Ingrid Seward, Dickie Arbiter and others caught lying about the Oprah interview.

[Mitchell]

Royal Correspondents Dickie Arbiter, Victoria Arbiter, Ingrid Seward and Richard Fitzwilliams have all been caught reviewing the Oprah interview, before they’ve seen it or know the contents of it.

T_j35t3GCsk

Don’t get how any of these 4 can ever be taken seriously again after being caught lying.

[Crimson Dynamo]

This is the problem with "experts" on tv

most are self-proclaimed and money-grabbing charlatans

[Mitchell]

This is the problem with "experts" on tv

most are self-proclaimed and money-grabbing charlatans

It’s interesting to see that they’d lie for a pay day, I sadly doubt it’ll have any impact on their reputations, but none of them should be labelled an expert ever again.

[Crimson Dynamo]

It’s interesting to see that they’d lie for a pay day, I sadly doubt it’ll have any impact on their reputations, but none of them should be labelled an expert ever again.

you watch they will all be on the tv next week

[AnnieK]

This is the problem with "experts" on tv

most are self-proclaimed and money-grabbing charlatans

Those people quoted are all Royal correspondents that Jet has quoted in the past as being very well informed. Now they are "experts" who just want to be on tv?

[QUOTE=jet;10785628]Reactions of respected people who have known the royals for many years.

Ingrid Seward, editor in chief of Majesty Magazine:
“It appears to be a gratuitous and ungracious swipe at the Queen.”

Angela Levin, Harry’s official Biographer:
I fear she has put a sliver of ice in Harry’s heart.

Tom Bower, Charles’s Biographer:
Their comments smack of spiteful fury. I fear it will get worse.

Dickie Arbiter, former spokesman for the Queen:
Harry knows the rules. Meghan knows the rules. It’s been made very clear to them.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
“They didn’t get what they wanted. They are clearly not happy and there is a hint of suppressed rage.

Angela Levin, Harry’s Biographer:
Harry and Meghan are almost stumbling in their rush to join a world of rich, self - centred celebrities.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
I’m worried about Prince Harry….I fear something is seriously amiss and he’s on a trajectory of self destruction.

Mmmm :suspect:

[Mitchell]

Those people quoted are all Royal correspondents that Jet has quoted in the past as being very well informed. Now they are "experts" who just want to be on tv?

Reactions of respected people who have known the royals for many years.

Ingrid Seward, editor in chief of Majesty Magazine:
“It appears to be a gratuitous and ungracious swipe at the Queen.”

Angela Levin, Harry’s official Biographer:
I fear she has put a sliver of ice in Harry’s heart.

Tom Bower, Charles’s Biographer:
Their comments smack of spiteful fury. I fear it will get worse.

Dickie Arbiter, former spokesman for the Queen:
Harry knows the rules. Meghan knows the rules. It’s been made very clear to them.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
“They didn’t get what they wanted. They are clearly not happy and there is a hint of suppressed rage.

Angela Levin, Harry’s Biographer:
Harry and Meghan are almost stumbling in their rush to join a world of rich, self - centred celebrities.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
I’m worried about Prince Harry….I fear something is seriously amiss and he’s on a trajectory of self destruction.

Mmmm :suspect:

https://media.tenor.com/images/74a8b1231d19e9d5d8ead0c3b4b850b6/tenor.gif

[Crimson Dynamo]

Those people quoted are all Royal correspondents that Jet has quoted in the past as being very well informed. Now they are "experts" who just want to be on tv?

[QUOTE=jet;10785628]Reactions of respected people who have known the royals for many years.

Ingrid Seward, editor in chief of Majesty Magazine:
“It appears to be a gratuitous and ungracious swipe at the Queen.”

Angela Levin, Harry’s official Biographer:
I fear she has put a sliver of ice in Harry’s heart.

Tom Bower, Charles’s Biographer:
Their comments smack of spiteful fury. I fear it will get worse.

Dickie Arbiter, former spokesman for the Queen:
Harry knows the rules. Meghan knows the rules. It’s been made very clear to them.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
“They didn’t get what they wanted. They are clearly not happy and there is a hint of suppressed rage.

Angela Levin, Harry’s Biographer:
Harry and Meghan are almost stumbling in their rush to join a world of rich, self - centred celebrities.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
I’m worried about Prince Harry….I fear something is seriously amiss and he’s on a trajectory of self destruction.

Mmmm :suspect:

im not jet

take it up with him

and i dont think any of the 3 are or have ever been royal correspondents

:shrug:

[Crimson Dynamo]

and all 3 have have known the royals for many years

its not in doubt.

[Glenn.]

Well well well

[Crimson Dynamo]

i would add I do think after they have watched the interview the same conclusions will probably be drawn by them and the watching public...

:skull:

[Glenn.]

Anything they say will be met with negativity regardless. That’s what irrational hatred creates.

[Tom4784]

They're just saying whatever will bring in the most clicks and people who are too warped by their own confirmation bias will confuse it for fact because it suits their narrative. These 'experts' don't know jack**** and are just telling the gullible what they want to hear.

[Mitchell]

and all 3 have have known the royals for many years

its not in doubt.

There’s no doubt they have known the royals, but they have thrown away any credibility they had with this interview imo, how can they be trusted when they’re so willing to lie.

[rusticgal]

Who are the two blokes asking the questions?

[Mitchell]

Who are the two blokes asking the questions?

Two YouTubers, they’ve previously done videos on Katie Hopkins, Carole Baskin and others.

[Crimson Dynamo]

There’s no doubt they have known the royals, but they have thrown away any credibility they had with this interview imo, how can they be trusted when they’re so willing to lie.

to be fair to them

they are talking to 2 unknown wee youtube laddies who they think are mug punter enough to pay them


would they have done this for the BBC/Times/ITV?

no

Does that mean they are not knobs

no

[Crimson Dynamo]

and dont forget we have the actual "interview" pretending to be an actual interview and most people will lap it up as if it is a real interview

that is a whole hill of beans worse


:skull:

[rusticgal]

Two YouTubers, they’ve previously done videos on Katie Hopkins, Carole Baskin and others.


So, maybe Im not getting this....but when these two You Tubers asks questions about their comments on William and Meghans love of Animals...have they just made that up?

[Cherie]

They asked a very specific question there about something that is allegedly said about William? Were they briefed about what the interview contained before hand as it doesn’t look like they went into the questions cold? Would they have answered that question without knowing what was supposed to have been said :laugh:

I never heard of any of these apart from the Majesty Editor woman :smug:

[AnnieK]

So, maybe Im not getting this....but when these two You Tubers asks questions about their comments on William and Meghans love of Animals...have they just made that up?

Have you watched the video? They asked them if they had seen the interview, they said no. They asked them to comment on the interview anyway and fed them bits that they said meghan mentioned in the interview. The two lads have not seen the interview either, but the respected journalists lied to make it look like they had. Thus proving that they will spin anything to suit the narrative they want to push it (as any journalist does).

[AnnieK]

They asked a very specific question there about something that is allegedly said about William? Were they briefed about what the interview contained before hand as it doesn’t look like they went into the questions cold? Would they have answered that question without knowing what was supposed to have been said :laugh:

I never heard of any of these apart from the Majesty Editor woman :smug:

To be honest if they had integrity, they wouldn't and shouldn't have answered any questions without seeing it first.

I had only heard of them as Jet has quoted them before. I wouldn't have known any of them otherwise :laugh: Then again I probably couldn't name many journalists apart from the news readers :worry:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Have you watched the video? They asked them if they had seen the interview, they said no. They asked them to comment on the interview anyway and fed them bits that they said meghan mentioned in the interview. The two lads have not seen the interview either, but the respected journalists lied to make it look like they had. Thus proving that they will spin anything to suit the narrative they want to push it (as any journalist does).

They are not "respected journalists"

One is a niche magazine editor and the others are television and radio commentators

[jet]

Hmmm, very odd and well, I agree, very unprofessional indeed if they haven't had previews of the interview. I don’t know who Richard Fitzwilliams is or Victoria whoever either.

The one I’m surprised at is Ingrid Seward, the editor of Majesty magazine . Dickie Arbiter was press secretary to the Queen years ago.
On the other hand, it doesn't mean that the opinions of those 2 I know of, past or future, are not worth listening to. Because they can still have informed opinions. But they are not, and never have been, royal commentators or reporters. :shrug:

I’d be much more surprised if those who have links and access to royal sources, like Jennie Bond or Richard Kay, for instance, did this.

[Crimson Dynamo]

CNN have got egg on their face..

:hehe:

[Cherie]

Jenny Bond would never

[Cherie]

To be honest if they had integrity, they wouldn't and shouldn't have answered any questions without seeing it first.

I had only heard of them as Jet has quoted them before. I wouldn't have known any of them otherwise :laugh: Then again I probably couldn't name many journalists apart from the news readers :worry:

Oh 100% that 50 quid must have been needed for the leccy bill

[jet]

Those people quoted are all Royal correspondents that Jet has quoted in the past as being very well informed. Now they are "experts" who just want to be on tv?

[QUOTE=jet;10785628]Reactions of respected people who have known the royals for many years.

Ingrid Seward, editor in chief of Majesty Magazine:
“It appears to be a gratuitous and ungracious swipe at the Queen.”

Angela Levin, Harry’s official Biographer:
I fear she has put a sliver of ice in Harry’s heart.

Tom Bower, Charles’s Biographer:
Their comments smack of spiteful fury. I fear it will get worse.

Dickie Arbiter, former spokesman for the Queen:
Harry knows the rules. Meghan knows the rules. It’s been made very clear to them.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
“They didn’t get what they wanted. They are clearly not happy and there is a hint of suppressed rage.

Angela Levin, Harry’s Biographer:
Harry and Meghan are almost stumbling in their rush to join a world of rich, self - centred celebrities.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
I’m worried about Prince Harry….I fear something is seriously amiss and he’s on a trajectory of self destruction.

Mmmm :suspect:

Grabbing an old post - I thought better of you Annie. No, they are clearly not royal correspondents if you read the descriptions beside their names....and they
have known the royals for years. And only 2 of the above appear in that utube video, the others do not.

[jet]

Jenny Bond would never

Indeed she wouldn't! :thumbs:

[AnnieK]

[QUOTE=AnnieK;11011644]Those people quoted are all Royal correspondents that Jet has quoted in the past as being very well informed. Now they are "experts" who just want to be on tv?



Grabbing an old post - I thought better of you Annie. No, they are clearly not royal correspondents if you read the descriptions beside their names....and they
have known the royals for years. And only 2 of the above appear in that utube video, the others do not.

I was only grabbing on an old post as I only have heard of them from your posts. You said they were respected and therefore I assumed they were correspondents so I apologise for that. Not sure why you would think less of me for trusting your thoughts on these people in the past :shrug:

[Mitchell]

to be fair to them

they are talking to 2 unknown wee youtube laddies who they think are mug punter enough to pay them


would they have done this for the BBC/Times/ITV?

no

Does that mean they are not knobs

no

They were told it was being produced for a national broadcaster, so as far as they knew, it was for TV.

[Crimson Dynamo]

They were told it was being produced for a national broadcaster, so as far as they knew, it was for TV.

i doubt they bought that from 2 wee boys tbh, a national would do it themselves as its nowt more than a piece to camera

[jet]

[QUOTE=jet;11011701]

I was only grabbing on an old post as I only have heard of them from your posts. You said they were respected and therefore I assumed they were correspondents so I apologise for that. Not sure why you would think less of me for trusting your thoughts on these people in the past :shrug:

Thanks for the apology. As only 2 of the people in my past post were involved, the rest were not and none of them were royal correspondents, I thought bringing my post to that thread was done to undermine me, especially as you commented 'Hmmm' at the end. But you've explained you thought they were royal correspondents so.....

[AnnieK]

[QUOTE=AnnieK;11011709]

Thanks for the apology. As only 2 of the people in my past post were involved, the rest were not and none of them were royal correspondents, I thought bringing my post to that thread was done to undermine me, especially as you commented 'Hmmm' at the end. But you've explained you thought they were royal correspondents so.....

I don't do undermining Jet, not my style. :laugh: My confusion was that LT called them charlatans but you had said that those two featured were respected so I was confused (I'm often confused :laugh:).

They have not cast themselves in a favourable light by doing this, whoever they are.

[jet]

[QUOTE=jet;11011715]

I don't do undermining Jet, not my style. :laugh: My confusion was that LT called them charlatans but you had said that those two featured were respected so I was confused (I'm often confused :laugh:).

They have not cast themselves in a favourable light by doing this, whoever they are.

I agree, they are off my 'respected' list. :hee:

[user104658]

Royal media circle-jerkers in "made their mind up before they even saw it" SHOCKER. You won't believe what happened next.

[jet]

It's odd that none of the 4 asked how the UK 'news broadcasters' knew what was in the interview - love of animals, what was said about William etc, - when nobody had seen it yet. Very confusing.

[rusticgal]

All very odd..

[bots]

they weren't caught lying. They were invited to comment before they had seen the video using their judgement on what they speculated it would contain. Big difference

[Crimson Dynamo]

they weren't caught lying. They were invited to comment before they had seen the video using their judgement on what they speculated it would contain. Big difference

dont ruin it:joker:

lol at the comments on youtube " I cant wait till this gets on the news" "harry was right after all" " NO WONDER THEY MOVED TO CANADA, I MEAN HOLLYWOOD"

[Glenn.]

they weren't caught lying. They were invited to comment before they had seen the video using their judgement on what they speculated it would contain. Big difference

And come to conclusions they had no basis of...

[rusticgal]

And come to conclusions they had no basis of...


That’s what Speculation is :laugh:

[rusticgal]

they weren't caught lying. They were invited to comment before they had seen the video using their judgement on what they speculated it would contain. Big difference


Well that makes more sense....