all up for nomination now??

[sampvt]

Sophie cheated by changing her noms and she will be put up but gina was also writing well into the process. I don't know if she changed her noms or whether or not she just was waiting but she broke the rules so she will be up as well. Tomorrow BB will announce they are all up due to a rule break and the betting lines will be opened.

With that in mind Gina will probably go due to her current change of attitude and this is borne out by her nom bomb inclusion tonight. She has fallen from grace and I cant contain my excitement.....eeeeeeh haaaaaa. The bitch is gone (hopefully)

[MrWong]

Wishful thinking. Gina did nothing wrong and should not be punished.

[lovebigbrotheruk]

Gina did absolutely nothing wrong.

[Parmy]

To be fair she did sway a nomination...hardly worth the punishment of being put up though.perhaps a forced shower would be punishment enough.

[sampvt]

Sweaty betty was still writing well into the noms process and anyway the news leaked is a decision will be made tomorrow. The lines are not open yet showing my source is right so far and the bookies have been told the same.

Before you all get expanding willies about Gina not being up, wait till tomorrow and the result will be even sweeter.

[fingers]

I do hope Gina gets he sinuses flushed out so that we can understand her better.

[Jordan.]

Misleading

[MatthewS]

Some pretty bold statements being made here...

I guess we'll see tomorrow if they pan out or not...

[sampvt]

Ive just watched the replay and Gina definitely writes or changes things on her board. Her pen was open and her hand was moving. She was seen doing it from the beginning of the noms process. Sophie was more blatant and even admitted she changed hers. If you look closely Sam was messing with his board but I think it was his finger he was using not the pen which seemed to have the cap on it. Only 3 of them showed what they wrote so BB has to sort that out. I think you will find my source was right in what she said.

[Ellen]

Ive just watched the replay and Gina definitely writes or changes things on her board. Her pen was open and her hand was moving. She was seen doing it from the beginning of the noms process. Sophie was more blatant and even admitted she changed hers. If you look closely Sam was messing with his board but I think it was his finger he was using not the pen which seemed to have the cap on it. Only 3 of them showed what they wrote so BB has to sort that out. I think you will find my source was right in what she said.

Hope you are right in that they are all up, the face to face noms were a farce!
But i think BB will sweep it under the carpet tbh.

[HBB1508]

I really hope they are all up - they should have done it properly in the first place imo.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Something is going on for sure. It's very strange they haven't opened the lines yet. :conf:

[smeagol]

iis this thread fact or speculation ?

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

iis this thread fact or speculation ?

Speculation. No one knows for sure what's going on. :shrug:

[south12345]

If this is the case and it is deemed that they did change their nominations then i think its only right that the culprits should be the only ones up...They broke the rules so should be the ones to be punished and the others rewarded because they stuck to the rules.....

[smudgie]

According to the bookies, only 3 up now. Charlie, twins and Dexter.

BB must have voided Sophie's noms.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

If this is the case and it is deemed that they did change their nominations then i think its only right that the culprits should be the only ones up...They broke the rules so should be the ones to be punished and the others rewarded because they stuck to the rules.....

I think Sophie nominations will be voided.

[MrWong]

People are getting desperate now wanting Gina up too.


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-IRcmvF3ezr8/Tu8e-J4LTHI/AAAAAAAABMI/Y6FIhKMnEZY/s320/Sour-Grapes-Central.jpg

[Northern Monkey]

Whole house should be up for sure.Whole thing was a farce.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

People are getting desperate now wanting Gina up too.


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-IRcmvF3ezr8/Tu8e-J4LTHI/AAAAAAAABMI/Y6FIhKMnEZY/s320/Sour-Grapes-Central.jpg

It's odd that the lines haven't opened yet. Something is going on.

[MrWong]

According to the bookies, only 3 up now. Charlie, twins and Dexter.

BB must have voided Sophie's noms.

If that's the case I wonder if they've told the hm's yet.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Whole house should be up for sure.Whole thing was a farce.

That would be fair.

[Gillian-73]

I doubt it, they'll void Sophie's noms if they do anything at all.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

I doubt it, they'll void Sophie's noms if they do anything at all.

But she had three names on her board.

[Marmalite]

I can't remember any time where F2F nominations have gone smoothly and fairly.

It's about time that BB either sort out their rules and regulations and ensure that HM's stick to them (or they face immediate nomination) before they attempt it again in another series, or they just scrap the bloody thing entirely.

Every year something along the lines of cheating or unfairness happens... it's starting to get ridiculous now!

[Ellen]

If she did cheat, BB should void her noms & she should be put up but i highly doubt BB will do anything.

[barbel13]

An investigation is on going.Scotland yard is involved and the SAS ready for any call up to the BB HOUSE.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

If she did cheat, BB should void her noms & she should be put up but i highly doubt BB will do anything.

She had three names written down,then crossed one of them out.

[sampvt]

Last night my student who has a niece in the bb production team told him then me that they were holding the lines until they looked at Sophie and Ginas cheating. She was also told that if they did cheat they would probably be up tomorrow. Obviously Sophies noms were now annulled and saved Sam but they chose to do nothing about Ginas because her choices made no difference to the end result. This is a cop out by BB and yet another blatant attempt to protect Gina.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Last night my student who has a niece in the bb production team told him then me that they were holding the lines until they looked at Sophie and Ginas cheating. She was also told that if they did cheat they would probably be up tomorrow. Obviously Sophies noms were now annulled and saved Sam but they chose to do nothing about Ginas because her choices made no difference to the end result. This is a cop out by BB and yet another blatant attempt to protect Gina.

I think Charlie cheated as well. She was dithering and rewriting and only went for it when Gina told her to just nominate her. :suspect:

[MrWong]

Last night my student who has a niece in the bb production team told him then me that they were holding the lines until they looked at Sophie and Ginas cheating. She was also told that if they did cheat they would probably be up tomorrow. Obviously Sophies noms were now annulled and saved Sam but they chose to do nothing about Ginas because her choices made no difference to the end result. This is a cop out by BB and yet another blatant attempt to protect Gina.

The stench of desperation to get Gina up is palpable.

I'm not buying that you have insider knowledge either.

[joeysteele]

Oh for me, Gina should be punished and/or up too, she told Charlie who was really being pathetic totally, just to vote for her.
That is blatant influencing of nominations too and she should have kept her mouth shut while anyone elses nominations were taking place.

Again,I doubt anything will done as to Gina.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

I think the lines haven't been open yet, because Big Brother is deciding what to do about the rule break. I noticed Charlie was cheating as well. She was dithering and rewriting. She only wrote Gina after she told her to just nominate her.

