She obviously has her reasons to hate him

[Benjamin]

We forget she knows him very well and with his awful past she probably has quite a few reasons to hate him.

[Josy]

Doesn't give her the right to constantly cause arguments then blame him..

[Benjamin]

I never said it did, but she clearly has deep rooted issues with him. he has obviously done something major (other than beat the **** out of his wife many times) for her to despise him.

[GiRTh]

Doesn't give her the right to constantly cause arguments then blame him..This.

[Josy]

I never said it did, but she clearly has deep rooted issues with him. he has obviously done something major (other than beat the **** out of his wife many times) for her to despise him.

Right but he tries to be ok with her in there and she shoves it back in his face constantly.

[Benjamin]

This.

:suspect:

I just agreed. That wasn't the point of this thread.

[Ammi]

..I think she has huge anger issues with him but him mentioning any incident which involved her deceased husband was extremely low...

[Vanessa]

Doesn't give her the right to constantly cause arguments then blame him..

I know, right? She surrounds hersef with her cronies and then slags him off. I hate her. :fist:

[smudgie]

I really don't think it s all one sided, they wind each other up.
No love lost there.

[Kazanne]

I never said it did, but she clearly has deep rooted issues with him. he has obviously done something major (other than beat the **** out of his wife many times) for her to despise him.

She hates him because she knows what her husband did,imo.

[Benjamin]

Right but he tries to be ok with her in there and she shoves it back in his face constantly.

Maybe because he has done something that bad? His past has been very awful, for all we know there could be a lot more to his past that hasn't yet surfaced.

[mizzy25]

well he did say to louissa to ask what happened in frank carson (or whoever it was) dressing room tonight, then clearly tried to back track. So obviously something happened way back but it is her husband and he is now dead so I think jim stopped a bit low there, prob not realising **** stirrer luissa went and asked linda asap.

[Josy]

Maybe because he has done something that bad? His past has been very awful, for all we know there could be a lot more to his past that hasn't yet surfaced.

Or maybe because he knows some not so nice things from her past too?

[Macie Lightfoot]

Doesn't give her the right to constantly cause arguments then blame him..

But Jim's the one who causes arguments though? His MO is to make a passive aggressive comment to get a reaction out of someone (a woman) and then get made when THEY are understandably defensive. And then he mutters to himself and walks away and has a cigarette.

[smeagol]

she hates him cause 1. she is a psycho and needs someone to hate just look at her face shes born bitter.
and 2. cause jim probably knows about her the dwarf the dildo the 3 strippers and the custard lol

[Black Dagger]

She should still get over herself tbh.

[AnnieK]

Her husband was caught stealing from Frank Carson who is a god friend of jams...he has probably had a go at her / her husband about it so she is never going to forgive that obviously but she has goaded and goaded him, she mst have thought he wouldn't say anything. They just need to give each other a seriously wide berth

[Kazanne]

Maybe because he has done something that bad? His past has been very awful, for all we know there could be a lot more to his past that hasn't yet surfaced.

Oh Lord Ben you make him sound like Jack the Ripper,hate him all you like but lets get some perpective here,he hit his wife which he admitted,he was a drinker he was in a bad place which hes admitted,he's no better or worse than hundreds of other men(and women):hugesmile:

[Josy]

But Jim's the one who causes arguments though? His MO is to make a passive aggressive comment to get a reaction out of someone (a woman) and then get made when THEY are understandably defensive. And then he mutters to himself and walks away and has a cigarette.

Linda was the cause of that argument starting tonight or did you not watch it happen on the highlights?

[joeysteele]

We forget she knows him very well and with his awful past she probably has quite a few reasons to hate him.

... and in my view vice versa too,to be fair. He has as to her likely as well.

[mizzy25]

I thought she said frank carson was her husband lol I wasn't watching it properly tonight lol

[joeysteele]

Linda was the cause of that argument starting tonight or did you not watch it happen on the highlights?

All her work Josy.
She got off lightly for me, I would have likely had to give a real verbal backlash if someone kept pushing me as she was him tonight.

[PrincessIona]

YES!! This is what I have been saying about Linda all along, she clearly knows a lot about him and has her reasons for not liking him. He knows how she feels about him and is deliberately winding her up knowing she will react badly

[Patricia4]

She is a bad person I bet her past isn't good.
Jim is doing a great job he's winding her up and she's taking the bait.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Linda was the cause of that argument starting tonight or did you not watch it happen on the highlights?

