Conspiracy theory website re 9-11

[Sticks]

There has been discussion on the Channel 4 News forum thread to say that George Bush and his government conspired to cause the two planes to hit the Twin towers in New York, which were then brought down by demolition charges.

The claim also is that no plane ever hit the Pentagon, it was a missile
deliberately fired at a convienient part of the Pentagon.

They say US government perpetrated this so they could have an excuse to get
rid of an uncooperative regime in Afghanistan and go to war against Iraq

The main proponent of this conspiracy theory is on http://www.koolpages.com/killtown/index.html

What do you lot make of it ?

Are there any answers to the apparent inconsistancies.

I found very disturbing the idea that the US government would carry this out, but could not think of replies to the points raised, as my usual line, reference to hoax busting websites was undermined by this site. :conf:

It must also be upsetting for those who lost relatives and friends in the attacks. :mad::conf:

[Janette]

What a load of tosh!

:nono:

[jbellemeg]

My son-in-law did remark on the lack of debri's from a plane at the pentagon .
Can any of you honestly remember seeing any?
As for the theory it was the USA themselves that did the awful deed I can't believe that.
We did think it might have been a bomb at the pentagon.
What an awful accusation to make.
:nono:

[steve_o]

What a load of rubbish, made up by some really sad, sick, people. There was no or hardly any plane rubble from the simple fact, there wouldn't be when a thin metal plane goes threw a building at 650 MPH and blows up, their wasn't much debri left of Naggasaki or Haroshama niether. There never is when something explodes in a ball of flames.:conf::conf:

[Mairi]

I've never, in all my life, read such a load of complete and total RUBBISH.

Who, on earth, dreams up these ridiculous accusations?

They make me VERY :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

[Sticks]

The "evidence" seemed so well presented. He seemed to dwell on the fact that there were no burn marks on the lawn of the Pentagon.

It all seemed so convincing and although we do not want to believe it, as Warrick says in CSI "You have to follow the evidence" And the way the evidence was presented ....

Will there ever be a point by point rebuttle from someone independant of the US government ? :conf:


As for who makes this stuff up, I would think it might be militia groups who believe the US government is out to get them. These people included the likes of Timoth McVeigh :nono:

[Sticks]

I have come across this link (http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=12536) which seems to refute the first link (Which has been pulled I wonder why :conf:)