King Charles III 10/9/22 Proclaimed

[GoldHeart]

haha ... i thought it was legit until the ear was pointed out :joker:

I know it's a fake joke one ,but just seeing his face on the coin itself is still odd .

[bots]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/live-experience/cps/624/cpsprodpb/vivo/live/images/2022/9/16/f11e8dfa-3991-4487-bfe3-faa66cc322da.jpg

As King Charles and Camilla, the Queen Consort, left Cardiff Castle to meet military officials and the public, there was one very noticeable four-legged attendee.

Lance Corporal Shenkin IV - a goat - is a very popular member of the Third Battalion of The Royal Welsh.

Sheinkin IV, the Battalion's official goat, is the latest in a long line of regimental mascots for the Royal Welsh. He's also got his own Twitter account.

At one point, Charles could be seen pointing and laughing at the furry military mascot before Camilla lent down to acknowledge him.

[Parmy]

Camilla lent down to Whisper in his ear.

"Hooves off bitch, hes mine!"

[arista]

Good on Ch4HDnews

Played the Boo's in Wales

Now debating
Welsh Independence
with 2 Guests.


The protestor
said the Royals have become a Soap Opera.

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/1242A/production/_126749747_telegraph-nc.png.webp

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/16A2/production/_126749750_times-nc.png.webp

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/C2E6/production/_126749894_express-nc.png.webp

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/FD1A/production/_126749746_sun-nc.png.webp

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/13816/production/_126749897_mail-nc-2.png.webp

[UserSince2005]

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/539158861484130314/1020337297859825705/unknown.png

Every pound I get with his mug on is going in the bin. Every note will be burned.

[Zizu]

Every pound I get with his mug on is going in the bin. Every note will be burned.


I just hate the idea that Charlie and Chlamydia are being rewarded for all their despicable behaviour when Di was aIive


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

Also I will never forgive queenie and her cronies for disrespecting Di immediately after her tragic accident !!

Never !!!

::::;

Buckingham Palace came under fire in the days after Princess Diana was killed when there was no flag flown at half mast in respect to the late royal and only relented days later under a wave of public disapproval

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220917/9e57ac5834b1c412745a37c95a357f4c.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Crimson Dynamo]

I just hate the idea that Charlie and Chlamydia are being rewarded for all their despicable behaviour when Di was aIive


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

she was off shagging anyone who would have her at that time

[Jordan.]

she was off shagging anyone who would have her at that time

Disgraceful comment and at a time like this.

[bots]

i don't think the firm behaved well at all after her death, in fact it nearly brought down the monarchy completely, however Diana was intentionally antagonising them too.

[Zizu]

she was off shagging anyone who would have her at that time


Bollox .. it was years after their wedding that she had her first fling !

Charlie had Chlamydia had been sha**ing for many years by then before she found out about their despicable behaviour


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[thesheriff443]

Every pound I get with his mug on is going in the bin. Every note will be burned.

Still trying to hard to be noticed

[joeysteele]

For anyone who watched the film The Queen, which dealt with Diana's death and the build to her funeral.

My parents thought the film to be pretty accurate.
I was only 5.
How do others feel as to if that film demonstrated things more than likely how it was.

It didn't show the Royals in a particularly good light.
I'm just curious what others view was on that film.

[Parmy]

It didn't teach anyone anything they didnt know already.

[bots]

For anyone who watched the film The Queen, which dealt with Diana's death and the build to her funeral.

My parents thought the film to be pretty accurate.
I was only 5.
How do others feel as to if that film demonstrated things more than likely how it was.

It didn't show the Royals in a particularly good light.
I'm just curious what others view was on that film.

i think the monarchy was within 24 hours of being scrapped, people were outraged by the royals behaviour. Its difficult to know who said what from the royal family, but the queen didnt want to bend protocol one millimetre and it was Tony Blair that persuaded her in the end. That's probably why she gave him a knighthood not that long ago

[Parmy]

Never ever believe the movies. That's the start of control.

[joeysteele]

i think the monarchy was within 24 hours of being scrapped, people were outraged by the royals behaviour. Its difficult to know who said what from the royal family, but the queen didnt want to bend protocol one millimetre and it was Tony Blair that persuaded her in the end. That's probably why she gave him a knighthood not that long ago

Really interesting read that.
Thanks bots.

[jet]

i think the monarchy was within 24 hours of being scrapped, people were outraged by the royals behaviour. Its difficult to know who said what from the royal family, but the queen didnt want to bend protocol one millimetre and it was Tony Blair that persuaded her in the end. That's probably why she gave him a knighthood not that long ago

As soon as the Queen eventually arrived, the crowd were all over her, giving her flowers. All was forgiven in a heartbeat. :hee:
She thought she was doing the right thing, being there with the boys at Balmoral who needed her way more than the man in the street.

[thesheriff443]

I haven’t watched the film but from my view point, Diana’s death was hard To take in and is still hard to believe all these years later.

I think the level of sadness and sorrow that was on show was on a level never seen before.
It took a lot of people by surprise.

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fc29c8bXkAADTjB?format=jpg&name=900x900


[Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada
and wife Sophie taking a walk
in the Autumn sunshine down St James]

https://twitter.com/RegalEyes/status/1571120454357909506

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fc5rBFJXkAAmyVp?format=jpg&name=small


President Biden now in the UK

[joeysteele]

I haven’t watched the film but from my view point, Diana’s death was hard To take in and is still hard to believe all these years later.

I think the level of sadness and sorrow that was on show was on a level never seen before.
It took a lot of people by surprise.

I agree with all that.

I was 5 and the faces and sadness felt by neighbours and family I couldn't take in obviously.

It just seemed all went dark for a good while.
I can remember anger towards the Royals though.

It's just when I watched the film.
None of the main Royals, The Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother seemed to be portrayed in a good light at all.
Prince Charles was portrayed better.
Thank you for that response sheriff

[bots]

i was working in london at the time and folk were disappearing at lunchtime to go and lay flowers, and I can say categorically, that there was considerable anger directed toward the royal family. It took many, many years for the queen to be forgiven. I lost a lot of respect for the queen during that time that was never recovered

[James]

It was a good film, but obviously written by someone that wanted to portray Blair in a good light.

[arista]

It was a good film, but obviously written by someone that wanted to portray Blair in a good light.


Of Course
but Blairs Iraq Invasion with GW Bush
destroys his record
of a good PM.

[joeysteele]

It was a good film, but obviously written by someone that wanted to portray Blair in a good light.

It certainly highlighted his annoying grin throughout for sure.

[Gusto Brunt]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fc5rBFJXkAAmyVp?format=jpg&name=small


President Biden now in the UK

But does he know he's in the UK?:hehe:

[joeysteele]

But does he know he's in the UK?:hehe:

He doesn't look like he does :joker:

[Parmy]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fc5rBFJXkAAmyVp?format=jpg&name=small


President Biden now in the UK

Keep those granddaughters of the queen away from him, dirty old bastard.

[Cherie]

He has a 15 car calvalcade ...why?????

[bots]

He has a 15 car calvalcade ...why?????

Security, dog walkers, care takers etc etc etc

[Oliver_W]

He has a 15 car calvalcade ...why?????

Frightful creature isn't he. I can't actually remember him particularly pretending to care about the environment so I won't call him a hypocrite... So he's just a planet-destroying letch.

[rusticgal]

He has a 15 car calvalcade ...why?????


Because the yanks go OTT with security...

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/14D8/production/_126763350_times-nc.png.webp

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-cd997e3a-4d09-482a-abae-0b9bf79757b6.jpeg

[thesheriff443]

He has a 15 car calvalcade ...why?????

History, president Kennedy associated, Robert Kennedy murdered , president regan shot in an attempted assassination

[rusticgal]

History, president Kennedy associated, Robert Kennedy murdered , president regan shot in an attempted assassination


In America….not the UK.

[thesheriff443]

In America….not the UK.

It’s better to be over protective than under.

[Zizu]

History, president Kennedy associated, Robert Kennedy murdered , president regan shot in an attempted assassination


https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220920/d73c262be0e5ebd20f851011df73cd77.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Oliver_W]

He has a 15 car calvalcade ...why?????

Apparently he had to sit at the back, because he forwent public transport :joker:

[Cherie]

History, president Kennedy associated, Robert Kennedy murdered , president regan shot in an attempted assassination

This is 2022,Biden had the Beast flown over specially, he did not need a further 14 cars in his calvcade, its just absurd

[arista]

Apparently he had to sit at the back, because he forwent public transport :joker:

And his driver went the wrong way
making Biden late.

[Oliver_W]

And his driver went the wrong way


Maybe Biden was given the directions?

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FdAclyDWIAE1dSu?format=jpg&name=900x900

[thesheriff443]

This is 2022,Biden had the Beast flown over specially, he did not need a further 14 cars in his calvcade, its just absurd

It is a 2022 and the terror threat has grown.
The president of the USA is the biggest name on a list when it comes to terror group’s wanting a leader dead because of what he represents.

Put it this way, you don’t go on holiday and take one change of clothes.

[Cherie]

It is a 2022 and the terror threat has grown.
The president of the USA is the biggest name on a list when it comes to terror group’s wanting a leader dead because of what he represents.

Put it this way, you don’t go on holiday and take one change of clothes.


Put it this way you dont pack factor 50 if you are going to Ireland

the security around this event was already at the highest level, there were plenty of other world leaders who would be just at much at risk and be just as much of a coup for terrorists, if he isn't safe in the Beast, why ship it

It is nothing more than vanity, look at me and how important I am

I did have to laugh when they arrived late to the Hall and had to wait while the Heros took their seats, be on time next time Joe!

[thesheriff443]

Put it this way you dont pack factor 50 if you are going to Ireland

the security around this event was already at the highest level, there were plenty of other world leaders who would be just at much at risk and be just as much of a coup for terrorists, if he isn't safe in the Beast, why ship it

It is nothing more than vanity, look at me and how important I am

I did have to laugh when they arrived late to the Hall and had to wait while the Heros took their seats, be on time next time Joe!

Are you saying Ireland isn’t sunny, wait until Niamh hears about this.

It’s a few cars on our roads for a very short period

More of a concern is that car manufacturers building software into their cars to cheat uk emissions

So put it this way, I’m such a great guy.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Cork gets average 1424 hours sunshine per annum

Liverpool gets 1502

Manchester gets 1416

Glasgow 1282

[Niamh.]

Are you saying Ireland isn’t sunny, wait until Niamh hears about this.

It’s a few cars on our roads for a very short period

More of a concern is that car manufacturers building software into their cars to cheat uk emissions

So put it this way, I’m such a great guy.

https://media1.giphy.com/media/ji6zzUZwNIuLS/200w.gif?cid=82a1493bwj8x6kxvu2hmhkot8l75l9szruat0 x4lmq65idor&rid=200w.gif&ct=g

[thesheriff443]

Cork gets average 1424 hours sunshine per annum

Liverpool gets 1502

Manchester gets 1416

Glasgow 1282
Cherie left her tin bath and hard soap in Ireland now she all power showers and moisturiser

[thesheriff443]

https://media1.giphy.com/media/ji6zzUZwNIuLS/200w.gif?cid=82a1493bwj8x6kxvu2hmhkot8l75l9szruat0 x4lmq65idor&rid=200w.gif&ct=g

Good morning Niamh
Just trying to add a bit of sunshine to your life this morning.

[bots]

All the other world leaders came to celebrate the life of the queen, Joe came to celebrate Joe

[thesheriff443]

All the other world leaders came to celebrate the life of the queen, Joe came to celebrate Joe

You say that , but us presidents have a right to be nervous/cautious.

Dou trust the police in another country

[Cherie]

You say that , but us presidents have a right to be nervous/cautious.

Dou trust the police in another country


Why wouldn't he trust the police force that have kept the Queen safe for 70 years, more than can be said for the US police eh?

[Swan]

[/B]

Why wouldn't he trust the police force that have kept the Queen safe for 70 years, most than can be said for the US police eh?

It's American arrogance, nothing new.

[bots]

[/B]

Why wouldn't he trust the police force that have kept the Queen safe for 70 years, more than can be said for the US police eh?

apart from the time they allowed a crazy person to get into her bedroom :skull:

[Liam-]

The simple fact is, you just can’t stick the leader of the free world onto a coach with the rest of them, the imagery is bad yes, but for the president it’s a necessity

[Swan]

The simple fact is, you just can’t stick the leader of the free world onto a coach with the rest of them, the imagery is bad yes, but for the president it’s a necessity

You wouldn't of said the same if it were Trump.

Just admit it's arrogance and 14 cars wasn't necessary at all.

[thesheriff443]

[/B]

Why wouldn't he trust the police force that have kept the Queen safe for 70 years, more than can be said for the US police eh?

So do you go to another country and trust the police?

A man managed to touch the queens coffin years ago the queen comes face to face with an intruder in her bedroom

If an armed met police officer can be a rapist murderer there is a chance one can go rogue an kill a president

Any ways this is pointless, he came he saw he went home, the end

[Cherie]

The simple fact is, you just can’t stick the leader of the free world onto a coach with the rest of them, the imagery is bad yes, but for the president it’s a necessity

I am not even talking about him not going on the bus, I understand that but a 15 car calvalcade? how do you justify that and then bang on about climate change

[Cherie]

So do you go to another country and trust the police?

A man managed to touch the queens coffin years ago the queen comes face to face with an intruder in her bedroom

If an armed met police officer can be a rapist murderer there is a chance one can go rogue an kill a president

Any ways this is pointless, he came he saw he went home, the end

Of course I do, otherwise I would be visiting a country where anarchy was the rule of law.

[bots]

i'm celebrating the fact that the bbc news home page has returned to normal

[Cherie]

i'm celebrating the fact that the bbc news home page has returned to normal

:dance:

[Liam-]

You wouldn't of said the same if it were Trump.

Just admit it's arrogance and 14 cars wasn't necessary at all.

Don’t tell me what I would and wouldn’t say about things, I’m not one of those brain dead losers that can’t think objectively, thank you.

14? Maybe a little excessive but the president has strict security protocols that have to be adhered to at all times, it’s literally a necessity

[bots]

i understand that the president lives in a bubble that goes wherever he does, but in these times of global climate crisis, the optics are grim

[Swan]

Don’t tell me what I would and wouldn’t say about things, I’m not one of those brain dead losers that can’t think objectively, thank you.

14? Maybe a little excessive but the president has strict security protocols that have to be adhered to at all times, it’s literally a necessity

Oh right.

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-9499f1cd-c0eb-4b7c-9028-9098d7bb5ff3.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-8b7545b8-aa2f-475d-bcfa-0e33c68888f4.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-ed2a9de0-f572-4cc8-996d-5b3a3b64b17f.jpeg

[Zizu]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-9499f1cd-c0eb-4b7c-9028-9098d7bb5ff3.png


Thoroughly modern ??

It’s hardly modern thinking or groundbreaking for a King to have a mistress .. it’s a given .

It’s also WRONG


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

im not aware of Charles having a mistress, he has a wife, yes

[Cherie]

Thoroughly modern ??

It’s hardly modern thinking or groundbreaking for a King to have a mistress .. it’s a given .

It’s also WRONG


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

The King has a wife? not a mistress

[Zizu]

The King has a wife? not a mistress


She will ALWAYS be a mistress to millions .. and she even had to go into hiding for ages such was her unpopularity ..

The Royals didn’t think that Charles would be safe walking in Di’s funeral procession because of the hatred towards him so they decided to make William and Harry walk alongside him knowing that the crowds wouldn’t attack him with them next to him !

In other words they used the lads as a human shield for Charlie boy !

Incidentally the lads initially refused to walk but Prince Philip ( who was also disapproved of them walking ) intervened and said that he would walk with them if they agreed ..

The lads have both said since how they hated the experience and that no child should have been made to do that walk .

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220921/ab9331f3ebf334a860713d48b7594d8b.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

Zizu, that was 25 years ago, they have been married for 15 years and now the GBP don't give a stuff about what happened back then anymore. Charles is modernising the monarchy going forward and that can only be a good thing

[Zizu]

Zizu, that was 25 years ago, they have been married for 15 years and now the GBP don't give a stuff about what happened back then anymore. Charles is modernising the monarchy going forward and that can only be a good thing


Thankfully .

Millions won’t just forgive and forget like the fickle ones seem to have …


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[thesheriff443]

Thankfully .

Millions won’t just forgive and forget like the fickle ones seem to have …


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

You and others have nothing to forgive!
It had nothing to do with you in the slightest
It wasn’t your marriage or any of your business it was played out in public unfortunately

So move on, hating on people that have done nothing to you

[Zizu]

You and others have nothing to forgive!
It had nothing to do with you in the slightest
It wasn’t your marriage or any of your business it was played out in public unfortunately

So move on, hating on people that have done nothing to you


It’s official he’s now the Queen !!

:)


https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220921/16a5de1f649749485880ad1d2e9c7b9a.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[AnnieK]

You and others have nothing to forgive!
It had nothing to do with you in the slightest
It wasn’t your marriage or any of your business it was played out in public unfortunately

So move on, hating on people that have done nothing to you

Completely agree Sheriff...same with the Harry and Meghan mess.....its family business played out in public with a lot the public are not privy too.

[Oliver_W]

It’s official he’s now the Queen !!

:)


https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20220921/16a5de1f649749485880ad1d2e9c7b9a.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

A man as queen?! Wokeness gone mad!!!!111

[rusticgal]

Completely agree Sheriff...same with the Harry and Meghan mess.....its family business played out in public with a lot the public are not privy too.


But Harry and Meghan put their private business on the world stage by going on Oprah….a huge difference.

[AnnieK]

But Harry and Meghan put their private business on the world stage by going on Oprah….a huge difference.

Meh, Charles did the same with the Dimbleby interview in 1994 when he admitted committing adultery during his marriage to Diana. So not so much a huge difference other than timescales and some people have long memories.

It all needs to be left in the past as far as I'm concerned. Charles and Camilla are obviously very much in love and have been all these years, its a shame that Diana was caught up in it because of Royal protocol and expectations. I think Camilla will make a fantastic Queen consort

[Oliver_W]

Meh, Charles did the same with the Dimbleby interview in 1994 when he admitted committing adultery during his marriage to Diana. So not so much a huge difference other than timescales and some people have long memories.

It all needs to be left in the past as far as I'm concerned. Charles and Camilla are obviously very much in love and have been all these years, its a shame that Diana was caught up in it because of Royal protocol and expectations. I think Camilla will make a fantastic Queen consort

Diana was always the "other woman", it's just a shame Charles was stuck with her for so long and had kids with her instead of Camilla.

Diana and Meghan seem similar types, with their simpering "poor little me" complex.

[Zizu]

Diana was always the "other woman", it's just a shame Charles was stuck with her for so long and had kids with her instead of Camilla.

Diana and Meghan seem similar types, with their simpering "poor little me" complex.


Shame for Di you mean …

“ poor little me !” … Just put yourself in Diana’s position for a moment then come back to us .

Unbelievable….


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

Diana very much played the game, it was supposed to be her sister that married Charles, but she flirted with Charles in front of her. Also, Charles wasn't allowed to marry Camilla at the time and I don't think there are many of us would accept that amount of control over our lives without rebelling

[GoldHeart]

Diana was always the "other woman", it's just a shame Charles was stuck with her for so long and had kids with her instead of Camilla.

Diana and Meghan seem similar types, with their simpering "poor little me" complex.

Excuse them for having feelings , I guess they're not allowed.

[Parmy]

Whatever diane was, the world would be a far better place morally if she was still alive.

[jet]

Meh, Charles did the same with the Dimbleby interview in 1994 when he admitted committing adultery during his marriage to Diana. So not so much a huge difference other than timescales and some people have long memories.

It all needs to be left in the past as far as I'm concerned. Charles and Camilla are obviously very much in love and have been all these years, its a shame that Diana was caught up in it because of Royal protocol and expectations. I think Camilla will make a fantastic Queen consort

No, they aren't similar situations at all.
Charles was asked a question and he told the truth. He wasn't being vindictive and didn't tell a lot of untruths like they (especially Meghan) did to discredit the Royal family in the Oprah interview and continue to make digs and attention seek ever since.
Meghan threatened very recently that she could reveal more if she so chooses as she didn't have to sign a NDA. Absolutely disgusting.

If they carry on with more of the same, and Harry goes ahead with the book, then it won't be left in the past, it's current, and it's going to be reported. The ball is entirely in their court now.

[AnnieK]

No, they aren't similar situations at all.
Charles was asked a question and he told the truth. He wasn't being vindictive and didn't tell a lot of untruths like they (especially Meghan) did to discredit the Royal family in the Oprah interview and continue to make digs and attention seek ever since.
Meghan threatened very recently that she could reveal more if she so chooses as she didn't have to sign a NDA. Absolutely disgusting.

If they carry on with more of the same, and Harry goes ahead with the book, then it won't be left in the past, it's current, and it's going to be reported. The ball is entirely in their court now.

In your opinion they aren't similar situations but I respectfully disagree. At the time the interview was huge news and, as Zizu has demonstrated, a lot of people remember (my dad feels exactly the same as Zizu and he loves the Royals - just not Charles) and Charles' popularity dipped quite dramatically because of that interview (and has never quite recovered although he is much better thought of now than he has been in as long as I can remember), in the same way that Harry and Meghan's has.

I completely agree that Harry should really rethink the book now, I am hoping that spending time with the family during the last few weeks has maybe served as a poignant reminder of what he is giving up and how scrapping those plans may heal rifts etc but that remains to be seen - its very possible he doesn't want those rifts to heal and or that the family have been pushed too far. Everything remains to be seen - but I hope it plays out behind closed doors (although I know it won't)

[Swan]

Is Harry in his Nan's Will?

[jet]

In your opinion they aren't similar situations but I respectfully disagree. At the time the interview was huge news and, as Zizu has demonstrated, a lot of people remember (my dad feels exactly the same as Zizu and he loves the Royals - just not Charles) and Charles' popularity dipped quite dramatically because of that interview (and has never quite recovered although he is much better thought of now than he has been in as long as I can remember), in the same way that Harry and Meghan's has.

I completely agree that Harry should really rethink the book now, I am hoping that spending time with the family during the last few weeks has maybe served as a poignant reminder of what he is giving up and how scrapping those plans may heal rifts etc but that remains to be seen - its very possible he doesn't want those rifts to heal and or that the family have been pushed too far. Everything remains to be seen - but I hope it plays out behind closed doors (although I know it won't)

Sure, his reputation took a big dip after the interview, though most already knew he'd had an affair, it wasn't exactly startling news. However, the situations aren't similar in that he didn't use the interview to paint Diana in an awful light with lies and slurs which to me is the important point. Most of it wasn't about Diana anyway.

How Harry and Meghan carry on from here is crucial. It would be impossible for anything to play out behind closed doors if Harry goes ahead with the book, and it will be obvious he doesn't want it to. The same goes for anything more (leaking of conversations etc) they may reveal about private family matters. They know the score and as I said before, the ball is in their court.

They must know that their bitterness and spite isn't bringing them happiness. I agree that this could be a new beginning for them - their chance to enjoy what they have with their lovely children and a fantastic home and lifestyle.

[bots]

i hope i'm proved wrong, but i just think Harry and Meghan choose money over who it hurts every time

[Swan]

i hope i'm proved wrong, but i just think Harry and Meghan choose money over who it hurts every time

I think if his Nan left him a fair large sum he'll most likely keep his mouth shut now. They will probably rethink slating the queen knowing it wont go down well at all now. I never realised how adored she was until her death.

[bots]

I think if his Nan left him a fair large sum he'll most likely keep his mouth shut now. They will probably rethink slating the queen knowing it wont go down well at all now. I never realised how adored she was until her death.

all the queens assets would go to Charles/Andrew/Anne/Edward it wouldnt go down to the next generation

[Swan]

all the queens assets would go to Charles/Andrew/Anne/Edward it wouldnt go down to the next generation

What about 'personal' wealth though? ie cash? Can she distribute that as she see's fit?

[Oliver_W]

What about 'personal' wealth though? ie cash? Can she distribute that as she see's fit?

Course she can. She can give it all to an orphanage for cats if she wanted.

[Swan]

Course she can. She can give it all to an orphanage for cats if she wanted.

Yeah that's what im saying, so if Harry inherits a large sum of cash im sure he and his wife will keep their mouth shut when it comes to slating the royals.

Also, as if she'd donate her wealth to the poor and needy, all hail!! :hehe:

[Parmy]

I think if his Nan left him a fair large sum he'll most likely keep his mouth shut now. They will probably rethink slating the queen knowing it wont go down well at all now. I never realised how adored she was until her death.

I dont think they have ever slated the queen. They wouldn't, she was the daddy when it comes to world wide popularity...if charles gets as popular they will start kissing so much of charles ass it will cause him to lose half his ear length.

[jet]

There is a good and enlightening documentary on ITV catchup about Charles:

Charles: The Monarch and the Man

'Jonathan Dimbleby looks back at the achievements of the man who is now our King, how he sought to establish his own role as heir, and what kind of monarch he will be'.

He really achieved so much that was never reported on. Quite awesome really. It must have been frustrating in the extreme that the media was more interested in his love life than the untiring work he was carrying out, especially for the disadvantaged and the environment.

[Swan]

There is a good and enlightening documentary on ITV catchup about Charles:

Charles: The Monarch and the Man

'Jonathan Dimbleby looks back at the achievements of the man who is now our King, how he sought to establish his own role as heir, and what kind of monarch he will be'.

He really achieved so much that was never reported on. Quite awesome really. It must have been frustrating in the extreme that the media was more interested in his love life than the untiring work he was carrying out, especially for the disadvantaged and the environment.

Anyway, i've been seeing stuff online that Charles is gonna shake things up in the family? Like stripping non "working" royals of their titles, like Andrew, Harry and Meghan. And lesser known members? Or is that just hear say?

[jet]

Anyway, i've been seeing stuff online that Charles is gonna shake things up in the family? Like stripping non "working" royals of their titles, like Andrew, Harry and Meghan. And lesser known members? Or is that just hear say?

I think that is just speculation at the moment.
What I think is more likely is that he'll make changes to the roles of counsellors of state (those who stand in for the King if he is indisposed.) Which means Andrew and Harry would lose those roles, which likely would go to Princess Anne and maybe Edward?
I'm just speculating too ..:hee:

[bots]

What about 'personal' wealth though? ie cash? Can she distribute that as she see's fit?

i think the majority if not all the assets would go to Charles, the dosh will always go to the next in line. It's the titles that generate income. For example William became a very wealthy man overnight when he was handed duke of cornwall. Harry got nothing. Remember how Andrew was scrambling around to raise the cash to pay off his legal settlement, well Harry wont be any different to that

[Zizu]

Diana very much played the game, it was supposed to be her sister that married Charles, but she flirted with Charles in front of her. Also, Charles wasn't allowed to marry Camilla at the time and I don't think there are many of us would accept that amount of control over our lives without rebelling


Why didn’t he just stand aside and sail off into the sunset with Chlamydia if he lived her that much ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

Why didn’t he just stand aside and sail off into the sunset with Chlamydia if he lived her that much ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

After the abdication, that would have been a no

[Swan]

i think the majority if not all the assets would go to Charles, the dosh will always go to the next in line. It's the titles that generate income. For example William became a very wealthy man overnight when he was handed duke of cornwall. Harry got nothing. Remember how Andrew was scrambling around to raise the cash to pay off his legal settlement, well Harry wont be any different to that

So in theory, Harry won't get a thing? (not that any of these people need anymore wealth)

[Zizu]

Sure, his reputation took a big dip after the interview, though most already knew he'd had an affair, it wasn't exactly startling news. However, the situations aren't similar in that he didn't use the interview to paint Diana in an awful light with lies and slurs which to me is the important point. Most of it wasn't about Diana anyway.

How Harry and Meghan carry on from here is crucial. It would be impossible for anything to play out behind closed doors if Harry goes ahead with the book, and it will be obvious he doesn't want it to. The same goes for anything more (leaking of conversations etc) they may reveal about private family matters. They know the score and as I said before, the ball is in their court.

They must know that their bitterness and spite isn't bringing them happiness. I agree that this could be a new beginning for them - their chance to enjoy what they have with their lovely children and a fantastic home and lifestyle.


Did Di mention in THAT interview that Charles had Chlamydia smuggled into the palace the night before he married Di ?
( with the Queen’s knowledge and approval !)

Imagine if that little snippet has been released into the public domain … Charles would have had to go into hiding !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

So in theory, Harry won't get a thing? (not that any of these people need anymore wealth)

yeah basically, i don't think he would get a penny

[jet]

Did Di mention in THAT interview that Charles had Chlamydia smuggled into the palace the night before he married Di ?
( with the Queen’s knowledge and approval !)

Imagine if that little snippet has been released into the public domain … Charles would have had to go into hiding !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

ffs :laugh:

From Robert Jobson's book 'Charles at 70'.

The royal is said to have told a friend: “The idea that this could have happened and that I could have done any such thing is beyond belief and yet this monstrous nonsense has persisted."

I believe Charles on this one....and to think that the Queen would have approved is preposterous.

[Swan]

yeah basically, i don't think he would get a penny

I see. Well, wont be long before the royal stories are dominated by the rift. I wont be on the side of either, as per. :hee:

[jet]

Harry and William had trust funds set up from the Queen and also from the Queen mother which provides them with an income. Harry received more than William because of Williams future prospects which he has now inherited (the duchy of Cornwall.)

[Zizu]

ffs :laugh:

From Robert Jobson's book 'Charles at 70'.

The royal is said to have told a friend: “The idea that this could have happened and that I could have done any such thing is beyond belief and yet this monstrous nonsense has persisted."

I believe Charles on this one....and to think that the Queen would have approved is preposterous.


That book was written by his good friend ffs



Why is it preposterous when the slimy barsteward waited until the night before the wedding to tell Di that he didn’t care for her !
A bit more notice would have been nice don’t you think !?

So given he chose THAT night to break that bombshell to Di it is ENTIRELY conceivable that he also had Chlamydia around to the palace at that time- they were clearly all aware that he was gonna break the poor girl’s heart at that late instance .

:::

‘One of the most shocking things that Diana told me was that the night before the wedding Charles told her that he didn’t love her,’ Penny Thornton announced in upcoming ITV documentary, The Diana Interview: Revenge of a Princess, via People. ‘I think Charles didn’t want to go into the wedding on a false premise. He wanted to square it with her and it was devastating for Diana.’


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

She married him for fame and fortune, that was obvious right from the start

[Parmy]

She married him for fame and fortune, that was obvious right from the start

Looks like it.

Thank you zizu.

[James]

I always thought the royals were treated harshly by the public over Diana. None of us know what went on behind the scenes.

Diana dying was a tragedy that should never have happened and the public response to it was basically a collective version of the five stages of grief.

People were lashing out in anger in the week that followed, trying to make sense of it. I don't think there was ever any real threat to the monarchy.

[Zizu]

She married him for fame and fortune, that was obvious right from the start


Obvious to who ?

She thighs are was marrying a dashing prince who loved her .. she was marrying into a dream which sadly turned into a nightmare , none of it her fault .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

I always thought the royals were treated harshly by the public over Diana. None of us know what went on behind the scenes.

Diana dying was a tragedy that should never have happened and the public response to it was basically a collective version of the five stages of grief.

People were lashing out in anger in the week that followed, trying to make sense of it. I don't think there was ever any real threat to the monarchy.


Royal silence
Anger mounts at the silence of the royal family, who are still holed up in the Scottish Highlands.

Newspapers vent fury that the British flag is not flying at half-mast over Buckingham Palace and call on Queen Elizabeth to return to London and address her subjects.

The papers ask: “Where is our Queen? Where is our flag?”.

It says not flying the flag is a “stark insult to Diana’s memory”.

The palace’s flagpole is only used when the monarch is in residence, flying the sovereign’s personal flag, which never flies at half-mast.

Eventually, the royals leave the sanctuary of Balmoral.

When the queen and Philip later visit the flowers outside Buckingham Palace, they are applauded. There is huge relief in royal circles.

Elizabeth pays homage to her former daughter-in-law in a live televised speech on September 5.

“If they (the royals) fail to heed her lesson, they will bury not just Diana on Saturday — but their future too,”

The Guardian broadsheet warns, as nearly a QUARTER of Britons call for the ABOLITION of the monarchy in a poll.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/10/10/01/63290195-0-image-m-3_1665363081574.jpg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11297291/Historians-fear-smaller-Coronation-waste-opportunity-advertise-Britain-global-stage.html

[bots]

Coronation will be on Saturday 6th May. It will be a shorter ceremony, the queens coronation took 3 hours :laugh:

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/10/11/18/63350885-0-image-m-49_1665508141490.jpg

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/10/11/15/63344211-11303059-Prince_Charles_looks_solemn_as_he_stands_chin_on_h and_between_th-a-50_1665499492548.jpg
[Prince Charles looks solemn
as he stands chin on hand
between the Queen Mother and Princess Margaret
in the Royal Box at Westminster Abbey,
from where he saw Queen Elizabeth II crowned on June 2,
1953]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11303991/Coronation-King-Charles-III-held-Saturday-6-year-Westminster-Abbey.html

[bots]

he looks bored, not solemn :laugh:

[jet]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-11338495/Netflix-backs-royal-row-adding-disclaimer-marketing-Crown.html

Netflix backs down in royal row by adding disclaimer to marketing for The Crown stating show is fictional

Netflix has faced a fierce backlash over the latest series, which is set to air on November 9. However, it had, until now, repeatedly resisted calls for it to carry a disclaimer.
Actress Dame Judi Dench accused the show of being 'cruelly unjust' and backed calls for a disclaimer.
And former prime minister Sir John Major dismissed scenes showing him discussing the Queen's potential abdication with Prince Charles as 'a barrel-load of malicious nonsense'.
Dame Judi, 87, who has played Elizabeth I and Queen Victoria, said the series risked damaging the monarchy. The Oscar-winning actress blamed it for 'crude sensationalism' and blurring fact and fiction.
........
About time too! The number of viewers who actually believe the sensationalised rubbish they put out is laughable.

[The Slim Reaper]

........
About time too! The number of viewers who actually believe the sensationalised rubbish they put out is laughable.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/H5C8CevNMbpBqNqFjl/giphy.gif

[bots]

i enjoy the crown, and so do millions of others. It is fictionalised for sure, but the main events are all still very true

[jet]

i enjoy the crown, and so do millions of others. It is fictionalised for sure, but the main events are all still very true

Yes, most of us know its fictionalised, but apparently many Americans in particular believe the series is actually historical and the gospel truth from what I have heard from friends living there.
I thought the first 2 series weren’t too OTT, but after that the series got carried away with the over-dramatisation and sensationalism of actual events and the often ludicrous depiction of living people involved in those events. It’s a shame that one of the most expensive TV series ever made ($260 million), underneath the glitz and beautifully shot scenes is really nothing more than a shoddily researched tawdry soap opera, which, because real events are covered, blurs the lines cynically between reality and fantasy. The writer is an anti - monarchist, after all.
I do watch it myself though, with many eye rolls. :fist: :hee:

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/10/26/02/63847963-0-image-m-15_1666748314862.jpg

[Palace has planned to replace
Harry and Andrew with Anne and Edward:
Officials finalise ways to avoid Dukes EVER
standing in for the King... in proposals first
considered MONTHS ago with the
late Queen's blessing]

House Cleaning is Essential.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11354319/How-question-House-Lords-revealed-Palace-plan-sideline-Harry-Andrew.html

[Glenn.]

About time too! The number of viewers who actually believe the sensationalised rubbish they put out is laughable.

:joker: :joker: :joker: :joker:

[bots]

Prince Harry’s memoir, an object of obsessive anticipation worldwide since first announced last year, is coming out Jan. 10.

The book will be called “Spare” and is being billed by Penguin Random House, as an account told with “raw, unflinching honesty” and filled with ”insight, revelation, self-examination, and hard-won wisdom about the eternal power of love over grief.”

In a statement released Thursday, Penguin Random House summoned memories of the stunning death in 1997 of Prince Harry’s mother, Diana, and of Harry and his brother, William, “walking behind their mother’s coffin as the world watched in sorrow — and horror.”

“As Diana, Princess of Wales, was laid to rest, billions wondered what the princes must be thinking and feeling — and how their lives would play out from that point on,” the statement reads in part.

“For Harry, this is his story at last.”

The memoir’s title is an apparent reference to Prince Harry’s being a royal “spare,” not the first in line to succession. William, Prince of Wales, is next in line.

The 416-page book will come out in 16 languages, from Dutch to Portuguese, and also will be released in an audio edition read by Prince Harry. Financial terms were not disclosed, but Harry, the Duke of Sussex, will be using proceeds from “Spare” to donate to British charities. He has already given $1.5 million to Sentebale, an organization he co-founded with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho to help children and young people in Lesotho and Botswana affected by HIV/AIDS.

Penguin Random House identifies Prince Harry as “a husband, father, humanitarian, military veteran, mental wellness advocate, and environmentalist.”

Royals watchers and the public at large have speculated endlessly since the book was first announced in July 2021, billed as “intimate and heartfelt” and tentatively scheduled for this year.

The Duke of Sussex had already revealed a news-making willingness to discuss his private life when he and his American-born wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, were interviewed for a March 2021 broadcast by their neighbor in Santa Barbara, California, Oprah Winfrey. The couple spoke of Meghan’s deep unhappiness with her new life in England, the alleged racism within the royal family and Harry’s fear that his wife’s life might be endangered had they remained in his native country.

In 1992, Diana worked with author Andrew Morton on her explosive memoir “Diana: Her True Story,” in which she described at length her unhappy marriage to the future King Charles, Harry’s father.

Harry and Meghan stepped back from their royal duties in 2020 and moved to the U.S. Harry told Winfrey that his family cut him off financially and that he helped pay for his security with money left to him by his mother. They have launched numerous initiatives, including a Netflix production deal and the “impact-driven non-profit” Archewell Foundation.

The book’s delay led to rumors that Harry was hesitating to say too much about his family, or was perhaps revising the narrative after his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, died in September. He has spoken of being estranged from his brother, William, although the siblings and their wives appeared in public together during the mourning period following the Queen’s death.

“Penguin Random House is honored to be publishing Prince Harry’s candid and emotionally powerful story for readers everywhere,” the global CEO of Penguin Random House, Markus Dohle, said in a statement. “He shares a remarkably moving personal journey from trauma to healing, one that speaks to the power of love and will inspire and encourage millions of people around the world.”

https://apnews.com/article/queen-elizabeth-ii-princess-diana-entertainment-new-york-meghan-markle-b3c17242a0aa3e7dfbdef8b0e91c2081?utm_source=homepa ge&utm_medium=TopNews&utm_campaign=position_05

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/10/27/11/63902849-0-image-m-13_1666866541792.jpg

[bots]

the last stamps featuring the queen have been released. A special christmas series

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/10E1E/production/_127505196_microsoftteams-image.png.webp

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/173F6/production/_127522259_cc4a554a4ecaa47c866ff99035b084e1106d4fb 30_0_3000_30001000x1000.jpg.webp


Today at Buckingham Palace
King Charles holds his Cop27 event.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-63516054

[rusticgal]

He is very touchy feely for a King….but it’s quite endearing and makes him so much more natural. Love it…

[Zizu]

He is very touchy feely for a King….but it’s quite endearing and makes him so much more natural. Love it…


I seem to recall him being very touchy- feely with the 3 Degrees all those years ago


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

[A doctor who received an award presented
by King Charles, after saving lives in Ukraine.
The paper writes that the King handed
her the award on what turned
out to be his final day as Prince Charles.]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-f3b4e164-cc91-44e7-a580-739fdc00eb18.png

[Zizu]

Did Di mention in THAT interview that Charles had Chlamydia smuggled into the palace the night before he married Di ?
( with the Queen’s knowledge and approval !)

Imagine if that little snippet has been released into the public domain … Charles would have had to go into hiding !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro




A few salient snippets

Diana began to harbour suspicions about Charles and Camilla as early as during her engagement. The bride-to-be was upset when she found out that Charles had gifted Camilla a bracelet, shortly before the Royal Wedding was due to take place .

TheQueen and Prince Philip missed the official ceremony. Despite him being her firstborn and heir, the Queen decided not to watch Charles and Camilla say their official vows at Windsor Guildhall, instead opting to stay at home with Prince Philip


https://youtu.be/J7_GD81NRFQ?si=9kv2tju2XT_r_Pqy

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-7b70e776-1f3e-43f4-b783-d181caedfd3b.png

[Zizu]

https://youtube.com/shorts/D86GPtnK9jE?si=eUQmcb-riQMu5Yo5


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Zizu]

/shorts/D86GPtnK9jE?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[arista]

Video Not working

[Zizu]

Video Not working


Neither one ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk