Emma's interview of Hazel was the best she has ever given

[jegmeister]

Contrary to the rubbish posted by some on this Forum, Emma actually gave a superb interview.

There was an overwhelming majority of people who wanted Hazel out and they wanted answers. Notably why Hazel did not play it safe given the mixed signals about his girlfriend that Daley was giving (and despite what Hazel fans say, they were - I can go into that in more detail if necessary but he on a number of occasions explained the difficult situation he was in) and in particular now that she knows, does she regret it and think it was a mistake? The honest answer from anyone with any moral conscience whatsoever would be to say yes and if Hazel had done, that would have been the end of it and they could have moved on to another question.

But Hazel, like the lying narcissist she is, repeated the same rubbish over and over again, never answering the question. So Emma kept pressing her, as any good interviewer would. And quite rightly would not let up. Don't blame Emma for Hazel's dishonesty in the interview.

[CaudleHalbard]

Emma wasn't asking the right questions. That was the problem.

She should have asked why Hazel lied and got Daley ejected as a consequence.

[sampvt]

I admit she was persistent but you failed to notice she never got her answer. Emma is lovely but last night she came across as a woman scorned by hazel herself. Maybe Emma has had a BF stolen from her because the interview had 1 vain running through it (admit you were wrong) she failed to secure that statement and missed loads of stuff relevant to Emmas golden girl Gina.

Hardly her finest hour and certainly not a great interview at all.

[jegmeister]

I admit she was persistent but you failed to notice she never got her answer. Emma is lovely but last night she came across as a woman scorned by hazel herself. Maybe Emma has had a BF stolen from her because the interview had 1 vain running through it (admit you were wrong) she failed to secure that statement and missed loads of stuff relevant to Emmas golden girl Gina.

Hardly her finest hour and certainly not a great interview at all.

This seems a bizarre argument. Why is it Emma's fault if someone just flat out lies and keeps on lying? If someone swears that black is blue no matter what evidence you show them, what are you supposed to do? Use thumbscrews? She pushed as hard as she could reasonably have expected to do.

[user104658]

Emma wasn't asking the right questions. That was the problem.

She should have asked why Hazel lied and got Daley ejected as a consequence.

An interviewer goes on facts not opinions or assumptions. To say "why did you lie and..." is stating an opinion and only invites the answer "I didn't lie".

Even Emma Willis is a better interviewer than that.

There are plenty of people who don't think she "lied", and she certainly didn't want Daley to be ejected, believing that is just nonsensical. Even if you're one of those who thinks she is cold / heartless / ruthless... why on earth would she deliberately destroy her own "main storyline"? Daft.

[Marsh.]

People wanted answers? She's not a murderer.

Why does Hazel warrant a harsh interview and Daley a nice one where Emma can pass him the kleenex?

Hazel's criticised for sticking up for herself and articulately explaining her actions. Daley's pitied after blaming all his actions on Hazel.

:rolleyes: Thank god it's over. Gina out next....

[CaudleHalbard]

It well be interesting to see if there is any change in Hazel's demeanour tonight after she had a chance to absorb all the Hazel-hate out there.

Incidentally, it looks like Iain Lee will NOT be giving her a hard time, if his recent tweet is anything to go by.

[Marsh.]

An interviewer goes on facts not opinions or assumptions. To say "why did you lie and..." is stating an opinion and only invites the answer "I didn't lie".

Even Emma Willis is a better interviewer than that.

There are plenty of people who don't think she "lied", and she certainly didn't want Daley to be ejected, believing that is just nonsensical. Even if you're one of those who thinks she is cold / heartless / ruthless... why on earth would she deliberately destroy her own "main storyline"? Daft.

Exactly, and if she wanted to capitalise on his ejection she sure didn't milk it, or make a song and dance about it.

Had that been Gina, we'd never hear the end of it.

[CaudleHalbard]

An interviewer goes on facts not opinions or assumptions. To say "why did you lie and..." is stating an opinion and only invites the answer "I didn't lie".



David Frost has been known to ask straight out: Why did you lie? And he is one of the world's top interviewers.

But if you use a little common sense, you will be able to think of ways of showing how Hazel lied without even using the term.

