John "We Need To Name and Shame"

[LukeB]

He said this about the knickers :umm2:

[MrWong]

He also, without a hint of irony said to Tiff 'I would never try to humiliate a young girl' when she confronted him about knickergate. :umm2:

[Northern Monkey]

She's a filthbag but John was loving being pack leader there.Got him abit of the attention he so badly craves.

[rusticgal]

He completely denied it....he instigated the whole thing...LIAR!

PLAY IT...TO TIFF...:cheer2:

[kirklancaster]

These are EXACTLY the same tactics the odious rodent employed when, BEHIND HER BACK as she sat alone in the garden, HE instigated most of the trouble against Tiffany and implored the others listening in the group to ostracize her and isolate her, only to then go to Tiffany and say; "THEY have said" and "THEY have decided", and THEY asked me to tell you".

They are ALL a bunch of two-faced, spineless and spoilt cry-babies, but King Rat John is THE Master Manipulator. Queen Gemma is his female counterpart.

[jennyjuniper]

Chris, Darren or Scotty to win. None of the three have really been active in the house, but those three are the least offensive of all the inmates.

[Kazanne]

He said this about the knickers :umm2:

We know,its old news,move on :sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep: We'll execute him when he comes out:hehe: it's all been done to death,try another angle.

[MrWong]

These are EXACTLY the same tactics the odious rodent employed when, BEHIND HER BACK as she sat alone in the garden, HE instigated most of the trouble against Tiffany and implored the others listening in the group to ostracize her and isolate her, only to then go to Tiffany and say; "THEY have said" and "THEY have decided", and THEY asked me to tell you".

They are ALL a bunch of two-faced, spineless and spoilt cry-babies, but King Rat John is THE Master Manipulator. Queen Gemma is his female counterpart.

:clap1:

[Kazanne]

These are EXACTLY the same tactics the odious rodent employed when, BEHIND HER BACK as she sat alone in the garden, HE instigated most of the trouble against Tiffany and implored the others listening in the group to ostracize her and isolate her, only to then go to Tiffany and say; "THEY have said" and "THEY have decided", and THEY asked me to tell you".

They are ALL a bunch of two-faced, spineless and spoilt cry-babies, but King Rat John is THE Master Manipulator. Queen Gemma is his female counterpart.

http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/conan-hulking-out.gifGood job I like you :joker::joker:

[MrWong]

We know,its old news,move on :sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep: We'll execute him when he comes out:hehe: it's all been done to death,try another angle.

What kind of mod?

[kirklancaster]

http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/conan-hulking-out.gifGood job I like you :joker::joker:

:laugh::laugh::laugh: And it's a bloody good job I KNOW you do - or I'd be :dog: for my life :joker:

[lime]

I had no idea what he and Tiffany were talking about on LF but I do remember him looking at Tiff and saying how wrong she was to think he was the type of person to humiliate a young girl.....really disappoited with his name and shame comment.

[Kazanne]

:laugh::laugh::laugh: And it's a bloody good job I KNOW you do - or I'd be :dog: for my life :joker:

And about John http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/you-have-to-stop.gif :joker:

[tanussa]

yes john used those words but all other HMs were slagging steph off to varying degrees. john said that also before it was known whos knickers they were. the 3 girls were slagging steph off abt knickergate. they were the worst culprits so why is john gettin all the stick for simply sayin 'name & shame'. it is disgusting anyway to leave dirty underwear lying around for all to see & on a table were someone might put a plate down with food on. thats why he said that, its disgusting leaving soiled knickers on a table for all to see, think hygiene

[jet]

yes john used those words but all other HMs were slagging steph off to varying degrees. john said that also before it was known whos knickers they were. the 3 girls were slagging steph off abt knickergate. they were the worst culprits so why is john gettin all the stick for simply sayin 'name & shame'. it is disgusting anyway to leave dirty underwear lying around for all to see & on a table were someone might put a plate down with food on. thats why he said that, its disgusting leaving soiled knickers on a table for all to see, think hygiene

It was Christopher who put them on the table along with other laundry. It was John who said to leave them there and not cover them up. I agree with you that John doing that was disgusting.

[reece(:]

Yep he's a nasty piece of work

[hot2go]

Yep he's a nasty piece of work

And that Essex Rock Ape was there in the epi centre of it all again...as always

[joeysteele]

We know,its old news,move on :sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep: We'll execute him when he comes out:hehe: it's all been done to death,try another angle.

Well sorry but I would too, this could have been a health hazard too and anyone touched them mistakenly.
David was ill in the house for one.

Nothing soiled in any way should be left anywhere were anyone else can come across them.
There are few general things that I would make a great fuss about but this whether it be womens or mens effects is one of them.

Stephanie when they first asked,denied they were hers, had she gone out and took responsibility right off, there may have been no reason for the greater fuss that came about.

Name and shame indeed should have been done,she should be thoroughly ashamed and in fact disgusted with herself.
Even moreso to let Jeremy go and wash them, all she had to do was wash then when she changed clothing.

This is all her fault and no one elses.
Maybe that naming and shaming will make her think before ever doing such a filthy and disgusting thing again where other people are.
Had I ever found anything like that,I'd have been furious with the eventually identified culprit.

[ThriceShy]

Why are people surprised? The man has shown these evil tendencies right from the beginning. Look how he demanded everybody leave the house in protest if Tiffany doesn't leave.

He has to be the most vile housemate they have ever had.

[Kazanne]

Well sorry but I would too, this could have been a health hazard too and anyone touched them mistakenly.
David was ill in the house for one.

Nothing soiled in any way should be left anywhere were anyone else can come across them.
There are few general things that I would make a great fuss about but this whether it be womens or mens effects is one of them.

Stephanie when they first asked,denied they were hers, had she gone out and took responsibility right off, there may have been no reason for the greater fuss that came about.

Name and shame indeed should have been done,she should be thoroughly ashamed and in fact disgusted with herself.
Even moreso to let Jeremy go and wash them, all she had to do was wash then when she changed clothing.

This is all her fault and no one elses.
Maybe that naming and shaming will make her think before ever doing such a filthy and disgusting thing again where other people are.
Had I ever found anything like that,I'd have been furious with the eventually identified culprit.

The voice of reason as usual Joey.

[Kazanne]

Why are people surprised? The man has shown these evil tendencies right from the beginning. Look how he demanded everybody leave the house in protest if Tiffany doesn't leave.

He has to be the most vile housemate they have ever had.

:laugh:Oh stop,I really cant take this seriously

[Marsh.]

How did they identify them as Steph's?

Did they run a DNA test?

A sniffing test?

[ThriceShy]

:laugh:Oh stop,I really cant take this seriously

You want me to stop having an opinion? I am going to politely decline, ta.

[bots]

How did they identify them as Steph's?

Did they run a DNA test?

A sniffing test?

She was the only moist one ... so it was easy to say it was her

[tanussa]

It was Christopher who put them on the table along with other laundry. It was John who said to leave them there and not cover them up. I agree with you that John doing that was disgusting.

christopher said we should turn them over, therefore leaving the dirty knickers on table. dont you think the 3 girls were horrible having a go at steph, making snidy remarks abt. using them as dental floss/jeremy eatin them. why arent you having a go at them. why was what john said worse than them 3 slaggin steph off. & still I remind you at time john said his bit it wasnt known whos knickers they were

[Kazanne]

You want me to stop having an opinion? I am going to politely decline, ta.

How very dare you,opinions are ok,porkies aint:hehe:

[ThriceShy]

How very dare you,opinions are ok,porkies aint:hehe:

Where was the porky?

And even if it was a porky, where in the rules are porkies forbidden?:shrug:

[erinp5]

John Partridge disgusted after finding Stephanie's knickers
D1MoN4vDOn4

[jet]

christopher said we should turn them over, therefore leaving the dirty knickers on table. dont you think the 3 girls were horrible having a go at steph, making snidy remarks abt. using them as dental floss/jeremy eatin them. why arent you having a go at them. why was what john said worse than them 3 slaggin steph off. & still I remind you at time john said his bit it wasnt known whos knickers they were

I really can't explain it all again. Go and watch it on catch up.

[MrWong]

christopher said we should turn them over, therefore leaving the dirty knickers on table. dont you think the 3 girls were horrible having a go at steph, making snidy remarks abt. using them as dental floss/jeremy eatin them. why arent you having a go at them. why was what john said worse than them 3 slaggin steph off. & still I remind you at time john said his bit it wasnt known whos knickers they were

Daniella said that.

Gemma said Jeremy would probably wash them for her. Which isn't in the same league as what John said and then lied about.

[ThriceShy]

John Partridge disgusted after finding Stephanie's knickers
D1MoN4vDOn4

God he is vile.

I said about two days into this series that he will be revealed as essentially a more intelligent version of Anthony Cotton. And that is exactly what he is.

[LukeB]

We know,its old news,move on :sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep: We'll execute him when he comes out:hehe: it's all been done to death,try another angle.

it's not old news at all, i've only just watched it and it's recent

[wendywillow]

Well sorry but I would too, this could have been a health hazard too and anyone touched them mistakenly.
David was ill in the house for one.

Nothing soiled in any way should be left anywhere were anyone else can come across them.
There are few general things that I would make a great fuss about but this whether it be womens or mens effects is one of them.

Stephanie when they first asked,denied they were hers, had she gone out and took responsibility right off, there may have been no reason for the greater fuss that came about.

Name and shame indeed should have been done,she should be thoroughly ashamed and in fact disgusted with herself.
Even moreso to let Jeremy go and wash them, all she had to do was wash then when she changed clothing.

This is all her fault and no one elses.
Maybe that naming and shaming will make her think before ever doing such a filthy and disgusting thing again where other people are.
Had I ever found anything like that,I'd have been furious with the eventually identified culprit.

oh come on, first of all they all sleep in one room so you cant not see everyones clothes, and used panties are a health hazard? :joker:

[joeysteele]

christopher said we should turn them over, therefore leaving the dirty knickers on table. dont you think the 3 girls were horrible having a go at steph, making snidy remarks abt. using them as dental floss/jeremy eatin them. why arent you having a go at them. why was what john said worse than them 3 slaggin steph off. & still I remind you at time john said his bit it wasnt known whos knickers they were



Absolutely right, fair point and well said.

[wendywillow]

We know,its old news,move on :sleep::sleep::sleep::sleep: We'll execute him when he comes out:hehe: it's all been done to death,try another angle.

well some were declaring John's complete innocence yesterday when tiff accused him....when the opposite is found to be true it should be swept under the rug? :dazzler:

[Kazanne]

well some were declaring John's complete innocence yesterday when tiff accused him....when the opposite is found to be true it should be swept under the rug? :dazzler:

That was only because people were accusing him of hanging them somewhere,which he didn't.they were on the table,and yes John was part of it but not the sole culprit.its not been swept under the rug its been done to death,not everyone will agree on this so its just going round and round

[jaxie]

Well sorry but I would too, this could have been a health hazard too and anyone touched them mistakenly.
David was ill in the house for one.

Nothing soiled in any way should be left anywhere were anyone else can come across them.
There are few general things that I would make a great fuss about but this whether it be womens or mens effects is one of them.

Stephanie when they first asked,denied they were hers, had she gone out and took responsibility right off, there may have been no reason for the greater fuss that came about.

Name and shame indeed should have been done,she should be thoroughly ashamed and in fact disgusted with herself.
Even moreso to let Jeremy go and wash them, all she had to do was wash then when she changed clothing.

This is all her fault and no one elses.
Maybe that naming and shaming will make her think before ever doing such a filthy and disgusting thing again where other people are.
Had I ever found anything like that,I'd have been furious with the eventually identified culprit.

:clap1:

Also what is with Jeremy wanting to wash her dirty panties? Some sort of fetish? :shocked:

[MrWong]

[/B]


Absolutely right, fair point and well said.

It's not a fair point actually. Whoevers knickers they were would have been humiliated by John's actions of calling the stain pigeon ****, wanting them left displayed on the dining room table and wanting to name and shame.

[joeysteele]

oh come on, first of all they all sleep in one room so you cant not see everyones clothes, and used panties are a health hazard? :joker:

I didn't say they actually were a health hazard I said they could have been, depending on what was in them.

However if you actually think it nice and right for anyone, man or woman to take off dirty underwear and even if soiled in any way, to just leave them somewhere for days,where other people can maybe find them or pick them up, rather than get them washed right off, well that's your affair.

I think it a disgusting and a filthy thing for Steph to have done and would say the same no matter as to whatever sex did it.

[joeysteele]

It's not a fair point actually. Whoevers knickers they were would have been humiliated by John's actions of calling the stain pigeon ****, wanting them left displayed on the dining room table and wanting to name and shame.

Then had she washed them right off and not left them for days no one could have or would have even had anything to complain about would they.
She got what she deserved, it was pure laziness and a filthy act to do just to leave them for days.
No sympathy for her whatsoever,
She should just wash any soiled underwear the moment she takes them off as anyone really decent would too, especially when sharing a house.
Just maybe this will make her wash any more right off now in future.

[ThriceShy]

Then had she washed them right off and not left them for days no one could have or would have even had anything to complain about would they.
She got what she deserved, it was pure laziness and a filthy act to do just to leave them for days.
No sympathy for her whatsoever,
She should just wash any soiled underwear the moment she takes them off as anyone really decent would too, especially when sharing a house.
Just maybe this will make her wash any more right off now in future.

Where did she actually leave them?

[joeysteele]

:clap1:

Also what is with Jeremy wanting to wash her dirty panties? Some sort of fetish? :shocked:

I agree,Even worse Steph letting him, for goodness sake.

[MrWong]

Then had she washed them right off and not left them for days no one could have or would have even had anything to complain about would they.
She got what she deserved, it was pure laziness and a filthy act to do just to leave them for days.
No sympathy for her whatsoever,
She should just wash any soiled underwear the moment she takes them off as anyone really decent would too, especially when sharing a house.
Just maybe this will make her wash any more right off now in future.

I love victim blaming.

Still, it distracts from John's nastiness I suppose.

She was a mucky cow leaving her knickers laying around, but that doesn't excuse what others did.

[joeysteele]

I love victim blaming.

Still, it distracts from John's nastiness I suppose.

She was a mucky cow leaving her knickers laying around, but that doesn't excuse what others did.

Then she should have owned up at the start when asked rather than deny they were hers when first asked and not then try to have others blamed for it.

[MrWong]

Where did she actually leave them?

In a pile by the bath.

Which must be true because the pile of clothes that Christopher brought in from the bathroom were all Steph's. This was confirmed when Daniella went through the pile bit by bit saying, that's Steph's, that's Steph's, that's Steph's etc..

[Maru]

Whatever his agenda is, John is smarter than your average housemate. I think that is part of the persona he is playing. Mr Calm, Cool and Collected... not really a bad game to play in that house of mostly aloof people and attention mongerers.

They ALL took the underwear incident too far. Should've just dropped it and moved on. Some just can't keep their mouths shut (Gemma) so it is too easy for people like John to fan the flames. This house is so easily riled up. However, it wasn't really his fault that people clung to that so much... this is where he is playing such a good game. Say what you will, but he is creating entertainment in any otherwise boring atmosphere of attention mongerers.

[ThriceShy]

In a pile by the bath.

Which must be true because the pile of clothes that Christopher brought in from the bathroom were all Steph's. This was confirmed when Daniella went through the pile bit by bit saying, that's Steph's, that's Steph's, that's Steph's etc..

You got to admit that is vile though. Leaving those my the communal bath and then denying it so that either Megan or Dani would get the blame.

[MrWong]

Then she should have owned up at the start when asked rather than deny they were hers when first asked and not then try to have others blamed for it.

Initially she was probably mortified. Hardly surprising really.

She was laying down with the guy she fancies while John kept on about the dirty knickers with pigeon **** in the gusset.

[MrWong]

You got to admit that is vile though. Leaving those my the communal bath and then denying it so that either Megan or Dani would get the blame.

It is nasty but I don't think she was trying to shift blame I think she was mortified about it and couldn't admit that they were hers.

[ThriceShy]

It is nasty but I don't think she was trying to shift blame I think she was mortified about it and couldn't admit that they were hers.

Well don't leave them by a bath if their discovery would mortify you.

She has a rep for doing this in the house. Megan was giving her grief for leaving her underwear around days before all that.

[jet]

I love victim blaming.

Still, it distracts from John's nastiness I suppose.

She was a mucky cow leaving her knickers laying around, but that doesn't excuse what others did.

You've hit the nail on the head.
As disgusting as leaving dirty knickers in the bath is, I'm actually surprised at how it seems okay to humiliate a young girl on national TV. If my faves Tiff or Darren had done it, I would have gone right off them and said so.

[Withano]

How can people defend John on this. He said something cruel. He just did. You can love him for other reasons but he just did make a dick of himself in at least one scene last night.

[MrWong]

Well don't leave them by a bath if their discovery would mortify you.

She has a rep for doing this in the house. Megan was giving her grief for leaving her underwear around days before all that.

I know. I'm not trying to defend the girl. She's in my bottom 3. Just pointing out John's role and suggesting why she might have found it hard to admit to owning the knickers initially.

[joeysteele]

That was only because people were accusing him of hanging them somewhere,which he didn't.they were on the table,and yes John was part of it but not the sole culprit.its not been swept under the rug its been done to death,not everyone will agree on this so its just going round and round

I didn't see or hear Christopher or Darren not wanting to name and shame the cuprit either Kazanne.
All 3 of them, John, Christopher and Darren were the ones who came across the soiled effects.

I cannot stand Gemma but had they been hers, Steph would have yelled it from the rooftop I would say.

[Kazanne]

You've hit the nail on the head.
As disgusting as leaving dirty knickers in the bath is, I'm actually surprised at how it seems okay to humiliate a young girl on national TV. If my faves Tiff or Darren had done it, I would have gone right off them and said so.

Darren was laughing his arse off too,and said Ew,but you like him so that's ok, :laugh: good God it's not like anyone called her a " fat Twunt" is it? seems they are the sort of people we should revere, well I'm not one of those,I like straight talking ,to the point,please or offend people.

[Tarryn]

I know. I'm not trying to defend the girl. She's in my bottom 3. Just pointing out John's role and suggesting why she might have found it hard to admit to owning the knickers initially.

Same here. I don't like Steph but I really felt for her in this. Why humiliate somebody like this :shrug:
John seems to enjoy going for another HM's weak points. He get's off on it.
But it was not just him doing it. Others came out of it looking bad too, like Danniella who has turned out to be a miserable cow.

[Tom4784]

He's a hypocrite that singles people out to exclude them from the group, he's done it before and he'll probably try to do it again.

[Tarryn]

Darren was laughing his arse off too,and said Ew,but you like him so that's ok, :laugh: good God it's not like anyone called her a " fat Twunt" is it? seems they are the sort of people we should revere, well I'm not one of those,I like straight talking ,to the point,please or offend people.

I really liked Darren until last night. He was totally wrong.
He & Christopher went way over the top. It was not just John doing it.
Gemma & Danniella were awful too.

[Kazanne]

I didn't see or hear Christopher or Darren not wanting to name and shame the cuprit either Kazanne.
All 3 of them, John, Christopher and Darren were the ones who came across the soiled effects.

I cannot stand Gemma but had they been hers, Steph would have yelled it from the rooftop I would say.

Yes Joey good point, if Darren and Chris didn't agree they would have said something,but wait ........................they all flock to John according to NY Tiff, so it's his fault alone.:laugh:

[joeysteele]

Yes Joey good point, if Darren and Chris didn't agree they would have said something,but wait ........................they all flock to John according to NY Tiff, so it's his fault alone.:laugh:

When the only fault in all of it lies solidly with Steph.:joker:

[tanussa]

it wasnt just john, who incidentally once it was known who knickers they were never piped up again, what abt the 3 girls making fun of her in the bedroom, & they did know the knickers belonged to steph, but they were havin a great time makin sarky jokes about steph. talk about girls sticking together - not!

[MrWong]

I didn't see or hear Christopher or Darren not wanting to name and shame the cuprit either Kazanne.
All 3 of them, John, Christopher and Darren were the ones who came across the soiled effects.

I cannot stand Gemma but had they been hers, Steph would have yelled it from the rooftop I would say.

Well of course not. It cut to another scene.

We saw the guys ewwwww reaction. We saw them laugh when John called it pigeon ****. We saw Christopher try to cover the knickers. We saw John stop him. We then heard John saying the owner should be named and shamed.

Just because we didn't see Darren/Christopher say the owner shouldn't be named doesn't mean they agreed. It means we don't know and isn't any kind of defence.

[jet]

I really liked Darren until last night. He was totally wrong.
He & Christopher went way over the top. It was not just John doing it.
Gemma & Danniella were awful too.

:joker: Sometimes you just have to laugh.

[jet]

Darren was laughing his arse off too,and said Ew,but you like him so that's ok, :laugh: good God it's not like anyone called her a " fat Twunt" is it? seems they are the sort of people we should revere, well I'm not one of those,I like straight talking ,to the point,please or offend people.

All I seen Darren doing was laugh and say ew - that's it. A perfectly natural reaction.
We seen all that John did but you like him so that's okay, eh? :laugh: If Darren had done what John did, no, I would NOT have continued to like him. But go on putting yourself out twisting the facts and defending a grown man humiliating a young girl on national TV over her knickers. If that's the kind of man you admire, that's your misfortune.

[Kazanne]

All I seen Darren doing was laugh and say ew - that's it. A perfectly natural reaction.
We seen all that John did but you like him so that's okay, eh? :laugh: If Darren had done what John did, no, I would NOT have continued to like him. But go on putting yourself out twisting the facts and defending a grown man humiliating a young girl on national TV over her knickers. If that's the kind of man you admire, that's your misfortune.

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh,listen to you on your high horse,i like John,so tough,all 3 were in the mix,thats a fact

[rusticgal]

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh,listen to you on your high horse,i like John,so tough,all 3 were in the mix,thats a fact


They were....but they didn't take it as far as your beloved John did...FACT.:wavey:

[Kizzy]

Good! humiliate her...It's what spoilt little tramps like that need, your mother isn't here steph and you're 22, pick up your own crusty draws dirty bint !!
In a shared house, who wants to see, smell or sleep breathing her stinking pants in?...unbelievable.

[Kazanne]

They were....but they didn't take it as far as your beloved John did...FACT.:wavey:

Oh I think Danielle certainly did !,John dropped it when he knew whos they were,they kept on and on,did you see his chat with Jeremy and Steph after ?

[Kazanne]

All I seen Darren doing was laugh and say ew - that's it. A perfectly natural reaction.
We seen all that John did but you like him so that's okay, eh? :laugh: If Darren had done what John did, no, I would NOT have continued to like him. But go on putting yourself out twisting the facts and defending a grown man humiliating a young girl on national TV over her knickers. If that's the kind of man you admire, that's your misfortune.

Well Darren ran off as Chris did,but ,don't let that get in the way of your hate for John.

[jet]

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh,listen to you on your high horse,i like John,so tough,all 3 were in the mix,thats a fact

You can say that until you are 100, it still doesn't make the other facts relating to John non existent.

If you put a babies toy behind a cushion, the baby thinks the toy no longer exists. That's a fact - look it up. :smug:

[jet]

Well Darren ran off as Chris did,but ,don't let that get in the way of your hate for John.

That doesn't even make sense. What is your point? :shrug: