[alex_front2]

http://www.tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv...-out-here.html

Jack: Marc + Sam
Harry: Sam + Jack
Marc: Danny + Cristian
Danny: Marc + Sam
Joel: Sam + Harry
Chloe: Marc + Harry
Sam: Harry + Jack
Cristian: Marc + Harry
Nick: Marc + Sam
Aisleyne: Marc + Sam

Marc: 6
Sam: 6
Harry: 4
Jack: 2

Wow, BB trying to save Marc by sacrificing easy target Jack. This is totally pathetic. It should either be a head to head or top 3 is Harry, Marc, Sam.

[Ashley.]

It's so laughable! Somebody needs to call them out. Are they going to give us a reason for this?

[Niamh.]

Ashleyne shouldn't get to nominate imo

[arista]

Just Get Jack Out

[DrunkerThanMoses]

Yes this is a tad unfair, they might as well put Danny and Christian up as well and said everyone who received a nomination is up for eviction

[Ramsay]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Ashleyne shouldn't get to nominate imo

truth, it's a bit weird.

[Pete.]

It should have been Marc vs Sam then.

There's zero transparency involved anymore what a complete joke

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

It should have been Marc vs Sam then.

There's zero transparency involved anymore what a complete joke

Marc Vs Sam Vs harry because I thought it was 3 or more HMs

[MrWong]

All part of BB's plan to save the performing seal.

[Pete.]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Marc Vs Sam Vs harry because I thought it was 3 or more HMs

I have no idea :/

[Griffin5779]

if it where resersed..and they put marc up with 2 noms you would be cheering...

when it was head to head and people didn't like who was up they would say..its unfair they should put the whole house up

well i think it is unfair to let a large group target a smaller one

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

I have no idea :/

They don't really like to tell us what the rule is because then they can't just change them around to suit whatever agenda they have

[Pete.]

Originally Posted by Griffin5779

if it where resersed..and they put marc up with 2 noms you would be cheering...

when it was head to head and people didn't like who was up they would say..its unfair they should put the whole house up

well i think it is unfair to let a large group target a smaller one

People have been campaigning for clearer rules for ages so there would be more outrage if Marc was put up with 2 because he has more fans than Jack

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by Griffin5779

if it where resersed..and they put marc up with 2 noms you would be cheering...

when it was head to head and people didn't like who was up they would say..its unfair they should put the whole house up

well i think it is unfair to let a large group target a smaller one

I'm sorry but I don't remember anyone ever saying that. People were over the moon when we finally had a head-to-head eviction this series.

[Babayaro.]

That's pathetic. What a shambles this show has become. I actually kind of don't want Jack to go now. Also, it's not really 'normal nominations' is it

[alex_front2]

Why didnt they do this in week #1 when Adjoa, Sarah and Eileen were up and Jade escaped by 1 nomination. Surely Jack should escape by 2 less nominations?

[Xtopher]

Bless Harry and Sam knowing what we want.

[bots]

that looks like unfair manipulation to get jack up to me

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by alex_front2

Why didnt they do this in week #1 when Adjoa, Sarah and Eileen were up and Jade escaped by 1 nomination. Surely Jack should escape by 2 less nominations?

They're better off getting rid of nominations all together and just having a public vote each week.

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Marc Vs Sam Vs harry because I thought it was 3 or more HMs

That's a stupid rule though unless they use Vote to Save :/

[Trasadkel1]

This series has just been a joke all the way through so why change now. I am surprised they get away with it. Would love to know how they explain how they have come to the conclusion as to who is up because it cannot be everyone that got a nomination or Danny and Cristian should have been up. The truth of the matter is that they didn't want to put them in the mix as it would have split the vote too much. How they can justify Jack being included in this beggars belief. I certainly won't be spending a penny of my money when they pretty much decide who they want in or out and fix things accordingly. Then they wonder why viewers are drifting away.

[Mullens123]

I posted about the Noms rule change on their facebook page. It got quite a few likes then was deleted. Mailed them about it too and their response gave bs reasoning for why the show was changing, but they never actually addressed my main question.

Id say try and bring it up but idk if you'll actually get a response.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Hayden

That's a stupid rule though unless they use Vote to Save :/

I know, it's very annoying how when it was Vote to Save it was 2 or more HMs then when they change it to 3 or more they went back to VTE

[alex_front2]

This is an omnishambles. C5 are taking the Mickey. There needs to be greater transparency about how the quantity of nomination candidates are aggregated from the vote.

What if Harry had still hated Marc and he got another vote would they still include Jack?

Three ways used to only happen when 1 hm was out in front and there was a tie for second place eg bb5 iirc Nadia had 4 noms, Victor and Jason had tied on 3. So three hms were up. Sam and Marc tied so it really should be ahead to head. Even if Marc had 2 more than Sam it still should be head to head. Harry (aka Barry ) and Jack should not even come into play.

[zakman440]

Last series, the rule was 2 or more noms and you're up iirc. It's stupid though, they need to start going back to head-to-head evictions.