate that so many TiBB members see things in black and white terms, i.e. it's all one person's fault or the other's.

I guess it's a consequence of the age profile on here- heavily weighed towards the lower end of the scale.

The world is not black and white, as many will eventually learn. You could almost say it is........ 50 shades of grey! ;)

Please advise how old everyone who subscribes to this forum is and how you deduce that opinion is age related?

I would say that in some cases spelling and grammar could be construed as age related on our forum - but not opinion.

When I am ninety I will still see and opine that an abusive man standing over a physically weaker woman and threatening her is a thug and his behaviour is therefore reprehensible. I would have said the same thing twenty years ago too. Where abuse is concerned there is no grey - it IS black and white if it happens. It happened - we saw it. He is so used to behaving in this way it does not even register with him that he is abusive. Did you watch the live feed when Hazel was outside and he gave her a countdown for coming back to him instead of "gossiping' outside? Did you notice his alter-ego takes over and talks in a different voice and barks what he is feeling?

I really don't see how my opinion can be age related...At any age he is a thug and an oik and sinisterly dangerous to be around.

Fosse
16-07-2013, 02:52 PM
Not for me it hasn't, the fact that BB allowed him to go stay and stay WITH Hazel until the following morning leaves a lot unanswered in my opinion,

The selective editing and Daley's reaction in the DR to the 'aggressive' behaviour also leads me to believe there is more to it!!

How else can you edit? Tautology much?

The video speaks volumes.

amu
16-07-2013, 02:52 PM
Lets hope this man gets a dignified exit. He deserved better than this.

dyfed
16-07-2013, 03:08 PM
I agree he went way too far and should have been evicted from the show ,but I do feel Hazel stepped over the mark by pulling down his shorts and should have lost being saved from eviction.

mr rochester
16-07-2013, 03:15 PM
I agree he went way too far and should have been evicted from the show ,but I do feel Hazel stepped over the mark by pulling down his shorts and should have lost being saved from eviction.

Yes - she should have had to relinquish her right to being safe as a punishment for her behaviour and also to make it a more level playing field for the others - however - HIS behaviour was entirely reprehensible and she made no contribution to that whatsoever. She was trying to be playful (but she is not famous for her good judgement calls...)

snail69
16-07-2013, 03:43 PM
I don't think you have any idea of the age profile of TiBB. And what's more, age doesn't always bring wisdom, sadly. I can tell you that in this case, from a legal point of view, it is very much a black and white issue. Clear cut and irrefutable thanks to the video evidence.

I think it's pretty clear of the age profile of this forum. All you have to do is read most of the posts and how they are structured to be able to see that.

I also wouldn't say it's clear cut or irrefutable or everyone would share the same opinion.

Rylan said himself last night that he's watched the whole thing several times but still can't decide if it was malicious or not.

To be honest I don't even know where I stand about the whole thing but I do believe he should be able to have his say.

I can't get my head around someone being terrified yet they proceed to share cuddles and a room with the person that terrified them. Surely if she was terrified she would have asked to be separated??

I ain't condoning his behaviour but at the same time plenty of women out there do enjoy a bit of rough during foreplay or indeed during sex.

Nobody on this forum is really in the position to say that it wasn't this but it was that because none of us know the truth. Not the real truth, only two people do!

BCFCMike
16-07-2013, 03:58 PM
I'm very happy to hear this. Whilst he clearly stepped over the mark, I hope he exposes Hazel for what she is on his interview tonight on BOTS. She deserved to be ejected just as much as he did.

What?!

Are you for real? :conf:

Niamh.
16-07-2013, 03:59 PM
Don't be daft. :D

Wouldn't be surprised if Daley goes into weepy mode - as he did at the start of the series. ;)

Also wouldn't be surprised if he announces he and Katie have made up..............

She'd be a very silly girl if that happens

reece(:
16-07-2013, 03:59 PM
He doesn't deserve a chance to "tell his side of the story" when the footage was clear.. He assaulted Hazel and doesn't deserve redemption.

Niamh.
16-07-2013, 04:00 PM
i hope when she introduces him, no one claps or boos..just silence

With that audience? Highly doubtful, they'll all probably blame Hazel and take his side. I hope Emma is stern with him

Jesus.
16-07-2013, 04:02 PM
It is unfortunate that so many TiBB members see things in black and white terms, i.e. it's all one person's fault or the other's.

I guess it's a consequence of the age profile on here- heavily weighed towards the lower end of the scale.

The world is not black and white, as many will eventually learn. You could almost say it is........ 50 shades of grey! ;)

How old are you CH?

Spoon
16-07-2013, 04:03 PM
He doesn't deserve any attention. He's a scumbag.

snail69
16-07-2013, 04:05 PM
He doesn't deserve a chance to "tell his side of the story" when the footage was clear.. He assaulted Hazel and doesn't deserve redemption.

Just because he gets to tell his side of events it doesn't mean he will get redemption. Redemption would be getting let back into the house.

arista
16-07-2013, 04:09 PM
bbspy ‏@bbspy 9m
Confirmed: Emma Willis will interview Daley about his removal from the Big Brother house on tonight's Bit On The Side, 11pm, Channel 5 #bbuk

Good
as what we got on Ch5 last night was Edited to much

CaudleHalbard
16-07-2013, 04:10 PM
. He assaulted Hazel and doesn't deserve redemption.

They were assaulting each other all night long until Hazel got scared when she heard those terrifying words:

"This is Big Brother..................."

At that point she knew there was a possibility BOTH of them would get kicked out for turning the safe house into a house of ill-repute. The possibility of leaving through the back door in disgrace and losing all those lucrative mag deals etc. She had a lot more to lose than Daley.

You could sense her relief in the DR when she was told it was only a formal warning. Which is why she is feeling so happy today. ;)

arista
16-07-2013, 04:11 PM
He doesn't deserve any attention. He's a scumbag.


But at 11PM
I think thats OK.


Emma wil not let him walk all over her.

Marsh.
16-07-2013, 04:13 PM
They were assaulting each other all night long until Hazel got scared when she heard those terrifying words:

"This is Big Brother..................."

At that point she knew there was a possibility BOTH of them would get kicked out for turning the safe house into a house of ill-repute. The possibility of leaving through the back door in disgrace and losing all those lucrative mag deals etc. She had a lot more to lose than Daley.

You could sense her relief in the DR when she was told it was only a formal warning. Which is why she is feeling so happy today. ;)

They were both playing and flirting. Daley got serious and was no longer playing.

Hazel clearly felt the change in tone as her giggling became awkward and she went quiet.

From his "respect your ****ing elders" onwards it had bugger all to do with any play acting, especially as this was exactly the tone he took in the diary room "Hazel is disrespecting me" etc.

Niamh.
16-07-2013, 04:15 PM
They were both playing and flirting. Daley got serious and was no longer playing.

Hazel clearly felt the change in tone as her giggling became awkward and she went quiet.

From his "respect your ****ing elders" onwards it had bugger all to do with any play acting, especially as this was exactly the tone he took in the diary room "Hazel is disrespecting me" etc.

Yeah, he mentioned respect and disrespect quite alot, that's pretty telling imo

Vicky.
16-07-2013, 04:18 PM
Usually if a HM is ejected they have nothing else to do with the show. I do wonder if lawyers have got involved somewhere down the line and maybe thats why he's getting a say?

I dont know..might just be for ratings too.

arista
16-07-2013, 04:21 PM
Usually if a HM is ejected they have nothing else to do with the show. I do wonder if lawyers have got involved somewhere down the line and maybe thats why he's getting a say?

I dont know..might just be for ratings too.



More like his Agent said we can go to the Daily Mirror if you prefer
and go on Ch4News.

So its best they do not chuck him to the kerb.



Also is it PreRecorded?

Livia
16-07-2013, 04:27 PM
This isn't quite accurate, there's plenty of legal scope for shades of grey here. That he was in the wrong is not disputable... however the fact that she was initially a willing participant would be taken into account in a court of law. Not making him "innocent", but probably resulting in a less harsh response than, say, if he had done and said the same things to someone who had been obviously intimidated from the start.

I can assure you that what I said was perfectly accurate. Being a "willing participant" in any form does not excuse him striking her, nor does it excuse him laying his hands on her in an aggressive way. Whether or not she was "obviously intimidated", it doesn't detract from the fact that he assaulted her.

Novo
16-07-2013, 04:29 PM
Usually if a HM is ejected they have nothing else to do with the show. I do wonder if lawyers have got involved somewhere down the line and maybe thats why he's getting a say?

I dont know..might just be for ratings too.

I think Emily was on BBLB straight after she got kicked out, i can remember her apology speech but yeah i can't remember anyone else

user104658
16-07-2013, 05:43 PM
I can assure you that what I said was perfectly accurate. Being a "willing participant" in any form does not excuse him striking her, nor does it excuse him laying his hands on her in an aggressive way. Whether or not she was "obviously intimidated", it doesn't detract from the fact that he assaulted her.

I didn't say it excuses him, in fact I specifically said he was undoubtedly in the wrong, I was only saying that in terms of legality, it isn't black and white. In terms of whether or not it was assault, maybe it is, but in terms of any sentencing it would definitely be taken into consideration, and he would be less harshly punished.

I'm not sticking up for him or trying to vilify her - she didn't do anything wrong, they were just playing, and he should have stopped when she stopped beingcomfortae but he didn't. There's still no excuse for his actions. Just pointing out that saying its "black and white" in legal terms isn't accurate. Very few things are black and white in legal terms. Even murder isn't.

CaudleHalbard
16-07-2013, 05:53 PM
The interview should be interesting. If Daley has been well advised, he would force Emma onto the back foot right from the start. E.g. he could imply he is getting most of the blame only because he is being stereotyped..... big black man with tattoos and muscles etc.

That would put the spotlight on BB's actions and Emma would end up on the defensive.

But it could be quite different of course!

aman201
16-07-2013, 05:54 PM
Cant wait!

Jack_
16-07-2013, 06:22 PM
He definitely deserves an interview, BOTS is always going on about people's 'right to reply'. When someone gives their side of the story, they promise the other person will be allowed to too...and I've always felt that was fair. Emma said this straight after Katie's interview that Hazel will be given her 'right to reply'. This is no different, and it doesn't matter what anyone of us thinks of the situation or of him, he should be entitled to respond.

Jackie S
16-07-2013, 06:23 PM
Just wanted to add a comment to this thread. The signs of controlling behaviour were evident on Sunday nights show. Hazel was in the shower doorway talking to Daley when Daley started telling her he wanted to see her more natural and that she shouldn't wear so much make-up. It rang alarm bells with me because it was almost an order as opposed to a suggestion. It made me feel uncomfortable then and after last nights show my thoughts were well and truly confirmed. Those threats he made to Hazel did not sound like play to me. That's extremely worrying, controlling behaviour and at times he seemed very close to losing it altogether. I would be surprised if that is the first time in his life he has acted in that way. . . . .