You can vote multiple times on the poll

[Yaki da]

Just delete cookies and you can vote again and again. So between mad Lewis fans doing that and the producers probably rigging the poll anyway, they'll get the result they want.

If it does indeed switch to Vote to Save, I'll be switching off entirely.

[Marsh.]

If it does indeed switch to Vote to Save, I'll be switching off entirely.

No, you won't.

[Yaki da]

No, you won't.

Yep, I will. I did it last series. I have no problem doing it for this one. One that I was actually enjoying until all of this.

[Marsh.]

Yep, I will.

No, you won't.

[Yaki da]

No, you won't.

:sleep:

[votebot]

There's no captcha either :D

[crashandburn]

There's no captcha either :D

LMFAO.

[JPG2502]

pretty sure votes will be recorded by IP address.

[Elliot]

pretty sure votes will be recorded by IP address.

Nah

[bots]

its not hard to filter the results by ip address. No idea if they will do that or not.

[votebot]

I use a different IP address every time I vote but I'm limited to 720 votes an hour :(

[Jase.]

No, you won't.

:skull:

[tanussa]

only just seen this thread. fed up.......polls closed. I would have hammered the 'vote to save' in order to save the flexitarian

[Kazanne]

Just delete cookies and you can vote again and again. So between mad Lewis fans doing that and the producers probably rigging the poll anyway, they'll get the result they want.

If it does indeed switch to Vote to Save, I'll be switching off entirely.

So cheating is ok as long as its us doing it:shrug: I'de rather play fair even if it means Lewis going

[Calderyon]

One vote is enough for me.

[Vanessa]

I don't like the idea of changing the vote midway. But i voted to save, because i prefer it in general.

[Marcus.]

I don't like the idea of changing the vote midway. But i voted to save, because i prefer it in general.

i dont mind vote to save but have it at the start not half way though

[Vanessa]

i dont mind vote to save but have it at the start not half way though

Yes, i agree. I think it's too late now. They should have done vote to save from the beginning. Then we would have had a great show.

[Marcus.]

Yes, i agree. I think it's too late now. They should have done vote to save from the beginning. Then we would have had a great show.

things like this
make me think they have a agenda

[Vanessa]

things like this
make me think they have a agenda

I don't know. I just think they want a good show. And many big characters going is not good really.

[Marcus.]

I don't know. I just think they want a good show. And many big characters going is not good really.

and thats what i mean ness

[rph]

Im glad they only changing it now to save lewis and cam :D

I didnt like Ellis , Ana, Lewis G and kay and glad they are gone

[bots]

I don't know. I just think they want a good show. And many big characters going is not good really.

which means they are fixing it to change the results :laugh:

Look at it logically, if they didn't want to change the voting system, they wouldn't have had a poll because its not required otherwise.

I am 99% sure it will change to VTS tonight, but I would be very happy if i am proved wrong

[Vanessa]

and thats what i mean ness

At least Cameron is going nowhere. And he's one of my favourites.

[Marcus.]

which means they are fixing it to change the results :laugh:

Look at it logically, if they didn't want to change the voting system, they wouldn't have had a poll because its not required otherwise.

I am 99% sure it will change to VTS tonight, but I would be very happy if i am proved wrong

well said bitontheslide

[Vanessa]

They won't change anything. I'm 100% sure they won't. I just think it's too late now.

[Marsh.]

I use a different IP address every time I vote but I'm limited to 720 votes an hour :(

:umm2:

[Cherie]

The result will be VTS at any rate, what a joke, I am glad the show is finishing

[Yaki da]

So cheating is ok as long as its us doing it:shrug: I'de rather play fair even if it means Lewis going

What are you on about? I think it should be one vote only. I don't think there should be a vote at all frankly.

[hijaxers]

I use a different IP address every time I vote but I'm limited to 720 votes an hour :(

Nothing worse than cheats

[votebot]

All is fair. If it's fair for some people to vote more than other people on evictions just because they have more money, then it's fair for me to deploy my votebot to save lewis and the show.

[Yaki da]

By the way, just about every poll with a relatively larger number of voters has Vote To Evict winning. So when Vote to Save wins, that will be another dodgy outcome.


