Ashley Madison Adultery Site Data 'Dumped Online'

[arista]

http://media.skynews.com/media/images/generated/2015/8/19/412777/default/v1/still-grab-1-736x414.jpg
The FBI is said to be investigating after hackers claim to upload the details of millions of people who use a website for affairs.


Justice In A Way


http://news.sky.com/story/1537943/ashley-madison-adultery-data-dumped-online

This has been building up for some time
since Hackers said they had Bank details as well.


[In July, AshleyMadison.com - which specialises in adulterous
relationships - was hacked by a group calling themselves Impact Team.
At the time, they threatened the website owners, Avid Life Media,
saying they would release the data unless the website was taken down.
Now, Sky News understands that just less than 10Gb of the data,
including user names, email addresses, passwords
and bank details, has been published on the dark web.]


http://media.skynews.com/media/images/generated/2015/8/19/412776/default/v2/statement-1-589x442.jpg

[waterhog]

you beat me to to it arista - just finished my views on this site. hope it makes you all laugh.

ashley madison - my down full is my name being exposed (confession) 19.08.15

yes there is a echo
because i have already said
the friendliness of this news is not Eco
if he was still here you could ask mr elliot fred.
this website has already caused controversy
its already split the family roof
because into any marriage you don't need this diversity
my x potential wife kicking me out is proof.
and now its the hackers
they are controlling the entry
all users will be going crackers
with the exposure of mrs Ashley.
i have to check out data
on the news statistics were no walk in the park
96% of the net is really a grater
is it true its only 4% of use is not dark.
i have to dig deep
this is my kind of corruption
the dark web is now attracting a creep
this hidden community is now my consumption.
my life is in jeopardy
Ashley Madison hackers this is my appeal
all my partners now no i had no church melody
this exposure will prove my marriage was not real.

( this is the webiste i am talking about that is in the news at present.www.ashleymadison.com )

[Crimson Dynamo]

good

[arista]

good


Not for MP's its not

[waterhog]

you would be surprised - you wait to the names start flowing.

i just hope i am not first.

[Will.]

good

[MTVN]

Haven't these hackers anything better to do than try and be the moral police watching over the public

[Will.]

"Life Is Short. Have An Affair".

Get some bloody class! You ****ing weirdos man.

http://i2.cdnds.net/14/24/618x347/bb_danielle1.jpg

[arista]

http://media.skynews.com/media/images/generated/2015/8/19/412993/default/v1/metro-p1-aug-20-1-563x750.jpg


http://media.skynews.com/media/images/generated/2015/8/19/412992/default/v1/eds20p001-1st-1-563x750.jpg

[Marsh.]

Erm, have these people ever thought that they could just not get married in the first place and shag around to their hearts (and dick's) content?

Life is Short. Don't Bother Getting Married in the First Place.

[smudgie]

You play away there is always the risk of getting caught, half the thrill for some.
I find the hackers worse than the adulterers, taking the moral high ground and then hacking the site.

[arista]

You play away there is always the risk of getting caught, half the thrill for some.
I find the hackers worse than the adulterers, taking the moral high ground and then hacking the site.


I want the Labour MP's on the List

[lostalex]

the point the hackers are making is that the site was charging people to delete their information, but they didn't delete the information. the clients should sue the company Ashley Madison, not blame the hackers.

The website was charging people 20 bucks to delete their accounts, and people thought if they paid that amount their data was being deleted, but instead ashley madison did not delete it, they kept it. that is why hackers are targeting them. Ashley Madison was running a major scam on people.

This really has nothing to do with cheating, it's about Ashley madison basically scamming people and blackmailing them to charge them 20 bucks for nothing.

I feel bad for all the people who had their information leaked, but it is ashley madison's fault, not the hackers! Ashley Madison promised to delete their information and charged them money to delete it, but they didn't delete it.

[Natalie.]

Erm, have these people ever thought that they could just not get married in the first place and shag around to their hearts (and dick's) content?

Life is Short. Don't Bother Getting Married in the First Place.

Yeah, exactly.

[MTVN]

the point the hackers are making is that the site was charging people to delete their information, but they didn't delete the information. the clients should sue the company Ashley Madison, not blame the hackers.

The website was charging people 20 bucks to delete their accounts, and people thought if they paid that amount their data was being deleted, but instead ashley madison did not delete it, they kept it. that is why hackers are targeting them. Ashley Madison was running a major scam on people.

This really has nothing to do with cheating, it's about Ashley madison basically scamming people and blackmailing them to charge them 20 bucks for nothing.

I feel bad for all the people who had their information leaked, but it is ashley madison's fault, not the hackers! Ashley Madison promised to delete their information and charged them money to delete it, but they didn't delete it.

That makes it sound as if the hackers were trying to do Ashley Madison customers a favour by punishing the site for not deleting their information but this leaking of all their details screws over the people signed up more than Ashley Madison not deleting their details does

[waterhog]

the point the hackers are making is that the site was charging people to delete their information, but they didn't delete the information. the clients should sue the company Ashley Madison, not blame the hackers.

The website was charging people 20 bucks to delete their accounts, and people thought if they paid that amount their data was being deleted, but instead ashley madison did not delete it, they kept it. that is why hackers are targeting them. Ashley Madison was running a major scam on people.

This really has nothing to do with cheating, it's about Ashley madison basically scamming people and blackmailing them to charge them 20 bucks for nothing.

I feel bad for all the people who had their information leaked, but it is ashley madison's fault, not the hackers! Ashley Madison promised to delete their information and charged them money to delete it, but they didn't delete it.



you done your home work - great post :cheer2: as for those feeling sorry for the exposure of the people on it - its just like your best mate seeing your boyfriend or girlfriend snogging the face off someone else and telling you. in the same what they got caught -

[lostalex]

That makes it sound as if the hackers were trying to do Ashley Madison customers a favour by punishing the site for not deleting their information but this leaking of all their details screws over the people signed up more than Ashley Madison not deleting their details does

it was a harsh way to expose corruption, just like all leakers, like chelsea manning, or edward snowden exposing a lot of stuff that wasn't corrupt, to expose something larger. when they make a big data dump, they expose a lot of innocent people that are not bad people in order to expose the bigger entities behind it.

i agree with you though, i don't know if it was the right thing to do. i'm just explaining the reasoning behind the hackers. i'm not necessarily agreeing with it.

the bottom line is that Ashley Madison should have deleted their information. and protected their members, and then the hackers could never have gotten it.

All internet companies need to protect the people who have accounts. They need to spend more money and time on security.

[waterhog]

i think we need a new law ?

[bots]

what we need is a few high profile companies to get sued for not protecting information. It should have happened already

[lostalex]

what we need is a few high profile companies to get sued for not protecting information. It should have happened already


eggsactly. we need to be criticizing companies for protecting data, not waging war on people who expose the flaws in those companies security flaws. if you run an internet company, especially one that promises privacy. it better be private. if you make a promise you have to keep it.

[Niamh.]

eggsactly. we need to be criticizing companies for protecting data, not waging war on people who expose the flaws in those companies security flaws. if you run an internet company, especially one that promises privacy. it better be private. if you make a promise you have to keep it.

the same could be said to these cheaters, didn't they make a promise to their other halves to be faithful :nono:

[lostalex]

the same could be said to these cheaters, didn't they make a promise to their other halves to be faithful :nono:

but that's not really fair, we all want more sex. sex and love are not the same thing. we all want more sex.

we need to change society to be more open minded about sex, and stop letting ancient religions tell us how relationships should be. why are we listening to old religious men about what we can do with our private parts. we all know what those religious old men do with their private parts and it;s perverted and gross, and way criminal.

who are they to tell us what to do with our bodies when they are ****ing kids???

[Niamh.]

but that's not really fair, we all want more sex. sex and love are not the same thing. we all want more sex.

Of course it's fair, marriage is a promise to be monogamous, if you want more sex with other people then you shouldn't get married :nono:

[lostalex]

Of course it's fair, marriage is a promise to be monogamous, if you want more sex with other people then you shouldn't get married :nono:

i think your idea of marriage is very outdated. it's an idea of marriage made by old men in the church who were ****ing young boys.

obviosly the churches idea of sexual rules is bull****.

[Crimson Dynamo]

but that's not really fair, we all want more sex. sex and love are not the same thing. we all want more sex.

we need to change society to be more open minded about sex, and stop letting ancient religions tell us how relationships should be. why are we listening to old religious men about what we can do with our private parts. we all know what those religious old men do with their private parts and it;s perverted and gross, and way criminal.

who are they to tell us what to do with our bodies when they are ****ing kids???

men want more sex

women want candles, cushions and to be listened to without offering a solution


no i am not bitter :idc:

[Niamh.]

i think your idea of marriage is very outdated. it's an idea of marriage made by old men in the church who were ****ing young boys.

Being monogamous to your spouse is an outdated idea? Really? Having an open relationship is fine if both parties know about it, otherwise it's cheating

[lostalex]

men want more sex

women want candles, cushions and to be listened to without offering a solution


no i am not bitter :idc:

as a gay man that has lots of straight women friends... trust me, women want more sex too... don't blame it all it on men.
women are just as horny, they are just better at hiding it.

