Meghan Markle is now 40 years old today

[Cherie]

One of many entries Meghan wrote about her Dad on her TIG blog.


“Draw your own box. White. Black. Hispanic. Asian/Pacific Islander.
Those were the only four options available for me to check as my ethnicity in my 7th grade English class. Choose one. It was some sort of mandatory census that had to be completed before an exam, and there I was (my curly hair, my freckled face, my pale skin, my mixed race) looking down at these boxes, not wanting to mess up, but not knowing what to do. Not knowing which box I fit in to.
I remember going home that night and telling my dad what happened, recounting how my teacher said to just “choose one” - that despite my being biracial, that I should simply choose one box and be done with it. And in one of those parenting moments that no guidebook could ever prep you for, my dad said words that will stay with me forever: “Draw your own box.”

This is the same man who took apart two Barbie boxed sets (because you could only buy a white Barbie or a black one), and made a custom one to bring home to me - his speciality set included a black Barbie mom, a white Ken doll dad, and two kids - one black and one white. I picture him standing there in Toys R Us, moms glaring at him for taking the toys apart, perhaps an employee saying “excuse me sir, you can’t do that” - as my dad carefully separated the boxed sets to make one that echoed my reality. One that showed me that I should (and could) make my own box.

In celebrating Father’s Day, I think of so many moments with my dad. Our club sandwich & fruit smoothie tradition post my tap & ballet class - classes, which by the way, he religiously took me to on Saturday mornings after working 75+ hours a week as a lighting director. The fishing trips along the Kern River and Big Bear Lake to catch catfish or trout and cook it up for dinner, and the commitment he made to lighting my high school musicals so that they felt as grand as a Broadway show.
The blood, sweat and tears this man (who came from so little in a small town of Pennsylvania, where Christmas stockings were filled with oranges, and dinners were potatoes and spam) invested in my future so that I could grow up to have so much.

He helped me turn my bathroom into a darkroom when I was twelve because I wanted to be a photographer - shading my windows in red lighting gels and filling my cabinets with extra jugs of fixer. He put gas in my car when I went from audition trying to make it as an actress. He is the person who believed in this grand dream of mine well before I could even see it as a possibility. He taught me to write thank you notes, to always arrive early, to drink Arnold Palmers, to find my light when I’m on camera…and beyond.

And that, right there, is the point: my dad taught me to find my light. And he taught me to always make my own box.
To my dad - my thoughtful, inspiring, hardworking Daddy - Happy Father’s Day. ‘If I had all the water in the world, I’d give all the water to you…’ (You won’t get that quote, but he will. And for Father’s Day, that’s all that matters).”
- Meghan Markle, June 2014


Terrible Dad obviously :laugh:

[Jordan.]

Because she is an opportunist....that's why she was slated.

Those actually affected didn't see it that way

1529976096497848338

[LukeB]

Those actually affected didn't see it that way

1529976096497848338

:clap1:

Obviously people are getting desperate to slate Meghan to keep up their obsession. To me people are gross to try and use this against her when people have lost their lives and loved ones, it shouldn’t be about Meghan but her haters are more concerned what she does than what happened.

[bots]

So believable, swears at people that criticise a 3rd rate actress when loads of their kids were murdered

[LukeB]

So believable, swears at people that criticise a 3rd rate actress when loads of their kids were murdered

If people weren’t being vile then maybe they won’t be a swear word. At least I’m not using something tragic as an agenda to slate Meghan and others

[GoldHeart]

Because she is an opportunist....that's why she was slated.

People have DIED

[LukeB]

People have DIED

They obviously don’t care about the deaths Goldheart, they will slate Meghan at any opportunity. People die, murdered or kidnapped and somehow Meghan will be slated for doing something others aren’t doing which is paying respects. There’s a time and a place.

[Cherie]

People have DIED

she doesn't know any of these people personally, meanwhile her Dad has suffered a serious medical episode yet there is no trip to see him....does that not make you wonder about her?

[LukeB]

she doesn't know any of these people personally, meanwhile her Dad has suffered a serious medical episode yet there is no trip to see him....does that not make you wonder about her?

If she went to the hospital to visit her dad you all would slate her. Anyway you don’t have to know people to pay respects, a lot of Americans paid their respects to the victims and they have no relationship with them. Just Americans coming together over a tragedy that happened over there. The whole fake concern about her father is boring and to use that for agenda over a tragedy is a questionable. A person don’t have to visit someone in hospital when they have no relationship.

[Cherie]

If she went to the hospital to visit her dad you all would slate her. Anyway you don’t have to know people to pay respects, a lot of Americans paid their respects to the victims and they have no relationship with them. Just Americans coming together over a tragedy that happened over there. The whole fake concern about her father is boring and to use that for agenda over a tragedy is a questionable. A person don’t have to visit someone in hospital when they have no relationship.

No I wouldn't I would say it's nice that they made up

[GoldHeart]

No I wouldn't I would say it's nice that they made up

If she visited her dad , it wouldn't necessarily mean they've 'made up' . And she would still be seen as doing it to 'make herself look good' . Maybe if the dad & sister would stop trash talking her then they might get somewhere with her. But I think it's past that now.

[jet]

Harry didn’t accompany Meghan to Texas because he said ‘the timing was wrong’. He was right. You don’t sweep in with your security men and a hired cameraman just days after a tragedy and before the President of the USA who was timing his visit appropriately to later in the week.
She flew there and back in a luxury private jet and paraded around for ages with cameras trained on her and posed with volunteers.

‘Paying her respects’ appropriately would have been sending the families a private note and donation or insisting her visit was private, not making sure the world captured her ‘compassion’ for all to see.

Meanwhile her father was seriously ill in hospital not that far away from her.
Meghan’s ‘compassion’ is always opportunistic. Every.single.time. She has form.
She plays her unquestioning fanbase like fiddles and they are duped every time. imo.

[jet]

If she visited her dad , it wouldn't necessarily mean they've 'made up' . And she would still be seen as doing it to 'make herself look good' . Maybe if the dad & sister would stop trash talking her then they might get somewhere with her. But I think it's past that now.

What has her Dad said about her that 'trashed' her? That he is desparate for her to contact him? That she isn't behaving like the lovely Meghan he knows?
That he doesn't understand what is going on with her? That's about the height of it. :shrug:
On the other hand, he has called Harry an 'idiot' and some other choice words.:laugh:

[rusticgal]

People have DIED



Tragic I know…but what’s your point?

[rusticgal]

They obviously don’t care about the deaths Goldheart, .


Ridiculous comment….

[Jordan.]

she doesn't know any of these people personally, meanwhile her Dad has suffered a serious medical episode yet there is no trip to see him....does that not make you wonder about her?

That she would have more empathy for violently murdered children than a father she has a broken relationship with? Nope.

[GoldHeart]

Tragic I know…but what’s your point?

It's more than tragic ,this is a regular occurrence in America with the gun violence. And it's horrific especially innocent children. So that's my focus ,not whether Meghan is looking for an "opportunity" .

[thesheriff443]

It's more than tragic ,this is a regular occurrence in America with the gun violence. And it's horrific especially innocent children. So that's my focus ,not whether Meghan is looking for an "opportunity" .

But the killing of those kids didn’t stop you coming in this thread

So your focus means the same as anyone else and considering the amount of time you spent in the Jonny and amber thread it makes you a hypocrite

[jet]

They obviously don’t care about the deaths Goldheart, they will slate Meghan at any opportunity. People die, murdered or kidnapped and somehow Meghan will be slated for doing something others aren’t doing which is paying respects. There’s a time and a place.

How do you know what people care about? Do they have to splash what they did to show they care and what they feel privately all over the internet complete with details and photos to prove it like the 2nd rate actress who thinks she is now so important that she must visit the scene, wait for it! - ‘in person’, as she stated? She blessed the bereaved with her actual presence, and was kind enough to share it all with the world, isn't she just wonderful! :rolleyes:

[Beso]

She diminished the deaths of those children by trying to make herself look like a caring person.

Then her dad collapses and she shows nothing..


It's as simple as that, make your own minds up.

[rusticgal]

It's more than tragic ,this is a regular occurrence in America with the gun violence. And it's horrific especially innocent children.

…and I could not agree more. But that’s a separate issue. That does not mean people cannot have an opinion on what Meghan’s motives really were.
There are some very self centred, manipulative people in this world and they will take any opportunity, however tragic, to monopolise their crave for attention…and Meghan imo is one of them.

[GoldHeart]

…and I could not agree more. But that’s a separate issue. That does not mean people cannot have an opinion on what Meghan’s motives really were.
There are some very self centred, manipulative people in this world and they will take any opportunity, however tragic, to monopolise their crave for attention…and Meghan imo is one of them.

Hmm... Interesting I don't remember people getting this annoyed with Bojo & Patel last year.... on remembrance day, when they were 'paying their respects '. People get more angry & upset with Meghan, than the fat cats running this country into the ground.

[jet]

Hmm... Interesting I don't remember people getting this annoyed with Bojo & Patel last year.... on remembrance day, when they were 'paying their respects '. People get more angry & upset with Meghan, than the fat cats running this country into the ground.

Boris is the Prime Minister and Patel the Home Secretary, officially representing the government at a service in their own country for their own countrymen/women. It's what prominent, elected officials do, not nobodys like Meghan making a display of themselves in a US state they have never lived in or had any connection to. :laugh:

[Jordan.]

Hmm... Interesting I don't remember people getting this annoyed with Bojo & Patel last year.... on remembrance day, when they were 'paying their respects '. People get more angry & upset with Meghan, than the fat cats running this country into the ground.

They've shown more anger and upset towards Meghan for paying tribute than to an actual child murderer. If that doesn't put the level of bitter, twisted hatred into perspective...

[Zizu]

They've shown more anger and upset towards Meghan for paying tribute than to an actual child murderer. If that doesn't put the level of bitter, twisted hatred into perspective...


Very good point !!

The poor girl is hated far more than that horrendous Camilla Parker Bowles woman

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[GoldHeart]

Boris is the Prime Minister and Patel the Home Secretary, officially representing the government at a service in their own country for their own countrymen/women. It's what prominent, elected officials do, not nobodys like Meghan making a display of themselves in a US state they have never lived in or had any connection to. :laugh:

I know it's their official routine , but people could still argue that both Bojo & Patel just pretend to show compassion. Might aswell say when Patel held the poppy wreath she wanted to 'look caring' .

Meghan is American , she knows what it's like to live in a country where gun control is crazy. It shouldn't matter if she's not from that particular state. Gun crime is a problem in America on a whole. I didn't mean for this to turn into some TEDTALK about 'guns' ... but yeah.

[Glenn.]

YouGov Poll

https://www.newsweek.com/meghan-markle-prince-harry-hit-new-low-u-k-polls-before-queen-platinum-jubilee-1711567

Meghan and Harry Hit New Low in U.K. Poll Before Queen's Platinum Jubilee

Meghan was viewed negatively by 63 percent, almost two thirds, of 1,692 British adults surveyed between May 18 and 19.

By contrast, 23 percent viewed her positively giving the duchess a net approval of -42, down from -39 in the pollster's last survey.

Prince Harry was disliked by 58 percent and liked by 32 percent giving him net figures of -26, down a point since YouGov's last survey.

A YouGov press release read: "In this latest round of figures, Harry and Meghan's popularity has dropped again, with scores for both fringe royals hitting new lows."
They have traditionally been viewed more positively among young people than among older Brits but even within Gen Z, support appears to be narrowing….


1,692 British adults surveyed

[jet]

They've shown more anger and upset towards Meghan for paying tribute than to an actual child murderer. If that doesn't put the level of bitter, twisted hatred into perspective...

Wrong thread for that. This thread is about Meghan Markle.

[jet]

Harry and Megsie have arrived in the UK, on a private jet of course.

[Crimson Dynamo]

1,692 British adults surveyed

again

what is your point in relation to how polls work?

[LukeB]

They've shown more anger and upset towards Meghan for paying tribute than to an actual child murderer. If that doesn't put the level of bitter, twisted hatred into perspective...


Good point and it won’t people will keep stopping to new lows each time.

Let’s also remember people have shown more upset with Meghan over a nonce. They pretend to care about her father too just to attack Meghan and now they are using her paying respects to those who have died as another reason to attack and bringing up her father over it which is pretty irrelevant to the story, he’s only used for an agenda. You think after covid people will find something better to do than spend hours thinking about Meghan and talking about whatever she does. Someone mentioned Meghan thinks she special on this thread.. She must be special if people are dedicated to her following her every move like a stalker even if it is to attack and be nasty.

[AnnieK]

Harry and Megsie have arrived in the UK, on a private jet of course.

As did the Queen,as does Charles and William. All have talked about climate change and demanded people make changes now to change the world and still use private jets. :shrug:

As do most mega rich celebs.

[GoldHeart]

It's only an issue when Meghan and Harry take private jets, it's ok for everyone else to. Gorgeous double standards as usual :idc: .

[Beso]

It's only an issue when Meghan and Harry take private jets, it's ok for everyone else to. Gorgeous double standards as usual :idc: .

there isnt threads about all these other people.

[Cherie]

It's only an issue when Meghan and Harry take private jets, it's ok for everyone else to. Gorgeous double standards as usual :idc: .

except that Harry is the only one banging on about people flying less?

[user104658]

except that Harry is the only one banging on about people flying less?


Fake news, William and Kate have done plenty of “climate change stuff” and environmentalism is a HUGE part of what Charles “bangs on about”.

[rusticgal]

They've shown more anger and upset towards Meghan for paying tribute than to an actual child murderer. If that doesn't put the level of bitter, twisted hatred into perspective...


If you want a debate about a child murderer...open up a thread :shrug:

[jet]

Private jets are much more damaging for the environment than commercial flights. This is Meghan’s second private jet journey in a week. (Texas).

The Royals, especially William and Kate, often fly first class on commercial flights, sometimes with their children as well.

https://www.hellomagazine.com/travel/20220428139030/kate-middleton-prince-william-british-airways/

When they do not fly commercial, the royal family sometimes charter private jets for official engagements.”

Meghan in Texas and an opportunist visit to see Granny aren’t official engagements, so they should quit banging on about what other people shouldn't do.

[Glenn.]

Private jets are much more damaging for the environment than commercial flights. This is Meghan’s second private jet journey in a week. (Texas).

The Royals, especially William and Kate, often fly first class on commercial flights, sometimes with their children as well.

https://www.hellomagazine.com/travel/20220428139030/kate-middleton-prince-william-british-airways/

When they do not fly commercial, the royal family sometimes charter private jets for official engagements.”

Meghan in Texas and an opportunist visit to see Granny aren’t official engagements, so they should quit banging on about what other people shouldn't do.

He says whilst telling everyone what they should be doing

[Glenn.]

Meghan Markle has been voted the most popular member of the royal family in a poll of Independent readers in the lead up to the platinum jubilee.

Prince Harry was a close second in the final ranking of adult and living royals, which means the Duke and Duchess of Sussex take the top two spots with 23 per cent and 17 per cent of the vote respectively.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/platinum-jubilee-harry-meghan-queen-b2092530.html

[thesheriff443]

Meghan Markle has been voted the most popular member of the royal family in a poll of Independent readers in the lead up to the platinum jubilee.

Prince Harry was a close second in the final ranking of adult and living royals, which means the Duke and Duchess of Sussex take the top two spots with 23 per cent and 17 per cent of the vote respectively.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/platinum-jubilee-harry-meghan-queen-b2092530.html

According to you and others on here the uk was full of racist’s ?

[Zizu]

Meghan Markle has been voted the most popular member of the royal family in a poll of Independent readers in the lead up to the platinum jubilee.

Prince Harry was a close second in the final ranking of adult and living royals, which means the Duke and Duchess of Sussex take the top two spots with 23 per cent and 17 per cent of the vote respectively.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/platinum-jubilee-harry-meghan-queen-b2092530.html


Come on #KingHarry !!

It’s back on !!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[thesheriff443]

Come on #KingHarry !!

It’s back on !!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

You need to sober up and if your not drunk you need to see a doctor because you are a nut job.

[Cherie]

According to you and others on here the uk was full of racist’s ?

it just doesnt add up

[Cherie]

Fake news, William and Kate have done plenty of “climate change stuff” and environmentalism is a HUGE part of what Charles “bangs on about”.

Yes they do but the difference is they havent told the plebs to stop taking so many foreign holidays like Hazza has..go look it up

in fact here it is for your

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/jim-treacher/2019/09/03/prince-harry-wants-you-to-stop-flying-so-much-n68533

[jet]

Meghan Markle has been voted the most popular member of the royal family in a poll of Independent readers in the lead up to the platinum jubilee.

Prince Harry was a close second in the final ranking of adult and living royals, which means the Duke and Duchess of Sussex take the top two spots with 23 per cent and 17 per cent of the vote respectively.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/platinum-jubilee-harry-meghan-queen-b2092530.html

The Independent isn’t exactly Monarchy friendly so the results will be skewed, I mean, they have Andrew at 5th most popular out of 14, so they were having a laugh :laugh: ....

This poll has 429 respondents, yet you are known to pooh - hoo cross sectioned and fair YouGov polls of thousands, which put Meghan (and Harry) at the bottom of the heap. (except for Andrew).
You couldn’t make it up…..you really couldn’t. :rolleyes:

[Glenn.]

The Independent isn’t exactly Monarchy friendly so the results will be skewed, I mean, they have Andrew at 5th most popular out ot 14, so they were having a laugh :laugh: ....

This poll has 429 respondents, yet you are known to pooh - hoo cross sectioned and fair YouGov polls of thousands, which put Meghan (and Harry) at the bottom of the heap. (except for Andrew).
You couldn’t make it up…..you really couldn’t. :rolleyes:

The polls you post have no more than 1200 voters :joker: hardly thousands

[jet]

The polls you post have no more than 1200 voters :joker: hardly thousands

Depends on the poll, some Royal popularity polls have been over 3,000.
You mock YouGov polls and then post one of 429 voters. Doesn't make any sense. :shrug:

[thesheriff443]

The polls you post have no more than 1200 voters :joker: hardly thousands

Glenn stick to poll dancing.

[jet]

Glenn stick to poll dancing.

:laugh:

[Glenn.]

Depends on the poll, some Royal popularity polls have been over 3,000.
You mock YouGov polls and then post one of 429 voters. Doesn't make any sense. :shrug:

You clearly think they are solid evidence of popularity so :shrug:

[Glenn.]

Glenn stick to poll dancing.

Care to explain this because I don’t know what you’re saying

[thesheriff443]

Care to explain this because I don’t know what you’re saying

I’m saying your poll was a load of bollox

[Jordan.]

1533914924711153664

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUmVc0iWAAAofZ1?format=png&name=900x900

How cute :love: hopefully this will shut all the freaks up who need to see other people's kids as proof they exist...

[jet]

Awww, she's a wee cutie. :)

[rusticgal]

Awww, she's a wee cutie. :)

Yes she is…..she looks like Harry did as a baby don’t you think?

[rusticgal]

1533914924711153664

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUmVc0iWAAAofZ1?format=png&name=900x900

How cute :love: hopefully this will shut all the freaks up who need to see other people's kids as proof they exist...


