PDA

View Full Version : Could they bring back people who left during a VTS?

Cal.
23-06-2017, 02:23 PM
What would be your stance on someone coming back who was evicted via VTS? Technically nobody voted them out of the house and the people they voted to keep in the house stayed in so it doesn't seem to be breaking any rules?

We want Imran and Sukhvinder back in!
Niamh.
23-06-2017, 02:24 PM
Nah i wouldn't like the idea tbh, evicted should mean evicted
reece(:
23-06-2017, 02:25 PM
Bring back the married legends
pontyboi
23-06-2017, 02:27 PM
That's the good thing about vts is we can get some legends back without screwing over the public like BB7 did.

I don't think they should be eligible to win however as they've been on the outside.
Cal.
23-06-2017, 02:28 PM
Nah i wouldn't like the idea tbh, evicted should mean evicted

I don't mean they'd be like 'Day 20: Randy Mandy walks back in as a fully fledged housemate!' but a possible vote or decision from the housemates on which evicted housemate got to go back in (pairing Imran and Sukhvinder up as one housemate this time of course).
Niamh.
23-06-2017, 02:29 PM
I don't mean they'd be like 'Day 20: Randy Mandy walks back in as a fully fledged housemate!' but a possible vote or decision from the housemates on which evicted housemate got to go back in (pairing Imran and Sukhvinder up as one housemate this time of course).

hhhmmm, the only way it would acceptable ish imo is if the public got to vote on it
Cal.
23-06-2017, 02:30 PM
They could even pull a Jon Tickle.

I just think Sukhvinder has left a huge void in the show and is needed!
pontyboi
23-06-2017, 02:31 PM
hhhmmm, the only way it would acceptable ish imo is if the public got to vote on it

Great idea but the public tend to make terrible decisions sadly.
EspeonBB
23-06-2017, 02:32 PM
Send Mutha Mandy back in to clock Tom
Cal.
23-06-2017, 02:32 PM
Out of a vote of everyone gone so far (excluding Arthur and Kayleigh obviously) I think Imran and Sukhvinder would get voted in pretty easily.
reece(:
23-06-2017, 02:33 PM
SUKH was the show!
Cal.
23-06-2017, 02:34 PM
SUKH was the show!

I miss her :(

It's like if Kosi had been evicted Week 2 in BB6</3
MB.
23-06-2017, 02:39 PM
'Day 20: Randy Mandy walks back in as a fully fledged housemate!'

Here for it :clap1:
Cal.
23-06-2017, 02:39 PM
http://www.nwemail.co.uk/portalsuite/image//ab6f0379-954f-46ed-a718-0782c857b40e/mainMediaSize=0x425_type=image_publish=true__image .jpg

They're coming!
Withano
23-06-2017, 02:40 PM
Nah, voting to save implies that someone would not be saved. From an ethical point of view I'm against it. Arthur and Sukh can come back though.
Epic.
23-06-2017, 03:06 PM
I'd LOVE a Sukhi and Imran comeback
Epic.
23-06-2017, 03:06 PM
ESPECIALLY with the house divide deepening. Just imagine the two of them taking down lotan
bots
23-06-2017, 03:07 PM
what would be the point in them bringing back people who have already shown to be unpopular with the public and failed to bring them in much revenue
Cal.
23-06-2017, 03:09 PM
what would be the point in them bringing back people who have already shown to be unpopular with the public and failed to bring them in much revenue

Sukhvinder would have done. They just need to bring Imran back as well to get her to go back in!
Vicky.
23-06-2017, 03:32 PM
...no. That would be taking the piss. Sukh definitely shouldnt be back in, she shouldn't even be getting interviews and such tbh as she is a walker.

They cannot offer a public vote, then just ignore it and put them back in because a few viewers are upset that their faves went :S
Nicky91
23-06-2017, 03:32 PM
it should be just VTE from now on, way easier to vote i think
Cal.
23-06-2017, 03:33 PM
...no. That would be taking the piss. Sukh definitely shouldnt be back in, she shouldn't even be getting interviews and such tbh as she is a walker.

They cannot offer a public vote, then just ignore it and put them back in because a few viewers are upset that their faves went :S

Oh you vicious cow

http://i.imgur.com/NCWEPIN.gif
Vicky.
23-06-2017, 03:34 PM
Nah, voting to save implies that someone would not be saved. From an ethical point of view I'm against it. Arthur and Sukh can come back though.

I would love Arthur back but...he walked. Still think theres something dodgy about his leaving though. I find it hard to believe he randomly decided to walk and find it suspicious that they didn't show ANY of it..simply said 'arthur has decided to leave the house'

Letting walkers back in would be a bit daft. I don;t even like it when they walk but don't really leave the house then are allowed back. Like Lisa (Marios lass) when she 'left' had tea and biscuits with producers then was put back :S
Vicky.
23-06-2017, 03:34 PM
Oh you vicious cow

http://i.imgur.com/NCWEPIN.gif

Oh wow. I actually missed the episode with the slipper thing...that looks pretty bad. I assumed it was a mistake :laugh:
Northern Monkey
23-06-2017, 03:38 PM
So what was even the point in the public voting in the first place?Or infact the whole eviction?
Lostie!
23-06-2017, 03:40 PM
It would still be dodgy imo, no point spending money voting to save someone if someone who lost the vote could still return. Any public vote result should be left as it is.

Apart from the ones I disagree with. So yes bring Mandy back.
Northern Monkey
23-06-2017, 03:41 PM
I would love Arthur back but...he walked. Still think theres something dodgy about his leaving though. I find it hard to believe he randomly decided to walk and find it suspicious that they didn't show ANY of it..simply said 'arthur has decided to leave the house'

Letting walkers back in would be a bit daft. I don;t even like it when they walk but don't really leave the house then are allowed back. Like Lisa (Marios lass) when she 'left' had tea and biscuits with producers then was put back :S
I hate it when they do this.They should atleast show him asking to leave and walking out through the other diary room door.
Wonder if he threatened to sue if they showed it or something