Vote To Evict sums up why Sam won.

[Headie]

If they don't revert to Vote To Save next year, then I can see them losing a lot of viewers.

[reece(:]

The producers got what they wanted. Sam would've been out early if it was VTS.

[TheManWhoLaughs]

Yes, Sam winning a five-way vote-to-save shows the problem with vote-to-evict....

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??

[Johnnyuk123]

Anyone else not watching Sexist Sam's very short Interview? I'm off to bed, night lol :)

[Shaun]

except you know, he was the favourite to win since week 5 and he wasn't up for eviction until week 6

please shut up with 'vote to save'. people will just save the ones they don't hate.

[Nedusa]

Big brother you are an absolute disgrace to crown the winner of this show with someone who has the personality of a wooden post, above all the characters in that house...

Fcuking unbelievable , a total farce of a show from start to finish...

Load of utter Balls .... My apologies to all the real viewers of this show..

Clearly the guy with the disability was picked to win months ago...

Shame on you BB .... Credibility now gone.....!!!!

[Withano]

Yes, Sam winning a five-way vote-to-save shows the problem with vote-to-evict....

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??

Logic is lost on some!

[Marc]

The last vote was a vote to save effectively so... Not really

[Headie]

The last vote was a vote to save effectively so... Not really

Well, he would've gone in Week 6 against Dan/Sophie.

It's cos all the other finalists did stuff to piss viewers off and he was the only non-effective one, therefore winning votes.