He purposefully set Luisa up to say something about Linda's husband and then pretended it never happened as usual.

[Josy]

He purposefully set Luisa up to say something about Linda's husband and then pretended it never happened as usual.

That wasn't what I asked you?

I know what Jim done and he was wrong to bring up what he did, did you see Linda start the argument earlier in the night or not?

[Macie Lightfoot]

You're speaking as if one arguments means that Jim's general MO isn't what I said it was.

[Jordan.]

People acting like Jim is a victim and Linda has no reason at all to have a vendetta against him lmfao. Actually looking forward to this series ending now.

[Ammi]

..if anyone was having and argument with someone and no matter how angry they were or how much that person was being an idiot to them....would it really ever be acceptable to then bring up something about a deceased spouse which they knew would bring back a bad memory and a bad time in that person's life...Linda behaved badly but Jim behaved worse...really just about as low as someone can go....

[Vanessa]

..if anyone was having and argument with someone and no matter how angry they were or how much that person was being an idiot to them....would it really ever be acceptable to then bring up something about a deceased spouse which they knew would bring back a bad memory and a bad time in that person's life...Linda behaved badly but Jim behaved worse...really just about as low as someone can go....

She's always trying to povoke him. She surrounds herself with her little posse and slags him off on a daily basis. Now for me that is worse.

[Jordan.]

..if anyone was having and argument with someone and no matter how angry they were or how much that person was being an idiot to them....would it really ever be acceptable to then bring up something about a deceased spouse which they knew would bring back a bad memory and a bad time in that person's life...Linda behaved badly but Jim behaved worse...really just about as low as someone can go....

True Ammi http://a.mod-site.net/s/appl.gif

Sadly people let their support for a housemates blind their morals

[sampvt]

She hates him because she knows what her husband did,imo.


She hates him because she blames Jim for having him arrested for being a theif

[smeagol]

so if someone dies you cant ever mention them again, thats nuts

he can mention who he likes he knew them. and if that is the cause of her problem then he can mention it.

she plays the victim well, she doesn't give a crap she just wants to hate

[Macie Lightfoot]

She's always trying to povoke him. She surrounds herself with her little posse and slags him off on a daily basis. Now for me that is worse.

That's what Conor did with Deana though?

[Kazanne]

She hates him because she blames Jim for having him arrested for being a theif

She needs to let go,this must have been a while ago,frank carsons been dead some time hasn't he?

[Kazanne]

so if someone dies you cant ever mention them again, thats nuts

he can mention who he likes he knew them. and if that is the cause of her problem then he can mention it.

she plays the victim well, she doesn't give a crap she just wants to hate

That's exactly how I feel smeagol,

[Vanessa]

so if someone dies you cant ever mention them again, thats nuts

he can mention who he likes he knew them. and if that is the cause of her problem then he can mention it.

she plays the victim well, she doesn't give a crap she just wants to hate

:thumbs:

[smeagol]

That's exactly how I feel smeagol,

yeah its just common sense.

we are the wise ones lol

[Jordan.]

so if someone dies you cant ever mention them again, thats nuts

he can mention who he likes he knew them. and if that is the cause of her problem then he can mention it.

she plays the victim well, she doesn't give a crap she just wants to hate

I'm sure you'd be saying the same if it was someone close to you who had been brought up.

[Josy]

..if anyone was having and argument with someone and no matter how angry they were or how much that person was being an idiot to them....would it really ever be acceptable to then bring up something about a deceased spouse which they knew would bring back a bad memory and a bad time in that person's life...Linda behaved badly but Jim behaved worse...really just about as low as someone can go....

I don't think I have seen anyone on here tonight saying it was acceptable what Jim brought up though Ammi?

My point earlier in this thread is that no matter if you hate a certain housemate or think a housemate is amazing you should still at least admit when they have been in the wrong..especially when it was shown for us all to see.

Anyone excusing Lindas behaviour tonight because they hate Jim is just doing so for that reason alone because she was far from innocent and vice versa.

[Z]

..if anyone was having and argument with someone and no matter how angry they were or how much that person was being an idiot to them....would it really ever be acceptable to then bring up something about a deceased spouse which they knew would bring back a bad memory and a bad time in that person's life...Linda behaved badly but Jim behaved worse...really just about as low as someone can go....

Jim was a dick but I think there are a lot of double standards where Jim and Linda are concerned; if they have bad blood between them from the past then Linda shouldn't keep provoking Jim and then be upset when he rises to the bait and responds to said bad blood. Also if the shoe were on the other foot, would it be okay to bring up Jim's alcohol problems or mentioning his domestic abuse with his ex-wife? That would bring back bad memories from a bad time in his life.

[Ammi]

I don't think I have seen anyone on here tonight saying it was acceptable what Jim brought up though Ammi?

My point earlier in this thread is that no matter if you hate a certain housemate or think a housemate is amazing you should still at least admit when they have been in the wrong..especially when it was shown for us all to see.

Anyone excusing Lindas behaviour tonight because they hate Jim is just doing so for that reason alone because she was far from innocent and vice versa.

..yeah, I agree because no one is always in the wright or always in the wrong in anything but it can sometimes be a thing in BB that if it's a favourite, whatever they do, it will always be somehow be seen as 'justified' but for me..(and because everyone is flawed..)...it's about acknowledging those flaws, which I know you do but still thinking that you see far more good things in someone that override them, which I do understand...I haven't actually got a favourite but even when I have, I don't think I've ever seen anyone as never being wrong sometimes in certain situations in the house...anyway as for Jim, for me personally and regardless of past histories etc I just haven't seen enough of the good things that others may have to override any opinion or any of his less than good qualities...and tbh, before he said that to Luisa and he did say to her to ask Linda about it...I was actually thinking by walking away/not responding etc to her silliness, that he was showing that maybe he was not too bad after all....(anyway, this is a bit of a rushed post because I'm late for work..)....

[Ammi]

Jim was a dick but I think there are a lot of double standards where Jim and Linda are concerned; if they have bad blood between them from the past then Linda shouldn't keep provoking Jim and then be upset when he rises to the bait and responds to said bad blood. Also if the shoe were on the other foot, would it be okay to bring up Jim's alcohol problems or mentioning his domestic abuse with his ex-wife? That would bring back bad memories from a bad time in his life.

...hmm, well I guess we all see things differently and that's the beauty..(and craziness..)..of BB because although I agree she's been quite awful, it's quite easy to behave and respond well to friends or people that we like or are being nice to us but to me, the telling of a true character is how someone responds to someone who behaves badly and the response he showed, to me was not good at all...

[thesheriff443]

...hmm, well I guess we all see things differently and that's the beauty..(and craziness..)..of BB because although I agree she's been quite awful, it's quite easy to behave and respond well to friends or people that we like or are being nice to us but to me, the telling of a true character is how someone responds to someone who behaves badly and the response he showed, to me was not good at all...

real people showing real emotion, good and bad.
I have only ever seen you lose your cool on here once and that was with me!.

if someone smacks you in the mouth!, you don't say thankyou!

[thesheriff443]

Jim was a dick but I think there are a lot of double standards where Jim and Linda are concerned; if they have bad blood between them from the past then Linda shouldn't keep provoking Jim and then be upset when he rises to the bait and responds to said bad blood. Also if the shoe were on the other foot, would it be okay to bring up Jim's alcohol problems or mentioning his domestic abuse with his ex-wife? That would bring back bad memories from a bad time in his life.

fighting fire with fire.

[MachoPoodle]

But Jim's the one who causes arguments though? His MO is to make a passive aggressive comment to get a reaction out of someone (a woman) and then get made when THEY are understandably defensive. And then he mutters to himself and walks away and has a cigarette.

This is what I just don't get. He's delivering text book examples of how to be passive aggressive, and that seems to go over so many people's heads. And it's always, *always* women who are his targets.

[bez87]

well he did say to louissa to ask what happened in frank carson (or whoever it was) dressing room tonight, then clearly tried to back track. So obviously something happened way back but it is her husband and he is now dead so I think jim stopped a bit low there, prob not realising **** stirrer luissa went and asked linda asap.

he actually just turned round and said " ask her about frank carson's dressing room" lusia then went on to say "What?" and at this point Jim repeated what he said, so how Lusia is a **** stirrer is beyond me because i'm pretty sure if someone said to me go ask so and so about something i'd go and ask them about it, but Jim knew that, he is a little low life little human being who thinks he better than everyone else and yet he prob has done some of the worst stuff in his life compared to everyone else.

I'm not defending linda she annoying the way she snaps, but i honestly believe jim gets a kick out of it winding her up saying snid remarks

[Crimson Dynamo]

..I think she has huge anger issues with him but him mentioning any incident which involved her deceased husband was extremely low...

I disagree. The guy died in 2007 and he is not some Islamic god. So what if he is dead?

She had it coming by pushing Jim to the limit. His comment about Luisa not having a dad around was based on the fact he is a dad and has children and that harridan Nolan pounced on him.

Then she plays the *sob* dead husband card like she is a martyr.

Pathetic:nono:

[Crimson Dynamo]

This is what I just don't get. He's delivering text book examples of how to be passive aggressive, and that seems to go over so many people's heads. And it's always, *always* women who are his targets.

I think its because the women have a set idea about him based on newspaper column inches and have not given him a chance, fueled by Nolans hate

[MrWong]

I disagree. The guy died in 2007 and he is not some Islamic god. So what if he is dead?

She had it coming by pushing Jim to the limit. His comment about Luisa not having a dad around was based on the fact he is a dad and has children and that harridan Nolan pounced on him.

Then she plays the *sob* dead husband card like she is a martyr.

Pathetic:nono:

No it's based on him thinking she needs a man in her life to be happy.

He said "It doesn't bother you that you don't have a man there?"

Linda pointed out that once again he'd turned the convo into man/woman thing when Luisa was talking about her relationship with her daughter and how she likes to dance around with her to Maltilda.

[MrWong]

I think its because the women have a set idea about him based on newspaper column inches and have not given him a chance, fueled by Nolans hate

Based on his own words.

[MachoPoodle]

I think its because the women have a set idea about him based on newspaper column inches and have not given him a chance, fueled by Nolans hate

So it's all the women's fault Jim is being a sexist arsehole? Ok then...

[MrWong]

She's always trying to povoke him. She surrounds herself with her little posse and slags him off on a daily basis. Now for me that is worse.

I can't with this ****.

They dig at each other. Hm's have said as much. It's only JIm that got nasty.

[Crimson Dynamo]

He is one of the few in there who will apologise and face difficult situations alone and not crying in his bed surrounded by fawning acolytes

[Crimson Dynamo]

I can't with this ****.

They dig at each other. Hm's have said as much. It's only JIm that got nasty.

If you play in mud you will get dirty. Nolan made a mistake to play in mud in her white garments

[MachoPoodle]

He is one of the few in there who will apologise and face difficult situations alone and not crying in his bed surrounded by fawning acolytes

His apologies are not in the slightest bit sincere. Right afterwards he goes to someone else and slag off the person he's just apologized to, or make a face behind their back or something. Being false and two faced is hardly some sort of sign or moral superiority. Besides, he doesn't face it , that's pretty much the exact opposite of how he handles it. In the heat of the moment he usually just walks away.

[MrWong]

He is one of the few in there who will apologise and face difficult situations alone and not crying in his bed surrounded by fawning acolytes

After he's tried to wriggle out of it by lying about saying it in the the first place and then lying about telling Luisa to ask Linda about the incident.

[MrWong]

If you play in mud you will get dirty. Nolan made a mistake to play in mud in her white garments

Jim's no longer the bookies fave so I'd say it was Jim that made the mistake. :xyxwave:

[Robodog]

Of course there is some history between them, none of us know the full story.

The big difference between Jim and Linda is that from the start - she has been constantly trying to have an argument with him - and he has been constantly trying to avoid having one with her !

No matter how much he has walked away from her, she has been utterly intent on goading him into an argument, trying to get him to say something to upset her so she can pin all her anger/hate/upset onto him.

Well tonight she finally managed to push hard enough to grind him down and make him say something back to her.

This is what she has been pushing for from the moment she went in the house.

Linda has no other story in this years CBB other than trying to have a big argument with Jim.

He has done well to hold his tongue for so long. No wonder he finally said something to try and make her back off. It's too much pressure trying to put up with someone baiting you the whole time.

[Z]

Jim's no longer the bookies fave so I'd say it was Jim that made the mistake. :xyxwave:

Yeah he'll regret that one, I think he might end up trying even harder to not crack, that was a slip up and it came on Day 14, he managed to go two weeks without snapping but it sort of happened so he'll be panicking a bit now I think

[MrWong]

Yeah he'll regret that one, I think he might end up trying even harder to not crack, that was a slip up and it came on Day 14, he managed to go two weeks without snapping but it sort of happened so he'll be panicking a bit now I think

It will be interesting to hear the rent-a-mobs reactions to Jim tonight. Not that they are any indicator of popularity as such, just that those reactions tend to have an impact on the house/hm's.

[smudgie]

Quite funny how Jim was asking about there not being a man there, he was not there for all his kids.:joker:

[Kazanne]

Quite funny how Jim was asking about there not being a man there, he was not there for all his kids.:joker:

I think he was just trying to mingle smudgie and show interest,I saw nothing wrong with him asking that,I'de have asked aswell to be honest as I have done sometimes to people,i don't think there was any reason for Linda to butt in on that convo,she hates it when he tries to get to know people and although he shouldn't have said that I can see why he did,when people are constantly nasty to you and yawping in your ear you say things to hurt people and regret it after which is what I thik happened here,she wasn't blameless at all.

[jet]

Of course there is some history between them, none of us know the full story.

The big difference between Jim and Linda is that from the start - she has been constantly trying to have an argument with him - and he has been constantly trying to avoid having one with her !

No matter how much he has walked away from her, she has been utterly intent on goading him into an argument, trying to get him to say something to upset her so she can pin all her anger/hate/upset onto him.

Well tonight she finally managed to push hard enough to grind him down and make him say something back to her.

This is what she has been pushing for from the moment she went in the house.

Linda has no other story in this years CBB other than trying to have a big argument with Jim.

He has done well to hold his tongue for so long. No wonder he finally said something to try and make her back off. It's too much pressure trying to put up with someone baiting you the whole time.

Not so. They are each as bad as each other according to the HM's who are actually THERE. I have seen him being snide to her and talking over her as if she isn't there on several occasions.
Some people must get different HL shows than others - there must be a 'Jim Davidson does no wrong' version.

[Kazanne]

Not so. They are each as bad as each other according to the HM's who are actually THERE. I have seen him being snide to her and talking over her as if she isn't there on several occasions.
Some people must get different HL shows than others - there must be a 'Jim Davidson does no wrong' version.

Likewise at those who are watching 'Jim Davidson can do no right' version:hugesmile:

[smudgie]

I think he was just trying to mingle smudgie and show interest,I saw nothing wrong with him asking that,I'de have asked aswell to be honest as I have done sometimes to people,i don't think there was any reason for Linda to butt in on that convo,she hates it when he tries to get to know people and although he shouldn't have said that I can see why he did,when people are constantly nasty to you and yawping in your ear you say things to hurt people and regret it after which is what I thik happened here,she wasn't blameless at all.

The way I saw it, he was having a little dig, however, Louisa is big enough and strong enough to defend herself.
Linda did not have to have a go at him.
I think that Linda and Jim are on a mission to carp at each other at every given opportunity.

[Kizzy]

His apologies are not in the slightest bit sincere. Right afterwards he goes to someone else and slag off the person he's just apologized to, or make a face behind their back or something. Being false and two faced is hardly some sort of sign or moral superiority. Besides, he doesn't face it , that's pretty much the exact opposite of how he handles it. In the heat of the moment he usually just walks away.

I agree, he has been instructed to walk away.... Except this time he couldn't help himself and the poison came out, so what if she felt his comment was a leading one? It was when you look at it.

[FrankCarsonsDressingRoom]

Pffffft!This is all getting very boring now....

[Kazanne]

The way I saw it, he was having a little dig, however, Louisa is big enough and strong enough to defend herself.
Linda did not have to have a go at him.
I think that Linda and Jim are on a mission to carp at each other at every given opportunity.

It is quite funny to watch though:hugesmile:

[flamingGalah!]

Yes Linda doesn't like him & Jim doesn't like her, but he isn't the one constantly goading her & trying to turn the rest of the house againt her is he? Says far more about her than it does about Jim! :xyxwave:

[jet]

Likewise at those who are watching 'Jim Davidson can do no right' version:hugesmile:

I've defended him on several occasions. In the thread about him saying the crowd are morons and in the one where people said he slurred his words because he was drunk. I also praised him in another thread for comforting a HM.
When I think he hasn't done anything wrong, I'll say so. :tongue:

What do you say to that Kaz?

[Munchkins]

Ive liked what Linda did once, when she defended Luisa and stated she would sleep with 5 men in one night if she could :joker:
And ill happily admitt Jims faults lol

[jet]

Ive liked what Linda did once, when she defended Luisa and stated she would sleep with 5 men in one night if she could :joker:
And ill happily admitt Jims faults lol

So tell us then. I'm all ears. :hugesmile:

[Pincho Paxton]

Linda has emotional issues, and Jim has issues with emotional women, so they both clash. But in the house it is Linda that is the cause of the clashes. I would not be able to get on with her myself.

[jet]

I've defended him on several occasions. In the thread about him saying the crowd are morons and in the one where people said he slurred his words because he was drunk. I also praised him in another thread for comforting a HM.
When I think he hasn't done anything wrong, I'll say so. :tongue:

What do you say to that Kaz?

I'm quoting myself for Kaz in case she hasn't seen this as I've always answered her questions to me. :hugesmile:

[BigBrotherfan4ever]

Not so. They are each as bad as each other according to the HM's who are actually THERE. I have seen him being snide to her and talking over her as if she isn't there on several occasions.
Some people must get different HL shows than others - there must be a 'Jim Davidson does no wrong' version.

Lol I'm with you on that one jet, according to all the forums Jim can do no wrong:devil:, IMHO the guy is a utter ....hole, can't wait see the back of him ...tbh

[Kizzy]

All objectivity has gone out of the window, so much there are now threads joking about linda being sexually assaulted.
There is no justification for that as far as I see it.

[Josy]

All objectivity has gone out of the window, so much there are now threads joking about linda being sexually assaulted.
There is no justification for that as far as I see it.

Where is the thread then and why not report it instead of commenting about it?

[MTVN]

Can't see any threads like that

[Munchkins]

Neither can I

[Niamh.]

:umm2:

[Pincho Paxton]

Where is the thread then and why not report it instead of commenting about it?

Lol, it's this one.. now. :joker:

[Northern Monkey]

so if someone dies you cant ever mention them again, thats nuts

he can mention who he likes he knew them. and if that is the cause of her problem then he can mention it.

she plays the victim well, she doesn't give a crap she just wants to hate

I agree with this,Well said.All this 'oh he's dead,no-one should ever mention anything ever again' is just bs.It's obviously the reason Linda is so vengeful for Jim and won't get off his nutsack,He has every reason to bring it up since it seems to be the cause of her vendetta against him.She needs to just let it go whilst they're in the house,Unless this is actually what she wants,Constant drama to give herself some camera time.If so then i would'nt blame Jim for eventually snapping with her and giving her an earful.

[chuff me dizzy]

Lol I'm with you on that one jet, according to all the forums Jim can do no wrong:devil:, IMHO the guy is a utter ....hole, can't wait see the back of him ...tbh

Agree 100% BBF,Why did I spend my hard earned voting for him ?

[Jezzy]

Where is the thread then and why not report it instead of commenting about it?

Haven't seen a thread about it, but was talking to mum today, and she brought up the same thing about Linda having been sexually assaulted by her father...

Totally OT though, sorry.

[Josy]

Still waiting on this link Kizzy?

Haven't seen a thread about it, but was talking to mum today, and she brought up the same thing about Linda having been sexually assaulted by her father...

Totally OT though, sorry.

No worries, I never knew anything about it tbh and I haven't seen any threads made joking about that.

[Kazanne]

Still waiting on this link Kizzy?



No worries, I never knew anything about it tbh and I haven't seen any threads made joking about that.

I heard a rumour about something like this,something within the family,and a big fall out over it but don't know if it was Linda,or factual,but not seen anything here about it

[MrWong]

I agree with this,Well said.All this 'oh he's dead,no-one should ever mention anything ever again' is just bs.It's obviously the reason Linda is so vengeful for Jim and won't get off his nutsack,He has every reason to bring it up since it seems to be the cause of her vendetta against him.She needs to just let it go whilst they're in the house,Unless this is actually what she wants,Constant drama to give herself some camera time.If so then i would'nt blame Jim for eventually snapping with her and giving her an earful.

Who's said that?

The issue for me is that he brought it up during a row in an attempt to rile and embarrass her. It was a low blow.

If he sincerely wanted to know he could have pulled her aside during a quiet moment, when they haven't been drinking and arguing and then ask her. That's only if he's sincere though.

[MachoPoodle]

Linda has emotional issues, and Jim has issues with emotional women, so they both clash. But in the house it is Linda that is the cause of the clashes. I would not be able to get on with her myself.

This tired old drivel about emotional women... :sleep:

If anyone is emotional in there it's Jim bloody Davidson, changing mood every 5 minutes.

[Ammi]

Haven't seen a thread about it, but was talking to mum today, and she brought up the same thing about Linda having been sexually assaulted by her father...

Totally OT though, sorry.

..I hadn't heard anything about this before but here is a link to the DM today...


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-528696/The-monster-family--I-sexually-abused-father-says-Nolan-Sisters-star-Anne.html