This show has gone back 5 years!

[JPG2502]

The evolution of the show, allowing the public to vote for there favourites.

Why the F did they change the voting back to negative ?!?

[Scotty07]

The best change bringing vote to save in and worst was taking it away. Vote to evict is the most selfish way of voting, hate it.

[Maneki-neko]

I really don't get why everybody is so obsessed with vote to save. BB 2012 was still boring like 50% of the time and Lydia and other big characters still went home with it. It seems like a lot of people's logic is flawed.

[Ramsay]

I really don't get why everybody is so obsessed with vote to evict. BB 2012 was still boring like 50% of the time and Lydia and other big characters still went home with it. It seems like a lot of people's logic is flawed.

Many of those evictions were one on ones..essentially making it vote to evict..when vote to save is in, there needs to be at least 3 up for it to work properly

[Patrick]

Because they are morons who are incapable of running a decent show and CONSTANTLY make backwards choices.

[Macie Lightfoot]

VTS vs. VTE is a tired out debate because ultimately it doesn't make much of a difference

[CaudleHalbard]

VTS was pretty crap in reality.

[RichardG]

I really don't get why everybody is so obsessed with vote to save. BB 2012 was still boring like 50% of the time and Lydia and other big characters still went home with it. It seems like a lot of people's logic is flawed.

That's because they still kept the evictions one on one, making it the same as VTE. They finally saw sense this series by making sure 3+ people are up... but then they removed VTS. :nono:

[SSL2012]

££££ talks. To evict must draw more votes.

[iRyan]

VTS only works if there are 3 or more people up, but with this new rule where they have 3+ people up each week - it would've been PERFECT. Such a missed opportunity.

[Lex]

Does anyone know what the voting percentages were for tonight?....because I really don't thinks it makes a difference tbh.