Unfortunately Emma is simply not up to that sort of interview. As I have said before she is only suited to light and fluffy.

[Kizzy]

Shame she didn't ask daley why he lied...
And why he used every excuse in the book to squirm his way out of the hole he was in, those who saw the live feed saw his stance and felt the tension.
I defy anyone to give a logical explanation as to how he ducked out of responsibility for that incident.

[anne666]

NO she didn't it was dire. Hazel completely dominated it repeating the same sentences constantly and Emma was clueless.

[anne666]

David Frost has been known to ask straight out: Why did you lie? And he is one of the world's top interviewers.

But if you use a little common sense, you will be able to think of ways of showing how Hazel lied without even using the term.

Unfortunately Emma is simply not up to that sort of interview. As I have said before she is only suited to light and fluffy.

O I agree with you for once.:joker:

[CaudleHalbard]

The trouble is none of the BB presenters has to courage to suggest to Hazel that she - overall - enjoyed the incident in the safe house and to follow up with effective questions if she denies it. ;)

"Why didn't you........

- ask Daley to stop it

- shout out

etc etc"

"You only seemed to get worried when you heard the words "This is Big Brother......"

That is the only way to nail Hazel's lies about the incident. Daley is a a knuckleheaded piece of junk whose existence I would prefer not to acknowledge! Let me make that abundantly clear.

However, in the debate about whether the incident was playfighting or not I believe him and not Hazel.

[MrWong]

I admit she was persistent but you failed to notice she never got her answer. Emma is lovely but last night she came across as a woman scorned by hazel herself. Maybe Emma has had a BF stolen from her because the interview had 1 vain running through it (admit you were wrong) she failed to secure that statement and missed loads of stuff relevant to Emmas golden girl Gina.

Hardly her finest hour and certainly not a great interview at all.

She did. Hazel finally admitted that although Daley said he didn't have a girlfriend, she knew that he did. As did most of the house.

[anne666]

The trouble is none of the BB presenters has to courage to suggest to Hazel that she - overall - enjoyed the incident in the safe house and to follow up with effective questions if she denies it. ;)

"Why didn't you........

- ask Daley to stop it

- shout out

etc etc"

"You only seemed to get worried when you heard the words "This is Big Brother......"

That is the only way to nail Hazel's lies about the incident. Daley is a a knuckleheaded piece of junk whose existence I would prefer not to acknowledge! Let me make that abundantly clear.

However, in the debate about whether the incident was playfighting or not I believe him and not Hazel.
Back to disagreeing with you and this has been argued about now to the point of AGGGHHHHHH !!!!

[the_answers]

She a very good interviewer but I really can't stand her stroppy defensiveness.

When she gets up on her high horse she's like a strict bossy and slightly nasty schoolteacher (along with that annoying nagging voice).

She also has this slightly irritating habit of constantly laughing at her own jokes.

[lippyzippy]

Contrary to the rubbish posted by some on this Forum, Emma actually gave a superb interview.

There was an overwhelming majority of people who wanted Hazel out and they wanted answers. Notably why Hazel did not play it safe given the mixed signals about his girlfriend that Daley was giving (and despite what Hazel fans say, they were - I can go into that in more detail if necessary but he on a number of occasions explained the difficult situation he was in) and in particular now that she knows, does she regret it and think it was a mistake? The honest answer from anyone with any moral conscience whatsoever would be to say yes and if Hazel had done, that would have been the end of it and they could have moved on to another question.

But Hazel, like the lying narcissist she is, repeated the same rubbish over and over again, never answering the question. So Emma kept pressing her, as any good interviewer would. And quite rightly would not let up. Don't blame Emma for Hazel's dishonesty in the interview.

No it was the worst she has ever given
totally skated around everything
didn't even show her ostracising Charlie, ridiculinjg callum and dexter or forcibly pulling down daleys pants..she also allowed hazel to try and justify being a homewrecker? incredible.just dodged it all...also what about the obscene verbal abuse she threw around , her vile temper and endless temper tantrums

emma bottled it totally, shes the worst interviewer ive ever seen

[the_answers]

also what about the obscene verbal abuse she threw around
Yeah Emma needs to cut that out from BBBOTS :wink:

Sorry I mean the obscene swearing

[lippyzippy]

Yeah Emma needs to cut that out from BBBOTS :wink:

Sorry I mean the obscene swearing

I don't recall her screaming you ugly ***** at anyone with her 2 middle digits showing

[jet]

People wanted answers? She's not a murderer.