[karezza]

If they are all up then Sophie or Gina would be evicted.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

If they are all up then Sophie or Gina would be evicted.

Those face to face noms were a complete farce. Lots of cheating going on. I think BB is deciding what to do.

[smudgie]

I think the lines haven't been open yet, because Big Brother is deciding what to do about the rule break. I noticed Charlie was cheating as well. She was dithering and rewriting. She only wrote Gina after she told her to just nominate her.

They won't open the lines until they can announce it, so it will be on tonight's show.
BB. Must have already decided what they are doing otherwise the bookies would not have opened the book so as to speak.

[Ellen]

Last night my student who has a niece in the bb production team told him then me that they were holding the lines until they looked at Sophie and Ginas cheating. She was also told that if they did cheat they would probably be up tomorrow. Obviously Sophies noms were now annulled and saved Sam but they chose to do nothing about Ginas because her choices made no difference to the end result. This is a cop out by BB and yet another blatant attempt to protect Gina.

If Gina has cheated didnt she nom Charlie? So that would mean Charlie only received one nom if Gina's are void?

Void nominations means no nominations and according to BB rules if no nomiation is made the said HM will go up.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

If Gina has cheated didnt she nom Charlie? So that would mean Charlie only received one nom if Gina's are void?

Void nominations means no nominations and according to BB rules if no nomiation is made the said HM will go up.

No idea, but i think Sophie, Charlie and Gina have all cheated. Sophie had three names down, but crossed on out. Charlie was rewriting and Gina influenced Charlie nominations.

[HBB1508]

I really wish they would just put the whole house up and be done with it now.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

I really wish they would just put the whole house up and be done with it now.

We'll have to wait and see what they decide to do.

[Ellen]

No idea, but i think Sophie, Charlie and Gina have all cheated. Sophie had three names down, but crossed on out. Charlie was rewriting and Gina influenced Charlie nominations.

Crikey all three of them!!! Just shows that face to face noms is a farce, BB seem to be taking their time in saying what is going on, cant take that much time going through the footage.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Crikey all three of them!!! Just shows that face to face noms is a farce, BB seem to be taking their time in saying what is going on, cant take that much time going through the footage.

I'm not sure they will punish all three. Maybe just Sophie? Her rule break was really obvious.

[sampvt]

The stench of desperation to get Gina up is palpable.

I'm not buying that you have insider knowledge either.

You never miss a chance to have a dig at me. Why don't you just ignore me son, your level of vitriol towards people is disturbing and you should be banned, you are little more than ????????????????????? that takes pleasure in winding posters up so they get banned for arguing with you. I have bitten my tongue so often but if there are mods reading this, can he be warned for this as its a day in day out event.

If you don't like me as you say you don't and want me to ignore you, why do you constantly poke fun at my posts. I proved last year that my contact was true and I see no reason to vindicate myself to you. I reported the truth and I was right so how you can poke fun at me is pathetic. She was told one thing and only part of that thing was implemented as the other part of that report was deemed as academic. The fact that I brought it up in the first place was enough to prove truth. so please bog off and get a life son.

[Ellen]

I'm not sure they will punish all three. Maybe just Sophie? Her rule break was really obvious.

Blatantly obvious with 3 names, she is a silly girl :nono:

[MrWong]

You never miss a chance to have a dig at me. Why don't you just ignore me son, your level of vitriol towards people is disturbing and you should be banned, you are little more than ????????????????????? that takes pleasure in winding posters up so they get banned for arguing with you. I have bitten my tongue so often but if there are mods reading this, can he be warned for this as its a day in day out event.

If you don't like me as you say you don't and want me to ignore you, why do you constantly poke fun at my posts. I proved last year that my contact was true and I see no reason to vindicate myself to you. I reported the truth and I was right so how you can poke fun at me is pathetic. She was told one thing and only part of that thing was implemented as the other part of that report was deemed as academic. The fact that I brought it up in the first place was enough to prove truth. so please bog off and get a life son.

Why do you always whine when I challenge your posts? Nobody else does.

I didn't believe you had insider knowledge last year either and it certainly wasn't proven.

Gina didn't cheat unless you consider Gina telling Charlie it's ok if she nom's her as cheating. It wasn't influencing as Charlie had already wrote it down but was dithering over the reason.

[Marmalite]

Why do you always whine when I challenge your posts? Nobody else does.

I didn't believe you had insider knowledge last year either and it certainly wasn't proven.

Gina didn't cheat unless you consider Gina telling Charlie it's ok if she nom's her as cheating. It wasn't influencing as Charlie had already wrote it down but was dithering over the reason.


How do you know that?

We only got to see Twins, Sam and Gina's board. They were the only ones who actually turned their board around like they were supposed to!

As far as I could see (which wasn't much) Charlie only ever wrote one name down and that was Jack & Joe.

[MrWong]

How do you know that?

We only got to see Twins, Sam and Gina's board. They were the only ones who actually turned their board around like they were supposed to!

As far as I could see (which wasn't much) Charlie only ever wrote one name down and that was Jack & Joe.

I've added a link of last nights show to one of the many threads whining about it.

[sampvt]

Why do you always whine when I challenge your posts? Nobody else does.

I didn't believe you had insider knowledge last year either and it certainly wasn't proven.

Gina didn't cheat unless you consider Gina telling Charlie it's ok if she nom's her as cheating. It wasn't influencing as Charlie had already wrote it down but was dithering over the reason.

As usual you are talking ****. The show was recorded and it shows clearly gina messing with her board throughout the noms process and she even verbally altered the result by telling Charlie to nem her, or are you totally hell bent on refusing to see anything bad she does, its called extreme denial syndrome or in your case wong gets it wrong and spells it wong.

You need to stop lambasting people with stupid one liner pokes as its not doing you any good son. Stick to slagging of celebs and the like, they don't care.

[MrWong]

As usual you are talking ****. The show was recorded and it shows clearly gina messing with her board throughout the noms process and she even verbally altered the result by telling Charlie to nem her, or are you totally hell bent on refusing to see anything bad she does, its called extreme denial syndrome or in your case wong gets it wrong and spells it wong.

You need to stop lambasting people with stupid one liner pokes as its not doing you any good son. Stick to slagging of celebs and the like, they don't care.

Not true.

Here's the link to last nights show - x130k46

[Livia]

Ahhh whatever. The comforting thing is that only the die-hards are still backing Gina. She's lost so much popularity over her questionable behaviour that there's no way she'll win now. I have more chance of winning that Gina does.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

How do you know that?

