[Mitchell]

Royal Correspondents Dickie Arbiter, Victoria Arbiter, Ingrid Seward and Richard Fitzwilliams have all been caught reviewing the Oprah interview, before they’ve seen it or know the contents of it.

Youtube video

Don’t get how any of these 4 can ever be taken seriously again after being caught lying.

[Crimson Dynamo]

This is the problem with "experts" on tv

most are self-proclaimed and money-grabbing charlatans

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

This is the problem with "experts" on tv

most are self-proclaimed and money-grabbing charlatans

It’s interesting to see that they’d lie for a pay day, I sadly doubt it’ll have any impact on their reputations, but none of them should be labelled an expert ever again.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

It’s interesting to see that they’d lie for a pay day, I sadly doubt it’ll have any impact on their reputations, but none of them should be labelled an expert ever again.

you watch they will all be on the tv next week

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

This is the problem with "experts" on tv

most are self-proclaimed and money-grabbing charlatans

Those people quoted are all Royal correspondents that Jet has quoted in the past as being very well informed. Now they are "experts" who just want to be on tv?

[QUOTE=jet;10785628]Reactions of respected people who have known the royals for many years.

Ingrid Seward, editor in chief of Majesty Magazine:
“It appears to be a gratuitous and ungracious swipe at the Queen.”

Angela Levin, Harry’s official Biographer:
I fear she has put a sliver of ice in Harry’s heart.

Tom Bower, Charles’s Biographer:
Their comments smack of spiteful fury. I fear it will get worse.

Dickie Arbiter, former spokesman for the Queen:
Harry knows the rules. Meghan knows the rules. It’s been made very clear to them.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
“They didn’t get what they wanted. They are clearly not happy and there is a hint of suppressed rage.

Angela Levin, Harry’s Biographer:
Harry and Meghan are almost stumbling in their rush to join a world of rich, self - centred celebrities.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
I’m worried about Prince Harry….I fear something is seriously amiss and he’s on a trajectory of self destruction.

Mmmm

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

Those people quoted are all Royal correspondents that Jet has quoted in the past as being very well informed. Now they are "experts" who just want to be on tv?

Mmmm

[Crimson Dynamo]

[QUOTE=AnnieK;11011644]Those people quoted are all Royal correspondents that Jet has quoted in the past as being very well informed. Now they are "experts" who just want to be on tv?

Originally Posted by jet

Reactions of respected people who have known the royals for many years.

Ingrid Seward, editor in chief of Majesty Magazine:
“It appears to be a gratuitous and ungracious swipe at the Queen.”

Angela Levin, Harry’s official Biographer:
I fear she has put a sliver of ice in Harry’s heart.

Tom Bower, Charles’s Biographer:
Their comments smack of spiteful fury. I fear it will get worse.

Dickie Arbiter, former spokesman for the Queen:
Harry knows the rules. Meghan knows the rules. It’s been made very clear to them.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
“They didn’t get what they wanted. They are clearly not happy and there is a hint of suppressed rage.

Angela Levin, Harry’s Biographer:
Harry and Meghan are almost stumbling in their rush to join a world of rich, self - centred celebrities.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
I’m worried about Prince Harry….I fear something is seriously amiss and he’s on a trajectory of self destruction.

Mmmm

im not jet

take it up with him

and i dont think any of the 3 are or have ever been royal correspondents

[jet]

[QUOTE=AnnieK;11011644]Those people quoted are all Royal correspondents that Jet has quoted in the past as being very well informed. Now they are "experts" who just want to be on tv?

Originally Posted by jet

Reactions of respected people who have known the royals for many years.

Ingrid Seward, editor in chief of Majesty Magazine:
“It appears to be a gratuitous and ungracious swipe at the Queen.”

Angela Levin, Harry’s official Biographer:
I fear she has put a sliver of ice in Harry’s heart.

Tom Bower, Charles’s Biographer:
Their comments smack of spiteful fury. I fear it will get worse.

Dickie Arbiter, former spokesman for the Queen:
Harry knows the rules. Meghan knows the rules. It’s been made very clear to them.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
“They didn’t get what they wanted. They are clearly not happy and there is a hint of suppressed rage.

Angela Levin, Harry’s Biographer:
Harry and Meghan are almost stumbling in their rush to join a world of rich, self - centred celebrities.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
I’m worried about Prince Harry….I fear something is seriously amiss and he’s on a trajectory of self destruction.

Mmmm

Grabbing an old post - I thought better of you Annie. No, they are clearly not royal correspondents if you read the descriptions beside their names....and they
have known the royals for years. And only 2 of the above appear in that utube video, the others do not.

[AnnieK]

[QUOTE=jet;11011701]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

Those people quoted are all Royal correspondents that Jet has quoted in the past as being very well informed. Now they are "experts" who just want to be on tv?



Grabbing an old post - I thought better of you Annie. No, they are clearly not royal correspondents if you read the descriptions beside their names....and they
have known the royals for years. And only 2 of the above appear in that utube video, the others do not.

I was only grabbing on an old post as I only have heard of them from your posts. You said they were respected and therefore I assumed they were correspondents so I apologise for that. Not sure why you would think less of me for trusting your thoughts on these people in the past

[jet]

[QUOTE=AnnieK;11011709]

Originally Posted by jet

I was only grabbing on an old post as I only have heard of them from your posts. You said they were respected and therefore I assumed they were correspondents so I apologise for that. Not sure why you would think less of me for trusting your thoughts on these people in the past

Thanks for the apology. As only 2 of the people in my past post were involved, the rest were not and none of them were royal correspondents, I thought bringing my post to that thread was done to undermine me, especially as you commented 'Hmmm' at the end. But you've explained you thought they were royal correspondents so.....

[Crimson Dynamo]

and all 3 have have known the royals for many years

its not in doubt.

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

and all 3 have have known the royals for many years

its not in doubt.

There’s no doubt they have known the royals, but they have thrown away any credibility they had with this interview imo, how can they be trusted when they’re so willing to lie.

[rusticgal]

Who are the two blokes asking the questions?

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Who are the two blokes asking the questions?

Two YouTubers, they’ve previously done videos on Katie Hopkins, Carole Baskin and others.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

Two YouTubers, they’ve previously done videos on Katie Hopkins, Carole Baskin and others.

So, maybe Im not getting this....but when these two You Tubers asks questions about their comments on William and Meghans love of Animals...have they just made that up?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

There’s no doubt they have known the royals, but they have thrown away any credibility they had with this interview imo, how can they be trusted when they’re so willing to lie.

to be fair to them

they are talking to 2 unknown wee youtube laddies who they think are mug punter enough to pay them


would they have done this for the BBC/Times/ITV?

no

Does that mean they are not knobs

no

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

to be fair to them

they are talking to 2 unknown wee youtube laddies who they think are mug punter enough to pay them


would they have done this for the BBC/Times/ITV?

no

Does that mean they are not knobs

no

They were told it was being produced for a national broadcaster, so as far as they knew, it was for TV.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

They were told it was being produced for a national broadcaster, so as far as they knew, it was for TV.

i doubt they bought that from 2 wee boys tbh, a national would do it themselves as its nowt more than a piece to camera

[Glenn.]

Well well well

[Crimson Dynamo]

i would add I do think after they have watched the interview the same conclusions will probably be drawn by them and the watching public...

[Glenn.]

Anything they say will be met with negativity regardless. That’s what irrational hatred creates.

[Tom4784]

They're just saying whatever will bring in the most clicks and people who are too warped by their own confirmation bias will confuse it for fact because it suits their narrative. These 'experts' don't know jack**** and are just telling the gullible what they want to hear.

[Crimson Dynamo]

and dont forget we have the actual "interview" pretending to be an actual interview and most people will lap it up as if it is a real interview

that is a whole hill of beans worse

[Cherie]

They asked a very specific question there about something that is allegedly said about William? Were they briefed about what the interview contained before hand as it doesn’t look like they went into the questions cold? Would they have answered that question without knowing what was supposed to have been said

I never heard of any of these apart from the Majesty Editor woman

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by Cherie

They asked a very specific question there about something that is allegedly said about William? Were they briefed about what the interview contained before hand as it doesn’t look like they went into the questions cold? Would they have answered that question without knowing what was supposed to have been said

I never heard of any of these apart from the Majesty Editor woman

To be honest if they had integrity, they wouldn't and shouldn't have answered any questions without seeing it first.

I had only heard of them as Jet has quoted them before. I wouldn't have known any of them otherwise Then again I probably couldn't name many journalists apart from the news readers