Why does Hazel warrant a harsh interview and Daley a nice one where Emma can pass him the kleenex?

Hazel's criticised for sticking up for herself and articulately explaining her actions. Daley's pitied after blaming all his actions on Hazel.

:rolleyes: Thank god it's over. Gina out next....

Spot on in every respect. :thumbs:

[lippyzippy]

Spot on in every respect. :thumbs:

wrong in every respect. daley got booted, no after show, no chance to redeem himself etc and lost his girlfriend. he was a a disgrace though
she got 4 or 5 more weeks , she got away with her role in the disgusting incidents of that night , she was a homewrecker and she dodged the questions
she blamed daley, daley blamed himself and apologised....she disingenuously tried to justify being a homewrecker, he didn't, he apologised, though he did hint that hazel was part to blame and she was
daley was far more honest and accepting of his blame.
emma let her off the hook, probably sexism as she may go to cry

[the_answers]

I don't recall her screaming you ugly ***** at anyone with her 2 middle digits showing
She does swear a fair bit on BBBOTS.

[Northern Monkey]

People wanted answers? She's not a murderer.

Why does Hazel warrant a harsh interview and Daley a nice one where Emma can pass him the kleenex?

Hazel's criticised for sticking up for herself and articulately explaining her actions. Daley's pitied after blaming all his actions on Hazel.

:rolleyes: Thank god it's over. Gina out next....

Best post i've read on it!

[lippyzippy]

She does swear a fair bit on BBBOTS.

she does but she doesn't scream you ugly ***** at people with her 2 middle digits raised....get it in context....hazel was very abusive ....not saying gina wasn't, shes been idiotic this week

[GypsyGoth]

Emma was in a no win situation. No matter how she handled it she was gonna get criticism. I think she took Hazel on and came off second best, but that's no surprise, Hazel is rather formidable. Maybe Emma seen it as her place to be biased against Hazel since so many BB fans were against her.

I think it was a real shame the way Emma & BOTS handled the whole thing, and they lost me as a fan over it. With BB manipulating events and then the support show being really onesided, it's felt like there's been no let up form the blatant favouritism this series.

Anyway I do think that Emma's dislike for Hazel lessened as the weeks went on.

[jet]

wrong in every respect. daley got booted, no after show, no chance to redeem himself etc and lost his girlfriend. he was a a disgrace though
she got 4 or 5 more weeks , she got away with her role in the disgusting incidents of that night , she was a homewrecker and she dodged the questions
she blamed daley, daley blamed himself and apologised....she disingenuously tried to justify being a homewrecker, he didn't, he apologised, though he did hint that hazel was part to blame and she was
daley was far more honest and accepting of his blame.
emma let her off the hook, probably sexism as she may go to cry

Since you have outright said I was wrong several times and forgotten that people are entitled to their opinions then I will say every single word you have said here is complete nonsense and wrong wrong wrong.

[Niamh.]

People wanted answers? She's not a murderer.

Why does Hazel warrant a harsh interview and Daley a nice one where Emma can pass him the kleenex?

Hazel's criticised for sticking up for herself and articulately explaining her actions. Daley's pitied after blaming all his actions on Hazel.

:rolleyes: Thank god it's over. Gina out next....

:worship:

[Seanbon]

David Frost has been known to ask straight out: Why did you lie? And he is one of the world's top interviewers.

But if you use a little common sense, you will be able to think of ways of showing how Hazel lied without even using the term.

Unfortunately Emma is simply not up to that sort of interview. As I have said before she is only suited to light and fluffy.

Why oh why didn't they get David Frost to do the interview????:conf:

[Seanbon]

The trouble is none of the BB presenters has to courage to suggest to Hazel that she - overall - enjoyed the incident in the safe house and to follow up with effective questions if she denies it. ;)

"Why didn't you........

- ask Daley to stop it

- shout out

etc etc"

"You only seemed to get worried when you heard the words "This is Big Brother......"

That is the only way to nail Hazel's lies about the incident. Daley is a a knuckleheaded piece of junk whose existence I would prefer not to acknowledge! Let me make that abundantly clear.

However, in the debate about whether the incident was playfighting or not I believe him and not Hazel.

Why would you believe a "knucklehead piece of junk" over Hazel? The hatred on here is unending!!:nono:

[Seanbon]

It well be interesting to see if there is any change in Hazel's demeanour tonight after she had a chance to absorb all the Hazel-hate out there.

Incidentally, it looks like Iain Lee will NOT be giving her a hard time, if his recent tweet is anything to go by.

Why would she absorb all the Hazel-hate out there?? She's not interested in the opinions of the mindless sheep,who wouldn't say boo to her if they met her face to face!:joker:

[Seanbon]

I don't recall her screaming you ugly ***** at anyone with her 2 middle digits showing

To someone who continually called her a "*****" and a "skank"!! I think Gina got off lightly. And I presume you would continually turn the other cheek?!?:nono:

[Seanbon]

wrong in every respect. daley got booted, no after show, no chance to redeem himself etc and lost his girlfriend. he was a a disgrace though
she got 4 or 5 more weeks , she got away with her role in the disgusting incidents of that night , she was a homewrecker and she dodged the questions
she blamed daley, daley blamed himself and apologised....she disingenuously tried to justify being a homewrecker, he didn't, he apologised, though he did hint that hazel was part to blame and she was
daley was far more honest and accepting of his blame.
emma let her off the hook, probably sexism as she may go to cry

Pure nonsense!!:nono:

[CaudleHalbard]

Why would she absorb all the Hazel-hate out there?? She's not interested in the opinions of the mindless sheep,who wouldn't say boo to her if they met her face to face!:joker:

I would certainly say more than boo!

I would ask her why she lied and got a fellow housemate evicted as a result.

[Seanbon]

I would certainly say more than boo!

I would ask her why she lied and got a fellow housemate evicted as a result.

And would she care about your opinion? Probably not!
And if she replied "I didn't lie to get a fellow HM evicted",what would you do then??

[CaudleHalbard]

And would she care about your opinion? Probably not!
And if she replied "I didn't lie to get a fellow HM evicted",what would you do then??

Then I provide her with the evidence. There is plenty.

[jet]

Seanbon owned Caudle. :joker:

[smeagol]

terraile interview didnt ask her anything normal, tried to put he down n failed n let hazel go on and on and on
she was great with sallie but she dropped the ball with hazel. didt ask the right questions n let her ramblle

[Seanbon]

Seanbon owned Caudle. :joker:

:xyxwave::xyxwave::xyxwave:

[Seanbon]

Then I provide her with the evidence. There is plenty.

And she'll sit down with you as you provide her with all the evidence? What if she refutes the evidence,what then??:conf:

[jet]

The trouble is none of the BB presenters has to courage to suggest to Hazel that she - overall - enjoyed the incident in the safe house and to follow up with effective questions if she denies it. ;)

"Why didn't you........

- ask Daley to stop it

- shout out

etc etc"

"You only seemed to get worried when you heard the words "This is Big Brother......"

That is the only way to nail Hazel's lies about the incident. Daley is a a knuckleheaded piece of junk whose existence I would prefer not to acknowledge! Let me make that abundantly clear.

However, in the debate about whether the incident was playfighting or not I believe him and not Hazel.

Ah, that's it, is it? A woman 'enjoys it' when a man goes too far and gets abusive towards her, and if she says she was scared she is a liar and must be questioned as to how she could possibly mind a big ape threatening her.
It's so damn sexy to a woman that, you know. I must try that on the wife next time she says she has a headache, she'll be panting for me in no time. :rolleyes:

[user104658]

David Frost has been known to ask straight out: Why did you lie? And he is one of the world's top interviewers.

But if you use a little common sense, you will be able to think of ways of showing how Hazel lied without even using the term.

Unfortunately Emma is simply not up to that sort of interview. As I have said before she is only suited to light and fluffy.

To people who have been caught in a lie (with evidence) or have changed their story. There is absolutely no evidence that Hazel "lied" to BB during the safehouse incident. They asked if she felt intimidated, she said yes. They didn't ask if it was a lot, a little bit, enough to not want to be near Daley, or just a bit shocked / it had gone too far. They just asked the flat out question "Were you feeling intimidated" and she said "yes". It is merely your opinion that she was not feeling intimidated at all. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that.

I actually think her interview with Emma made the safe house incident a lot clearer. She was "sort of" enjoying it, they were both drunk, it was getting a bit "weird" as things sometimes do but they were caught up in the moment and forgot where they were. Big Brother intervened and snapped them out of it and Hazel said in the interview, "So I thought maybe they had seen something that I hadn't because it was so dark" - I think we forget that it was very dark in there because the cams are night vision - she might have thought that they could see that his face looked angry / menacing, or that he was trying to get his penis out, or anything - and she even elaborated that "suddenly you're aware that you're there with someone you actually don't know very well". So, maybe she wasn't intimidated by what was going on until they intervened, but then when they did, she must have thought there was a reason for them doing so, that THEY thought she was at some sort of risk, and so was feeling a bit scared. It showed on her face when she went to the other side of the room - it's the ONLY time in the whole show that her "hard exterior" has cracked - so very unlikely it was an act.

TL;DR - she didn't lie to Big Brother. She answered their question which, IMO, could easily be seen as a loaded question in the first place. They could simply have asked if she was feeling OK about everything and guaged from her reaction how to proceed.

I also maintain that Daley would have been removed from the house no matter what she said, so it would be completely false to say that "her lies" got him removed. Even if she had said she was massively turned on by the whole thing and didn't consider it aggressive at all - HIS choice of words and actions were obviously seen as "triggers" for suffereres of domestic abuse. THAT is why he was removed.

[user104658]

However, in the debate about whether the incident was playfighting or not I believe him and not Hazel.

This is a non-issue. Hazel has never said that it wasn't playfighting. In fact, I believe she herself described it as playfighting "that went too far" (as playfighting sometimes does) - which is exactly what it was.

[james130]

Think it was her worst and felt she let her own opinions of Hazel stop her from doing; what could have been, a great interview.

[jet]

To people who have been caught in a lie (with evidence) or have changed their story. There is absolutely no evidence that Hazel "lied" to BB during the safehouse incident. They asked if she felt intimidated, she said yes. They didn't ask if it was a lot, a little bit, enough to not want to be near Daley, or just a bit shocked / it had gone too far. They just asked the flat out question "Were you feeling intimidated" and she said "yes". It is merely your opinion that she was not feeling intimidated at all. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that.

I actually think her interview with Emma made the safe house incident a lot clearer. She was "sort of" enjoying it, they were both drunk, it was getting a bit "weird" as things sometimes do but they were caught up in the moment and forgot where they were. Big Brother intervened and snapped them out of it and Hazel said in the interview, "So I thought maybe they had seen something that I hadn't because it was so dark" - I think we forget that it was very dark in there because the cams are night vision - she might have thought that they could see that his face looked angry / menacing, or that he was trying to get his penis out, or anything - and she even elaborated that "suddenly you're aware that you're there with someone you actually don't know very well". So, maybe she wasn't intimidated by what was going on until they intervened, but then when they did, she must have thought there was a reason for them doing so, that THEY thought she was at some sort of risk, and so was feeling a bit scared. It showed on her face when she went to the other side of the room - it's the ONLY time in the whole show that her "hard exterior" has cracked - so very unlikely it was an act.

TL;DR - she didn't lie to Big Brother. She answered their question which, IMO, could easily be seen as a loaded question in the first place. They could simply have asked if she was feeling OK about everything and guaged from her reaction how to proceed.

I also maintain that Daley would have been removed from the house no matter what she said, so it would be completely false to say that "her lies" got him removed. Even if she had said she was massively turned on by the whole thing and didn't consider it aggressive at all - HIS choice of words and actions were obviously seen as "triggers" for suffereres of domestic abuse. THAT is why he was removed.

Great post. :worship:

[Seanbon]

Ah, that's it, is it? A woman 'enjoys it' when a man goes too far and gets abusive towards her, and if she says she was scared she is a liar and must be questioned as to how she could possibly mind a big ape threatening her.
It's so damn sexy to a woman that, you know. I must try that on the wife next time she says she has a headache, she'll be panting for me in no time. :rolleyes:
And that's why you believe the man and not the woman?

:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:

[Seanbon]

To people who have been caught in a lie (with evidence) or have changed their story. There is absolutely no evidence that Hazel "lied" to BB during the safehouse incident. They asked if she felt intimidated, she said yes. They didn't ask if it was a lot, a little bit, enough to not want to be near Daley, or just a bit shocked / it had gone too far. They just asked the flat out question "Were you feeling intimidated" and she said "yes". It is merely your opinion that she was not feeling intimidated at all. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that.

I actually think her interview with Emma made the safe house incident a lot clearer. She was "sort of" enjoying it, they were both drunk, it was getting a bit "weird" as things sometimes do but they were caught up in the moment and forgot where they were. Big Brother intervened and snapped them out of it and Hazel said in the interview, "So I thought maybe they had seen something that I hadn't because it was so dark" - I think we forget that it was very dark in there because the cams are night vision - she might have thought that they could see that his face looked angry / menacing, or that he was trying to get his penis out, or anything - and she even elaborated that "suddenly you're aware that you're there with someone you actually don't know very well". So, maybe she wasn't intimidated by what was going on until they intervened, but then when they did, she must have thought there was a reason for them doing so, that THEY thought she was at some sort of risk, and so was feeling a bit scared. It showed on her face when she went to the other side of the room - it's the ONLY time in the whole show that her "hard exterior" has cracked - so very unlikely it was an act.

TL;DR - she didn't lie to Big Brother. She answered their question which, IMO, could easily be seen as a loaded question in the first place. They could simply have asked if she was feeling OK about everything and guaged from her reaction how to proceed.

I also maintain that Daley would have been removed from the house no matter what she said, so it would be completely false to say that "her lies" got him removed. Even if she had said she was massively turned on by the whole thing and didn't consider it aggressive at all - HIS choice of words and actions were obviously seen as "triggers" for suffereres of domestic abuse. THAT is why he was removed.
:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:

[brianna_jones]

People wanted answers? She's not a murderer.

Why does Hazel warrant a harsh interview and Daley a nice one where Emma can pass him the kleenex?

Hazel's criticised for sticking up for herself and articulately explaining her actions. Daley's pitied after blaming all his actions on Hazel.

:rolleyes: Thank god it's over. Gina out next....

Well said! Best post of the day! :cheer:

[Tom4784]

Emma's a pretty good host, anyone that dislikes her should be glad we no longer have to suffer Brian any more.

[brianna_jones]

To people who have been caught in a lie (with evidence) or have changed their story. There is absolutely no evidence that Hazel "lied" to BB during the safehouse incident. They asked if she felt intimidated, she said yes. They didn't ask if it was a lot, a little bit, enough to not want to be near Daley, or just a bit shocked / it had gone too far. They just asked the flat out question "Were you feeling intimidated" and she said "yes". It is merely your opinion that she was not feeling intimidated at all. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that.

I actually think her interview with Emma made the safe house incident a lot clearer. She was "sort of" enjoying it, they were both drunk, it was getting a bit "weird" as things sometimes do but they were caught up in the moment and forgot where they were. Big Brother intervened and snapped them out of it and Hazel said in the interview, "So I thought maybe they had seen something that I hadn't because it was so dark" - I think we forget that it was very dark in there because the cams are night vision - she might have thought that they could see that his face looked angry / menacing, or that he was trying to get his penis out, or anything - and she even elaborated that "suddenly you're aware that you're there with someone you actually don't know very well". So, maybe she wasn't intimidated by what was going on until they intervened, but then when they did, she must have thought there was a reason for them doing so, that THEY thought she was at some sort of risk, and so was feeling a bit scared. It showed on her face when she went to the other side of the room - it's the ONLY time in the whole show that her "hard exterior" has cracked - so very unlikely it was an act.

TL;DR - she didn't lie to Big Brother. She answered their question which, IMO, could easily be seen as a loaded question in the first place. They could simply have asked if she was feeling OK about everything and guaged from her reaction how to proceed.

I also maintain that Daley would have been removed from the house no matter what she said, so it would be completely false to say that "her lies" got him removed. Even if she had said she was massively turned on by the whole thing and didn't consider it aggressive at all - HIS choice of words and actions were obviously seen as "triggers" for suffereres of domestic abuse. THAT is why he was removed.

Another great post on this topic! Glad to see there are people thinking clearly and not just looking for a witch hunt.

[CaudleHalbard]

The very fact that BB had to ask Hazel the question should tell you something.... but probably doesn't! Lol! :D

The fact that they allowed her to go back into the safe house although they have a duty of care should also tell you something... but again probably doesn't.

Never mind. They are both out of the house now. I suspect there may be a (magazine) "reconciliation" at some point, provided Daley isn't still fuming about it. I wonder if he and Callum have chatted about the incident on their recent night out? :)

[joeysteele]

For me it wasn't just the worst interview I have seen done with an evictee on Channel 5, it was because of what I saw as Emma's personal bias against Hazel, one of the 3 very worst eviction interviews in all BB series frong it beginning.

I expected it to be a poor interview and I expected Emma to not be able to hold back on her bias.
However what I didnt expect was a totally bad and ridiculous interview,which to me it was 100% throughout.

[jet]

Emma's a pretty good host, anyone that dislikes her should be glad we no longer have to suffer Brian any more.

I liked Brian. :hugesmile:

[Marsh.]

wrong in every respect. daley got booted, no after show, no chance to redeem himself etc and lost his girlfriend. he was a a disgrace though

He got a 10 minute pity party on BOTS, several mag interviews and his girlfriend accompanied him to the studios where we were told by Emma they were "sorting things out". Stop victimising him.

[jegmeister]

For me it wasn't just the worst interview I have seen done with an evictee on Channel 5, it was because of what I saw as Emma's personal bias against Hazel, one of the 3 very worst eviction interviews in all BB series frong it beginning.

I expected it to be a poor interview and I expected Emma to not be able to hold back on her bias.
However what I didnt expect was a totally bad and ridiculous interview,which to me it was 100% throughout.

"Emma's personal bias". Well I and many people who disliked Hazel wanted her to ask the question. The public evicted her to massive boos and wanted her to answer the question. It's not Emma's fault if Hazel deliberately refused to answer it.

[Seanbon]

"Emma's personal bias". Well I and many people who disliked Hazel wanted her to ask the question. The public evicted her to massive boos and wanted her to answer the question. It's not Emma's fault if Hazel deliberately refused to answer it.

Sorry she's not answerable to anyone,and definitely not to the booing sheep in the BB crowd!!:dance:

[joeysteele]

"Emma's personal bias". Well I and many people who disliked Hazel wanted her to ask the question. The public evicted her to massive boos and wanted her to answer the question. It's not Emma's fault if Hazel deliberately refused to answer it.

She did answer the questions and it was the only thing Emma talked to her about, she nearly ran out of time to show any best bits because of it.

Emma was pathetic in my view, a good presenter holds back on their bias.
There were loads of questions I would have liked to see Emma ask Hazel in additionto questions about Daley certainly but not all about the Daley issue as she did.

Hopeless interview and Emma was really poor all the way though, that is my view,you hold a different one.
However,to be really successful as the main presenter, Emma is going to have to learn to or be made to,reign in her own personal bias if eviction interviews are going to be in any way worth watching at all.

[CaudleHalbard]

I think it's high time they dropped the interview in front of the baying crowd and just did one on BOTS.

[joeysteele]

I think it's high time they dropped the interview in front of the baying crowd and just did one on BOTS.

Definitely, I agree fully with that because that crowd now is really spoiling the eviction interviews.

[Seanbon]

I think it's high time they dropped the interview in front of the baying crowd and just did one on BOTS.

:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:

[Speedster]

Ah, that's it, is it? A woman 'enjoys it' when a man goes too far and gets abusive towards her, and if she says she was scared she is a liar and must be questioned as to how she could possibly mind a big ape threatening her.
It's so damn sexy to a woman that, you know. I must try that on the wife next time she says she has a headache, she'll be panting for me in no time. :rolleyes:


:worship:

[lippyzippy]

hazel is a twat plain and simple