We only got to see Twins, Sam and Gina's board. They were the only ones who actually turned their board around like they were supposed to!

As far as I could see (which wasn't much) Charlie only ever wrote one name down and that was Jack & Joe.

Yes. I think there was a lot of cheating going on. BB will know who was doing that. Let's hope they're fair in their decision.

[Speedster]

To be fair she did sway a nomination...hardly worth the punishment of being put up though.perhaps a forced shower would be punishment enough.

If she has a shower she'll melt-water isn't good for witches. I hope she has to shower in cold water-I'd refuse to turn the handle so that she can have hoy water if I was in there.

[Beastie]

Gina won't be evicted even if she is up. Charley will definitely be evicted. Bloody hell she is even more boring than Sam now. If it takes a person that long to do a bastard nomination they can **** off. So bloody draining. No offence.

[Marmalite]

If she has a shower she'll melt-water isn't good for witches. I hope she has to shower in cold water-I'd refuse to turn the handle so that she can have hoy water if I was in there.


Talking of that... did anyone hear Ryland again on BOTS last night say she still hasn't showered?


:shocked:

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Gina won't be evicted even if she is up. Charley will definitely be evicted. Bloody hell she is even more boring than Sam now. If it takes a person that long to do a bastard nomination they can **** off. So bloody draining. No offence.

I agree. Even us Dexter fans are bored of her. :joker:

[Livia]

If she has a shower she'll melt-water isn't good for witches. I hope she has to shower in cold water-I'd refuse to turn the handle so that she can have hoy water if I was in there.

LOL... I didn't think of that.

Hope you're sticking around after BB is over Speedster.

[Speedster]

Last night my student who has a niece in the bb production team told him then me that they were holding the lines until they looked at Sophie and Ginas cheating. She was also told that if they did cheat they would probably be up tomorrow. Obviously Sophies noms were now annulled and saved Sam but they chose to do nothing about Ginas because her choices made no difference to the end result. This is a cop out by BB and yet another blatant attempt to protect Gina.


I've had a feeling for quite a long time now that BB show a lot of bias towards gina; they gave her a lot of control through tasks she did, then let her have power over specific h.m's, in other words, Hazel.

I'll bet they've promised her mummy that Vile Beauregarde can win because she (her mom) has said she'll fund the next series of BB.

[sampvt]

Not true.

Here's the link to last nights show - x130k46

Ok Sherlock, prepare to be crushed. Firstly at 35.49 into the show the shot of the whole room showing dexters noms shows Ginas board with 2 large names wrote on it. when it comes to her time to nom at 35.54 it clearly pans to her and shows her just finishing writing something hurriedly with the pen top off, not on like it was in the previous shots. Then when we see her names written down, they are both different. One looks bold and written at normal speed and the second looks like it was a changed one and written in scrawl and quickly.

When we write we tend to write the same way. when we finish and have no intentions to change we put the top on the pen especially a magic dry marker and when we lie or cheat we tend to tilt the head and make little giggles (according to the experts) Gina cheated, end of and this does not include the fact that she told someone to vote for her.

Now lets see you get out of that.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Ok Sherlock, prepare to be crushed. Firstly at 35.49 into the show the shot of the whole room showing dexters noms shows Ginas board with 2 large names wrote on it. when it comes to her time to nom at 35.54 it clearly pans to her and shows her just finishing writing something hurriedly with the pen top off, not on like it was in the previous shots. Then when we see her names written down, they are both different. One looks bold and written at normal speed and the second looks like it was a changed one and written in scrawl and quickly.

When we write we tend to write the same way. when we finish and have no intentions to change we put the top on the pen especially a magic dry marker and when we lie or cheat we tend to tilt the head and make little giggles (according to the experts) Gina cheated, end of and this does not include the fact that she told someone to vote for her.

Now lets see you get out of that.

So Gina has cheated just like Sophie and Charlie. :suspect:

[MrWong]

Ok Sherlock, prepare to be crushed. Firstly at 35.49 into the show the shot of the whole room showing dexters noms shows Ginas board with 2 large names wrote on it. when it comes to her time to nom at 35.54 it clearly pans to her and shows her just finishing writing something hurriedly with the pen top off, not on like it was in the previous shots. Then when we see her names written down, they are both different. One looks bold and written at normal speed and the second looks like it was a changed one and written in scrawl and quickly.

When we write we tend to write the same way. when we finish and have no intentions to change we put the top on the pen especially a magic dry marker and when we lie or cheat we tend to tilt the head and make little giggles (according to the experts) Gina cheated, end of and this does not include the fact that she told someone to vote for her.

Now lets see you get out of that.

Your description for what happened at 35:49 isn't true and neither is it true for 35:54.

Nice try but no cigar.

[reece(:]

The producers are making the rules up as they go along, there's no denying that.

[MrWong]

So Gina has cheated just like Sophie and Charlie. :suspect:

Did you watch the clip? What Sam is claiming isn't true.

[Adamw92]

Ok Sherlock, prepare to be crushed. Firstly at 35.49 into the show the shot of the whole room showing dexters noms shows Ginas board with 2 large names wrote on it. when it comes to her time to nom at 35.54 it clearly pans to her and shows her just finishing writing something hurriedly with the pen top off, not on like it was in the previous shots.

Did we even just watch the same show here?

I've just watched that again myself. Firstly, we don't see Gina's board at all until she turns it around. You need to get your timings right here because when we see Gina at 35.49, her board is being held to her chest without a pen in her hand. Also, Dexter is next to nominate so Gina doesn't even begin her nominations until 37.16 into the show.

[sampvt]

Did we even just watch the same show here?

I've just watched that again myself. Firstly, we don't see Gina's board at all until she turns it around. You need to get your timings right here because when we see Gina at 35.49, her board is being held to her chest without a pen in her hand. Also, Dexter is next to nominate so Gina doesn't even begin her nominations until 37.16 into the show.

I went off the time line on the clip but my re runs on my 60 inch digital hd tv are quite clear. She was holding the board to her chest in on clip with 2 names on it and they were big written. Just before she stands up to nominate she has the pen in her hand and is capping it with the names altered. Wong is wrong, end of.

[Adamw92]

I went off the time line on the clip but my re runs on my 60 inch digital hd tv are quite clear. She was holding the board to her chest in on clip with 2 names on it and they were big written. Just before she stands up to nominate she has the pen in her hand and is capping it with the names altered. Wong is wrong, end of.

Yeah...no. You're just being desperate now. :xyxwave:

[MrWong]

I went off the time line on the clip but my re runs on my 60 inch digital hd tv are quite clear. She was holding the board to her chest in on clip with 2 names on it and they were big written. Just before she stands up to nominate she has the pen in her hand and is capping it with the names altered. Wong is wrong, end of.


If anyone can be arsed to watch the clip they'll know i'm right.

[Adamw92]

If anyone can be arsed to watch the clip they'll know i'm right.

I did and I know you are. sampvt is just grasping at non-existant straws now.

[MrWong]

I did and I know you are. sampvt is just grasping at non-existant straws now.

As usual :D

[Kazanne]

Sam is still up,the bookies dropped a clanger,lol.

[joeysteele]

Timing and boards are one thing but another is that Gina should be punished and put up too.
Charlie was doing her usual indecisive procrastination nonsense as to her 2nd nomination. Then Gina clearly said to her to nominate her.

Gina needed to keep her mouth shut while someone was doing their own noms and to tell someone to vote for yourself and/or anyone else is brealking the noms rules.

Gina was as wrong as Sophie, even without the board, both made an attempt to alter or influence noms and both should be punished and preferably both up as well.
That's the only fair and resonable way to sort this, again a farce by BB,as to the nominations.

[MrWong]

Timing and boards are one thing but another is that Gina should be punished and put up too.
Charlie was doing her usual indecisive procrastination nonsense as to her 2nd nomination. Then Gina clearly said to her to nominate her.
Gina needed to keep her mouth shut while someone was doing their own noms and to tell someone to vote for yourself and/or anyone else is brealking the noms rules.

Gina was as wrong as Sophie, even without the board, both made an attempt to alter or influence noms and both should be punished and preferably both up as well.
That's the only fair and resonable way to sort this, again a farce by BB,as to the nominations.

Charlie had already written Gina's name down when Gina said 'just do it'

[Daffodil]

Sophie's cheating was blatant. My surmising is that apart from the obvious Sam, she wanted Gina out but was frightened of her, so changed at the last minute. She still had the pen poised in her hand just before she stood up. Action must be taken. And yes I am also one of those who want Gina OUT!!!!!

[Madlyaddicted]

If Sophie's Noms are voided they need to put her up too.

[anne666]

If Sophie's Noms are voided they need to put her up too.

Don't like her , but why should she be put up?

[honeydew]

Wishful thinking. Gina did nothing wrong and should not be punished.

DIDN'T SHE, TOLD CHARLIE DO NOT NOM' HER . IS THAT NOT INTEFERING WITH THE VOTE...fULL OF HER OWN **** AGAIN..:hmph:

[Ellen]

When do BB usually put it on their website who is up & voting begins?
I thought it would be all sorted by now or will it be on bbots?

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

When do BB usually put it on their website who is up & voting begins?
I thought it would be all sorted by now or will it be on bbots?

They should have opened the vote by now. Something is not right. Maybe we'll know more later. I would be really mad if they did nothing about the cheating.

[Ellen]

They should have opened the vote by now. Something is not right. Maybe we'll know more later. I would be really mad if they did nothing about the cheating.

I know, it seems to be taking them an awful long time just to view some footage.
Like you say Vanessa, something is not right. They could at least address it so the public know's what is going on.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

I know, it seems to be taking them an awful long time just to view some footage.
Like you say Vanessa, something is not right. They could at least address it so the public know's what is going on.

I want to know why some of them did not turn their boards over. :suspect:

[Ellen]

I want to know why some of them did not turn their boards over. :suspect:

Exactly & why didnt BB tell them to show their boards :conf::suspect:

[cfromhx02]

If Gina has cheated didnt she nom Charlie? So that would mean Charlie only received one nom if Gina's are void?

Void nominations means no nominations and according to BB rules if no nomiation is made the said HM will go up.

If that's true then Gina has to be up to, though they might try and say her votes didn't change anything and therefore not declare them as void, I wouldn't put anything past them to try and save Gina, but whether her votes changed anything or not it doesn't matter she still has broken the rules and should be up

This is not desperation to get her up.There cannot be one rule for Gina and another rule for rest. It's just she broke the rules

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Exactly & why didnt BB tell them to show their boards :conf::suspect:

Dexter didn't turn the board either, but he was not cheating. I noticed some of them quickly changed their second nominations. Charlie only wrote one name down when she was called. Is she for real? :bored:

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

If that's true then Gina has to be up to, though they might try and say her votes didn't change anything and therefore not declare them as void, I wouldn't put anything past them to try and save Gina, but whether her votes changed anything or not it doesn't matter she still has broken the rules and should be up

This is not desperation to get her up.There cannot be one rule for Gina and another rule for rest. It's just she broke the rules

I noticed some of them changed their second nomination. That's not allowed.

[Lex]

Sampvt is only guessing of course....but I would agree that it was a complete shambles, and all up would be the only fair thing to do!...but there's not a cat in hell's chance that Gina would be going anywhere on friday!!....The same result will happen anyway!...Charlie's toast!... :wavey: ...[personally prefer the Lardy-Boys of course...but i'm just not that lucky! :hugesmile: ]

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Sampvt is only guessing of course....but I would agree that it was a complete shambles, and all up would be the only fair thing to do!...but there's not a cat in hell's chance that Gina would be going anywhere on friday!!....The same result will happen anyway!...Charlie's toast!... :wavey: ...[personally prefer the Lardy-Boys of course...but i'm just not that lucky! :hugesmile: ]

I wonder if they'll put all housemates up or only those who cheated. :suspect:

[Adamw92]

Again, Gina did not cheat.

sampvt is trying to stir things up, having watched the live nominations back, we never see anything to indicate that she changed her nominations, the only person who may have been guilty of this is Sophie. If anyone's nominations are to be voided then it will be hers and the only thing that will change is Sam not being up for eviction.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Again, Gina did not cheat.

sampvt is trying to stir things up, having watched the live nominations back, we never see anything to indicate that she changed her nominations, the only person who may have been guilty of this is Sophie. If anyone's nominations are to be voided then it will be hers and the only thing that will change is Sam not being up for eviction.

Some of them did not turn their boards over. I do wonder what did they have to hide. :conf:

[Adamw92]

Some of them did not turn their boards over. I do wonder what did they have to hide. :conf:

Well there are people speculating that Sophie had 3 names written down so I guess that could be why she didn't show hers (correct me if I'm wrong because I don't remember seeing her board). I have no idea why Charlie and Dexter did not show their boards.

[Ellen]

Dexter didn't turn the board either, but he was not cheating. I noticed some of them quickly changed their second nominations. Charlie only wrote one name down when she was called. Is she for real? :bored:

The one's that didnt turn their board round could have easily forgot due to the situation so BB should have reminded them to show their boards then HM's & viewers can see what was written.
If Charlie had wrote only one name down by the time allowed then BB should not have let her write anything else, she should have automatically nominated herself as BB stated would happen. BB made a right cock up of it :mad:

[sampvt]

Again, Gina did not cheat.

sampvt is trying to stir things up, having watched the live nominations back, we never see anything to indicate that she changed her nominations, the only person who may have been guilty of this is Sophie. If anyone's nominations are to be voided then it will be hers and the only thing that will change is Sam not being up for eviction.

I am not trying to stir things up. she cheated in 2 ways. firstly she verbally asked Charlie to vote for her and secondly she was writing when she was called to stand up.YThe clip online clearly shows that unless you are a gina supporter then her subliminal mind games have brain washed you as well.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

The one's that didnt turn their board round could have easily forgot due to the situation so BB should have reminded them to show their boards then HM's & viewers can see what was written.
If Charlie had wrote only one name down by the time allowed then BB should not have let her write anything else, she should have automatically nominated herself as BB stated would happen. BB made a right cock up of it :mad:

That's true. But some of them were definetely up to no good and were not subtle about it either. :laugh:

[Adamw92]

I am not trying to stir things up. she cheated in 2 ways. firstly she verbally asked Charlie to vote for her and secondly she was writing when she was called to stand up.YThe clip online clearly shows that unless you are a gina supporter then her subliminal mind games have brain washed you as well.

She didn't "ask" Charlie to nominate her, she said it was okay to do so after seeing her name already on Charlie's board. The clip clearly shows Gina holding the board to her chest after finishing her nominations and not showing or touching it again until she turns it over to reveal her nominations, your hatred of her is clearly making you see things that you want to see.

[sampvt]

Some of them did not turn their boards over. Having watched the video i think Sophie, Charlie and Gina cheated. Charlie only wrote one name down.

I am getting so pissed off and angry about this. On the clip clearly available she is sat with her names filled in and clearly there with pen at her side. When she is called to stand up the clip shows her writing something down and putting the top o the pen. The two names are wrote differently and she also said to Charlie vote for me. How freeking clear does it need to be before Gina supporters take the blinkers off. Its pathetic but we will know for sure tonight so lets just wait till that comes up, ok.

[sampvt]

She didn't "ask" Charlie to nominate her, she said it was okay to do so after seeing her name already on Charlie's board. The clip clearly shows Gina holding the board to her chest after finishing her nominations and not showing or touching it again until she turns it over to reveal her nominations, your hatred of her is clearly making you see things that you want to see.

Pity you cant see whats plainly there, sad really but being brainwashed by Gina seems to be effecting loads.

[Ellen]

That's true. But some of them were definetely up to no good and were not subtle about it either. :laugh:

Very true Vanessa.
Am getting a tad annoyed/frustrated at BB not addressing this even just to say they are looking into it.

[Adamw92]

Pity you cant see whats plainly there, sad really but being brainwashed by Gina seems to be effecting loads.

Keep telling yourself that. :xyxwave:

I've watched the video 3 times now and nothing you have said even occurs in it.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

I am getting so pissed off and angry about this. On the clip clearly available she is sat with her names filled in and clearly there with pen at her side. When she is called to stand up the clip shows her writing something down and putting the top o the pen. The two names are wrote differently and she also said to Charlie vote for me. How freeking clear does it need to be before Gina supporters take the blinkers off. Its pathetic but we will know for sure tonight so lets just wait till that comes up, ok.

I saw that too. The only ones who did not cheat were twins , Dexter and Sam.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Very true Vanessa.
Am getting a tad annoyed/frustrated at BB not addressing this even just to say they are looking into it.

I think they might address Sophie's cheating, but not the rest.

[sampvt]

Well there are people speculating that Sophie had 3 names written down so I guess that could be why she didn't show hers (correct me if I'm wrong because I don't remember seeing her board). I have no idea why Charlie and Dexter did not show their boards.


You admit to not seeing a lot yet you spew forth accusations about others like confetti. Why don't you take some time to survey the clip and then you can talk from a position of strength instead of following the great Gina crowd that choose to spit venom at everyone that dares to down her.

[the_answers]

Your description for what happened at 35:49 isn't true and neither is it true for 35:54.

Nice try but no cigar.
I concur !

Even if it WAS true
Then unless I'm mistaken

At NO point were they told they MUST

- show their boards
- pens their pens down

and most importantly of all...

- Not change names !

If you wish to complain then blame the process, not HM's who followed all the rules.

[Adamw92]

You admit to not seeing a lot yet you spew forth accusations about others like confetti. Why don't you take some time to survey the clip and then you can talk from a position of strength instead of following the great Gina crowd that choose to spit venom at everyone that dares to down her.

How does me not remembering if Sophie turned her board around equal not seeing a lot? what the actual hell? We clearly saw Gina, the Twins' and Sam's boards, Charlie and Dexter did not turn theirs yet no one throws accusations of cheating their way.

I'm not spewing venom at all. Simply stating facts that Gina was never seen changing her nominations, pity you can't look past your hatred of her to actually listen to the other side of the story, just seeing what you want to see because you're unhappy with how the result of the nominations went.

[sampvt]

How does me not remembering if Sophie turned her board around equal not seeing a lot? what the actual hell? We clearly saw Gina, the Twins' and Sam's boards, Charlie and Dexter did not turn theirs yet no one throws accusations of cheating their way.

I'm not spewing venom at all. Simply stating facts that Gina was never seen changing her nominations, pity you can't look past your hatred of her to actually listen to the other side of the story, just seeing what you want to see because you're unhappy with how the result of the nominations went.

I think you are confusing me with someone that give a fook. If you cant see the evidence in front of you then I pity you. Even Vanessa agrees with me and we are on different sides. Why don't you just wait till tonight so you can see. then you can apologise.

[MatthewS]

Let's just see how this all plays out. Some really big claims have been made by the OP, such as:

Tomorrow BB will announce they are all up due to a rule break and the betting lines will be opened.


... my source is right...the bookies have been told the same.


Last night my student who has a niece in the bb production team told him then me that they were holding the lines until they looked at Sophie and Ginas cheating.

She was also told that if they did cheat they would probably be up tomorrow.


I proved last year that my contact was true.

Seems like this is pretty cut and dry. Sampvt apparently has inside knowledge, or at least he's claiming he has. Either this will pan out and be true, or it won't. Today is the day, let's see how things unfold. Maybe he's right. Maybe it's all just bu!!sh*t. Time will tell...

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

I think you are confusing me with someone that give a fook. If you cant see the evidence in front of you then I pity you. Even Vanessa agrees with me and we are on different sides. Why don't you just wait till tonight so you can see. then you can apologise.

Sophie thinks she got away with it. :cloud:

[Adamw92]

I think you are confusing me with someone that give a fook. If you cant see the evidence in front of you then I pity you. Even Vanessa agrees with me and we are on different sides. Why don't you just wait till tonight so you can see. then you can apologise.

I can see the evidence in front of me thanks very much. I've watched it clearly many times now and this imaginary version of events you've conjured up just does not exist.

Oh wow, someone actually agrees with you who isn't a Gina fan anyway. Shocker there.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Let's just see how this all plays out. Some really big claims have been made by the OP, such as:











Seems like this is pretty cut and dry. Sampvt apparently has inside knowledge, or at least he's claiming he has. Either this will pan out and be true, or it won't. Today is the day, let's see how things unfold. Maybe he's right. Maybe it's all just bu!!sh*t. Time will tell...

There was cheating going on for sure during the vote. Sophie was hardly subtle about it. Looks like she wanted to nominate Charlie, but changed it to Dexter. :suspect:

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

I can see the evidence in front of me thanks very much. I've watched it clearly many times now and this imaginary version of events you've conjured up just does not exist.

Oh wow, someone actually agrees with you who isn't a Gina fan anyway. Shocker there.

I am a Gina fan. I like Ginxter.

[kate2013]

They need to do more than void her noms because for Sophie thats no punishment at all because she isnt up. They need to put them all up for Sophies noms would have influenced the vote, Sam might nit have been up, Gina might of etc

[Adamw92]

I am a Gina fan. I like Ginxter.

Doesn't seem like it Vanessa, you're very quick to jump on bandwagons of "Gina did this, she obviously cheated" "Gina did that...".

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

They need to do more than void her noms because for Sophie thats no punishment at all because she isnt up. They need to put them all up for Sophies noms would have influenced the vote, Sam might nit have been up, Gina might of etc

She wrote three names down : Sam, Dexter and Charlie. She crossed the last one out at the last minute.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Doesn't seem like it Vanessa, you're very quick to jump on bandwagons of "Gina did this, she obviously cheated" "Gina did that...".

So what? I've gone off her a bit, but i'm still a fan.

[Lex]

I just think the whole vote was a shambles. Sophie's blatant cheating did get on my nerves. She was smirking as well. :mad:

I agree Vanessa....and the way that bb allowed Charlies dithering also irked me!
I'm not even disagreeing with Sampvt's guess, i'm just pointing out that it is all mere speculation, and Sampvt is just being obnoxious as usual..:nono:...but don't worry about it!...i'm well used to her by now! :joker:

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

I agree Vanessa....and the way that bb allowed Charlies dithering also irked me!
I'm not even disagreeing with Sampvt's guess, i'm just pointing out that it is all mere speculation, and Sampvt is just being obnoxious as usual..:nono:...but don't worry about it!...i'm well used to her by now! :joker:

I think they will just punish Sophie. BB seems to be protecting Gina.

[MatthewS]

There was cheating going on for sure during the vote. Sophie was hardly subtle about it. Looks like she wanted to nominate Charlie, but changed it to Dexter. :suspect:

I don't really question whether something was going on or not. I mean, I watched the vids, and it's probable that their was a name change last minute and even some discussion amongst some of the HM's. I have no doubt that BB have already looked at it and made a decision regarding what to do. Maybe they deemed them to be violating the rules, maybe not, it's their call. The more interesting story line to me is the OP, he's made all these claims and statements that he says are factual and apparently has a source inside BB production. We'll soon find out if that all true or not...

[Ellen]

Doesn't seem like it Vanessa, you're very quick to jump on bandwagons of "Gina did this, she obviously cheated" "Gina did that...".

Just because you are a fan of a HM doesnt mean to say you cannot disagree with some things they do or say.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

I don't really question whether something was going on or not. I mean, I watched the vids, and it's probable that their was a name change last minute and even some discussion amongst some of the HM's. I have no doubt that BB have already looked at it and made a decision regarding what to do. Maybe they deemed them to be violating the rules, maybe not, it's their call. The more interesting story line to me is the OP, he's made all these claims and statements that he says are factual and apparently has a source inside BB production. We'll soon find out if that all true or not...

I just wish they'd let us know what's going on. :(

[Adamw92]

So what? I've gone off her a bit, but i'm still a fan.

Then why are you accusing her of cheating when she clearly didn't? You're very quick to get suspicious of her about this when Dexter (your own favourite) never even showed his board so he could clearly of cheated. Have you even watched the clip back? because I have six times now and there is zero evidence of her cheating.

[MatthewS]

I just wish they'd let us know what's going on. :(

They'll have to let us know quite soon I'd imagine, it's not like they can keep the lines closed for very much longer...

[Adamw92]

Just because you are a fan of a HM doesnt mean to say you cannot disagree with some things they do or say.

I didn't say you couldn't but if you're an actual fan of a HM you don't just jump ship as quickly as this. I'm a fan of Dexter and he didn't show his board at all, do I go around accusing him of cheating? No.

All I'm trying to say is how can a fan of a housemate actually back up an opinion of a non-existing fact about the housemate they apparently support?

[Lex]

I think they will just punish Sophie. BB seems to be protecting Gina.

Perhaps Vanessa!...but i'd rather they put them all up...it would get the most out of Gina if she thought that she still wasn't safe. :hugesmile: ..although I am 100% certain she is anyway!...and it would be even better if BB did a fake popularity line-up and put Gina near the bottom!...just for the laugh! :joker:

[the_answers]

I'm afraid the truth is that BB has cocked up the whole F2F noms process.

Either make them void and re-do the whole thing properly or let them stand.

You can't break a rule that doesn't exist.

[HBB1508]

Perhaps Vanessa!...but i'd rather they put them all up...it would get the most out of Gina if she thought that she still wasn't safe. :hugesmile: ..although I am 100% certain she is anyway!...and it would be even better if BB did a fake popularity line-up and put Gina near the bottom!...just for the laugh! :joker:

I'm loving your thinking there Lex with the line up - that would ruffle some feathers for sure :)

[Marmalite]

Not true.

Here's the link to last nights show - x130k46



I have just watched this.

Can anyone confirm what Sophie says just before she stands up and gives her first nomination?

It sounds like "I'm something on who I was told to choose".

I may be wrong and it's something like "I'm torn between who I should choose but I've replayed it about 5 x now and I still think she says something about told who to choose.

Anyone have better speakers than me to confirm what is actually said by her?

[Lex]

I'm loving your thinking there Lex with the line up - that would ruffle some feathers for sure :)

Yeah, and it would be interesting to see if Sophie et al' backs away from their new found friendship with her HBB! :joker:

[mr rochester]

This whole debacle needs the judgement of Solomon. This is my take on it (not that I'm Solomon...)

BB SHOULD HAVE CLEARLY STATED THAT THE NOMS BOARD SHOULD HAVE BEEN TURNED AROUND.

They should have also made the time limit clearer initially and collected the pens when the noms had been written prior to the noms being shown.

No housemate should have been allowed to dither and procrastinate at the point of nomination - they had had all day to consider their votes and the idea that they could not make a decision is ludicrous. This was the last nomination and therefore the MOST CRITICAL.

The fault of this whole fiasco lies with BB for not making this crucial vote viable.

Therefore, it is up to them to deal with this swiftly and efficiently. The way to do this is to show them the vid of last nights noms and regardless of what the culprits say they were writing they should, be put up for nomination for not doing as they were told (i.e nominating 2 other housemates).

Therefore Charlie should remain up as she was so indecisive (her indecisiveness set the tone for the rest of the fiasco BTW) and Gina and Sophie should be up too for continuing to write.

In this case we the voting public have to opportunity to vote for the person we would like to see evicted.

For instance - I would like No Trophy Sophie to go as she has flown under the radar. Since this is the only chance I might have I would like the opportunity to vote her out. If she is not punished (as previous HM's have been in previous series) there is no point in doing the programme anymore if the whole basic premise fall apart at the end of the series. Setting that aside BB need to act - quickly - end of...

If BB had done what they were supposed to do there would be no need for this thread and Sam and Mr Wong would not have to be having this argument.

[Marmalite]

I'm going to stick my foot in it here and say I agree with those that say that Gina did not continue to write on her board.

It may have looked a bit suspicious but all she did was pick up her pen (that had the lid on), as it was on a string, before standing and giving her nominations. Previous to that she had both hands on top of the board which she clutched to her chest.

Gina knew who she was voting for before nominations happened and there was no way she changed it or was going to change it.

When she was speaking to Charlie (who created this whole stupid saga with her confusion and uncertainty) she saw Charlie start to write a G on her board then she stopped and we had another 5 minutes of "Oh, I don't know blah blah confused blah blah".

As far as I can hear Gina said to Charlie "It's ok" and then something else. I didn't hear anything along the lines of "Just choose me".

[joeysteele]

Charlie had already written Gina's name down when Gina said 'just do it'

Well If she could know that, Gina shouldn't have been able to see Charlie's board or even be looking at it to even make the comment, still wrong.

[Patricia4]

I didnt think she cheated and Im not a big fan.

[MrWong]

DIDN'T SHE, TOLD CHARLIE DO NOT NOM' HER . IS THAT NOT INTEFERING WITH THE VOTE...fULL OF HER OWN **** AGAIN..:hmph:

:nono: No need to shout.

Watch the clip.

Charlie wrote Gina down, then she stood up and said 'no, no, no' and went to rub it out then Gina says 'just do it' Charlie again says 'no, no, no' and again Gina says 'just do it'

[MrWong]

Well If she could know that, Gina shouldn't have been able to see Charlie's board or even be looking at it to even make the comment, still wrong.

Being able to see someones board isn't a rule break.

Unless you can point to a time that that's happened on BB.

[joeysteele]

Being able to see someones board isn't a rule break.

Unless you can point to a time that that's happened on BB.

Then why were they told that no one must see their selections until they were nominating.
That their selections had to remain secret until they revealed them.

Charlie was wrong to allow Gina to be able to see her board and Gina was equally wrong to comment as to it.

[MrWong]

Then why were they told that no one must see their selections until they were nominating.
That their selections had to remain secret until they revealed them.

Charlie was wrong to allow Gina to be able to see her board and Gina was equally wrong to comment as to it.

A telling off will do. It's not cheating. Which is what some keep accusing her of.

[sampvt]

This whole debacle needs the judgement of Solomon. This is my take on it (not that I'm Solomon...)

BB SHOULD HAVE CLEARLY STATED THAT THE NOMS BOARD SHOULD HAVE BEEN TURNED AROUND.

They should have also made the time limit clearer initially and collected the pens when the noms had been written prior to the noms being shown.

No housemate should have been allowed to dither and procrastinate at the point of nomination - they had had all day to consider their votes and the idea that they could not make a decision is ludicrous. This was the last nomination and therefore the MOST CRITICAL.

The fault of this whole fiasco lies with BB for not making this crucial vote viable.

Therefore, it is up to them to deal with this swiftly and efficiently. The way to do this is to show them the vid of last nights noms and regardless of what the culprits say they were writing they should, be put up for nomination for not doing as they were told (i.e nominating 2 other housemates).

Therefore Charlie should remain up as she was so indecisive (her indecisiveness set the tone for the rest of the fiasco BTW) and Gina and Sophie should be up too for continuing to write.

In this case we the voting public have to opportunity to vote for the person we would like to see evicted.

For instance - I would like No Trophy Sophie to go as she has flown under the radar. Since this is the only chance I might have I would like the opportunity to vote her out. If she is not punished (as previous HM's have been in previous series) there is no point in doing the programme anymore if the whole basic premise fall apart at the end of the series. Setting that aside BB need to act - quickly - end of...

If BB had done what they were supposed to do there would be no need for this thread and Sam and Mr Wong would not have to be having this argument.

And I would have missed an infraction for breaking the swear filter lol ....BTW wtf is a swear filter when its at home.

[YodaBB]

Then why were they told that no one must see their selections until they were nominating.
That their selections had to remain secret until they revealed them.

Charlie was wrong to allow Gina to be able to see her board and Gina was equally wrong to comment as to it.

If i wasn't for Gina telling Charlie to just do it, It would have taken Charlie another 10 minutes to nominate.
I disagree about Gina being equally wrong, Charlie wrote Gina and Gina only pushed her to actually nominate, she didn't influence anything. Gina only saw the board as Charlie had stood up to nominate also.

From watching the clip, I didn't see Gina cheat, she was one of the only ones to show her board, and so should not be punished by being in the minority that followed the rules

[MatthewS]

So what's the update on this? Apparently they were all going up according to the OP and his reliable inside source.....

[Miranda123]

Sophie cheated by changing her noms and she will be put up but gina was also writing well into the process. I don't know if she changed her noms or whether or not she just was waiting but she broke the rules so she will be up as well. Tomorrow BB will announce they are all up due to a rule break and the betting lines will be opened.

With that in mind Gina will probably go due to her current change of attitude and this is borne out by her nom bomb inclusion tonight. She has fallen from grace and I cant contain my excitement.....eeeeeeh haaaaaa. The bitch is gone (hopefully)

Making it up as you go along now lol

Hazel is GONE

Gina is in the FINAL

Thats hilaaarious!!!!

[Miranda123]

So what's the update on this? Apparently they were all going up according to the OP and his reliable inside source.....

His reliable source is living inside his head lol

[Miranda123]

If i wasn't for Gina telling Charlie to just do it, It would have taken Charlie another 10 minutes to nominate.
I disagree about Gina being equally wrong, Charlie wrote Gina and Gina only pushed her to actually nominate, she didn't influence anything. Gina only saw the board as Charlie had stood up to nominate also.

From watching the clip, I didn't see Gina cheat, she was one of the only ones to show her board, and so should not be punished by being in the minority that followed the rules

she was the ONLY one to show her board EVER and then everyone else followed her

GINA THE ONLY REAL THING ABOUT THIS REALITY SHOW!!

[Miranda123]

This whole debacle needs the judgement of Solomon. This is my take on it (not that I'm Solomon...)

BB SHOULD HAVE CLEARLY STATED THAT THE NOMS BOARD SHOULD HAVE BEEN TURNED AROUND.

They should have also made the time limit clearer initially and collected the pens when the noms had been written prior to the noms being shown.

No housemate should have been allowed to dither and procrastinate at the point of nomination - they had had all day to consider their votes and the idea that they could not make a decision is ludicrous. This was the last nomination and therefore the MOST CRITICAL.

The fault of this whole fiasco lies with BB for not making this crucial vote viable.

Therefore, it is up to them to deal with this swiftly and efficiently. The way to do this is to show them the vid of last nights noms and regardless of what the culprits say they were writing they should, be put up for nomination for not doing as they were told (i.e nominating 2 other housemates).

Therefore Charlie should remain up as she was so indecisive (her indecisiveness set the tone for the rest of the fiasco BTW) and Gina and Sophie should be up too for continuing to write.

In this case we the voting public have to opportunity to vote for the person we would like to see evicted.

For instance - I would like No Trophy Sophie to go as she has flown under the radar. Since this is the only chance I might have I would like the opportunity to vote her out. If she is not punished (as previous HM's have been in previous series) there is no point in doing the programme anymore if the whole basic premise fall apart at the end of the series. Setting that aside BB need to act - quickly - end of...

If BB had done what they were supposed to do there would be no need for this thread and Sam and Mr Wong would not have to be having this argument.

And I would have missed an infraction for breaking the swear filter lol ....BTW wtf is a swear filter when its at home.


They should have made that clear but they didnt.

Luckily for them , Gina turned hers around immediately after Charlie scerwed around with hers, and therefore Gina ensured that no other HM could mess with the game like Charlie
If Sophie changed hers from Charlie to Sam, thats her problem, but if they want to change it back, thats fine, Gina still wont be up lololol

[Miranda123]

Well If she could know that, Gina shouldn't have been able to see Charlie's board or even be looking at it to even make the comment, still wrong.

Oh so now Gina should go up because she saw Charlies board, after Charlie had written on it

How desperate are you lot?

Its hilaarious!!!!

[Marcus.]

well they phone numbers not up and i heard that sophie was in the dairy room

[boomoo]

I didn't say you couldn't but if you're an actual fan of a HM you don't just jump ship as quickly as this. I'm a fan of Dexter and he didn't show his board at all, do I go around accusing him of cheating? No.

All I'm trying to say is how can a fan of a housemate actually back up an opinion of a non-existing fact about the housemate they apparently support?

There would be no possible reason for Dexter to cheat because he was first to nominate.

The last two to vote could alter the result by mentally calculating how many noms each person had.

[Videostar]

Has the phone lines opened yet?

[Miranda123]

Last night my student who has a niece in the bb production team told him then me that they were holding the lines until they looked at Sophie and Ginas cheating. She was also told that if they did cheat they would probably be up tomorrow. Obviously Sophies noms were now annulled and saved Sam but they chose to do nothing about Ginas because her choices made no difference to the end result. This is a cop out by BB and yet another blatant attempt to protect Gina.

Like the blatant attempts to save Hazel, that never worked lol

We'll see that on tonights BBOTS then? Thanks for giving us a heads up

This is hilaaarious!!!!!

GINA IN THE FINAL, ITS HILAAARIOUS!!

[MrWong]

There would be no possible reason for Dexter to cheat because he was first to nominate.

The last two to vote could alter the result by mentally calculating how many noms each person had.

He was 2nd to nominate.

[Miranda123]

well they phone numbers not up and i heard that sophie was in the dairy room

Obviously the OP's Mole is exatly that

A MOLE (and not a member of the BB Production Team ) lol

maybe they should give Hazel a call and ask her, after all, she is at HOME now

And GINA IS IN THE FINAL!!!

[Videostar]

He was 2nd to nominate.

Are you suggesting Dexter cheated also thus deflecting from the true cheats?

[Miranda123]

He was 2nd to nominate.

You werent expecting facts now were you Mr Wong, not when it didnt go their way!

[Miranda123]

Are you suggesting Dexter cheated also thus deflecting from the true cheats?

Only cheats were Sophie & Charlie (for rubbing out)

But the nomis stand so its all good in the hood

Dexter will go nowhere!

[Shaun]

well isn't this the misleading title

[Videostar]

Only cheats were Sophie & Charlie (for rubbing out)

But the nomis stand so its all good in the hood

Dexter will go nowhere!

Fair enough.

Has the phone lines opened yet?

[MatthewS]

The lines are still closed....

[MrWong]

Are you suggesting Dexter cheated also thus deflecting from the true cheats?

FFS! The fm said Dexter nominated 1st. I corrected him. I said nothing about cheating.

[MrWong]

Last night my student who has a niece in the bb production team told him then me that they were holding the lines until they looked at Sophie and Ginas cheating. She was also told that if they did cheat they would probably be up tomorrow. Obviously Sophies noms were now annulled and saved Sam but they chose to do nothing about Ginas because her choices made no difference to the end result. This is a cop out by BB and yet another blatant attempt to protect Gina.

:suspect: