View Full Version : Isn't it better to be an "Other" re: nominations/evictions
Yaki da
16-06-2016, 05:45 PM
Aren't the "The Others" essentially immune? Or will they all be up with whoever has been nominated?
It seems a little strange that not being a full housemate is actually an advantage.
Until they're all mass evicted to reduce the numbers, yes, it is
Yeah atm, but at one point there will no doubt be a mass cull of the others to shorten the numbers
Yaki da
16-06-2016, 05:47 PM
Yeah atm, but at one point there will no doubt be a mass cull of the others to shorten the numbers
I doubt the producers know what they're going to do with them. But for now they're the safest people on the show.
Shaun
16-06-2016, 05:47 PM
I wouldn't really mind if they ran concurrent votes to evict every Friday if it meant one from the real house and one of the others goes.
Right now you'd imagine it'll be Marco and Ryan, so no huge loss :hee:
I hope they decide the mass cull after all the original others leave!
Headie
16-06-2016, 05:49 PM
I wouldn't really mind if they ran concurrent votes to evict every Friday if it meant one from the real house and one of the others goes.
Right now you'd imagine it'll be Marco and Ryan, so no huge loss :hee:
Lol Natalie is an Angry Black Woman there's no way she'd survive a VTE
rionablue
16-06-2016, 05:56 PM
They HAVE to start reducing the numbers. If Andrew hadn't been evicted there would be 18 still there seeing that Emma is still a housemate after Victoria bailing. I am getting a tad tired of 'the other house' now and I am SICK of seeing the boiler suits
rionablue
16-06-2016, 05:57 PM
Its the shortest BB I remember also at only 8 weeks
starry
16-06-2016, 05:58 PM
I assume those left in the 'others' house just get mass evicted at some stage.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.