View Full Version : So Jack only got 2 noms
alex_front2
29-06-2015, 02:50 PM
http://www.tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv/big-brother/225299-big-brother-2015-spoilers-who-nominated-who-this-week-find-out-here.html
Jack: Marc + Sam
Harry: Sam + Jack
Marc: Danny + Cristian
Danny: Marc + Sam
Joel: Sam + Harry
Chloe: Marc + Harry
Sam: Harry + Jack
Cristian: Marc + Harry
Nick: Marc + Sam
Aisleyne: Marc + Sam
Marc: 6
Sam: 6
Harry: 4
Jack: 2
Wow, BB trying to save Marc by sacrificing easy target Jack. This is totally pathetic. It should either be a head to head or top 3 is Harry, Marc, Sam.
Ashley.
29-06-2015, 02:52 PM
It's so laughable! Somebody needs to call them out. Are they going to give us a reason for this?
Niamh.
29-06-2015, 02:52 PM
Ashleyne shouldn't get to nominate imo
arista
29-06-2015, 02:52 PM
Just Get Jack Out
DrunkerThanMoses
29-06-2015, 02:53 PM
Yes this is a tad unfair, they might as well put Danny and Christian up as well and said everyone who received a nomination is up for eviction
Ramsay
29-06-2015, 02:53 PM
Ashleyne shouldn't get to nominate imo
truth, it's a bit weird.
Pete.
29-06-2015, 02:53 PM
It should have been Marc vs Sam then.
There's zero transparency involved anymore what a complete joke
Niamh.
29-06-2015, 02:55 PM
It should have been Marc vs Sam then.
There's zero transparency involved anymore what a complete joke
Marc Vs Sam Vs harry because I thought it was 3 or more HMs
MrWong
29-06-2015, 02:55 PM
All part of BB's plan to save the performing seal.
Pete.
29-06-2015, 02:56 PM
Marc Vs Sam Vs harry because I thought it was 3 or more HMs
I have no idea :/
Griffin5779
29-06-2015, 02:56 PM
if it where resersed..and they put marc up with 2 noms you would be cheering...
when it was head to head and people didn't like who was up they would say..its unfair they should put the whole house up
well i think it is unfair to let a large group target a smaller one
Niamh.
29-06-2015, 02:57 PM
I have no idea :/
They don't really like to tell us what the rule is because then they can't just change them around to suit whatever agenda they have
Pete.
29-06-2015, 02:59 PM
if it where resersed..and they put marc up with 2 noms you would be cheering...
when it was head to head and people didn't like who was up they would say..its unfair they should put the whole house up
well i think it is unfair to let a large group target a smaller one
People have been campaigning for clearer rules for ages so there would be more outrage if Marc was put up with 2 because he has more fans than Jack
Ashley.
29-06-2015, 02:59 PM
if it where resersed..and they put marc up with 2 noms you would be cheering...
when it was head to head and people didn't like who was up they would say..its unfair they should put the whole house up
well i think it is unfair to let a large group target a smaller one
I'm sorry but I don't remember anyone ever saying that. People were over the moon when we finally had a head-to-head eviction this series.
Babayaro.
29-06-2015, 02:59 PM
That's pathetic. What a shambles this show has become. I actually kind of don't want Jack to go now. Also, it's not really 'normal nominations' is it
alex_front2
29-06-2015, 03:04 PM
Why didnt they do this in week #1 when Adjoa, Sarah and Eileen were up and Jade escaped by 1 nomination. Surely Jack should escape by 2 less nominations?
Xtopher
29-06-2015, 03:06 PM
Bless Harry and Sam knowing what we want.
that looks like unfair manipulation to get jack up to me
Ashley.
29-06-2015, 03:06 PM
Why didnt they do this in week #1 when Adjoa, Sarah and Eileen were up and Jade escaped by 1 nomination. Surely Jack should escape by 2 less nominations?
They're better off getting rid of nominations all together and just having a public vote each week.
