How will nominations work?

[supertv247]

They said housemates will nominate positively, and those with the fewest votes will be put up. Then the 3 with the fewest public votes will also be up.

but I don’t understand how..

If they’re nominating positively and it’s those with the fewest who are ACTUALLY nominated, does that mean someone who potentially gets the most pos noms could still actually be up from the poll? Cause if so that seems like a giveaway to the HM’s.

But then if not, and the top 2 with the most noms are safe and the bottom 2 are up, and then another 3 from the middle are up with the poll - it basically spoils the whole thing? That could mean someone coming 4th / 3rd / 2nd on the poll actually being up because they’re in the bottom 3 (not already nominated)?! So surely not that then

[bots]

yeah, something isnt quite right, i'm not understanding it fully either

If getting the most positive noms keeps you safe, then no nominations will make you vulnerable if you are in the public poll. So zero noms may mean you are up ... and 1 nom may make it go to the poll?

[BBDodge]

The housemate noms take priority.

The 3 least popular with the public (discounting those already up) will be added.

It's possible that everyone could be up with ties in the noms.

[supertv247]

So that does mean the one / two / three people who get the MOST positive nominations could still actually be put up with the poll?

[Cherie]

The housemate noms take priority.

The 3 least popular with the public (discounting those already up) will be added.

It's possible that everyone could be up with ties in the noms.

How many positive noms will you need to be safe? 1, 2 3 it’s suitably vague

[chuff me dizzy]

Im truly baffled

[lewis111]

So that does mean the one / two / three people who get the MOST positive nominations could still actually be put up with the poll?

Probabaly, just like with normal noms you could get zero and still be up with the public poll
Having 3 be up from the public poll make zero sense with this

[chuff me dizzy]

Probabaly, just like with normal noms you could get zero and still be up with the public poll
Having 3 be up from the public poll make zero sense with this

When does poll open ?

[bots]

When does poll open ?

its open now chuff, get voting

[supertv247]

3 public noms AND reverse normal noms is just too much. Should’ve done one or the other this week and the other next.

[bots]

3 public noms AND reverse normal noms is just too much. Should’ve done one or the other this week and the other next.

it will surely work the same way as normal, just that they will count from zero noms upward rather than top down. If someone in the viewers poll already has too few noms, then it will rise up the poll results as before

[BBDodge]

How many positive noms will you need to be safe? 1, 2 3 it’s suitably vague

Presumably the 2 housemates with the least positive noms (including ties) will be up.

[chuff me dizzy]

its open now chuff, get voting

Cheers Ive voted xx

[DouglasS]

Basically 5 or 6 people will be up of the 8..

It'll be the 2 housemates with the fewest 'saves', which is looking to be Tomasz and Akeem I guess [Potentially Cian or Sian also]

Then the three with the fewest votes; Brooke, Zoe and Sian.

Lets say Sian for example is also nominated due to tying with a housemate, that would make Tomasz, Akeem, Sian nomianted by the housemates and Brooke, Zoe and Cian then being the three with the fewest.

I am expecting it to either be; Akeem, Tomasz, Brooke, Zoe and Sian or Akeem, Tomasz, Sian, Brooke, Zoe and Akeem.

Cameron is guaranteed not to be up as he'll get saves off Zoe/Tomasz/Lewis F for sure and will not be the viewers nom.

[Cherie]

Presumably the 2 housemates with the least positive noms (including ties) will be up.

There has to be a cut off though are you safe with 3 positive noms or safe with 2 or will you need 4

[Cherie]

Basically 5 or 6 people will be up of the 8..

It'll be the 2 housemates with the fewest 'saves', which is looking to be Tomasz and Akeem I guess [Potentially Cian or Sian also]

Then the three with the fewest votes; Brooke, Zoe and Sian.

Lets say Sian for example is also nominated due to tying with a housemate, that would make Tomasz, Akeem, Sian nomianted by the housemates and Brooke, Zoe and Cian then being the three with the fewest.

I am expecting it to either be; Akeem, Tomasz, Brooke, Zoe and Sian or Akeem, Tomasz, Sian, Brooke, Zoe and Akeem.

Cameron is guaranteed not to be up as he'll get saves off Zoe/Tomasz/Lewis F for sure and will not be the viewers nom.

Who will save Lewis apart from Cameron

[chuff me dizzy]

Basically 5 or 6 people will be up of the 8..

It'll be the 2 housemates with the fewest 'saves', which is looking to be Tomasz and Akeem I guess [Potentially Cian or Sian also]

Then the three with the fewest votes; Brooke, Zoe and Sian.

Lets say Sian for example is also nominated due to tying with a housemate, that would make Tomasz, Akeem, Sian nomianted by the housemates and Brooke, Zoe and Cian then being the three with the fewest.

I am expecting it to either be; Akeem, Tomasz, Brooke, Zoe and Sian or Akeem, Tomasz, Sian, Brooke, Zoe and Akeem.

Cameron is guaranteed not to be up as he'll get saves off Zoe/Tomasz/Lewis F for sure and will not be the viewers nom.

Why can't they keep things simple ?

[saiwong]

I think it will be like the current 'negative' noms, whereby BB will see the tallys and
decide how many housemates are up dependant on the number of noms they got and how much higher this count is to other housemates


for example Lewis F got 5 noms, Isabella got 4 noms and Akeem got 5 noms
other housemates got either 1 nom or 0 noms


so 4 or 5 noms is much higher than the rest so only those three get put up for eviction.



with positive noms I can see it as housemates getting much less positive noms (or no noms at all) than other housemates will get put up

[BBDodge]

There has to be a cut off though are you safe with 3 positive noms or safe with 2 or will you need 4

They are safe by not being in the bottom 2/ties. The numbers of noms are not fixed.

[Cherie]

Why can't they keep things simple ?

:laugh: it’s beyond them ....normal noms with two viewer noms would be fine, this is just nonsense

[chuff me dizzy]

:laugh: it’s beyond them ....normal noms with two viewer noms would be fine, this is just nonsense

As clear as fog !

[bots]

There has to be a cut off though are you safe with 3 positive noms or safe with 2 or will you need 4

that will depend on the spread .... If for example Brooke and Sian get no positive votes and the rest get 1 or more then those 2 will be up for eviction. However, as they will be at the bottom of the viewers poll, it will then be the next 3 closest to the bottom of the viewers poll that will go up .... and that will likely catch Cian, Zoe and Thomasz/Cameron

I would say Zoe was most at risk, and with 3 being included from the viewers poll, its likely a double/triple eviction on friday

[chuff me dizzy]

that will depend on the spread .... If for example Brooke and Sian get no positive votes and the rest get 1 or more then those 2 will be up for eviction. However, as they will be at the bottom of the viewers poll, it will then be the next 3 closest to the bottom of the viewers poll that will go up .... and that will likely catch Cian, Zoe and Thomasz/Cameron

I would say Zoe was most at risk, and with 3 being included from the viewers poll, its likely a double/triple eviction on friday

So the poll votes are counted 1st then the hm8s choose ?

[bots]

So the poll votes are counted 1st then the hm8s choose ?

No it will be as usual, but housemates with the fewest noms will be up, if they are not in the 3 lowest places in the poll, then the lowest 3 in the poll will also be up. If the lowest in the poll are already up, then it will rise up the list filling the 3 spots

[chuff me dizzy]

No it will be as usual, but housemates with the fewest noms will be up, if they are not in the 3 lowest places in the poll, then the lowest 3 in the poll will also be up. If the lowest in the poll are already up, then it will rise up the list filling the 3 spots

So the hm8s vote for their favs too ?

[bots]

So the hm8s vote for their favs too ?

yes, and those that get the most favourable noms will be safe. So for example ... Cameron and Zoe vote lewis .... 2 noms will likely make him safe

[chuff me dizzy]

yes, and those that get the most favourable noms will be safe. So for example ... Cameron and Zoe vote lewis .... 2 noms will likely make him safe

Oh hell that the perv safe AGAIN !!!!!! :rant:

[bots]

Oh hell that the perv safe AGAIN !!!!!! :rant:

he may cop it in the viewer poll though if Sian and Brook are at the bottom and also receive the fewest votes, as he is probably around the half way mark ....

The bottom if the viewers list is likely to be from the top

Lewis
Akeem
Cameron/Thomasz
Cian
Zoe
Brooke
Sian


Remove Brooke and Sian from that as they are already up from housemates ... and Thomasz could be in the firing line

[Kazanne]

iT SAYS ON THE APP THE 3 WITH THE fewest votes,will automatically be nominated. (sorry about caps)

[bots]

iT SAYS ON THE APP THE 3 WITH THE fewest votes,will automatically be nominated. (sorry about caps)

OK :laugh:

Well, its all guess work as usual ... mutter mutter

Another way it could work, is that ... say, after the results of the viewers poll and the bottom 3 are nominated, if they do badly in housemate nominations, then it rises in the list in housemate nominations. So, if Sian and Brooke get zero, then it moves up to those that only got 1 hm nomination

[lewis111]

HMs noms have priority, so that will probabaly put Akeem and Sian up as I can’t see any more than 1 voting for them
Then 3 more are put up by public, the three with the least public votes excluding Sian and Akeem so probabaly Brooke, Tomasz and Zoe

[arista]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_psychology

Reverse Psychology Emma smiled at.

[Alf]

The way I took it was.

They each vote for their 2 favourites and the 2 or more with the least amount of votes will be up along with the housemate who finishes bottom of the viewers vote as normal.

[tanussa]

interesting

[Headie]

So basically everyone but Cameron and Lewis will be up.

Did we expect anything else?

[Yaki da]

All you need to understand is that Lewis cannot be up because (1) he'll get the most noms and (2) he will not be in the bottom 3 on the viewers vote.

The whole thing is clearly set up to keep him in longer. Just as the attempt to make it vote to save was an attempt to keep him in. Just as giving Cameron the power to evict was a way to make sure he would be kept in (had he not won the game changer, he was going nowhere anyway because of this)