Emma saying they didnt have Sukhi's best bits ready as they weren't expecting her out

[Headie]

I thought all nominees had best bits prepared in the event of eviction?

I get that it was probably more of a time issue but still :suspect:

[Ant.]

Nah, definitely because they knew she wouldnt be going. The same thing happened with Austin, who production loved and didnt do a best bits for. That being said, production's use of "by your side" kinda implied they were expecting them to leave together, especially if they had mentioned it beforehand

[T*]

I thought all housemates got one made if they were nominated wtf

[Amy Jade]

makes me to believe she was the housemate who was by far in the lead on votes as Emma indicated.

[Jordan.]

They probably just make them for whoever is in the bottom 3 come eviction morning to save time/money. Like someone said the same happened to Austin even though he faced eviction earlier in the night.

[Headie]

They probably just make them for whoever is in the bottom 3 come eviction morning to save time/money. Like someone said the same happened to Austin even though he faced eviction earlier in the night.

Didn't Emma say the bottom 5 were all within 3% of each other :think:

[Ant.]

Didn't Emma say the bottom 5 were all within 3% of each other :think:

Yeah, but probably meant hypothetical. When someone's a clear winner they won't bother producing best bits when it'd be a waste of time and money. In this case it was clearly Sukh

[Headie]

Yeah, but probably meant hypothetical. When someone's a clear winner they won't bother producing best bits when it'd be a waste of time and money. In this case it was clearly Sukh

It was clearly Raph tho

[Jordan.]

Didn't Emma say the bottom 5 were all within 3% of each other :think:

She either lied or they knew there wouldn't be enough votes in the hour to impact the result. It'd be a scream if the vote did massively sway one night and they didn't have best bits for the evictee though :skull:

[Ant.]

It was clearly Raph tho

I love Raph but imo it was definitely Sukh. People will vote for Sukh under the impression she may be evicted die to her boos and mixed views, whereas people would feel Raph's safe snd wouldnt vote for him

[Locke.]

Maybe they just hadn't added the music to it or something

[sampvt]

rigged. they needed space to put new people in . emma admitted her script read NEW FACES, not new person. They had to replace arthur but they had several ready to go in to try an rescue the series. They knew if Imran went she would follow hence no Marcu asking her to return to the house and not having her best bits is a lie, she was up for eviction and within 3% of the others. Its all a scam.

[y.winter]

Didn't Emma say the bottom 5 were all within 3% of each other :think:

Trying to convince people not to vote for Raph who's "too safe", slowly putting him in danger?

[Jack_]

See on most shows the voting is monitored by an independent company and the exec producers are provided with the names of the winners/losers only

But this is twice this has happened now, makes me wonder if they know more about the results than most other programmes

[supertv247]

I think it was likely just a time issue. Like once they get the result they send off Imran's best bits to be aired, and this probably all happens before Emma actually reads the result. Then Sukhvinder left at the last minute, so they probably just weren't ready to roll it

[Vicky.]

Didn't Emma say the bottom 5 were all within 3% of each other :think:

She says this every eviction to just get everyone voting more though :laugh:

I thought they would do one for all nominees just incase. But then the Austin thing..kinda proved this wasn't the case

Maybe they did have hers but it was a time thing and Emma got lines wrong. She handled the 'unexpected' circumstances pretty well tbh. Fairly obvious Sukh had threatened to walk earlier that day.

[BBDodge]

Yes, time issue.

[bots]

Didn't Emma say the bottom 5 were all within 3% of each other :think:

and they may have been, but, depending on how you read that it could be:

5: 3%
4: 6%
3: 9%
2: 12%
1: 15%

So still 3% but a good difference between last and first

[NotARylanFan]

rigged. they needed space to put new people in . emma admitted her script read NEW FACES, not new person. They had to replace arthur but they had several ready to go in to try an rescue the series. They knew if Imran went she would follow hence no Marcu asking her to return to the house and not having her best bits is a lie, she was up for eviction and within 3% of the others. Its all a scam.
Considering since the very beginning, the memory wall has had two empty spaces AND the BotS wall has had an empty panel on each end with the HM's faces - it was clearly always planned for two to enter late.

[Cherry Christmas]

Didn't Emma say the bottom 5 were all within 3% of each other :think:

It's clearly a line trotted out every eviction night to promote voting, it must work as well :idc:

[Cherry Christmas]

rigged. they needed space to put new people in . emma admitted her script read NEW FACES, not new person. They had to replace arthur but they had several ready to go in to try an rescue the series. They knew if Imran went she would follow hence no Marcu asking her to return to the house and not having her best bits is a lie, she was up for eviction and within 3% of the others. Its all a scam.

Good point Sam about Marcus not asking her to return to the house, production knew they would leave together

What new faces will we get, someone Kieran shagged probably

[Firewire]

I thought it was just that they didn't have enough time to edit it

Because following the eviction they have to add the eviction to the tape but they only have about 10 minutes to do that

[chuff me dizzy]

She was up for eviction,so hers along with all the others who were up best bits will have been done,but she didn't deserve to see them as she's a walker ,she shouldn't have been allowed on Emmas interview stage with Imran