If an Other fails their mission to become a Housemate, should they be evicted?

[Headie]

Theoretically I would say yes as it would defeat the purpose otherwise, however I really like most of the Others so from a selfish viewpoint I'd say no :laugh:

[Shaun]

It should send them to the back of the pile in the next opportunity to become a housemate at the very least.

[Headie]

It should send them to the back of the pile in the next opportunity to become a housemate at the very least.

Yeah I'd agree with this tbh. And Original HMs should also be at the back end too.

[Amy Jade]

I voted evict but I thought it meant evicted from the main house back to the other house.

I think because Ryan was such a flop he should be sent back and if there is another public vote to send an other to the main house he should not be eligible.

Only Natalie, Jayne, Charlie and Hughie should be. Give them all at least one chance to earn housemate status

[rionablue]

yes. I thought that was the original plan. The others had to EARN housemate status if they didn't they were out. Likewise I reckon the housemates that lost housemate status shouldn't be certain to regain it anyway. Anything that gets rid of that little screeching toebag Ryan is good by me

[Cal.]

No but I don't think Ryan should be eligible for the next public vote. Charlie/Jayne/Natalie/Hughie have been in there the longest with no chance to get out so they should be given the opportunity next.

[hijaxers]

Yes - anything to get rid of that little turd Ryan.

[Pete.]

No why would we let great HMs go without having a say

[Josy]

There's 18 hm spaces on the wall so I can see them maybe all becoming hms

[Cherie]

What's the point if them having tasks if there are no consequences :shrug:

[armand.kay]

The others are better than the man house so no