Proof that VTS does not work!

[Wizard.]

Whatever anyone's personal opinions of them, Arthur, Sukhvinder and Kayleigh had all survived an eviction shortly before they walked or were ejected. This means that people wasted their money voting for them. And it's something that cannot ever be solved - the producers cannot guarantee that a Housemate will remain in the House for any length of time after eviction night, so asking for someone's money in return for voting to save them is pretty disingenuous (posted in DS).

[Nicky91]

so true, and i personally am more a fan of VTE

[chuff me dizzy]

VTE is always the best way

[armand.kay]

If it was VTE Kayleigh would of probably gone and we would still have sukhvinder

[Nicky91]

If it was VTE Kayleigh would of probably gone and we would still have sukhvinder

probably, i think certainly


i think Chanelle would have more chances to survive with VTE, especially against the sisters, Tom, Joe and possibly Rebecca

[sampvt]

VTE is BB, VTS is a BB invention to make money.

[chuff me dizzy]

VTE is BB, VTS is a BB invention to make money.

True, but i never vote in a VTS so they lose my money

[Greg!]

VTS is better. Okay so some twats slip through the net but it also mostly keeps the entertaining characters in.

[Nicky91]

True, but i never vote in a VTS so they lose my money

this is a lie, babe

you did vote for Charlotte, last eviction :smug:

[Withano]

I like vte for civilian and vts for celeb. For reasons i cba to explain.

[chuff me dizzy]

this is a lie, babe

you did vote for Charlotte, last eviction :smug:

No I didn't, i forgot to vote for you until it was too late

[armand.kay]

VTS is better. Okay so some twats slip through the net but it also mostly keeps the entertaining characters in.

I mean you only have to look at the state on cbb and how good the VTE seasons have been to see how trash vote to save is.

[Vanessa]

Civilan BB should always be vote to evict.

[Fosse]

If it was VTE Kayleigh would of probably gone and we would still have sukhvinder

What does "would of" mean?

[starry]

Vote to save is good and is hardly to blame for bad casting and the scrapping of live feed. But they shouldn't give clues as to how are are the top of the vote or near to the bottom.

Vote to evict leads to tedious lynch mobs, and the edit ends up catering to the hatred. Pantomime is boring and just for immature tabloid ****.

The vote to save element enabled some good Australian series, with a more positive show rather than the extremely tedious boo on demand mob they assemble at evictions. And people then don't have to waste their time on forums trying to stir hatred for some HM.

With vote to evict people often don't give a crap about who wins.

[RhysJones]

With VTE, Sukhvinder would've been out first week then Kayleigh then Arthur if he would still be there. VTS is way better than VTE

[starry]

Also the crowd going 'get [insert HM name] out' is just so tiresome. In vote to evict it spoils it every time for those in the house. The crowd actually announce the result.

[emptynest]

True, but i never vote in a VTS so they lose my money

Me neither but I do if it's vte

[ethanjames]

vte is always better tbh

[starry]

Most of the audience don't vote either way, I think many stopped voting after BB7.

[Nicky91]

vte is always better tbh

definitely and :fc: that from this week and onwards is a vte