[lostalex]

Being monogamous to your spouse is an outdated idea? Really? Having an open relationship is fine if both parties know about it, otherwise it's cheating

i agree that lying to someone who trusts you is always wrong. i'm saying we need to create relationships where people feel more safe being honest about their desires. relationships where you can be honest about your desires for other people.

don't you think that people should be honest with their partners?

[lostalex]

There are three things that all human beings need, food, sleep, and sex.

For some reason it's totally okay to tell people you are hungry or that you are tired, but is taboo if you say you are horny.

Sex is a basic human need. the same way we get hungry, the same way we get tried, we also get horny.

[Crimson Dynamo]

as a gay man that has lots of straight women friends... trust me, women want more sex too... don't blame it all it on men.
women are just as horny, they are just better at hiding it.


You are lucky that you never have to have sex with them

[Niamh.]

i agree that lying to someone who trusts you is always wrong. i'm saying we need to create relationships where people feel more safe being honest about their desires. relationships where you can be honest about your desires for other people.

don't you think that people should be honest with their partners?

Of course they should be and like I said if both parties are ok with it then that's fine but I know I wouldn't be happy to share my husband with other people

[lostalex]

Of course they should be and like I said if both parties are ok with it then that's fine but I know I wouldn't be happy to share my husband with other people

but what if your husband doesn't feel the same way, would you divorce him, just because he needs more sexually?
what if he wants something sexual you won't give but he could get it somewhere else but still love you just as much.

[Crimson Dynamo]

but what if your husband doesn't feel the same way, would you divorce him, just because he needs more sexually?
what if he wants something sexual you won't give but he could get it somewhere else but still love you just as much.

neem your husband sounds like a sex maniac :omgno:

Its time to dump and replace

[lostalex]

You are lucky that you never have to have sex with them

i could give you a million reasons why having sex with women is easier. so don't complain too much. gay sex isn't as easy as you imagine.

but for the record, the blow jobs are great! lol (not to brag, but it's true)

[Niamh.]

but what if your husband doesn't feel the same way, would you divorce him, just because he needs more sexually?
what if he wants something sexual you won't give but he could get it somewhere else but still love you just as much.

Yes I would. It's not what I agreed to when I married him and I have no desire to share like that.

[lostalex]

Yes I would. It's not what I agreed to when I married him and I have no desire to share like that.

well i think that's why we need more open take about sexuality in society then, because maybe he didn't feel like he could tell you about all of his sexual needs when you were dating. and maybe lots of men feel ashamed to be honest about their sexual desires.

do you at least agree that we should encourage a more open society when it comes to people expressing their sexual desires?

don;t you think we need to make a society were men can be honest about wanting more sexual partners, instead of automatically assuming that they want monogamy? and also being more free to express their desires for other men.

i don't think most women understand that most men have some bisexual desires.

women are so used to society forcing men to treat them like goddesses, but in truth most men just want to have fun.

[Niamh.]

Well then they shouldn't get married in the first place Alex

[lostalex]

Well then they shouldn't get married in the first place Alex

but is marriage really about sex? i don't think so. i think loving someone, and being romantically attracted to someone is very different from just sex.

[Crimson Dynamo]

lol

alex stop trying to persuade yourself that all straight men could be turned gay


only some can, like marsh

[lostalex]

lol

alex stop trying to persuade yourself that all straight men could be turned gay


only some can, like marsh

all straight men can close their eyes! LOL

[Niamh.]

but is marriage really about sex? i don't think so. i think loving someone, and being romantically attracted to someone is very different from just sex.

It's not all about sex but sex is certainly a part of it

[lostalex]

It's not all about sex but sex is certainly a part of it

what is sex really? it' about that excitement you feel about getting to touch another person al over their body... but after a few times, you've seen it all, some people need the excitement of seeing something new!

that's why men love porn so much, and why porn stars only last a few years, we always want to see something new.

[lostalex]

and LT, remember...

also gay men are willing to do things str8 men can't get from women.

trust me, when you lick below the balls on a str8 guy, he goes wild! cause most str8 guys can't get that from a girl... most girls won't do that.

[Niamh.]

what is sex really? it' about that excitement you feel about getting to touch another person al over their body... but after a few times, you've seen it all, some people need the excitement of seeing something new!

that's why men love porn so much, and why porn stars only last a few years, we always want to see something new.

Sex is more than just that to me, it's an intimacy that I only share with my husband, I would hate to think of him being that way with someone else. But there's no solid rule on what sex is or isn't, to me it's obviously a totally different thing to what your idea of it is, doesn't mean either of us are right or wrong but certainly because our ideas on it are so different, it's definitely something that needs to be discussed before any promises are made between couples

[Crimson Dynamo]

and LT, remember...

also gay men are willing to do things str8 men can't get from women.

trust me, when you lick below the balls on a str8 guy, he goes wild! cause most str8 guys can't get that from a girl... most girls won't do that.

yes but a gay guy is still buying candles and cushions

[lostalex]

Sex is more than just that to me, it's an intimacy that I only share with my husband, I would hate to think of him being that way with someone else. But there's no solid rule on what sex is or isn't, to me it's obviously a totally different thing to what your idea of it is, doesn't mean either of us are right or wrong but certainly because our ideas on it are so different, it's definitely something that needs to be discussed before any promises are made between couples

that's very fair. you get to decide what is right for you, and you have a right to expect your partner to be honest with you too. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with monogamy. i'm glad you and your husband are on the same page

unfortunately, some men, and some women, are not so happy in their relationships. and feel like they can't be honest.

i think everyone should just feel conformable being honest, but we do live in a society that makes people feel like they have to lie.

you will admit that our society does pressure people into feeling like they HAVE to be monogamous, right?

[lostalex]

yes but a gay guy is still buying candles and cushions

well it's true, i do enjoy candles lol... and i also enjoy licking ass :dance:

and you'll never hear me utter the words "too deep" ;P

[lostalex]

have you ever messed around with a guy LT?

[Liam-]

well it's true, i do enjoy candles lol... and i also enjoy licking ass :dance:

and you'll never hear me utter the words "too deep" ;P

Dear god

[Crimson Dynamo]

have you ever messed around with a guy LT?


No, I have a hard enough time with women

[Crimson Dynamo]

Dear god

:joker:

[lostalex]

Dear god

our god
who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name.

thy kingdom CUM.

see, it's in the bible....

[Niamh.]

that's very fair. you get to decide what is right for you, and you have a right to expect your partner to be honest with you too. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with monogamy. i'm glad you and your husband are on the same page

unfortunately, some men, and some women, are not so happy in their relationships. and feel like they can't be honest.

i think everyone should just feel conformable being honest, but we do live in a society that makes people feel like they have to lie.

you will admit that our society does pressure people into feeling like they HAVE to be monogamous, right?

Yeah I agree, as you rightly point out, it's actually honesty between couples that's the bigger issue here. Yes society does push towards monogamy and maybe open relationships should not be frowned upon so much. As I've said before, i don't have any issues with people wanting open relationships as long as they're both on the same page and again that comes back to honesty. Unfortunately though i think alot of these people who cheat don't really want open relationships, they want to be able to sleep around themselves but maybe wouldn't be as open to their partner doing it and maybe that's why they sneak around instead of discussing it

[Crimson Dynamo]

A relationship can only work with 100% trust on each side. You have to make yourself vulnerable when you have that trust in someone and that is why it works

its also why it hurts like a bastard when that trust is broken..

[Niamh.]

A relationship can only work with 100% trust on each side. You have to make yourself vulnerable when you have that trust in someone and that is why it works

its also why it hurts like a bastard when that trust is broken..

wise words LT :love:

[Liam-]

I once had a chance to get into a relationship with a guy I really liked, but he only wanted to be in an open relationship, I thought about it, but in the end I turned it down because at the end of the day, if I'm not good enough for a monogamous relationship with you, then I don't want to be in one, I personally don't see open relationships as proper relationships tbh, they're seedy and weird imo, but each to their own.

[lostalex]

I once had a chance to get into a relationship with a guy I really liked, but he only wanted to be in an open relationship, I thought about it, but in the end I turned it down because at the end of the day, if I'm not good enough for a monogamous relationship with you, then I don't want to be in one, I personally don't see open relationships as proper relationships tbh, they're seedy and weird imo, but each to their own.



how old are you?

[Crimson Dynamo]

how old are you?

run Liam

:dog:

[lostalex]

run Liam

:dog:

lol i'm not attacking...

but i will say that open relationships actually are much more stable because there is more communication usually.

The vast majority of monogamous relationships fail and a big part of that is because they try to live up to some disney fairy tale, and fairy tales are not real.

[lostalex]

Notice how most religious make allowances for men with multiple wives, but never for women to have multiple husbands...

it's because even the most HOLY of men ended up cheating and the religions need to make excuses for men, but never for women..

[Niamh.]

lol i'm not attacking...

but i will say that open relationships actually are much more stable because there is more communication usually.

The vast majority of monogamous relationships fail and a big part of that is because they try to live up to some disney fairy tale, and fairy tales are not real.

How do you know open relationships are more stable, that's a genuine question btw, is there some study done on it or what? And even if that's actually the case, open relationships only work for people who want to be in an open relationship and that's not alot as far as I can see

[Liam-]

how old are you?

20 :hee:

[lostalex]

How do you know open relationships are more stable, that's a genuine question btw, is there some study done on it or what? And even if that's actually the case, open relationships only work for people who want to be in an open relationship and that's not alot as far as I can see

i agree, they only work for people who are willing to be totally honest and free and admit their sexual desires. if one person isn;'t into it, it won't work because it will make jealousy, especially the double standards in straight relationships, because usually men want to have open relationships with women, but not allow the the women to have open relationships with other men.

I admit that it doesn't work well for straight people because straight men are so possessive and sexist against women. They see women as their property.

[Kizzy]

These people aren't in open relationships... well, one is but the other has no clue.
It is deceptive and you would've thought the new moral army would've been championing this lil stunt... but no.
Why? because it's business, and nothing gets in the way of business.

[lostalex]

These people aren't in open relationships... well, one is but the other has no clue.
It is deceptive and you would've thought the new moral army would've been championing this lil stunt... but no.
Why? because it's business, and nothing gets in the way of business.

no duhh Kizzy, if they were in an open relationship they wouldn't need to pay to be a member of a website like this. that was my whole point.

obviously this website is only for people in monogamous relationships.

The whole point of the website, and why it was so successful, is that it advertised to people who were in MONOGAMOUS relationships.

you can't "cheat" in an open relationship. there's no such thing.

[smudgie]

Try before you buy, get to know someone really really well before you commit.
Maybe it is harder to find your soulmate nowadays, I don't know.
Hubby and I have been together 38 years on Sunday, we manage to communicate very well, in bed, out of bed, hanging from chandeliers and anywhere else that takes your imagination.
Real loves carries on growing, as does the good sex, all this talk of getting bored etc normally boils down to rushing into a marriage through infatuation:shrug:

[lostalex]

Try before you buy, get to know someone really really well before you commit.
Maybe it is harder to find your soulmate nowadays, I don't know.
Hubby and I have been together 38 years on Sunday, we manage to communicate very well, in bed, out of bed, hanging from chandeliers and anywhere else that takes your imagination.
Real loves carries on growing, as does the good sex, all this talk of getting bored etc normally boils down to rushing into a marriage through infatuation:shrug:

how long was the longest relationship you've been in?

[Niamh.]

i agree, they only work for people who are willing to be totally honest and free and admit their sexual desires. if one person isn;'t into it, it won't work because it will make jealousy, especially the double standards in straight relationships, because usually men want to have open relationships with women, but not allow the the women to have open relationships with other men.

I admit that it doesn't work well for straight people because straight men are so possessive and sexist against women. They see women as their property.

You know it's funny you should say that, after I read you last post I googled open relationship success and came across an article about Pitbull who's been in an open relationship for 9 years, I thought the bit in bold was quite funny and telling :

Most of Pitbull's friends in Miami aren't as open, and they think he's a bit nuts. "At the same time, they'll be like, ‘Damn, I wish I had a relationship like yours,'" he says. Guys like the idea of freedom for themselves, but the thought of their girl doing the same is too much to handle. "Men have to under- stand that women are loyal," he says, perhaps naively. "If she gets something she likes, she'll stick with it."

So he's basically saying that his partner can have sex with other men if she wants but she just wants him......

- See more at: http://www.mensfitness.com/women/dating-advice/do-open-relationships-work#sthash.3tmj8zEr.dpuf

[smudgie]

how long was the longest relationship you've been in?

Well, this one is 38 years and going strong.
I had 4 years of trying before you buy before I met him.
Purely for sex mainly, like a kid in a sweetshop really once I discovered I liked it.
The big secret is learning that sexual attraction and infatuation wear off eventually, so wait a good while and sow those wild oats before you commit to one person.
Hard Lesson, but if worked for me in the long run.:shrug:

[Kizzy]

no duhh Kizzy, if they were in an open relationship they wouldn't need to pay to be a member of a website like this. that was my whole point.

obviously this website is only for people in monogamous relationships.

The whole point of the website, and why it was so successful, is that it advertised to people who were in MONOGAMOUS relationships.

you can't "cheat" in an open relationship. there's no such thing.