It should be noted that with Hussain seemingly imploding, there's still a possibility that he's up and I imagine it being possibly close between him and Lewis this week in a Vote To Evict. Even so, Lewis is a goner in the Vote To Evict format at some point, and they know it.

[Vanessa]

All is fair. If it's fair for some people to vote more than other people on evictions just because they have more money, then it's fair for me to deploy my votebot to save lewis and the show.

I love you! :kiss:

[Cherie]

oh dear, so basically what the OP is saying is that he can't win by fair means so it has to be by cheating :laugh: it will make such a difference to my life if he wins I can't even begin to tell you :laugh:

[Calderyon]

All is fair. If it's fair for some people to vote more than other people on evictions just because they have more money, then it's fair for me to deploy my votebot to save lewis and the show.

The show is dead and nothing is going to save it.

[Amy Jade]

All is fair. If it's fair for some people to vote more than other people on evictions just because they have more money, then it's fair for me to deploy my votebot to save lewis and the show.

A bit pathetic, no?

[Jack_]

I use a different IP address every time I vote but I'm limited to 720 votes an hour :(

Are you being serious or on a wind up? Please say the former

[Yaki da]

oh dear, so basically what the OP is saying is that he can't win by fair means so it has to be by cheating :laugh: it will make such a difference to my life if he wins I can't even begin to tell you :laugh:

No, what I am saying is that lunatic Lewis fans will probably vote multiple times to make sure they get the result they want. Or, the BB production team will do so, to make sure they get the result they want. Which is the same thing.

The fact is, it is totally unfair that such a change is being done to the voting format in the middle of an nomination/eviction process for the sole purpose of keeping certain people in, in the first place. So to talk of fairness in respect to this is laughable anyway.

[Jack_]

Most reality shows aren't fair (especially in the modern era), they are entertainment programmes first and foremost and are manipulated to maximise that potential

[Yaki da]

Most reality shows aren't fair (especially in the modern era), they are entertainment programmes first and foremost and are manipulated to maximise that potential

This series was doing fine up until this week.

[Jack_]

This series was doing fine up until this week.

Some people still had an issue with the viewer nomination, and before that others had an issue with the addition of the Gamechanger :shrug:

I don't have a problem with this poll at all, in fact I pray they rig it to get the right result. So long as producer manipulation is for the greater good and for the benefit of the series overall, I'm all for it...and that goes for most reality shows that have public votes

[Yaki da]

Some people still had an issue with the viewer nomination, and before that others had an issue with the addition of the Gamechanger :shrug:

Most of that was being done fairly though. It's not like anyone was being given a particular advantage over others. This week however, you had a certain housemate in serious danger of going in a Vote to Evict so they just changed the entire voting format to keep him in. That is ridiculously unfair.

I don't have a problem with this poll at all, in fact I pray they rig it to get the right result. So long as producer manipulation is for the greater good and for the benefit of the series overall, I'm all for it...and that goes for most reality shows that have public votes

But it's not for the greater good when it turns the show into something totally farcical and corrupt. No one expects much credibility or integrity on a reality show, but this is so blatant it's pathetic. On what is still a gameshow with a 100,000 prize, there's still supposed to be some level of fairness.

[Jack_]

Most of that was being done fairly though. It's not like anyone was being given a particular advantage over others. This week however, you had a certain housemate in serious danger of going in a Vote to Evict so they just changed the entire voting format to keep him in. That is ridiculously unfair.

Not to the people complaining about it...they were saying it made them paranoid (which is the whole point of Big Brother anyway), and that it was completely unfair that Kenny got evicted when she wasn't even nominated.

But it's not for the greater good when it turns the show into something totally farcical and corrupt. No one expects much credibility or integrity on a reality show, but this is so blatant it's pathetic. On what is still a gameshow with a 100,000 prize, there's still supposed to be some level of fairness.

They've done worse than this in the past, and things that were actually to the detriment of the show too. It is a gameshow...but (and this is a big but), it's totally different to Big Brother US and Canada. With no public vote, I would completely agree...for the most part I like very little interference, the game plays out naturally and that's that. But public votes? Eh, they more often than not have a negative affect on the series so anything that can be done to limit that, be my guest.

[Yaki da]

Not to the people complaining about it...they were saying it made them paranoid (which is the whole point of Big Brother anyway), and that it was completely unfair that Kenny got evicted when she wasn't even nominated.

The point is that they came up with that as a rule and it has been implemented from the start. Any housemate could have been taken out by it. That was fair, whether you regarded it is a good idea or not.



They've done worse than this in the past, and things that were actually to the detriment of the show too.

This is right up there with one of the most blatant attampts to manipulate the show on behalf of a certain housemate.


It is a gameshow...but (and this is a big but), it's totally different to Big Brother US and Canada. With no public vote

The fact this show has a public vote makes this far worse. The production team don't like how the public are voting, so they just change the format to save a particular housemate. That's disgraceful.


I would completely agree...for the most part I like very little interference, the game plays out naturally and that's that. But public votes? Eh, they more often than not have a negative affect on the series so anything that can be done to limit that, be my guest.

The public vote is one of the biggest parts of Big Brother. And it is the attempts to manipulate the public vote by changing things up like this to save certain characters that has alienated viewers over the years. You say the show has been improved by this but it hasn't. It's lost viewers because of this. And now it's got hardly any left and is being axed. You say you want little interference, and yet you've just shrugged your shoulders at an extraordinary example of interference designed to benefit one particular housemate over all of the others. It's hilarious what those left watching this crap will defend.

[Jordan.]

I use a different IP address every time I vote but I'm limited to 720 votes an hour :(

All is fair. If it's fair for some people to vote more than other people on evictions just because they have more money, then it's fair for me to deploy my votebot to save lewis and the show.

I'm phoning the police

[JPG2502]

All is fair. If it's fair for some people to vote more than other people on evictions just because they have more money, then it's fair for me to deploy my votebot to save lewis and the show.

have you actually done this or are you just winding people up? :shrug:

[smudgie]

The most popular will not be evicted in VTS.
The least popular and floaters get through on VTE.
Here for it.:shrug:

[bots]

I'm phoning the police

ofcom please

[Jack_]

The point is that they came up with that as a rule and it has been implemented from the start. Any housemate could have been taken out by it. That was fair, whether you regarded it is a good idea or not.

I'm not speaking on my own behalf because I like the viewer nomination, merely reciting what others have claimed. My point is not everyone agrees that the series has been "fair" up until this week, there's always going to be something that someone disagrees with, so.

But as I said I don't think the viewer nom is unfair so I'd prefer it if we left this part or else this conversation is going to become even longer.

This is right up there with one of the most blatant attampts to manipulate the show on behalf of a certain housemate.

Sure, but what I said was 'they've done worse than this in the past, and things that were actually to the detriment of the show too.'

I'm struggling to care when it's the opposite. Positive manipulation is a-okay with me and part and parcel of reality television, especially in the modern era.

The fact this show has a public vote makes this far worse. The production team don't like how the public are voting, so they just change the format to save a particular housemate. That's disgraceful.

Not really...that's just a sense of entitlement on behalf of the viewers. Channel 5, Endemol or quite frankly any British reality show production team are under no obligation to provide a public vote - it has just become the "done" thing in this country. The only thing they can't do legally is rig a televote, anything else is fair game and comes with the territory.

The production team also has a duty and objective to ensure that they are maximising the potential of the cast and storyline strands, and attempting to prevent the public from destroying that is totally understandable.

The public vote is one of the biggest parts of Big Brother. And it is the attempts to manipulate the public vote by changing things up like this to save certain characters that has alienated viewers over the years. You say the show has been improved by this but it hasn't. It's lost viewers because of this. And now it's got hardly any left and is being axed. You say you want little interference, and yet you've just shrugged your shoulders at an extraordinary example of interference designed to benefit one particular housemate over all of the others. It's hilarious what those left watching this crap will defend.

In this country, sure. But it doesn't need to be. And hopefully if the show ever returns it won't be again.

The show's demise has been due to a lot of things (most of which are Channel 5's doing - you can read my post in the Ratings Thread for my thoughts on that), but this isn't one of them. There was production manipulation well over a decade ago, and surprisingly enough there were still in excess of 5m people watching.

Do you know what is damaging to series of Big Brother though? Dreadful eviction orders. There have been examples in BBUK's history where several big characters have been evicted and the show's ratings for that series have declined. It has even happened this year...and people think it doesn't matter :shrug:

Love Island has a production manual which details certain "safety nets" to protect the "key characters" (which is how they refer to it) from public votes to ensure they last as long as possible - and guess what? Over 3m people watch it every night and it's ITV2's most successful show. They tried a vote to evict dump once, it got rid of the villain and they never repeated it again. The production team understand the necessity of keeping key characters and what do you know...it pays off. It's time Big Brother started doing the same thing.

This is to the benefit of the overall series and franchise, not just Lewis. It should've been implemented five years ago, let alone now.

[Yaki da]

I'm not speaking on my own behalf because I like the viewer nomination, merely reciting what others have claimed. My point is not everyone agrees that the series has been "fair" up until this week, there's always going to be something that someone disagrees with, so.

There's a difference between disgareeing with something and whether or not it is fair. The viewer vote has been conducted in a fair manner. Changing a voting format to suit a particular result is something else entirely.


Sure, but what I said was 'they've done worse than this in the past, and things that were actually to the detriment of the show too.'

I'm struggling to care when it's the opposite. Positive manipulation is a-okay with me and part and parcel of reality television, especially in the modern era.

It is not part and parcel of a reality show. And who decides what is positive and what is not? And again, it is the very manipulation itself that has got so out of control, people have switched off. They've damaged the show by doing this.


Not really...that's just a sense of entitlement on behalf of the viewers. Channel 5, Endemol or quite frankly any British reality show production team are under no obligation to provide a public vote - it has just become the "done" thing in this country.

Yes, it is an integral part of the format and has been for the entire time it has been on the television. It is an interactive show. It was alienating the viewers that led to the show losing them and being axed.


The production team also has a duty and objective to ensure that they are maximising the potential of the cast and storyline strands, and attempting to prevent the public from destroying that is totally understandable.

Not on a show where they are asking the viewers to decide. Can you really not see the damage that has been done to the show over the years? Look where it is now. 500k viewing ratings and axed.



The show's demise has been due to a lot of things (most of which are Channel 5's doing - you can read my post in the Ratings Thread for my thoughts on that), but this isn't one of them. There was production manipulation well over a decade ago, and surprisingly enough there were still in excess of 5m people watching.


The show's demise began on Channel 4 (hence the reason it was axed there as well) because of this kind of interference.

Do you know what is damaging to series of Big Brother though?

Is urinating all over a chosen format for a show, pissing off half the audience by doing something so clearly unfair in the process, not damaging to the show? Are you serious?

Dreadful eviction orders. There have been examples in BBUK's history where several big characters have been evicted and the show's ratings for that series have declined. It has even happened this year...and people think it doesn't matter :shrug:

It doesn't matter half as much as rigging an entire show to keep certain people in. And if they picked a better set of housemates it wouldn't matter anyway. And many people like watching Big Brother to see "big characters" get their comeuppance. Indeed, some of the biggest viewing figures ever have been watching people like Grace get evicted.

Love Island has a production manual which details certain "safety nets" to protect the "key characters" (which is how they refer to it) from public votes to ensure they last as long as possible - and guess what? Over 3m people watch it every night and it's ITV2's most successful show. They tried a vote to evict dump once, it got rid of the villain and they never repeated it again. The production team understand the necessity of keeping key characters and what do you know...it pays off. It's time Big Brother started doing the same thing.

This is to the benefit of the overall series and franchise, not just Lewis. It should've been implemented five years ago, let alone now.

I have no problem with there being a vote to save at the start of the show. But when you do this after weeks of it being the other way, you are rigging the show. It is that simple. Whether this should be the chosen format is irrelevant. You don't just change a voting format to suit a particular agenda one week.

You're essentially saying they can do whatever they want including saying "Yeah, **** the format, **** the viewers, **** the voters, **** you all. We do as we please despite this supposedly being an interactive show"

That kind of attitude stinks and it is what ultimately destroys a show. The show has not benefited one bit from it.

[JoshBB]

Didn't you just make a thread saying the vote would be rigged? And now you're basically promoting a way of cheating the poll........ smh

[Yaki da]

Didn't you just make a thread saying the vote would be rigged? And now you're basically promoting a way of cheating the poll........ smh

I'm not promoting anything. I was alerting people to the fact that this could be done. I wasn't encouraging anyone to do it. I was concerned it was something that could be used to rig the poll. Hence my talking about that.