Like whoever questioned she didn’t exist…:joker:

[jet]

Yes she is…..she looks like Harry did as a baby don’t you think?

Yes, she really does, I think Archie as a baby did too.

[Jordan.]

like whoever questioned she didn’t exist…:joker:

Daily Mail readers just a few hours ago (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10890111/Harry-Meghan-touch-California-wooden-swing-set-similar-one-gifted-Cambridges.html?ico=amp-comments-viewall&_gl=1*10smp4j*_ga*Mms5aUpsT09JanlfcWcxN0tYSDJSaTha NlBDcXltT2xLdzl3NkpxR1ZxdkEzNGVldGFMRGc2QlUtQXFnOU ROcA..#article-10890111)

https://i.imgur.com/jYzukKc.jpeg

same type of Meghan hating nutters on social media too


1533014361643667456
1532742322470805504
1533567714157285376

:shrug:

[jet]

1533914924711153664

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUmVc0iWAAAofZ1?format=png&name=900x900

How cute :love: hopefully this will shut all the freaks up who need to see other people's kids as proof they exist...

Well go and post that wherever those freaks are, they aren't on this forum. :nono:

[rusticgal]

Daily Mail readers just a few hours ago (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10890111/Harry-Meghan-touch-California-wooden-swing-set-similar-one-gifted-Cambridges.html?ico=amp-comments-viewall&_gl=1*10smp4j*_ga*Mms5aUpsT09JanlfcWcxN0tYSDJSaTha NlBDcXltT2xLdzl3NkpxR1ZxdkEzNGVldGFMRGc2QlUtQXFnOU ROcA..#article-10890111)

https://i.imgur.com/jYzukKc.jpeg

same type of Meghan hating nutters on social media too


1533014361643667456
1532742322470805504
1533567714157285376

:shrug:


It’s pure sarcasm….tongue in cheek. Try not to take everything you read too literally…:laugh:

[Jordan.]

It’s pure sarcasm….tongue in cheek. Try not to take everything you read too literally…:laugh:

Lol no people who have full social media accounts dedicated to hating on Meghan aren't being sarcastic about it. But if that's the type of people you want to defend and associate yourself with that's on you I guess.

[jet]

Daily Mail readers just a few hours ago (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10890111/Harry-Meghan-touch-California-wooden-swing-set-similar-one-gifted-Cambridges.html?ico=amp-comments-viewall&_gl=1*10smp4j*_ga*Mms5aUpsT09JanlfcWcxN0tYSDJSaTha NlBDcXltT2xLdzl3NkpxR1ZxdkEzNGVldGFMRGc2QlUtQXFnOU ROcA..#article-10890111)

https://i.imgur.com/jYzukKc.jpeg

same type of Meghan hating nutters on social media too


1533014361643667456
1532742322470805504
1533567714157285376

:shrug:

You take that nonsense seriously? They are winding people up, just like you when you said you pretend to like Meghan to piss certain people off. :smug:

[rusticgal]

Lol no people who have full social media accounts dedicated to hating on Meghan aren't being sarcastic about it. But if that's the type of people you want to defend and associate yourself with that's on you I guess.


….eh we saw a picture of the 4 of them last year…so there is no question they exist. I think you will find its pure sarcasm because they were not seen during their visit to the Uk :pat:

[Glenn.]

The comments on the daily Mail are literally in the same vein of nonsense that gets posted on here about Meghan and Harry

[Jordan.]

A lovely collection of more "sarcasm" from totally normal folk

1533170943887032320

[Glenn.]

The haters are literally psychotics

[jet]

The haters are literally psychotics

I bet William and Kate get the same button - pushers. Only fools read that sort of nonsense. Stick with us on BB, for sound opinions based on common sense and research. :fan:

[Glenn.]

I bet William and Kate get the same button - pushers. Only fools read that sort of nonsense. Stick with us on BB, for sound opinions based on common sense and research. :fan:

He says whilst posting another tabloid story about Harry and Meghan

[Beso]

Like whoever questioned she didn’t exist…:joker:

Shea Diana's double, what a gorgeous wee thing she is.

[Vanessa]

Awww how cute is Lilibeth? :lovedup:

[rusticgal]

How lovely to see a picture of cute little Lilly to commemorate her 1st Birthday....shame we didnt get one for Archies 1st/2nd and 3rd birthday. This brings me to the question why now? why now do they decide to 'play the game'?
Maybe the multitude of adorable snaps of George, Charlotte and Louis over the last 4 days had something to do with it :whistle:

[Glenn.]

Well as their parents they should be able to release whatever pictures they feel like when they feel like

[Jordan.]

How lovely to see a picture of cute little Lilly to commemorate her 1st Birthday....shame we didnt get one for Archies 1st/2nd and 3rd birthday. This brings me to the question why now? why now do they decide to 'play the game'?
Maybe the multitude of adorable snaps of George, Charlotte and Louis over the last 4 days had something to do with it :whistle:

Er they did put out photos of Archie on his 1st birthday.

Not that it's any of your business when someone decides to share photos of THEIR children.

[smudgie]

Adorable little girl.
She is the image of her dad.🥰

[Cherie]

Georgeous photo of Lilibet :love:

[bots]

Details of the Duke of Sussex's latest legal claim against the publishers of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday have been aired at a High Court hearing.

Prince Harry is suing Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) for libel over a February article about a dispute over his family's security arrangements.

His barrister said the story falsely suggested he had "lied" and "cynically" tried to manipulate public opinion.

But ANL said it contained "no hint of impropriety" and was not defamatory.

The story, published in the Mail on Sunday and online, referred to the prince's separate legal case against the Home Office over security arrangements when he and his family are in the UK.

In a written statement to Thursday's preliminary hearing, Prince Harry said it had caused him "substantial hurt, embarrassment and distress, which is continuing".

The prince's barrister Justin Rushbrooke said the article suggested he had "lied in his initial public statements" by claiming to have always been willing to pay for police protection in the UK. The story suggested "he had only made such an offer recently, after his dispute had started and after his visit to the UK in June 2021", Mr Rushbrooke said.

He added that the Mail on Sunday story claimed he had "improperly and cynically tried to manipulate and confuse public opinion by authorising his 'spin doctors' to put out false and misleading statements about his willingness to pay for police protection immediately after the Mail on Sunday had revealed he was suing the government".

He said the story also claimed the prince "tried to keep his legal fight with the government secret from the public, including the fact that he expected British taxpayers to pay for his police protection, in a way which was improper and showed a lack of transparency on his part".

ANL is disputing the claim, and the company's barrister Andrew Caldecott said the print and online versions of the article were "essentially identical" and were not "defamatory" to Prince Harry in the eyes of "the reasonable reader".

"There is no hint of impropriety on any sensible reading of the article," he said. "The claimant is not portrayed as seeking to keep the whole action secret.

"The article does not accuse the claimant of lying in his initial statement about offering to pay for his security.

"The article does allege that the claimant's PR team spun the story (or added a gloss unduly favourable to the claimant) which led to inaccurate reporting and confusion about the nature of the claim. It does not allege dishonesty against them."

Judge Justice Nicklin oversaw Thursday's hearing and must now decide a number of things before the case proceeds, including the meaning of parts of the article, whether they are a statement of fact or opinion, and if they are defamatory. He will deliver his ruling at a later date.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex announced last year that they would step back as "senior" royals and work to become financially independent, dividing their time between the US and UK.

Last year, he accepted an apology and "substantial damages" from ANL after suing the company for libel over claims that he had "turned his back" on the Royal Marines.

Meghan won a privacy claim against the company after the Mail on Sunday published a handwritten letter that Meghan sent to her father Thomas Markle in 2018.

Last weekend, Prince Harry and Meghan attended their first royal event since leaving the UK, at St Paul's Cathedral, to mark the The Queen's Platinum Jubilee.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-61743917

[jet]

After being almost written out of the Jubilee celebrations, the Sussexes were able to lick their wounds on their private jet. The return trip emitted nearly 30 times the annual carbon each of us is allowed by the Paris Climate Agreement. Just saying.
Platell’s People, Daily Mail. June 11th.

[user104658]

After being almost written out of the Jubilee celebrations, the Sussexes were able to lick their wounds on their private jet. The return trip emitted nearly 30 times the annual carbon each of us is allowed by the Paris Climate Agreement. Just saying.
Platell’s People, Daily Mail. June 11th.


Wow that’s a crazy amount of carbon from that jet jet! Thank goodness no other royals or celebrities use private jets jet or we’d be in some real trouble jet.

[rusticgal]

Wow that’s a crazy amount of carbon from that jet jet! Thank goodness no other royals or celebrities use private jets jet or we’d be in some real trouble jet.


Not all other Royals and celebrities lecture us via Podcasts about climate change...:shrug:

[jet]

Not all other Royals and celebrities lecture us via Podcasts about climate change...:shrug:

Exactly...and as I posted before....

The Royals, especially William and Kate, often fly first class on commercial flights, sometimes with their children as well.

https://www.hellomagazine.com/travel...itish-airways/

When they do not fly commercial, the royal family sometimes charter private jets for official engagements.”

Meghan in Texas and an opportunist visit to see Granny aren’t official engagements, so they should quit banging on about what other people shouldn't do.

[user104658]

Not all other Royals and celebrities lecture us via Podcasts about climate change...:shrug:


Charles and William talk about climate change as much as, if not more than, Harry. Charles was talking about it when Harry was still in primary school. You’re frankly talking nonsense there.

[user104658]

Exactly...and as I posted before....

The Royals, especially William and Kate, often fly first class on commercial flights, sometimes with their children as well.

https://www.hellomagazine.com/travel...itish-airways/

When they do not fly commercial, the royal family sometimes charter private jets for official engagements.”

Meghan in Texas and an opportunist visit to see Granny aren’t official engagements, so they should quit banging on about what other people shouldn't do.


Oh so long as they occasionally hop on an EasyJet for a spot of virtue signalling, I guess that’s fine :joker:.

If they use private jets they use private jets. The plane doesn’t say “oh this is an official engagement - I’ll emit less carbon today!”

Honestly I’m not judging either way - the planet is beyond ****ed and it makes no difference how they choose to fly. I’m just saying… the double standards are silly.

[arista]

Color photos are better

[jet]

William and Kate in particular fly commercial ‘often’ not occasionally, whereas Megs and Harry always take private jets. If you are going to go on about climate change to others, then have the sensitivity/intelligence to at least show by example when possible, otherwise you are going to get valid criticism.

[jet]

Especially when he heads ‘Travalyst’.

“Prince Harry is on a mission to transform the travel industry”.

"Other people need to pull their socks up, but not me and Megs, we are VIPS, doncha know! Okay Harry. :laugh:

[Beso]

Paying £244 quid for a 1 yr olds birthday cake.....if that's not stupid I dont know what is.

[user104658]

Paying £244 quid for a 1 yr olds birthday cake.....if that's not stupid I dont know what is.


That’s just because of the wheat prices crisis.

[jet]

After Meghan's Pearl was dumped, Prince Harry has put forward an idea for a documentary to Netflix from Archewell Productions, whom they are still waiting to produce something watchable.

Title - ‘The Sport of Kings’ - behind the scenes at the Polo - he intends to show it’s not just a sport for the very rich…. okay Harry. :laugh:

I can't see Netflix going with this. Would you watch it?

[Glenn.]

After Meghan's Pearl was dumped, Prince Harry has put forward an idea for a documentary to Netflix from Archewell Productions, whom they are still waiting to produce something watchable.

Title - ‘The Sport of Kings’ - behind the scenes at the Polo - he intends to show it’s not just a sport for the very rich…. okay Harry. :laugh:

I can't see Netflix going with this. Would you watch it?

Well we know tons of people are going to be watching. Mainly the ones that can’t keep Harry and Meghan out of their minds.

[jet]

Well we know tons of people are going to be watching. Mainly the ones that can’t keep Harry and Meghan out of their minds.

You can't keep me out of your mind, and I'm not even a celeb. As soon as I post, there you are, with your insults. You little stalker. :hee:

[Glenn.]

How have I insulted you :skull:

[jet]

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are in the 'last chance saloon' with the royal family and will be 'cut off' if they leak anything from Jubilee, a royal author has claimed.

Royal biographer and journalist Duncan Larcombe has now said the 'test now begins' for the royal couple, telling Closer magazine: 'If anything from the weekend leaked, I imagine they will be totally cut off and that'll be it.'

The Sussexes reportedly wanted their own photographer to capture the Monarch meeting her great-granddaughter Lilibet at Windsor for the first time, but a source claimed they were told 'no chance' because it was a private moment.
Daily Mail
.................
The nerve of them, bringing their own photographer. They didn't get their money shot anyway. The Queen is nobodys fool. :hee:

[Glenn.]

“Claimed”

[jet]

“Claimed”

100% True.

[Glenn.]

100% True.

If it was then it would say “confirmed”


claim
/kleɪm/
Learn to pronounce
verb
past tense: claimed; past participle: claimed
1.
state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof.

[jet]

Their visit to the Queen with Lilibet lasted 15 minutes and was 'formal'.

[Glenn.]

If it was formal then shame on the queen. Regardless of titles, she’s still the child’s great grandmother.

[Crimson Dynamo]

The Sussexes reportedly wanted their own photographer to capture the Monarch meeting her great-granddaughter Lilibet at Windsor for the first time, but a source claimed they were told 'no chance' because it was a private moment.
Daily Mail
.................
The nerve of them, bringing their own photographer. They didn't get their money shot anyway. The Queen is nobodys fool. :hee:

VILE PAIR

[jet]

If it was formal then shame on the queen. Regardless of titles, she’s still the child’s great grandmother.

She probably wanted Harry and Meghan in and out as quickly as possible. It was an awkward meeting after all that has transpired and she tires easily.
She has plenty more great grandchildren around her, whats the point of trying to bond with one she will likely never see again.
They could have brought her (and Archie) to meet the Queen any time in the last year, and didn't.

[Glenn.]

What an awful woman if that is the case :umm2:

[bots]

Their visit to the Queen with Lilibet lasted 15 minutes and was 'formal'.

the queen wouldn't want to give them any opportunity to bad mouth again on the next talk show

[user104658]

She probably wanted Harry and Meghan in and out as quickly as possible. It was an awkward meeting after all that has transpired and she tires easily.
She has plenty more great grandchildren around her, whats the point of trying to bond with one she will likely never see again.
They could have brought her (and Archie) to meet the Queen any time in the last year, and didn't.

FFS what a grim outlook :joker:. I sometimes forget how little you think of Elizabeth, jet.

I imagine she was delighted to meet Lilibet, as I simply am not going to sit here trying to fathom that a 96 year old woman might hold grudges against babies :joker:.

[jet]

FFS what a grim outlook :joker:. I sometimes forget how little you think of Elizabeth, jet.

I imagine she was delighted to meet Lilibet, as I simply am not going to sit here trying to fathom that a 96 year old woman might hold grudges against babies :joker:.

Who said anything about a grudge? Really, TS, your intelligence takes a wild dip when it comes to Royalty or your beloved Harry and Meghan for that matter and your emotions get the better of you. :nono:

[jet]

the queen wouldn't want to give them any opportunity to bad mouth again on the next talk show

Now there is common sense. :thumbs:

[Glenn.]

FFS what a grim outlook :joker:. I sometimes forget how little you think of Elizabeth, jet.

I imagine she was delighted to meet Lilibet, as I simply am not going to sit here trying to fathom that a 96 year old woman might hold grudges against babies :joker:.

My view exactly

[user104658]

Who said anything about a grudge? Really, TS, your intelligence takes a wild dip when it comes to Royalty or your beloved Harry and Meghan for that matter and your emotions get the better of you. :nono:

You said she wouldn't care about Lilibet because "she has plenty of other great grandkids" as if she's collecting them like pokemon cards, and implying that her ill-feeling (if there is any) towards Harry and Meghan would also apply to their children ... one of whom is a baby.

A rather longwinded way of saying, "the Queen holds grudges against babies".

As I said, I'm not so uncharitable about the Queen and believe that she probably is a warm-blooded human being and grandmother at the end of the day and would have, thus, been very pleased to meet baby Lilibet, and not sat there thinking "Pfft I have other better ones".

[Liam-]

Trying to own Harry and Meghan by paining Lizzie as this evil grandmother is actually sending me

[jet]

You said she wouldn't care about Lilibet because "she has plenty of other great grandkids" as if she's collecting them like pokemon cards, and implying that her ill-feeling (if there is any) towards Harry and Meghan would also apply to their children ... one of whom is a baby.

A rather longwinded way of saying, "the Queen holds grudges against babies".



Where did I say that she didn't care?

I said: She has plenty more great grandchildren around her, whats the point of trying to bond with one she will likely never see again.


What that has to do with holding a grudge against a baby? Only in your warped mind.
I'm sure she was delighted to see her, but as she limited the meeting to 15 minutes she obviously didn't plan on a bonding session for a future relationship, as there is likely to be none.

[user104658]

Trying to own Harry and Meghan by paining Lizzie as this evil grandmother is actually sending me

http://crazzfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ShowImage-1.jpg

[user104658]

Where did I say that she didn't care?

"What's the point" implies not caring, surely?

[Beso]

If it was formal then shame on the queen. Regardless of titles, she’s still the child’s great grandmother.

It's the company the child keeps.

[Beso]

My view exactly

Surprised you didnt type it out....

[Glenn.]

Trying to own Harry and Meghan by paining Lizzie as this evil grandmother is actually sending me

It’s hilarious :joker:

[jet]

Trying to own Harry and Meghan by paining Lizzie as this evil grandmother is actually sending me

How very dare you. :nono: All the Queens great grandchildren obviously adore her, or the ones who actually know her and visit her do anyway. :nono:

[jet]

"What's the point" implies not caring, surely?

To you, because it suits you, it does. If it didn't suit you, it wouldn't. Am I right? :laugh:

.....and thinking there is no point in a bonding session and not caring about an actual baby are 2 very different things. But you know that already.

[Alf]

1537178912844918784

[bots]

:laugh2:

[Jordan.]

So sad what contact sports can do to the brain.

[Glenn.]

1537178912844918784

How uncouth

[Cherie]

MIKe Tindall didn’t interact with Harry at all when they were on the steps waiting for cars to arrive ...no love lost there for sure

[rusticgal]

1537178912844918784



…and he ain’t wrong :laugh:

[GoldHeart]

MIKe Tindall didn’t interact with Harry at all when they were on the steps waiting for cars to arrive ...no love lost there for sure

I'm sure Harry will survive , life's too short to worry about silly things like that.

[rusticgal]

I'm sure Harry will survive , life's too short to worry about silly things like that.


You could see on Harry’s face he was not Happy…whilst Meghan had a perma-smile on her face. I am sure if it was only Mike Tindall that didn’t speak to him he would be able to deal with it….but when it’s a huge portion of your family it’s not that easy to shrug off. Harry’s face spoke volumes….and the pictures of the two of them interacting together with Meghan looking deliriously happy whilst looking at Harry with a totally pissed off expression on his face did not go hand in hand.
Meghan was putting on a front…and Harry was fuming.

So I think it’s more than ‘a silly little thing’….

[Jordan.]

I'm sure Harry will survive , life's too short to worry about silly things like that.

Exactly Goldie, he clearly doesn't speak to any of these people anyway so why would he be bothered what they think... of course the haters are in desperate need of some excitement in their life so they'll have their fun regardless :skull:

[rusticgal]

Exactly Goldie, he clearly doesn't speak to any of these people anyway so why would he be bothered what they think...


Harry, William and Zara used to be very close….so I think it would bother him tremendously…:hee:

[Jordan.]

Harry, William and Zara used to be very close….so I think it would bother him tremendously…:hee:

Nice to see Zara was chatting to him and Meghan then :hee:

[GoldHeart]

Nice to see Zara was chatting to him and Meghan then :hee:

:laugh:

[jet]

Of course Zara was going to speak to them, they were standing right beside her. She has good manners and is a delightful girl, she wasn’t going to snub them in front of TV cameras. You will have noticed that no senior Royal was put in the position of having to interact with them.

Professional lip reader Jeremy Freeman revealed to the Mirror that Harry told Zara, “You’ve lost some weight.”
Zara, who had recently given birth to her son Lucas when they last met, replied, “No I haven’t, how do you know?”

According to Freeman, Harry responds, “I know, nice in pink! I didn’t know whether you’d wear blue, pink, orange, green,… grey.”
Freeman says that Meghan, 40, was also keen to compliment Zara, apparently telling the equestrian she “looked great.”
.....................
A lot of sucking up going on...:laugh:

[rusticgal]

Nice to see Zara was chatting to him and Meghan then :hee:


Out of politeness no doubt…just like Meghans fake smile.

[thesheriff443]

Out of politeness no doubt…just like Meghans fake smile.

Mike was being polite when he called them them bellends.

[Jordan.]

Out of politeness no doubt…just like Meghans fake smile.

well if rustygrill from tibb has "no doubt" it must be true.. are you a professional lip reader too? :skull:

[rusticgal]

well if rustygrill from tibb has "no doubt" it must be true.. are you a professional lip reader too? :skull:


Who is Rustygrill…?? Because Rusticgal’s comment never implied reading anyones lips. She simply implied Zara was being polite and accommodating especially in the knowledge that her husband sees them for what they are…:hee:

I can’t lipread…but you clearly can’t read full stop :laugh:

[Jordan.]

Who is Rustygrill…?? Because Rusticgal’s comment never implied reading anyones lips. She simply implied Zara was being polite and accommodating especially in the knowledge that her husband sees them for what they are…:hee:

I can’t lipread…but you clearly can’t read full stop :laugh:

I didn't imply anything, I asked you a question.

I guess that makes two bad readers :hee:

[rusticgal]

I didn't imply anything, I asked you a question.

I guess that makes two bad readers :hee:


Backpedaling as usual…:dog:….:laugh:

[jet]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10929247/Back-high-horse-Prince-Harry-plays-polo-Santa-Barbara-Meghan-watches.html

Back on his high horse! Double-denim clad Meghan Markle watches from sidelines as Prince Harry plays polo with his Los Padres team in Santa Barbara, but loses game and place in league final

Prince Harry was playing polo on Friday in Santa Barbara, a few miles from his Montecito home
Meghan Markle was watching from the sidelines, dressed down in denim shorts and a matching denim shirt

[Beso]

well if rustygrill from tibb has "no doubt" it must be true.. are you a professional lip reader too? :skull:

My goodness, I just found out you are a grown man...an adult a grown man adult...chasing the girls around the forum calling them silly names..

I hope you are proud of yourself.:joker::joker:

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/06/18/12/59226941-0-image-m-8_1655551867887.jpg

[Glenn.]

My goodness, I just found out you are a grown man...an adult a grown man adult...chasing the girls around the forum calling them silly names..

I hope you are proud of yourself.:joker::joker:

Says parm who called me silly names, got banned then sent me more silly names via PM not three days ago :skull:

[Beso]

Says parm who called me silly names, got banned then sent me more silly names via PM not three days ago :skull:

Imagine reporting someone calling you silly names.:hehe:

[Glenn.]

Imagine reporting someone calling you silly names.:hehe:

I was fed up with you hounding me with your childish name calling. Thought you being banned would have solved it until I see you triggered pm afterwards :joker:

Stay pressed

[jet]

Oops, this very, very close to home - Santa Barbara’s longest running broadsheet:

https://newspress.com/the-duke-duchess-of-woke-or-woe/

The Duke & Duchess of Woke (or Woe)
by Robert Eringer

The relevancy of Montecito’s resident duke and duchess appears to be diminishing at the same rate as wokism.

If their recent visit to London for the queen’s platinum jubilee proved anything, it is that the British royal family is more popular than ever and has moved on mightily despite the efforts of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to soil the royals’ image by laying the family’s dirty laundry on an Oprah Winfrey special for all to hear.
The duke’s new nickname might as well be “Second Row Harry,” based on the seating arrangement for a thanksgiving service inside St. Paul’s Cathedral, at which, upon arrival, the duke and duchess were booed by spectators.
It would prove to be the first and last event during the four-day extravaganza Harry and Megs would attend. Thereafter, perhaps mortified by the public’s disapproval of their presence, they snubbed a Guildhall reception (leaving party goers without a royal, as promised) and abruptly returned home to Montecito before the jubilee climaxed with a pageant. Hardly mattered, anyway, since they were not invited to wave from the balcony of Buckingham Palace along with the queen and her family. (And maybe that’s why they departed when they did.)

There are also reports that Prince Harry was rebuffed after asking permission for his own photographer to snap pics of Queen Elizabeth II greeting her nick-namesake grandchild, Lilibet, at a private gathering. And this may also explain why — to preclude photo ops — the duke and duchess were choreographed away from senior royals…..etc etc…..

[jet]

Palace report on Meghan’s bullying ‘has been buried’

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/palace-report-on-meghans-bullying-has-been-buried-sntzvl0xg

June 2022, The Sunday Times

An investigation into claims that the Duchess of Sussex bullied members of her staff has led to Buckingham Palace “improving the policies and procedures” in its HR department, according to royal sources.
However, the findings from the highly sensitive inquiry, which was paid for privately by the Queen and conducted by an independent law firm, will never be published.
It is understood they will be kept under wraps to protect the privacy of those who took part and to limit tensions between the Sussexes and the palace.


Courtiers have insisted the inquiry, which was launched in March last year, should “not be played out in public” to ensure those who took part felt “comfortable”.

Some participants are deeply disappointed the report is being “buried”.

Meghan, 40, denied the allegations which were first reported in The Times in March 2021. Her lawyers described the claims as a “calculated smear campaign” before the Sussexes’ interview with Oprah Winfrey the same month and said the media was “being used by Buckingham Palace to peddle a wholly false narrative” about the duchess.

The palace, which initially planned to conduct the inquiry internally, said it would “not tolerate any bullying and harassment” and was “very concerned by the allegations” that Meghan forced out two personal assistants and undermined the confidence of a third.

A palace spokesman said: “Members of staff involved at the time, including those who have left the household, will be invited to participate to see if lessons can be learnt. The royal household has had a dignity at work policy in place for a number of years and does not and will not tolerate bullying or harassment in the workplace.”

After the allegations emerged, including claims that young members of staff were “broken” and reduced to tears by Meghan’s behaviour, a royal source said: “The actual worst incidences haven’t come out. There are some harrowing stories to tell.” Another palace source said: “There’s a lot that could come out in the wash that hasn’t been told.”..

[rusticgal]

Palace report on Meghan’s bullying ‘has been buried’

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/palace-report-on-meghans-bullying-has-been-buried-sntzvl0xg

June 2022, The Sunday Times

An investigation into claims that the Duchess of Sussex bullied members of her staff has led to Buckingham Palace “improving the policies and procedures” in its HR department, according to royal sources.
However, the findings from the highly sensitive inquiry, which was paid for privately by the Queen and conducted by an independent law firm, will never be published.
It is understood they will be kept under wraps to protect the privacy of those who took part and to limit tensions between the Sussexes and the palace.


Courtiers have insisted the inquiry, which was launched in March last year, should “not be played out in public” to ensure those who took part felt “comfortable”.

Some participants are deeply disappointed the report is being “buried”.

Meghan, 40, denied the allegations which were first reported in The Times in March 2021. Her lawyers described the claims as a “calculated smear campaign” before the Sussexes’ interview with Oprah Winfrey the same month and said the media was “being used by Buckingham Palace to peddle a wholly false narrative” about the duchess.

The palace, which initially planned to conduct the inquiry internally, said it would “not tolerate any bullying and harassment” and was “very concerned by the allegations” that Meghan forced out two personal assistants and undermined the confidence of a third.

A palace spokesman said: “Members of staff involved at the time, including those who have left the household, will be invited to participate to see if lessons can be learnt. The royal household has had a dignity at work policy in place for a number of years and does not and will not tolerate bullying or harassment in the workplace.”

After the allegations emerged, including claims that young members of staff were “broken” and reduced to tears by Meghan’s behaviour, a royal source said: “The actual worst incidences haven’t come out. There are some harrowing stories to tell.” Another palace source said: “There’s a lot that could come out in the wash that hasn’t been told.”..



So everyone is left to speculate....looks like the Palace are playing Meghan and Harry at their own game....:laugh:

[Liam-]

If that report had found even the slightest bit of conclusive evidence that Meghan was this awful, horrible bitch like the Palace claimed she was, you can guarantee the report would have been released immediately :joker:

[thesheriff443]

People that live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
The gravy train is over.
The damage came from their own mouths and actions.

[jet]

If that report had found even the slightest bit of conclusive evidence that Meghan was this awful, horrible bitch like the Palace claimed she was, you can guarantee the report would have been released immediately :joker:

Not so. The Palace said from the start it was to be a private investigation, paid for by the Queen, and the result wouldn’t be publicly released.
Also, the Palace have never said Meghan was a horrible bitch, it was some of her employees that claimed she bullied them - and the Palace kept it quiet to protect Meghan, which was unfair to the alleged victims, contrary to Meghan’s lies that they never did anything to help her.

Meghan will get a copy of the report, and if it has found her innocent, I can guarantee the report will be released immediately. :joker:
The Palace may not wash their dirty linen in public, Meghan will have no hesitation in washing it for them. She has sued for far less than extremely damaging bullying claims. Why hasn’t she thus far?

[Glenn.]

If that report had found even the slightest bit of conclusive evidence that Meghan was this awful, horrible bitch like the Palace claimed she was, you can guarantee the report would have been released immediately :joker:

Exactly. The timing this was made public is too suspicious. If there was a shread of evidence of her bullying anyone it would have been leaked.

[jet]

https://www.news24.com/you/royals/news/more-staff-drama-for-prince-harry-and-meghan-as-archewell-director-catherine-st-laurent-leaves-after-just-11-months-20210323

Archewell director leaves…..”At least 9 other aides quit jobs when Meghan and Harry were working as senior royals”....
.....in that short time. :eek:

And another 4 since leaving the Monarchy to the date of this article, March 2021.
On average, that is 1 every 3 months.

Although it isn’t unusual of course for some staff turnover if things don’t work out, those figures are extraordinary and concerning.

[The Slim Reaper]

When anyone posts in the william thread anything than is less than fawning, folks beg mods to clean it...

Just sayin' :hehe:

[jet]

When anyone posts in the william thread anything than is less than fawning, folks beg mods to clean it...

Just sayin' :hehe:

Really? Examples?

[Cherie]

When anyone posts in the william thread anything than is less than fawning, folks beg mods to clean it...

Just sayin' :hehe:

How would you know unless it is posted in the thread and I can't see it

[The Slim Reaper]

How would you know unless it is posted in the thread and deleted in the cleanups

:smug:

[jet]

When anyone posts in the william thread anything than is less than fawning, folks beg mods to clean it...

Just sayin' :hehe:

The only time posts were removed that I can recall was when you implied that the author of an article with pics of Prince Louis since babyhood to the present day may be somehow paedophile - ish?
The conversation was, why would your mind even go there?

That would hardly qualify as ‘anything less than fawning’.

The mods would not have removed the posts if they had been fine with them.

[arista]

When anyone posts in the william thread anything than is less than fawning, folks beg mods to clean it...

Just sayin' :hehe:


Stop all this Locking Threads up wishing
you trouble maker

[jet]

Back to the topic....
There are other reports out there...this article is from March 2021

https://metro.co.uk/2021/03/04/meghan-hissed-at-employee-and-reduced-her-to-tears-in-fiji-visit-row-14188561/

Meghan ‘hissed at staff member and reduced her to tears’ in row on Fiji visit
Siba Jackson
Thursday 4 Mar 2021

Meghan Markle is said to have reduced a staff member to tears after ‘turning and hissing at her’ during a row on a visit to Fiji.
The Duchess of Sussex, 39, was reportedly ‘incandescent with rage’ and ‘demanded to leave’ a market tour on the Pacific island in October 2018, reports claim.
Meghan, who was pregnant with son Archie at the time, was swept away by her entourage, amid apparent concerns about the humidity and large crowds in attendance.
Lawyers have denied claims in The Times that she cut short the visit over worries about the presence of a UN organisation promoting women, with whom she previously worked with but no longer wished to be associated with……..

The Duchess and Prince Harry were on a 16-day Royal tour of Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Tonga at the time of the alleged row at Suva Market, in the Fijian capital.
The Daily Mail’s royal editor Rebecca English, who attended the Fiji market trip, claimed: ‘I was there at the time and witnessed Meghan turn and “hiss” at a member of her entourage, clearly incandescent with rage about something, and demand to leave.

‘I later saw that same – female – highly distressed member of staff sitting in an official car, with tears running down her face. ….
.................
The staff bullying claims, the extremely high staff turnover, other reports of Meghan's attitude to staff members....are pretty damning.
These allegations should be taken very seriously and not brushed off as some vendetta against Meghan, unless there is stuff which didn't come from Meghan herself/what she tells her PR machine (and we know she has lied about a lot of things) that such an ongoing vendetta existed. I know of none.

[Glenn.]

Well given what has come to light about the report that the palace are refusing to hand over that little hit piece is just that, a hit piece.

I highly doubt anything happened at all as many are guessing and given that there’s no actual evidence to suggest she did it appears that’s the case.

[Jordan.]

Meghan vindicated once again :flutter:

[The Slim Reaper]

Stop all this Locking Threads up wishing
you trouble maker

yesterday, fish, windows, open, draft excluder, monkey.

[arista]

yesterday, fish, windows, open, draft excluder, monkey.


https://media2.giphy.com/media/utLAblyJ8K2Dm/200.webp?cid=ecf05e472opiw6h3atfbfq5m85p8csuaxh5ii f33njpg9npj&rid=200.webp&ct=g

[Beso]

There too many stories for it not to be true. Shes lucky the queen isnt as vindictive as duchess difficult or she wouldnt be trying to bury all these allegations on little miss difficult's behalf.

[jet]

Well given what has come to light about the report that the palace are refusing to hand over that little hit piece is just that, a hit piece.

I highly doubt anything happened at all as many are guessing and given that there’s no actual evidence to suggest she did it appears that’s the case.

Meghan was given the report - she can hand it over...:hee:

[jet]

There too many stories for it not to be true. Shes lucky the queen isnt as vindictive as duchess difficult or she wouldnt be trying to bury all these allegations on little miss difficult's behalf.

Exactly.

[Glenn.]

Meghan was given the report - she can hand it over...:hee:

Source?

[bots]

Source?

The Queen

[user104658]

Hissing? :joker:

[Oliver_W]

Hissing? :joker:

She's one of the reptiles!!

[jet]

Hissing? :joker:

A descripive term to show extreme disapproval or contempt towards someone.
Not usually considered an hilarious action. :bored:

[Crimson Dynamo]

"There was emotional cruelty, manipulation, and bullying".

"palace employees say they were humiliated by Meghan Markle.

bullying royal staffers into leaving their jobs back when she lived in Kensington Palace.
She came under fire when a number of employees went on to expose her conduct.

https://www.geo.tv/assets/uploads/updates/2022-06-21/423499_7344505_updates.jpg

https://www.geo.tv/latest/423499-meghan-markle-emotional-cruelty-to-royal-staffers-should-be-exposed-expert

[thesheriff443]

Meghan vindicated once again :flutter:

You have got a good imagination
I suppose the boos they got were pre recorded by the palace.

[jet]

"There was emotional cruelty, manipulation, and bullying".

"palace employees say they were humiliated by Meghan Markle.

bullying royal staffers into leaving their jobs back when she lived in Kensington Palace.
She came under fire when a number of employees went on to expose her conduct.

https://www.geo.tv/assets/uploads/updates/2022-06-21/423499_7344505_updates.jpg

https://www.geo.tv/latest/423499-meghan-markle-emotional-cruelty-to-royal-staffers-should-be-exposed-expert

"They added that locals "will never see the light of day" because "the Queen wants peace".

I totally get that. She doesn’t need any more hassle. If Meghan was exonerated by the report, there is no way on earth the Queen would hold back that information.
The claims of bullying by Meghan have obviously been found to be valid ones, as they more than likely expected they would be, but the Palace is refusing to make the results public (like they said they wouldn’t from the start) to avoid the inevitable press/social media/Meghan & Harry storm of coming out and saying so directly.
It's how they handle sensitive issues, rather reminiscent of the diplomatic 'recollections may vary'. :hee:

[Glenn.]

Or rather and more likely, the report isn’t being made public because they found no evidence. Let’s be real if there was anything it would have been leaked with every last detail revealed.

[rusticgal]

It’s highly amusing that those that claim that the decision to not publicise the report proves nothing unyet those very people did not defend the Royals when Meghan and Harry accused a member of the Royal family of being racist but refused to name them….:laugh:

[rusticgal]

Or rather and more likely, the report isn’t being made public because they found no evidence. Let’s be real if there was anything it would have been leaked with every last detail revealed.


….but you are willing to accept there is a racist in the Royal family because Meghan said so…even though she refused to name them… :laugh:

[Glenn.]

We’re not all blinded by irrational hatred so can form our own opinions. We don’t need to be led by the tabloids which is where 99% of the nonsense stories come from.

I’d rather believe the people actually involved speaking about the events rather than a hit piece in a newspaper.

[Beso]

We’re not all blinded by irrational hatred so can form our own opinions. We don’t need to be led by the tabloids which is where 99% of the nonsense stories come from.

I’d rather believe the people actually involved speaking about the events rather than a hit piece in a newspaper.

Is that the royal we?

[jet]

We’re not all blinded by irrational hatred so can form our own opinions. We don’t need to be led by the tabloids which is where 99% of the nonsense stories come from.

I’d rather believe the people actually involved speaking about the events rather than a hit piece in a newspaper.

Meghan accuses the Royal family of racism.

William "We are very much not a racist family"

:smug:

[Glenn.]

Well he’s hardly gonna say yes we are. It would destroy them.

[rusticgal]

Well he’s hardly gonna say yes we are. It would destroy them.


So you are contradicting your earlier comment then....:whistle:

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/06/27/22/59595735-0-image-m-13_1656365051561.jpg


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10958157/Harry-Meghan-seen-pulling-Oprahs-Montecito-home-weekend.html

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/3908/production/_125700641_mail-nc.png

[jet]

Doesnt matter whether they are made public imo. Markle has had over a year to challenge these women who have accused her of bullying. When someone sues frequently over relatively petty matters and doesn't sue over something this substantive, it is not unreasonable to conclude the allegations are true. I believe them.

[bots]

it's something that will come out because it's a matter of public interest. Having a royal family that bullies employees cannot remain covered up, no matter how hard they try

[Beso]

Doesnt matter whether they are made public imo. Markle has had over a year to challenge these women who have accused her of bullying. When someone sues frequently over relatively petty matters and doesn't sue over something this substantive, it is not unreasonable to conclude the allegations are true. I believe them.

One can only agree with this.

[jet]

it's something that will come out because it's a matter of public interest. Having a royal family that bullies employees cannot remain covered up, no matter how hard they try

The Royal family haven't been accused of bullying, Meghan has. The unanswered question is why was the bullying covered up initially, and by whom?

Tom Bowers forthcoming book on Meghan may reveal more. He has said he has spoken to ‘victims’ of Meghan - whether they are the the victims in her Palace employ or other people unrelated to it is unclear.

[user104658]

it's something that will come out because it's a matter of public interest. Having a royal family that bullies employees cannot remain covered up, no matter how hard they try

:laugh: No it isn't! A "matter of public interest" means something that is reasonably likely to actually have an impact on members of the general public if it isn't revealed.

It doesn't just mean "something that stickybeaked members of the public really really want to know about".

No one in the general public is realistically affected by Meghan Markle being mean to palace staff.

[user104658]

The Royal family haven't been accused of bullying, Meghan has.

Whether you like it or not Jet, as Prince Harry's wife Meghan is a member of the Royal Family.

[jet]

Whether you like it or not Jet, as Prince Harry's wife Meghan is a member of the Royal Family.

I didn't say she wasn't, Mr. Pernickety :hee:
I said she was the one accused of bullying, not the Royal family as a whole.

[bots]

I didn't say she wasn't, Mr. Pernickety :hee:
I said she was the one accused of bullying, not the Royal family as a whole.

without it being made public, we have no idea if it is limited to Markle or not

[Beso]

:laugh: No it isn't! A "matter of public interest" means something that is reasonably likely to actually have an impact on members of the general public if it isn't revealed.

It doesn't just mean "something that stickybeaked members of the public really really want to know about".

No one in the general public is realistically affected by Meghan Markle being mean to palace staff.



Well that's not entirely true, by law, matters of public interest can mean all sorts of things, like making youtube videos of animals or building sites or the police, they can be described as matters of public interest and more importantly it is the reason for making the videos, because members of the public will watch the videos because they ate interested.

So if someone who has an interest in Meghan markle, and doesnt have the means to make their own videos, they rely on their matter of interest as a member of the public being made for their viewing pleasure, being made by someone else. Ie news channels, YouTube uploaders and things.

[Liam-]

Sorry, but I stand by the belief that if the report painted the palace in a good light and proved even the slightest part of the ‘accusations’ against Meghan to be true, the report would not be hidden, it would be plastered everywhere, the ‘royal reporter’ bootlickers would be playing with themselves at the thought of being proven ‘right’

[jet]

without it being made public, we have no idea if it is limited to Markle or not

True, but we can only refer to what we currently know. To date, no present or past employee has taken the opportunity to reveal “I was bullied by *insert other Royal name*, and was forced out of my job, etc”!! :shrug:

[jet]

Sorry, but I stand by the belief that if the report painted the palace in a good light and proved even the slightest part of the ‘accusations’ against Meghan to be true, the report would not be hidden, it would be plastered everywhere, the ‘royal reporter’ bootlickers would be playing with themselves at the thought of being proven ‘right’

Those women revealed they were forced out of their jobs by her and are suffering post traumatic stress.

1. Why hasn't Meghan sued them for defamation of character? - she has had over a year to do so. She has sued for a hell of a lot less.

2. Why has she not made any statement about the report being 'buried' if she knows she is innocent? Where is her demand for it to be made public?

[Liam-]

Also convenient timing that the palace briefed the media of this at the same time it’s revealed that the RF overspent by nearly £15m, they continue to use the abuse against Meghan as a shield to hide their wrongdoings, it’s utterly shameful

[Beso]

Also convenient timing that the palace briefed the media of this at the same time it’s revealed that the RF overspent by nearly £15m, they continue to use the abuse against Meghan as a shield to hide their wrongdoings, it’s utterly shameful



£15 million, was that not Harry's pay off?

[AnnieK]

True, but we can only refer to what we currently know. To date, no present or past employee has taken the opportunity to reveal “I was bullied by *insert other Royal name*, and was forced out of my job, etc”!! :shrug:

There have been allegations about Andrew as well - fairly recently even - about his attitude to staff.

[thesheriff443]

At the time when Meghan was still part of the royal family it was reported of tantrums and demands being made

Also Meghan sacking Nanny after nanny

Megan lied and manipulated the truth and took harry along for the ride
Members on this site wont change their opinions either way

What the platinum jubilee showed was harry miserable and Meghan with a permanent false smile on her face

While the rest of the family happy and relaxed

[Jordan.]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/3908/production/_125700641_mail-nc.png

Wow what a scoop it's not like we didn't know this over a week ago. Interesting time to regurgitate this story.

[Liam-]

There have been allegations about Andrew as well - fairly recently even - about his attitude to staff.

Charles and Anne are apparently also quite well known for poor treatment towards their staff

[jet]

Charles and Anne are apparently also quite well known for poor treatment towards their staff

Rubbish. Charles and Anne’s staff are known to be devoted and loyal. If any staff said they were badly treated/have suffered trauma, etc, post the links, I'm open to seeing them, don't just pull something out of your ass.

It’s just absolutely pathetic diversion tactics away from the perfect, wonderful Meghan…

I suppose those women who accused Meghan are horrible, lying weaklings and all the Royal family are terrible bullies and any member of staff that tells on them will be secretly tortured. The Queen even kicks her corgis don’t you know.

Disgusting how these women who spoke out about Meghan are being brushed off like nobodies by some.

[jet]

There have been allegations about Andrew as well - fairly recently even - about his attitude to staff.

I don't read stuff about Andrew, I'm not interested, so I googled that, and you are quite right about the allegations. I can well believe they are true. :suspect:

[The Slim Reaper]

Rubbish. Charles and Anne’s staff are known to be devoted and loyal. If any staff said they were badly treated/have suffered trauma, etc, post the links, I'm open to seeing them, don't just pull something out of your ass.

It’s just absolutely pathetic diversion tactics away from the perfect, wonderful Meghan…

I suppose those women who accused Meghan are horrible, lying weaklings and all the Royal family are terrible bullies and any member of staff that tells on them will be secretly tortured. The Queen even kicks her corgis don’t you know.

Disgusting how these women who spoke out about Meghan are being brushed off like nobodies by some.

I have no idea whether or not this is/isn't true, but we know trump treats his people appallingly, and his people are willing to go to prison for him. Loyalty of staff is not a sign they treat them well.

[Liam-]

Nobody actually accused Meghan of anything y’know, there was one staffer who used other members of staffs name to accuse Meghan and when they found out, they demanded their names be withdrawn from the complaint because they hadn’t actually complained

[jet]

I have no idea whether or not this is/isn't true, but we know trump treats his people appallingly, and his people are willing to go to prison for him. Loyalty of staff is not a sign they treat them well.

True, but...
"We know Trump treats his people appallingly" - therefore it is known.

I have never heard reports of Charles or Anne treating their staff appallingly, as claimed - so not known.

(Unless Liam (or anyone else) can provide links saying their staff accused them of such treatment, which I will certainly read.)

It's all diversion tactics however; this thread is about Meghan Markle. Perhaps someone would like to start a thread to discuss the Royals bullying of their staff along with links and the staff accusations, if they exist.

[jet]

:cheer2:Nobody actually accused Meghan of anything y’know, there was one staffer who used other members of staffs name to accuse Meghan and when they found out, they demanded their names be withdrawn from the complaint because they hadn’t actually complained

ffs :laugh:

You didn't respond to my questions upthread to you:

1. Why hasn't Meghan sued them for defamation of character? - she has had over a year to do so. She has sued for a hell of a lot less.

2. Why has she not made any statement about the report being 'buried' if she knows she is innocent? Where is her demand for it to be made public?

and another one:
3. Isn't it odd that 9 aides left their employment in the short time that they were working Royals?

No rush for your response :hee: I'm off to watch Wimbledon....:cheer2:

[rusticgal]

Sorry, but I stand by the belief that if the report painted the palace in a good light and proved even the slightest part of the ‘accusations’ against Meghan to be true, the report would not be hidden, it would be plastered everywhere, the ‘royal reporter’ bootlickers would be playing with themselves at the thought of being proven ‘right’


Not really….unlike Meghan and Harry they try to be discrete about private issues and probably want to prevent them being further discredited. Also they have Meghans mental health issues to consider…

[rusticgal]

I don't read stuff about Andrew, I'm not interested, so I googled that, and you are quite right about the allegations. I can well believe they are true. :suspect:


Andrew is just a pompous arrogant git…

[hijaxers]

:cheer2:

ffs :laugh:

You didn't respond to my questions upthread to you:

1. Why hasn't Meghan sued them for defamation of character? - she has had over a year to do so. She has sued for a hell of a lot less.

2. Why has she not made any statement about the report being 'buried' if she knows she is innocent? Where is her demand for it to be made public?

and another one:
3. Isn't it odd that 9 aides left their employment in the short time that they were working Royals?

No rush for your response :hee: I'm off to watch Wimbledon....:cheer2:

Yes home truths coming home to roost :cheer2:

[jet]

I’m starting to wonder now if the Oprah interview was a calculated damage control “we’ll get in first” exercise because H&M feared the bullying saga (which had been going on for 2 years) could be publicly brought to light at some stage.

They wanted to paint themselves as victims of the awful Monarchy -
(Racists! Refused to help me when I had suicidal thoughts! Refused me any help to fit in with Royal life! I couldn’t leave the Palace for 4 months! They took away my passport! etc etc) -
so if the bullying was revealed, the public would view it as just more of the horrible smear campaign against Meghan by the Monarchy - “See, this is how I was/am being treated, and now they are accusing me of being a bully”!!

Unfortunately, it didn’t quite work for the majority of the British public who are great at spotting bull****ters….and the Times, who had been sitting on the bullying stories for months, went ahead and released it prior to the interview being aired. If they hadn’t done the interview, we may never have heard about the bullying at all.
Great own goal, H&M, if I'm right. :hee:

[Beso]

The report has not been made public because those asked about their experiences whilst working for their horrible bullying employer were offered anonymity by the royal household to do so.

[Glenn.]

The report hasn’t been made public because it was investigated and nothing happened. I know you’re all very quick to believe everything negative you read about Meghan but you all know as well as I do that if there was any wrong doing you can believe it would it be released for the vultures to enjoy.

[Zizu]

The report hasn’t been made public because it was investigated and nothing happened. I know you’re all very quick to believe everything negative you read about Meghan but you all know as well as I do that if there was any wrong doing you can believe it would it be released for the vultures to enjoy.


Exactly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Beso]

No.

[jet]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2022/06/30/uneasy-truce-prince-harry-meghan-keep-schtum-bullying-report/

Buckingham Palace and the Sussexes appear to have called a public truce over a controversial bullying report, after its contents were kept secret from the public.

The Palace has blocked details of a report into the handling of bullying allegations made against the Duchess of Sussex in 2018, with its limited findings kept hidden from even those who contributed.
In response, the Duke and Duchess will make no public comment on the unresolved allegations, despite previously authorising the strongest of statements defending Meghan.

The unusual silence on either side has led to speculation that the Palace and Sussexes, who work closely with their lawyers, are both moving to downplay the long-running dispute.

Both sides are understood to be hopeful of drawing a line under the episode…..
……The Telegraph understands that the Duke and Duchess do not plan to issue a response to the news.

The decision is a stark contrast from when the allegations first came to light, when their team issued a stinging statement calling it a “calculated smear campaign based on misleading and harmful misinformation”.
…………………..
Hmmm, I think the verdict is clear enough. Meghan did bully staff.
Some TV talking head journalists are saying that the Royals are worried in particular about Harry's current mental well - being and will be avoiding any more drama around the Sussexes like the plaque.

[Beso]

It's because the abused staff were promised anonymity by the queen..so if anything was released about a bullying claim in the royal household, the abused staff would be hounded and bullied further, which wouldnt look good in a bullying case.


Hence why there are no findings being made public. A statement was made saying changes would be made, which itself points to Meghan's guilt.

Shes being protected, as are the abused staff.

Only half of that should have happened.

[jet]

It's because the abused staff were promised anonymity by the queen..so if anything was released about a bullying claim in the royal household, the abused staff would be hounded and bullied further, which wouldnt look good in a bullying case.


Hence why there are no findings being made public. A statement was made saying changes would be made, which itself points to Meghan's guilt.

Shes being protected, as are the abused staff.

Only half of that should have happened.

Oh definately. Imagine the abuse they would get from the Sussex fans.....and Meghan not suing and her silence is very indicative of her gulit.

[bots]

i think it's simply at 96, the queen doesn't want to deal with it and who can blame her. It will all surface in due course

[Beso]

.

[Glenn.]

Oh definately. Imagine the abuse they would get from the Sussex fans.....and Meghan not suing and her silence is very indicative of her gulit.

Or equally there was no wrong doing at all and Meghan has graciously agreed to move on to save questions being asked. We’ll never know though so it’s difficult to come to any real conclusions and not just go off of hearsay and bias hatred

[Zizu]

.


“ Why , dad .... just why !?! “


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[jet]

Or equally there was no wrong doing at all and Meghan has graciously agreed to move on to save questions being asked. We’ll never know though so it’s difficult to come to any real conclusions and not just go off of hearsay and bias hatred

We can go on what is very much the most likely given past form. Meghan sues the UK arm of Splash for taking a picture of her out walking but won’t sue or even defend herself now over serious bullying allegations. The chances of Meghan suddenly turning into a gracious little mouse over such damaging accusations are nil. :hee:

[Beso]

We can go on what is very much the most likely given past form. Meghan sues the UK arm of Splash for taking a picture of her out walking but won’t sue or even defend herself now over serious bullying allegations. The chances of Meghan suddenly turning into a gracious little mouse over such damaging accusations are nil. :hee:

Tbh it's probably less than that.

[jet]

Tbh it's probably less than that.

:hehe:

[Glenn.]

We can go on what is very much the most likely given past form. Meghan sues the UK arm of Splash for taking a picture of her out walking but won’t sue or even defend herself now over serious bullying allegations. The chances of Meghan suddenly turning into a gracious little mouse over such damaging accusations are nil. :hee:

Well you would think that because you hate Meghan. If the report has been released and nothing had been found then you would still find out something to discredit.

[jet]

Well you would think that because you hate Meghan. If the report has been released and nothing had been found then you would still find out something to discredit.

:idc: :wink:

[jet]

Several sources reporting that Harry wants to spend 6 months of the year in the US, 6 months back in the UK. Meghan not joining him.

If this is true (and I'm dubious), he can bloody well stay in the US, we don’t want him back.

[Swan]

Several sources reporting that Harry wants to spend 6 months of the year in the US, 6 months back in the UK. Meghan not joining him.

If this is true (and I'm dubious), he can bloody well stay in the US, we don’t want him back.

I very much doubt that's true.

[Cherie]

Several sources reporting that Harry wants to spend 6 months of the year in the US, 6 months back in the UK. Meghan not joining him.

If this is true (and I'm dubious), he can bloody well stay in the US, we don’t want him back.

Isn't that what they wanted to do originally, have a half in, half out arrangment which the Queen vetoed

[bots]

Isn't that what they wanted to do originally, have a half in, half out arrangment which the Queen vetoed

it is, and when they first moved to "canada" they intended to do 50/50 split

[Swan]

it is, and when they first moved to "canada" they intended to do 50/50 split

Yeah but things change, instead they moved to Hollywood for the quiet life in order to escape the paps, limelight and any media attention.

[Jordan.]

Several sources reporting that Harry wants to spend 6 months of the year in the US, 6 months back in the UK. Meghan not joining him.

If this is true (and I'm dubious), he can bloody well stay in the US, we don’t want him back.

You don't get a say in what he does.

[Beso]

You don't get a say in what he does.

I'm not sure harry does either.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I'm not sure harry does either.

:joker:

[Jordan.]

I'm not sure harry does either.

Haha yeah Meghan is the evil controlling wife isn't she. At least it's slightly less sexist than you calling her a prostitute.

[Beso]

Haha yeah Meghan is the evil controlling wife isn't she. At least it's slightly less sexist than you calling her a prostitute.

I should have said yacht girl

Much the same thing though

[rusticgal]

I'm not sure harry does either.


:joker:

[rusticgal]

Yeah but things change, instead they moved to Hollywood for the quiet life in order to escape the paps, limelight and any media attention.


....and they went on NT and slaughtered his family :laugh:....now nobody wants them over here...:laugh:

[Jordan.]

Slaughtered... the dramatics :skull: they barely even said anything about actual family members it was more targeted at the firm and the media. Clearly some never even watched it and just wanted a spot on the hate train.

[rusticgal]

Slaughtered... the dramatics :skull: they barely even said anything about actual family members it was more targeted at the firm and the media. Clearly some never even watched it and just wanted a spot on the hate train.



1. My father has cut us off financially....
2. A member of the family made a racist comment about our baby's skin colour...
3. No body cared about my mental health despite the thoughts of suicide...

....sounds like a slaughtering to me :hehe:

[jet]

1. My father has cut us off financially....
2. A member of the family made a racist comment about our baby's skin colour...
3. No body cared about my mental health despite the thoughts of suicide...

....sounds like a slaughtering to me :hehe:

Yep, brutal. :notimpressed:

[Gusto Brunt]

She looks younger. :)

[Liam-]

I can’t find a thread dedicated for the people’s Prince and Princess, so I’ll put it here :hee:

https://twitter.com/skynews/status/1545335451279572992?s=12

[Jordan.]

Justice is always on the side of Harry and Meghan :hee:

[rusticgal]

Its a small victory.... nobody cares...it wont change anything.

[Glenn.]

Justice is always on the side of Harry and Meghan :hee:

What a lovely kick in the teeth for the haters

[Jordan.]

Its a small victory.... nobody cares...it wont change anything.

True, the media will still continue their vicious lies to appease the haters... but it's nice to see H&M vindicated as always :hee:

[rusticgal]

True, the media will still continue their vicious lies to appease the haters... but it's nice to see H&M vindicated as always :hee:

...just as Meghan and Harry will continue with their vicious little lies in the knowledge that they wont be taken to court.

[Jordan.]

...just as Meghan and Harry will continue with their vicious little lies in the knowledge that they wont be taken to court.

If that was true and someone had a case against them and doesn't use it more fool them.

[jet]

Has Meghan sued the employees who said she bullied them yet? She's had over 2 years to do it. :think:

[Jordan.]

Has Meghan sued the employees who said she bullied them yet? She's had over 2 years to do it. :think:

There's no real need to drag something back up that the public have already come to know was fruitless and therefore buried. The employees failed at getting their 5 minutes best to leave it that way.