Headie
29-06-2015, 03:06 PM
Marc Vs Sam Vs harry because I thought it was 3 or more HMs
That's a stupid rule though unless they use Vote to Save :/
Trasadkel1
29-06-2015, 03:07 PM
This series has just been a joke all the way through so why change now. I am surprised they get away with it. Would love to know how they explain how they have come to the conclusion as to who is up because it cannot be everyone that got a nomination or Danny and Cristian should have been up. The truth of the matter is that they didn't want to put them in the mix as it would have split the vote too much. How they can justify Jack being included in this beggars belief. I certainly won't be spending a penny of my money when they pretty much decide who they want in or out and fix things accordingly. Then they wonder why viewers are drifting away.
Mullens123
29-06-2015, 03:11 PM
I posted about the Noms rule change on their facebook page. It got quite a few likes then was deleted. Mailed them about it too and their response gave bs reasoning for why the show was changing, but they never actually addressed my main question.
Id say try and bring it up but idk if you'll actually get a response.
Niamh.
29-06-2015, 03:13 PM
That's a stupid rule though unless they use Vote to Save :/
I know, it's very annoying how when it was Vote to Save it was 2 or more HMs then when they change it to 3 or more they went back to VTE :facepalm:
alex_front2
29-06-2015, 03:14 PM
This is an omnishambles. C5 are taking the Mickey. There needs to be greater transparency about how the quantity of nomination candidates are aggregated from the vote.
What if Harry had still hated Marc and he got another vote would they still include Jack?
Three ways used to only happen when 1 hm was out in front and there was a tie for second place eg bb5 iirc Nadia had 4 noms, Victor and Jason had tied on 3. So three hms were up. Sam and Marc tied so it really should be ahead to head. Even if Marc had 2 more than Sam it still should be head to head. Harry (aka Barry ) and Jack should not even come into play.
zakman440
29-06-2015, 03:21 PM
Last series, the rule was 2 or more noms and you're up iirc. It's stupid though, they need to start going back to head-to-head evictions.
Nancy.
29-06-2015, 03:31 PM
It's so laughable! Somebody needs to call them out. Are they going to give us a reason for this?
It's laughable because it's not going your way? lol
Jamie89
29-06-2015, 03:46 PM
Lol, this is crazy, so much for normal noms! I actually kind of hope jack stays just as a middle finger to the producers.
I would have imagined a marc/sam head to head would result in sam being evicted anyway so I really don't get it.
Robertocarlo
29-06-2015, 03:47 PM
http://www.tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv/big-brother/225299-big-brother-2015-spoilers-who-nominated-who-this-week-find-out-here.html
Jack: Marc + Sam
Harry: Sam + Jack
Marc: Danny + Cristian
Danny: Marc + Sam
Joel: Sam + Harry
Chloe: Marc + Harry
Sam: Harry + Jack
Cristian: Marc + Harry
Nick: Marc + Sam
Aisleyne: Marc + Sam
Marc: 6
Sam: 6
Harry: 4
Jack: 2
Wow, BB trying to save Marc by sacrificing easy target Jack. This is totally pathetic. It should either be a head to head or top 3 is Harry, Marc, Sam.
Two votes is enough for me. Get Jack out!
alex_front2
29-06-2015, 03:51 PM
Iirc on bb13 this happened the week before Siobhan was evicted and on bbots a comedian questioned this rule and Emma quickly brushed this off.
The surprise for myself was Harry not nominating marc.?
alex_front2
29-06-2015, 03:59 PM
The surprise for myself was Harry not nominating marc.?
They are now BFFs. They seem to have banter and cozy chats. Helen groomed her, and Marc has tried to gain her friendship when he realised she is malleable and not in core4.
Get the impression he prefers her to Sam, who blatantly annoys him, but needs to keep onside for tactical reasons. Also had Harry nominated him, it would have to be a head to head Marc on 7 and Sam on 6, it would be harder for tptb to justify including Harry herself and Jack, so she shot herself in foot.
if it was Marc, Harry and Sam up for eviction, there wouldn't have been the same number of voters. Adding Jack to the mix ensures a voting frenzy. It is purely a money earning manipulation
sungrass
29-06-2015, 04:02 PM
Please save Jack - rid of boring fence sitting please everyone sam
abhorson
29-06-2015, 04:03 PM
It's so laughable! Somebody needs to call them out. Are they going to give us a reason for this?
More vote = more money. But yes, bad.
sungrass
29-06-2015, 04:03 PM
i wont ever pay to vote again. its so manpilated Im not a mug
Shaun
29-06-2015, 04:04 PM
I genuinely think Marc would be safe against Harry and Sam anyway. Can see the misogynist portions of the fans out in full force trying to persuade us that Harry and Sam are anything other than lovely innocent girls.
Hope Jack stay now, Just to prove a point.
Vicky.
29-06-2015, 04:09 PM
Should be Marc V Sam.
Anyway, LOL at the hysteria over this apparently being done to save Marc, when if it was the head to head it should be he would be safe as houses...whereas with more others to split the vote, he is actually in danger :D
alex_front2
29-06-2015, 04:32 PM
Vicky, disagree, most Sam haters would be too apathetic to vote her out. Suspect despite having most fans, Marc has most haters, plus even those who don't mind Marc eg Joel fans will vote him out for tactic reasons eg secure a Joel victory without Marc being in final.
ThriceShy
29-06-2015, 04:54 PM
Well done BB.
Team Smug's plan to pick off the newbies has been scuppered.
chuff me dizzy
29-06-2015, 04:57 PM
Marc ,spot on about the bores picking off the newbies
Pete.
29-06-2015, 05:00 PM
Marc ,spot on about the bores picking off the newbies
Why did Marc bully Harry then?
ItWasJustBanter
29-06-2015, 05:08 PM
What an exciting final week it'll be if we're left with Danny, Nick, Chloe and Cristian.
MrWong
29-06-2015, 05:11 PM
What an exciting final week it'll be if we're left with Danny, Nick, Chloe and Cristian.
This pile of **** of a series doesn't deserve anything better.
Ashley.
29-06-2015, 05:17 PM
It's laughable because it's not going your way? lol
Are you being serious?
sosadbbend
29-06-2015, 06:19 PM
that looks like unfair manipulation to get jack up to me
I agree! Vote Sam out and let's really see what Marc is made of!
alex_front2
29-06-2015, 09:02 PM
Jack would not have been up had this been in week 1
BB4fan
29-06-2015, 09:04 PM
It's so laughable! Somebody needs to call them out. Are they going to give us a reason for this?
I'll give you the most likely reason for it.
Jack is rubbish.
BB4fan
29-06-2015, 09:05 PM
What an exciting final week it'll be if we're left with Danny, Nick, Chloe and Cristian.
Yeah, and sadly if that happened one of them would have to win.:bawling:
hijaxers
29-06-2015, 09:10 PM
http://www.tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv/big-brother/225299-big-brother-2015-spoilers-who-nominated-who-this-week-find-out-here.html
Jack: Marc + Sam
Harry: Sam + Jack
Marc: Danny + Cristian
Danny: Marc + Sam
Joel: Sam + Harry
Chloe: Marc + Harry
Sam: Harry + Jack
Cristian: Marc + Harry
Nick: Marc + Sam
Aisleyne: Marc + Sam
Marc: 6
Sam: 6
Harry: 4
Jack: 2
Wow, BB trying to save Marc by sacrificing easy target Jack. This is totally pathetic. It should either be a head to head or top 3 is Harry, Marc, Sam.
More like a double eviction on the way
rionablue
29-06-2015, 09:39 PM
The way I see it is that whoever they put up, people who don't like a housemate will vote to evict (well those who bother voting) therefore the person with the most is booted out. There are 4 up. Let the people decide. I do think that everyone who got a nomination should have been up if they were putting someone with just 2 up with three others who had more. The major prob with the vote to evict is that the fans of the housemates have to try and vote for the others up if they want to save their fave otherwise they cant assume they are safe
jaxie
29-06-2015, 10:07 PM
I wondered about Jack's 2 also, Ive seen others with just 2 noms get away with it do why is Jack up? He got the least noms.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.