Why are you duhhing at me?... I don't care what your point is.
I would've thought even in an open relationship there was a degree of exclusivity, as in as much as you have more than one partner but all are aware of one another?

[lostalex]

You know it's funny you should say that, after I read you last post I googled open relationship success and came across an article about Pitbull who's been in an open relationship for 9 years, I thought the bit in bold was quite funny and telling :

Most of Pitbull's friends in Miami aren't as open, and they think he's a bit nuts. "At the same time, they'll be like, ‘Damn, I wish I had a relationship like yours,'" he says. Guys like the idea of freedom for themselves, but the thought of their girl doing the same is too much to handle. "Men have to under- stand that women are loyal," he says, perhaps naively. "If she gets something she likes, she'll stick with it."

So he's basically saying that his partner can have sex with other men if she wants but she just wants him......

- See more at: http://www.mensfitness.com/women/dating-advice/do-open-relationships-work#sthash.3tmj8zEr.dpuf

That's awesome if he really gives her complete freedom... that being said, based on "hip-hop" culture i hope she really is being given as much freedom as he claims. But if he really does give her complete freedom, it's a good example of a straight open relationship. (assuming he would have no problem when she does **** other men.)

[Niamh.]

That's awesome if he really gives her complete freedom... that being said, based on "hip-hop" culture i hope she really is being given as much freedom as he claims.

Well I doubt it, he's basically saying there that she can if she wants but she chooses not to because she's too loyal to him. So in other words he pretends that she can go away and have sex with other guys but it sounds like he would see her as disloyal if she did........double standards much?

[lostalex]

Well I doubt it, he's basically saying there that she can if she wants but she chooses not to because she's too loyal to him. So in other words he pretends that she can go away and have sex with other guys but it sounds like he would see her as disloyal if she did........double standards much?

or maybe his girl is bisexual and she only wants to get with other girls, we don't know the specifics. every relationship is different.

just like in some monogamous relationships a boyfriend won't even let his girlfriend have male friends... i would consider that incredibly sexist, but plenty of women in monogamous relationships accept that.

[Scarlett.]

Bet divorce lawyers the world over are rubbing their hands in glee, lol.

[Niamh.]

or maybe his girl is bisexual and she only wants to get with other girls, we don't know the specifics. every relationship is different.

just like in some monogamous relationships a boyfriend won't even let his girlfriend have male friends... i would consider that incredibly sexist, but plenty of women in monogamous relationships accept that.

Well I guess there's also alot of women who don't want their partners to have female friends either

[lostalex]

Well I guess there's also alot of women who don't want their partners to have female friends either



exactly and if they are jealous over even friends it means they don't trust each other much, right?

That's not the kind of relationship i'd like to be in.

[Niamh.]

exactly and if they are jealous over even friends it means they don't trust each other much, right?

Yeah, I agree with that

[Crimson Dynamo]

this whole thread is giving me my marriage teas


:bawling:

[Niamh.]

this whole thread is giving me my marriage teas


:bawling:

aww :hug:

[lostalex]

this whole thread is giving me my marriage teas


:bawling:

hot talented asian chick just for you!

ItosTQ4PVlI

[arista]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/20/14/article-3204408-2B83651700000578-367_636x438.jpg
[Do YOU trust your partner? Millions
of suspicious spouses crash websites
set up to find names of
Ashley Madison 'cheaters' as
map reveals locations of men
and women registered
with the adultery website ]

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3204408/Millions-suspicious-spouses-crash-websites-set-names-Ashley-Madison-cheaters-interactive-map-reveals-men-women-registered-adultery-website-live.html#ixzz3jMZeBP6f

[Crimson Dynamo]

hot talented asian chick just for you!

ItosTQ4PVlI


she looks so sweet but her lyrics are quite disgusting:shocked:

[Crimson Dynamo]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/20/14/article-3204408-2B83651700000578-367_636x438.jpg
[Do YOU trust your partner? Millions
of suspicious spouses crash websites
set up to find names of
Ashley Madison 'cheaters' as
map reveals locations of men
and women registered
with the adultery website ]

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3204408/Millions-suspicious-spouses-crash-websites-set-names-Ashley-Madison-cheaters-interactive-map-reveals-men-women-registered-adultery-website-live.html#ixzz3jMZeBP6f

You look at that and think - "way to go Canada"

then you remember that like 90% of Canada live 50 miles from the USA border and its like


Canada :fist: you slut

[Kizzy]

It's always the quiet ones...

[Crimson Dynamo]

It's always the quiet ones...

yeah, them and the unquiet ones

[arista]

2 on the site in Canada
have taken their lives after they were put out in the public

[Ammi]

..none of the suicides have been confirmed as directly linked but another one...

A police captain took his own life days after his official email address was found among the massive data leak from cheating website Ashley Madison. The 25-year veteran of the City of San Antonio police department was one of three officials who saw their email addresses leaked as part of the huge information dump, though it remains unclear whether the man's suicide was directly linked to the Ashley Madison leak.

IBTimes UK has confirmed that the officer's email address was listed among the millions. However, as Ashley Madison doesn't require users to verify email addresses, it is impossible to say who used the address for certain. The suicide was first reported by the San Antonio Express News which doesn't identify the person in question and said it "wasn't clear whether his death had anything to do with the leak".

Hackers known as the Impact Team released the private details of over 36 million customers of the cheating website on Sunday, 16 August. In subsequent days the private details of millions of people were publicised around the world including details of how much they paid to subscribe to the website and even their sexual fantasies.

According to data from the leaked Ashley Madison customer database, there are 99,157 accounts located in the City of San Antonio in Texas which has a population of 1.4 million, making it the 14th biggest city in the world in terms of accounts on the affairs website. Three of those accounts had official government email addresses (@sanantonio.gov). Two of those accounts are said to be linked to members of the San Antonia police department (a detective and the captain who died by suicide), while the third email address is said to have belonged to a former city employee.

A statement from city officials said because Ashley Madison doesn't verify email addresses it "cannot confirm whether these addresses were legitimately used to access the site." The statement goes on to say: "The City does use internet filters to block access to various websites, including the Ashley Madison site, which has been blocked for some time from City employees."

The fallout from the Ashley Madison leak continues with the hackers posting a second data dump on Friday which contains a huge amount of private emails from the site's co-founder Noel Biderman.

In their first interview, the hackers told Motherboard they still had a huge amount of data which was yet to be released, including 300GB of employee emails and documents from Avid Life Media's internal network. It said that while it won't be publishing most employee emails, it may decide to publish those belonging to other executives.

Even more worrying for customers of the cheating website, the hackers say they have "tens of thousands of Ashley Madison user pictures [and] some Ashley Madison user chats and messages". The hackers said that one third of the images were pictures of customers' penises and it wouldn't be publishing these.

The identity of the hackers remains a mystery, but Avid Life Media (ALM), the parent company of Ashley Madison, believes that at least one of the hackers has had access to its systems previously, though not as a permanent employee. In their interview with Motherboard, the hackers compared ALM to "drug dealers abusing addicts" and said it published the private customer data to stop the next 60 million people from signing up to the website.

When asked if they were planning to attack any other websites, the hackers warned that it was not only companies that were at risk: "Any companies that make 100s of millions profiting off pain of others, secrets, and lies. Maybe corrupt politicians. If we do, it will be a long time, but it will be total."



..really the actions of these hackers is deplorable..they have no right to act in judgement of anything, no one has or to release any personal information...

[Toy Soldier]

"tens of thousands of Ashley Madison user pictures"

...

"one third of the images were pictures of customers' penises"

:joker: :joker: :joker:

****ing brilliant! Maybe people will now learn that you should at least wait until you take a conversation to snapchat or WhatsApp before sending dikpix :hehe:.

Also I get the overwhelming impression that if people are taking all of this so hard that they're killing themselves, then frankly, they take themselves / life / sex all far too seriously :shrug:.

[GypsyGoth]

..really the actions of these hackers is deplorable..they have no right to act in judgement of anything, no one has or to release any personal information...

Yea the hackers seem to be a lower caliber of person than the people running the site Ashley Madison. I don't see how the hackers can justify their actions, they don't have the moral high ground, there was no public outcry about the unfairness of this site, they seem to be using worse tactics than the site.

As the article suggests, maybe a former employee was involved. And I'd say they're pretty close to being caught.

Also I'd never even heard of the site before this hacking took place.

[MTVN]

:joker: :joker: :joker:

****ing brilliant! Maybe people will now learn that you should at least wait until you take a conversation to snapchat or WhatsApp before sending dikpix :hehe:.

Also I get the overwhelming impression that if people are taking all of this so hard that they're killing themselves, then frankly, they take themselves / life / sex all far too seriously :shrug:.

Bit unsympathetic, we have no idea of the full stories behind these suicides or behind people who might have signed up to the site in the first place. I don't think it should come as a surprise if a lot of the members are deeply unhappy people who have a lot of issues in their personal lives.

[Ammi]

Bit unsympathetic, we have no idea of the full stories behind these suicides or behind people who might have signed up to the site in the first place. I don't think it should come as a surprise if a lot of the members are deeply unhappy people who have a lot of issues in their personal lives.

...yeah, also adultery is punishable by death/sentence in some countries like Saudi Arabia, is it not..?..these hackers are really the lowest of the low...

[Toy Soldier]

Bit unsympathetic, we have no idea of the full stories behind these suicides or behind people who might have signed up to the site in the first place. I don't think it should come as a surprise if a lot of the members are deeply unhappy people who have a lot of issues in their personal lives.
True, the suicides may be mostly unrelated to the leak, but my point would remain that if people HAVE become suicidal purely because their little perversions have been leaked, then that's a product of society taking these encounters a bit too seriously. Everyone has a little pervert inside them somewhere, amirite? Hakuna matata :shrug:

[Ammi]

..it's 'perverted' to have an affair..?..

[Kizzy]

...yeah, also adultery is punishable by death/sentence in some countries like Saudi Arabia, is it not..?..these hackers are really the lowest of the low...

Then why risk your life? The internet isn't a secure medium, I thought that was well established.
Don't blame the player, blame the game.

[Toy Soldier]

..it's 'perverted' to have an affair..?..

I was talking about the part where it mentions that details of their fetishes / fantasies have been leaked, but you're right, EVERYONE has those so by definition it's not actually a perversion.

[Ammi]

I was talking about the part where it mentions that details of their fetishes / fantasies have been leaked, but you're right, EVERYONE has those so by definition it's not actually a perversion.

..indeed..:laugh:../sorry I misunderstood you...

[Kizzy]

Pervert.
1.
to affect with perversion.
2.
to lead astray morally.
3.
to turn away from the right course.
4.
to lead into mental error or false judgment.
5.
to turn to an improper use; misapply.
6.
to misconstrue or misinterpret, especially deliberately; distort:
to pervert someone's statement.
7.
to bring to a less excellent state; vitiate; debase.

If you are deliberately misleading your spouse as to your fidelity then I'd say that the term 'pervert' was apt as to your intention...

[Toy Soldier]

Pervert.
1.
to affect with perversion.
2.
to lead astray morally.
3.
to turn away from the right course.
4.
to lead into mental error or false judgment.
5.
to turn to an improper use; misapply.
6.
to misconstrue or misinterpret, especially deliberately; distort:
to pervert someone's statement.
7.
to bring to a less excellent state; vitiate; debase.

If you are deliberately misleading your spouse as to your fidelity then I'd say that the term 'pervert' was apt as to your intention...

That's the definition of the verb though, not the noun.

"A person whose sexual behaviour is regarded as abnormal and unacceptable."

I suppose you could argue that a lot of people would find it unacceptable, though certainly not abnormal. But then again I think it's referring to the sexual activity itself there, not the "affair", so... someone having an affair and having sex in the missionary position whilst listening to "Take My Breath Away" would not be a pervert, but someone having an affair, dressing up as a clown, and insisting on popping balloons on a knife held in some's vagina whilst singing the themesong of "Friends" might be considered a pervert.

Might.

[Kizzy]

That's the definition of the verb though, not the noun.

"A person whose sexual behaviour is regarded as abnormal and unacceptable."

I suppose you could argue that a lot of people would find it unacceptable, though certainly not abnormal. But then again I think it's referring to the sexual activity itself there, not the "affair", so... someone having an affair and having sex in the missionary position whilst listening to "Take My Breath Away" would not be a pervert, but someone having an affair, dressing up as a clown, and insisting on popping balloons on a knife held in some's vagina whilst singing the themesong of "Friends" might be considered a pervert.

Might.

That's the context you inferred.. The context in which Ammi used the term 'perverted' that the act of having an affair was perverted... which in the context of the verb, it is.

[Ryan57]

daffy.duck@warnerbros.com is one of the email addresses to of been leaked.

It's a sad, sad day when even Daffy Duck is at it. R.I.P childhood.

[Northern Monkey]

That's the definition of the verb though, not the noun.

"A person whose sexual behaviour is regarded as abnormal and unacceptable."

I suppose you could argue that a lot of people would find it unacceptable, though certainly not abnormal. But then again I think it's referring to the sexual activity itself there, not the "affair", so... someone having an affair and having sex in the missionary position whilst listening to "Take My Breath Away" would not be a pervert, but someone having an affair, dressing up as a clown, and insisting on popping balloons on a knife held in some's vagina whilst singing the themesong of "Friends" might be considered a pervert.

Might.:joker: :joker:
I think the missionary with 'Take my Breath Away' sounds more perverted to me,That's just cringing:laugh: