About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

LukeB · 24-01-2016, 12:43 PM

He said this about the knickers

MrWong · 24-01-2016, 12:52 PM

He also, without a hint of irony said to Tiff 'I would never try to humiliate a young girl' when she confronted him about knickergate.

Northern Monkey · 24-01-2016, 12:59 PM

She's a filthbag but John was loving being pack leader there.Got him abit of the attention he so badly craves.

rusticgal · 24-01-2016, 01:00 PM

He completely denied it....he instigated the whole thing...LIAR!

PLAY IT...TO TIFF...

kirklancaster · 24-01-2016, 01:15 PM

These are EXACTLY the same tactics the odious rodent employed when, BEHIND HER BACK as she sat alone in the garden, HE instigated most of the trouble against Tiffany and implored the others listening in the group to ostracize her and isolate her, only to then go to Tiffany and say; "THEY have said" and "THEY have decided", and THEY asked me to tell you".

They are ALL a bunch of two-faced, spineless and spoilt cry-babies, but King Rat John is THE Master Manipulator. Queen Gemma is his female counterpart.

jennyjuniper · 24-01-2016, 01:24 PM

Chris, Darren or Scotty to win. None of the three have really been active in the house, but those three are the least offensive of all the inmates.

Kazanne · 24-01-2016, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukeB

He said this about the knickers

We know,its old news,move on

We'll execute him when he comes out

it's all been done to death,try another angle.

MrWong · 24-01-2016, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

These are EXACTLY the same tactics the odious rodent employed when, BEHIND HER BACK as she sat alone in the garden, HE instigated most of the trouble against Tiffany and implored the others listening in the group to ostracize her and isolate her, only to then go to Tiffany and say; "THEY have said" and "THEY have decided", and THEY asked me to tell you".

They are ALL a bunch of two-faced, spineless and spoilt cry-babies, but King Rat John is THE Master Manipulator. Queen Gemma is his female counterpart.

Kazanne · 24-01-2016, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

These are EXACTLY the same tactics the odious rodent employed when, BEHIND HER BACK as she sat alone in the garden, HE instigated most of the trouble against Tiffany and implored the others listening in the group to ostracize her and isolate her, only to then go to Tiffany and say; "THEY have said" and "THEY have decided", and THEY asked me to tell you".

They are ALL a bunch of two-faced, spineless and spoilt cry-babies, but King Rat John is THE Master Manipulator. Queen Gemma is his female counterpart.

Spoiler:

MrWong · 24-01-2016, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne

We know,its old news,move on

We'll execute him when he comes out

it's all been done to death,try another angle.

What kind of mod?

kirklancaster · 24-01-2016, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Spoiler:

And it's a bloody good job I KNOW you do - or I'd be

for my life

lime · 24-01-2016, 05:04 PM

I had no idea what he and Tiffany were talking about on LF but I do remember him looking at Tiff and saying how wrong she was to think he was the type of person to humiliate a young girl.....really disappoited with his name and shame comment.

Kazanne · 24-01-2016, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

And it's a bloody good job I KNOW you do - or I'd be

for my life

And about John

tanussa · 24-01-2016, 05:14 PM

yes john used those words but all other HMs were slagging steph off to varying degrees. john said that also before it was known whos knickers they were. the 3 girls were slagging steph off abt knickergate. they were the worst culprits so why is john gettin all the stick for simply sayin 'name & shame'. it is disgusting anyway to leave dirty underwear lying around for all to see & on a table were someone might put a plate down with food on. thats why he said that, its disgusting leaving soiled knickers on a table for all to see, think hygiene

jet · 24-01-2016, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tanussa

yes john used those words but all other HMs were slagging steph off to varying degrees. john said that also before it was known whos knickers they were. the 3 girls were slagging steph off abt knickergate. they were the worst culprits so why is john gettin all the stick for simply sayin 'name & shame'. it is disgusting anyway to leave dirty underwear lying around for all to see & on a table were someone might put a plate down with food on. thats why he said that, its disgusting leaving soiled knickers on a table for all to see, think hygiene

It was Christopher who put them on the table along with other laundry. It was John who said to leave them there and not cover them up. I agree with you that John doing that was disgusting.

reece(: · 24-01-2016, 05:23 PM

Yep he's a nasty piece of work

hot2go · 24-01-2016, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reece(:

Yep he's a nasty piece of work

And that Essex Rock Ape was there in the epi centre of it all again...as always

joeysteele · 24-01-2016, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne

We know,its old news,move on

We'll execute him when he comes out

it's all been done to death,try another angle.

Well sorry but I would too, this could have been a health hazard too and anyone touched them mistakenly.
David was ill in the house for one.

Nothing soiled in any way should be left anywhere were anyone else can come across them.
There are few general things that I would make a great fuss about but this whether it be womens or mens effects is one of them.

Stephanie when they first asked,denied they were hers, had she gone out and took responsibility right off, there may have been no reason for the greater fuss that came about.

Name and shame indeed should have been done,she should be thoroughly ashamed and in fact disgusted with herself.
Even moreso to let Jeremy go and wash them, all she had to do was wash then when she changed clothing.

This is all her fault and no one elses.
Maybe that naming and shaming will make her think before ever doing such a filthy and disgusting thing again where other people are.
Had I ever found anything like that,I'd have been furious with the eventually identified culprit.

ThriceShy · 24-01-2016, 05:41 PM

Why are people surprised? The man has shown these evil tendencies right from the beginning. Look how he demanded everybody leave the house in protest if Tiffany doesn't leave.

He has to be the most vile housemate they have ever had.

Kazanne · 24-01-2016, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Well sorry but I would too, this could have been a health hazard too and anyone touched them mistakenly.
David was ill in the house for one.

Nothing soiled in any way should be left anywhere were anyone else can come across them.
There are few general things that I would make a great fuss about but this whether it be womens or mens effects is one of them.

Stephanie when they first asked,denied they were hers, had she gone out and took responsibility right off, there may have been no reason for the greater fuss that came about.

Name and shame indeed should have been done,she should be thoroughly ashamed and in fact disgusted with herself.
Even moreso to let Jeremy go and wash them, all she had to do was wash then when she changed clothing.

This is all her fault and no one elses.
Maybe that naming and shaming will make her think before ever doing such a filthy and disgusting thing again where other people are.
Had I ever found anything like that,I'd have been furious with the eventually identified culprit.

The voice of reason as usual Joey.

Kazanne · 24-01-2016, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Why are people surprised? The man has shown these evil tendencies right from the beginning. Look how he demanded everybody leave the house in protest if Tiffany doesn't leave.

He has to be the most vile housemate they have ever had.

Oh stop,I really cant take this seriously

Marsh. · 24-01-2016, 05:42 PM

How did they identify them as Steph's?

Did they run a DNA test?

A sniffing test?

ThriceShy · 24-01-2016, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Oh stop,I really cant take this seriously

You want me to stop having an opinion? I am going to politely decline, ta.

bots · 24-01-2016, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

How did they identify them as Steph's?

Did they run a DNA test?

A sniffing test?

She was the only moist one ... so it was easy to say it was her

tanussa · 24-01-2016, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet

It was Christopher who put them on the table along with other laundry. It was John who said to leave them there and not cover them up. I agree with you that John doing that was disgusting.

christopher said we should turn them over, therefore leaving the dirty knickers on table. dont you think the 3 girls were horrible having a go at steph, making snidy remarks abt. using them as dental floss/jeremy eatin them. why arent you having a go at them. why was what john said worse than them 3 slaggin steph off. & still I remind you at time john said his bit it wasnt known whos knickers they were

Site Navigation

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com