This years nomination farce ....

[chuff me dizzy]

It is getting crazier by the week now ,why 5 up ?? In other years its been 2 ,but this year stupid amounts of them I think its a twist to save producers blue eyed favourites

[Withano]

Can you imagine the backlash if Gina and Dexter had the 4th and 5th highest amount of noms but were put up with the top three. Its a shame nobody cares about the odd and bias sudden unexplained rule change because it benefits their favourites.

[Vanessa]

It's about time the twins and Jackie were put up for eviction. :thumbs2:

[chuff me dizzy]

Can you imagine the backlash if Gina and Dexter had the 4th and 5th highest amount of noms but were put up with the top three. Its a shame nobody cares about the odd and bias sudden unexplained rule change because it benefits their favourites.

Exactly ,but its just stupid ,all that many up week after week

[00Jamie00]

Prefer 5 than only 2

[Withano]

Exactly ,but its just stupid ,all that many up week after week

I'm with you on this one Chuff. There should be one rule and they should stick to it. Ridiculous decision to add the extras.

[Calderyon]

More nominees brings more Money. Or the fact that they want to protect someone or someones from eviction. (I still think it´s D&G)

[Jordan.]

Their logic is ridiculous. Instead of changing the nomination process to save big characters why not just go back to vote to save :crazy:

[Calderyon]

Now you know how we have felt on our BB for 6 series now.

[Daffodil]

All I know is that Jackie Travers is up!!! Yayyy there is a God!

[Vanessa]

All I know is that Jackie Travers is up!!! Yayyy there is a God!

:joker: My feelings exactly.

[RichardG]

Their logic is ridiculous. Instead of changing the nomination process to save big characters why not just go back to vote to save :crazy:

Exactly. Vote to save with a minimum of three up and they're sorted.

[Jake.]

I'm all for this, four-way evictions>>> and you just know that this thread wouldn't have been made if Jackie was not up

[Josy]

The more up the better

[Shaun]

It is strange. But I don't think it's going to help Dexter or Gina. If they were up against Callum, he would go. No question.

[armand.kay]

I would care if it didn't benefit my faves xox

[Withano]

I'm all for this, four-way evictions>>> and you just know that this thread wouldn't have been made if Jackie was not up

But you just know that if Gina and Dexter had the 4th and 5th highest amount of noms, the thread would have been made at least 30 times..

[fingers]

BB have said from the very first, "BB makes the rules, BB can change the rules at any time" how very convenient.

[Jake.]

I'm all for this, four-way evictions>>> and you just know that this thread wouldn't have been made if Jackie was not up

[chuff me dizzy]

I'm with you on this one Chuff. There should be one rule and they should stick to it. Ridiculous decision to add the extras.

Just no need whatsoever for it ,apart from greed and trying to save their favs ,lets be honest here we have never been able to prove WE decide ,its all down to trust ,and this year I dont feel I can trust them

[chuff me dizzy]

But you just know that if Gina and Dexter had the 4th and 5th highest amount of noms, the thread would have been made at least 30 times..

EXACTLY..No one has been nominated as many times as these 2 ,but still they are in there ? I smell a big fat ,rat

[daniel-lewis-1985]

BB have said from the very first, "BB makes the rules, BB can change the rules at any time" how very convenient.

Yes.

They are the boss.

Deal with it.

[chuff me dizzy]

I'm all for this, four-way evictions>>> and you just know that this thread wouldn't have been made if Jackie was not up

:bored:

[smeagol]

EXACTLY..No one has been nominated as many times as these 2 ,but still they are in there ? I smell a big fat ,rat

lol

[smeagol]

secrets & lies secrets & lies

[Vanessa]

lol

O maybe they have enough fans to keep them in. :dance2:

[fingers]

Yes.

They are the boss.

Deal with it.

Not my problem, sorry to disappoint you. :dance: