Prince Harry was in London Court now back in LA

[thesheriff443]

I was thinking about this yesterday. Kate had just come from a 2 week hospital stay and was recovering at home and for whatever reason Harry didn't go and see how his brothers wife was. That implies a complete breakdown in relations with Will

He sold his family out
There is no way he didn’t know that rat omid had left the names of the so called racist’s in his book one being Kate.

[Glenn.]

I was thinking about this yesterday. Kate had just come from a 2 week hospital stay and was recovering at home and for whatever reason Harry didn't go and see how his brothers wife was. That implies a complete breakdown in relations with Will

Why would he? Kate has been awful to Meghan in the past. I’d say his father was more important than her no?

[Cherie]

I think the 45 minute meet with Charles and then him hotfooting it to Sandringham said it all.. made no sense for him to go to Sandringham when he is being treated on a weekly basis in London.... lets see if he goes this week....think Harry blindsided them with his visit, and let the paps know he was on route for his own gain sadly

[arista]

#


Still clinging on to their Royal titles to get them noticed and keep them relevant...:laugh:


Yes Harry wants to keep the money to come in more
hence them using the Royal Titles alot

[jet]

They gave Prince Philip and the Queen a lot of trouble in their final years without a smidgen of guilt or thought and now it’s the turn of King Charles, newly diagnosed with cancer and needing peace,not additional stress. Can they sink any lower?

[rusticgal]

Why would he? Kate has been awful to Meghan in the past. I’d say his father was more important than her no?


Really?….what did she do?

[Cherie]

They gave Prince Philip and the Queen a lot of trouble in their final years without a smidgen of guilt or thought and now it’s the turn of King Charles, newly diagnosed with cancer and needing peace,not additional stress. Can they sink any lower?

not sure but they will try

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/02/15/10/81294443-13086773-image-a-3_1707994250223.jpg
[Meghan led the way as she and Harry were filmed
as the arrived for the publicity event]

[At the Ski resort of Whistler, in British Columbia,
for a two-day trip from California to highlight
next year's Invictus Games,
the first time it will involve winter sports.]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13086773/Meghan-laughs-taking-picture-Harry-trying-sit-skiing-Sussexes-joined-film-crew-Whistler-public-appearance-royal-rebrand-backlash.html

[Cherie]

Zizu will not be happy with Megs skinny legs

[jet]

Zizu will not be happy with Megs skinny legs

Meghan Markle skinny legs steal the spotlight at 2023 Invictus Games

https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/1109817-meghan-markle-skinny-legs-steal-the-spotlight-at-2023-invictus-games

Yep. Very thin arms too. :omgno: :hee:

[Glenn.]

…think Harry blindsided them with his visit, and let the paps know he was on route for his own gain sadly

That’s a lot of thinking and sadly for you, not true.

They gave Prince Philip and the Queen a lot of trouble in their final years without a smidgen of guilt or thought and now it’s the turn of King Charles, newly diagnosed with cancer and needing peace,not additional stress. Can they sink any lower?

Again, not true. The FACT is, not one person outside of that bubble knows what’s going on no matter how much they think they do.

[Glenn.]

Meghan Markle skinny legs steal the spotlight at 2023 Invictus Games

https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/1109817-meghan-markle-skinny-legs-steal-the-spotlight-at-2023-invictus-games

Yep. Very thin arms too. :omgno: :hee:

A grown man talking about how a women’s figure look. A grown man

Why is it even a story?

[jet]

A grown man talking about how a women’s figure look. A grown man

Why is it even a story?

Zizu has used nearly a whole thread talking about how Kate's figure looks and you haven't said a word.
What are you like? :laugh:

[Zizu]

Zizu has used nearly a whole thread talking about how Kate's figure looks and you haven't said a word.
What are you like? :laugh:


I don’t see anything wrong with a grown man sharing concerns about a woman’s weight and/or health .. especially as it’s coming from a good place


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

Kate will be getting the very best of care. This isn't like Diana

[rusticgal]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/02/15/10/81294443-13086773-image-a-3_1707994250223.jpg




"Oh quick Harry...there's a Camera"

[jet]

"Oh quick Harry...there's a Camera"

:laugh:

[jet]

That’s a lot of thinking and sadly for you, not true.



Again, not true. The FACT is, not one person outside of that bubble knows what’s going on no matter how much they think they do.

Both true.
In the case of the latter, the Queen's lady in waiting revealed after her death how H&M's behaviour caused the Queen and Philip a lot of stress and worry, which is hardly a surprise.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/02/15/11/81299951-13086773-Meghan_Markle_could_not_contain_her_laughter_as_sh e_snapped_a_pi-a-50_1707996015770.jpg

[bots]

the could do a sled chase, i believe they like them

[Glenn.]

Both true.
In the case of the latter, the Queen's lady in waiting revealed after her death how H&M's behaviour caused the Queen and Philip a lot of stress and worry, which is hardly a surprise.

Gossip cannot be taken for truth no matter how bad you like to instantly believe every bad thing you read/make up in your head about them.

[rusticgal]

Why would he? Kate has been awful to Meghan in the past.


I will ask you again....what did Kate do that was so awful????

[thesheriff443]

Meghan and Harry have released a statement saying they will not be broken and Harry has done an interview talking about his father the kings cancer diagnosis

[Kazanne]

Gossip cannot be taken for truth no matter how bad you like to instantly believe every bad thing you read/make up in your head about them.

But the same can be said for the gossip surrounding the Royal Family, its really all gossip depending on who you like, personally I take it all with a pinch of salt,the press is notoriousl for exaggerating things,nothing ,but from the horses mouth cant be believed.

[Glenn.]

Meghan and Harry have released a statement saying they will not be broken and Harry has done an interview talking about his father the kings cancer diagnosis

Good for them

[jet]

I will ask you again....what did Kate do that was so awful????

:wavey:

The silence means you have your answer Rusti - absolutely nothing.

[rusticgal]

:wavey:

The silence means you have your answer Rusti - absolutely nothing.



Yup….:wavey:

[Glenn.]

Kate was awful to Meghan over a bridesmaid’s dress. She never wanted to have a relationship with her from the beginning. No doubt jealous a far more beautiful woman was coming into the fold, while her and her husband age like milk.

[arista]

They got on the Free Metro Paper today

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/930E/production/_132664673_the_metro-nc.png.webp

[jet]

Kate was awful to Meghan over a bridesmaid’s dress. She never wanted to have a relationship with her from the beginning. No doubt jealous a far more beautiful woman was coming into the fold, while her and her husband age like milk.



Well now….Far more beautiful? I wouldn't say so....both are very attractive women, it depends on your taste. I prefer Kate's looks.
Meghan was awful to Kate over little Charlotte’s bridesmaid dress, she was no doubt jealous of Kate’s elegance, poise, height, gorgeous shapely legs, her dress sense, her popularity, her ability at dozens of sports, of Kate’s greater status and importance as the future Queen.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it, Glenn boy. :smug:

[Glenn.]

On ignore....sure you have. :laugh:

Well now….Far more beautiful? I wouldn't say so....both are very attractive women, it depends on your taste. I prefer Kate's looks.
Meghan was awful to Kate over little Charlotte’s bridesmaid dress, she was no doubt jealous of Kate’s elegance, poise, height, gorgeous shapely legs, her dress sense, her popularity, her ability at dozens of sports, of Kate’s greater status and importance as the future Queen.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it, Glenn boy. :smug:

That’s great but it was Kate that was awful to Meghan.

[Jordan.]

Meghan and Harry have released a statement saying they will not be broken and Harry has done an interview talking about his father the kings cancer diagnosis

They are so strong :love:

[jet]

That’s great but it was Kate that was awful to Meghan.

That wasn't the actual truth, it was Harry and Meghan's 'truth' - there is a vast difference. Most sane people know that by now.

[Glenn.]

That wasn't the actual truth, it was Harry and Meghan's 'truth' - there is a vast difference. Most sane people know that by now.

Harry and Meghan haters are far from sane and there’s nothing that you can ever say to change my mind on that. It’s unhinged.

I find it far more believable that Kate was horrendous to a Meghan over a wedding dress than the other way around.

[Zizu]

Harry and Meghan haters are far from sane and there’s nothing that you can ever say to change my mind on that. It’s unhinged.

I find it far more believable that Kate was horrendous to a Meghan over a wedding dress than the other way around.


It’s a shame we will never even know the truth around all this plus all the other incidents .. it’s kinda like the Diana situation..

I do think that it’s entirely feasible that someone did say something about Archie’s skin colour though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[rusticgal]

That’s great but it was Kate that was awful to Meghan.


How do you know that?…

[rusticgal]

Harry and Meghan haters are far from sane and there’s nothing that you can ever say to change my mind on that. It’s unhinged.

I find it far more believable that Kate was horrendous to a Meghan over a wedding dress than the other way around.



:joker:


Is this the lovely Meghan who has spun a web of lies to deliberately hurt and slander her husbands family…:laugh:

[jet]

Prince Harry loses security case

R (The Duke of Sussex) -v- The Secretary of State for the Home Department

https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-the-duke-of-sussex-v-the-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department/

Quite right too.

[Zizu]

Still can’t believe we don’t give Harry the protection he deserves .. whilst looking after hogface Camilla .

Di must be turning in her grave


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Cherie]

He is appealing the appeal verdict

[arista]

He is appealing the appeal verdict


As Expected.

[thesheriff443]

Let’s be honest him bragging about killing people while shooting from a helicopter was him putting a target on his back or as I suspect making himself a target so he would be entitled to protection when in the uk.

[Vanessa]

He's not entitled to it, because he's not a working royal anymore.
But he will still get security if he comes over to see his family.

[Zizu]

He's not entitled to it, because he's not a working royal anymore.
But he will still get security if he comes over to see his family.


He has ROYAL blood .. Camilla just slept with a Royal ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

He's not entitled to it, because he's not a working royal anymore.
But he will still get security if he comes over to see his family.


He should be protected 24/7 all around the world .. the son of Di and our King !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[thesheriff443]

I think his biggest threat would be from William beating him up over his putting his family down.

[thesheriff443]

He should be protected 24/7 all around the world .. the son of Di and our King !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

You and only the people that think like that should pay for his safety while he travels the world in private jets and stays in top hotels while preaching how we all should be doing more to save the planet

I feel embarrassed for you when I read the sh1t you and people like you write

[thesheriff443]

More should be spent on the safety of the general public not sum jumped up twat wanting to swan around the world handing out fake awards

[Crimson Dynamo]

He is appealing the appeal verdict

What an entitled twat

[bots]

i would be fine with it if it means he never comes back to the UK :fc:

[Zizu]

You and only the people that think like that should pay for his safety while he travels the world in private jets and stays in top hotels while preaching how we all should be doing more to save the planet

I feel embarrassed for you when I read the sh1t you and people like you write


Well I strongly resent paying towards the protection of a common hussy like Camilllla


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[jet]

i would be fine with it if it means he never comes back to the UK :fc:

If the Heritage Foundation have their way Harry could be deported if it turns out he lied about his drug taking on his visa application.
Even if he did I'm sure he would be given preferential treatment and allowed to stay in the US. Which is one battle I hope he wins. :hee:

[bots]

people are completely misunderstanding this.

Harry is still getting appropriate security when he or his family visit the UK, the same way any foreign dignitary is entitled to protection while they are here

What he is not entitled to is a constantly updated threat assessment, which the royal family do get, because they are resident in the UK. That's what he is complaining about

[jet]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13119383/princy-harry-lied-cocaine-use-books-government-claims.html?ico=topics_pagination_desktop

Prince Harry's admissions in his memoir that he took drugs are not 'proof' that he actually did and could have been a ploy to 'sell books', the US government has argued in court.
The claim by the Biden administration came as a think tank in Washington DC sought access to Harry's visa application to see if he lied about drug taking.
John Bardo, for the Department of Homeland Security, told the court Harry's book 'Spare' was not 'sworn testimony or proof' that he took drugs.
He said: 'Just saying something in a book doesn't make it true.'
The lawyer added that people say things to 'sell books' as he argued Harry's immigration records should remain private.

This is hilarious. His defence is…he probably lied.
The rest of his book is true though…..honestly it is! :joker:

[Zizu]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13119383/princy-harry-lied-cocaine-use-books-government-claims.html?ico=topics_pagination_desktop

Prince Harry's admissions in his memoir that he took drugs are not 'proof' that he actually did and could have been a ploy to 'sell books', the US government has argued in court.
The claim by the Biden administration came as a think tank in Washington DC sought access to Harry's visa application to see if he lied about drug taking.
John Bardo, for the Department of Homeland Security, told the court Harry's book 'Spare' was not 'sworn testimony or proof' that he took drugs.
He said: 'Just saying something in a book doesn't make it true.'
The lawyer added that people say things to 'sell books' as he argued Harry's immigration records should remain private.

This is hilarious. His defence is…he probably lied.
The rest of his book is true though…..honestly it is! :joker:


I wonder if Harry is the only Royal to have ever taken drugs … LOL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Vanessa]

I wonder if Harry is the only Royal to have ever taken drugs … LOL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Definitely not. I bet that is still happening.

[Vanessa]

people are completely misunderstanding this.

Harry is still getting appropriate security when he or his family visit the UK, the same way any foreign dignitary is entitled to protection while they are here

What he is not entitled to is a constantly updated threat assessment, which the royal family do get, because they are resident in the UK. That's what he is complaining about

Yes, he doesn't live here anymore. So he only gets security when he comes over to visit.

[jet]

I wonder if Harry is the only Royal to have ever taken drugs … LOL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That's irrelevant as Harry is the only Royal filling in a visa form to live in the USA.

[rusticgal]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13119383/princy-harry-lied-cocaine-use-books-government-claims.html?ico=topics_pagination_desktop

Prince Harry's admissions in his memoir that he took drugs are not 'proof' that he actually did and could have been a ploy to 'sell books', the US government has argued in court.
The claim by the Biden administration came as a think tank in Washington DC sought access to Harry's visa application to see if he lied about drug taking.
John Bardo, for the Department of Homeland Security, told the court Harry's book 'Spare' was not 'sworn testimony or proof' that he took drugs.
He said: 'Just saying something in a book doesn't make it true.'
The lawyer added that people say things to 'sell books' as he argued Harry's immigration records should remain private.

This is hilarious. His defence is…he probably lied.
The rest of his book is true though…..honestly it is! :joker:


So he can pick and choose “his truth”…:joker:

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-d0f673ec-6cca-4235-92c9-355ee6427da5.png

[thesheriff443]

Yes harry, the way to protect your family is to tell the world how you killed 25 Taliban soldiers

Got to be as thick as dog sh1t

[jet]

So he can pick and choose “his truth”…:joker:

In a nutshell...and we must have imagined that we heard him talking about taking drugs in the Spare promotion interviews, right? :laugh:
He's freaking bonkers :crazy:

[jet]

More should be spent on the safety of the general public not sum jumped up twat wanting to swan around the world handing out fake awards

Hear hear!

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/02/23/20/81648503-13119383-image-a-1_1708721391561.jpg

Month's ago
Harry dashed into the London Court.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/02/23/21/81648871-13119383-image-a-19_1708722250102.jpg
[Harry and Megan
attend the Invictus Winter Games in
Vancouver, Canada, last week]

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/02/29/02/81853945-0-image-m-1_1709174096853.jpg


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13138807/I-like-persons-Prince-Harry-demanded-know-responsible-downgrading-police-protection-court-documents-reveal-loses-legal-battle-decision.html

[arista]

USA Party Girl In Las Vegas causing trouble for Harry


https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-9712302c-e762-416a-bffd-da2040f9294a.jpeg

[rusticgal]

USA Party Girl In Las Vegas causing trouble for Harry


https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-9712302c-e762-416a-bffd-da2040f9294a.jpeg



Eeewww...no thanks

[jet]

Eeewww...no thanks

Awww Rusti, how could you resist that body of his....:joker:

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/15225/production/_132856568_sun-nc.png.webp


You Dirty Minx

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/03/07/12/82152657-13168031-In_an_exclusive_interview_with_MailOnline_Carrie_t old_how_Harry_-a-11_1709815580907.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/03/07/12/82152651-13168031-Carrie_Royale_52_revealed_how_she_saw_Harry_losing _a_game_of_str-a-10_1709815580906.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/03/07/12/82152531-13168031-It_has_been_revealed_that_Carrie_has_threatened_to _post_previous-a-12_1709815580908.jpg

[Dominatrix who threatened to reveal
nude pictures of Prince Harry's 'crazy
Las Vegas night' tells of her
'nice little smooch' with the royal
Carrie Royale told how Harry is a
different person today to party-loving prince]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13168031/Dominatrix-threatened-reveal-nude-pictures-Prince-Harrys-crazy-Las-Vegas-night-tells-nice-little-smooch-royal.html

[Glenn.]

Nice little smooch

The daily fail really do print anything. I’m happy for the haters that they have such insights to fuel their hatred.

[Kazanne]

Still can’t believe we don’t give Harry the protection he deserves .. whilst looking after hogface Camilla .

Di must be turning in her grave


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Really? thats not nice she cant help her looks, she looks fine to me

[bots]

Nobody is denying Harry police protection, it's just not the same as he spends most of his time not here

[Liam-]

Can’t find a thread suitable for this news so I’ll put it here :hee:

Looks like she’ll have to go back to selling stories about Meghan to make some more money off of her back

https://twitter.com/scobie/status/1767576746633654417?s=46&t=-V1HH0UJyce-tDsLnymASQ

[Zizu]

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20240313/6b89681bb3cf35ebcf9bb6b68fe6d3a4.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

Trump hints he could
DEPORT Prince Harry from the US if he wins the election

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13212995/Trump-suggests-Prince-Harry-KICKED-America-drug-use-immigration-forms-debacle-Duke-Sussex-no-special-privileges-wins-election.html

[user104658]

Trump hints he could
DEPORT Prince Harry from the US if he wins the election

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13212995/Trump-suggests-Prince-Harry-KICKED-America-drug-use-immigration-forms-debacle-Duke-Sussex-no-special-privileges-wins-election.html

Ooh I like it. Harry can claim that Spare is partially a work of fiction - if it is found in court to constitute a factual document and NOT a semi-fictional autobiographical account, then there's precedent for all of his claims about the fam being legally established fact.

He's played a blinder :clap1:.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/04/17/17/83770339-0-image-m-9_1713371252727.jpg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13319663/prince-harry-lists-primary-residence-time.html

[Beso]

Hoist up that skirt and dont stop till you see brooklyn harry.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/04/18/10/83801663-0-image-m-21_1713433706532.jpg


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13322811/Prince-Harrys-decision-use-date-Meghan-evicted-Frogmore-Cottage-start-residency-reveals-irritation-King-Charles-confirmation-couple-no-intention-living-UK-near-future-royal-experts-say.html

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-c64d3c28-b098-42f5-a46e-ec3ac59b7bf2.jpeg

[arista]

BBC News Text:
[The Daily Mirror is reporting that the Duke of Sussex
is to visit his father next week as the
King continues his treatment for cancer.
Prince Harry flies from the US on Tuesday
for three days to mark his
Invictus Games' 14th anniversary,
the paper says.]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/c752/live/0c729e30-0995-11ef-bee9-6125e244a4cd.png.webp

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-f0e30d10-1cc8-4e55-891b-44905340e5c8.png

[arista]

Harry is back in the UK
for the I. games.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/05/07/14/84562257-13391363-Prince_Harry_at_Armoury_House_in_London_this_after noon_for_an_In-a-67_1715088337757.jpg
[Prince Harry at Armoury House in London
this afternoon for an Invictus Games discussion
called 'Realising a Global Community'
hosted by Louise Minchin,
ahead of the service]

[arista]

BREAKING NEWS
Prince Harry Won't meet Charles
on whistle-stop UK trip
due to King's 'full programme' but says
'I hope to see him soon' as he hosts
Invictus Games event in London]


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13391363/prince-harry-arrives-uk-without-meghan-invictus-games-meet-king-charles.html

[Zizu]

BREAKING NEWS
Prince Harry Won't meet Charles
on whistle-stop UK trip
due to King's 'full programme' but says
'I hope to see him soon' as he hosts
Invictus Games event in London]


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13391363/prince-harry-arrives-uk-without-meghan-invictus-games-meet-king-charles.html


Not a very fatherly thing to do … he’s supposed to be the mature one .

Fancy saying your too busy and not having time to see your motherless son when he’s over from America


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

Not a very fatherly thing to do … he’s supposed to be the mature one .

Fancy saying your too busy and not having time to see your motherless son when he’s over from America


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

it really depends, if Harry said i can meet you between 2-3 on Wednesday, and Charles has an engagement, it's not possible. We don't know the context

[arista]

it really depends, if Harry said i can meet you between 2-3 on Wednesday, and Charles has an engagement, it's not possible. We don't know the context


Yes Harry is the one that
should make more of an effort to fit into
of the King's timetable

[rusticgal]

Maybe Harry should pop over to see his dad when he is free and not just slot him into HIS schedule…:shrug:

[arista]

Sky News Text:
[Prince Harry has been "forced to admit" the King
is "too busy to see him" as he visits the UK
for events to mark the 10th anniversary
of the Invictus Games, the Daily Mail reports.]


https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-aee35d54-6a25-4024-a55b-f6d583b4c853.png

[arista]

Sky News Text:
[Prince Harry has said he will not
see his father on his "whistle-stop trip"
to the UK this week - because the King has
a "full programme" and is too busy to
see him,

the Metro reports.]


https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-6a1988d5-b9b0-46cd-b52a-f6d31f813333.png

[jet]

Harry was ‘forced to admit'.....not likely! :hee:
Harry hates the media yet he is always ready to have some lackey issue a statement to them.
He didn’t have to comment at all, but he can say anything which may or may not be true, because the Palace won’t react or contradict him.

[arista]

They are only 3 miles apart,

It was reported.

[Gusto Brunt]

They are only 3 miles apart,

It was reported.

I don't believe a father 'doesn't have time' to see his own son.

Charles just didn't want to see him. Seems the hurt is too big.

[Zizu]

I don't believe a father 'doesn't have time' to see his own son.

Charles just didn't want to see him. Seems the hurt is too big.


Its a disgrace given that Charle’s selfish actions robbed Harry (and Will ) of their mum at dreadfully young age


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Gusto Brunt]

Its a disgrace given that Charle’s selfish actions robbed Harry (and Will ) of their mum at dreadfully young age


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That's a point of view many people would agree with.

[rusticgal]

Sorry...but normal people arrange to meet up at a time thats convenient for both of them.
It happens to be 'convenient' for Harry because he is in town for his work. Maybe Harry should call his father and arrange a meet up when both of them have a free schedule...its what normal people do :shrug:
Why should Charles have to drop everything to fit into Harry's schedule :shrug:...then try and make Charles look bad.

[rusticgal]

Its a disgrace given that Charle’s selfish actions robbed Harry (and Will ) of their mum at dreadfully young age


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Is that the selfish actions taken by millions across the world...its called 'life'.

[Zizu]

Is that the selfish actions taken by millions across the world...its called 'life'.


No just Charles who’s never been able to keep his todger in his kecks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

Sorry...but normal people arrange to meet up at a time thats convenient for both of them.
It happens to be 'convenient' for Harry because he is in town for his work. Maybe Harry should call his father and arrange a meet up when both of them have a free schedule...its what normal people do :shrug:
Why should Charles have to drop everything to fit into Harry's schedule :shrug:...then try and make Charles look bad.


Charlie boy’s conscience should have guided him to see his youngest son


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

Harry could meet him later
than 10PM

Thats the only way

[user104658]

Maybe Harry should pop over to see his dad when he is free and not just slot him into HIS schedule…:shrug:

This should not (ever) be part of any parent-offspring relationship. Popping in to visit your parents when its convenient for them? Who considers that to be a healthy parental dynamic? Only people who are crap parents would be my view (or who HAVE crap parents but aren't ready to admit it to themselves yet, out of misguided "family loyalty" or whatever).

[arista]

Yes its the King
get permission to visit,
then go

[Cherie]

This should not (ever) be part of any parent-offspring relationship. Popping in to visit your parents when its convenient for them? Who considers that to be a healthy parental dynamic? Only people who are crap parents would be my view (or who HAVE crap parents but aren't ready to admit it to themselves yet, out of misguided "family loyalty" or whatever).

tbf if your kids only ever visited you when they were in the area you would be a bit miffed off as well, Harry had made his bed, he blindsided Charlie when he visited after the cancer diagnosis, he can come whenever he wants, he is hardly busy...so dont blame Charles, he didnt write a book dissing Harrys wife

[bots]

we aren't dealing with a normal family though are we. The royals have never been considered normal, none of them. If Harry turned up unannounced, he could be taken out by a sniper for starters :laugh:

When I lived away from home, I always called my Dad and asked when would be a convenient time. It's just good manners

[Ammi]

we aren't dealing with a normal family though are we. The royals have never been considered normal, none of them. If Harry turned up unannounced, he could be taken out by a sniper for starters :laugh:

When I lived away from home, I always called my Dad and asked when would be a convenient time. It's just good manners

…is that not normal, then…?…I just learned to dodge them at a very young age…

[Maru]

At best Charles can at least be partly blamed for the type of man Harry has become. That said, he's more than fully grown now and he can't be blamed for Harry's actions or decisions. He is within his right to not meet with his son. It's very possible he just simply can't trust him with a meeting with the amount of things likely going on in private.

[rusticgal]

So when children grow up and have a life of their own…you communicate with your family and arrange get togethers. Harry has occasional commitments but he runs his own agenda pretty much. It is therefore Harry who can slot into his fathers Agenda who has more commitments than his son.
Harry fails to see that…it’s a matter of fit into mine or lose out…:shrug:

[rusticgal]

tbf if your kids only ever visited you when they were in the area you would be a bit miffed off as well, Harry had made his bed, he blindsided Charlie when he visited after the cancer diagnosis, he can come whenever he wants, he is hardly busy...so dont blame Charles, he didnt write a book dissing Harrys wife


Exactly.

[arista]

This paper is also on the
Conservative Leadership thread.


https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-33bf88b2-c483-4586-aa4f-bd9e04b2bc87.png

[arista]

Prince Harry spoke for one hour
last night to ITV1HD. (Tabloids on Trial)

He confirmed Meghan will not be brought to the UK
on safety grounds.

He said it just takes one person...............


It was Debated on the newspaper review
on Ch5HD AM 1st show.

[Livia]

Prince Harry spoke for one hour
last night to ITV1HD. (Tabloids on Trial)

He confirmed Meghan will not be brought to the UK
on safety grounds.

He said it just takes one person...............


It was Debated on the newspaper review
on Ch5HD AM 1st show.

She'll be safe in the US. No nutters there...

[bots]

this is all quite ridiculous

[arista]

She'll be safe in the US. No nutters there...


Yes, good point
same problem in America

[jet]

He has to remind us that he exists and how hard done by him and his awful wife are - lest we forget.
People are struggling with major issues in the UK, nobody wants to listen to the continuous whinging of an entitled, rich, self absorbed, failed Prince/ turned failed celebrity.
Go away Harry and do something useful - like helping your missus to screw on jam jar and dog biscuit lids. :hee:

[rusticgal]

Harry has completely lost the plot...

[thesheriff443]

Poor harry spending every second of his life worrying about his wife

Remember the taxi ride Harry when she nearly died of boredom because no was chasing after her even though she got the driver to drive round the block for two hours

[Cherie]

He was on ITV the other day claiming that the hacking case is what led to the rift with Willy and Charlie...

[Cherie]

She'll be safe in the US. No nutters there...

No none at all

[rusticgal]

He was on ITV the other day claiming that the hacking case is what led to the rift with Willy and Charlie...


I know…how pathetic. He is deluded. They have told so many lies between them they don’t know what is the truth and what isn’t :laugh:

[rusticgal]

She'll be safe in the US. No nutters there...


Just ask Donald….:laugh:

[jet]

He drags up a different reason depending on what fits with his current whine. I mean, wasn’t the rift because they were all horrid to his angel Megs/he had never recovered from William getting an extra sausage and a bigger bedroom? :hee:
As Harry himself had to admit his ‘lived experiences aren’t necessarily what really happened’ when the very many untruths in his book were brought to
light.

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-cc2c1a06-b593-4515-bfbd-c33a83438260.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-6958c648-64cb-412e-b25f-b39444117a63.png

[Glenn.]

And as with his leadership, he failed spectacularly.

[arista]

And as with his leadership, he failed spectacularly.


Fair Point

[rusticgal]

And as with his leadership, he failed spectacularly.


Thank god...what a nasty bit of work he turned out to be.

[Glenn.]

Thank god...what a nasty bit of work he turned out to be.

The irony of this when the haters dedicate hours of their time obsessively hating them on the internet.

Grow up

[rusticgal]

The irony of this when the haters dedicate hours of their time obsessively hating them on the internet.

Grow up


:sleep::sleep::sleep:

[Glenn.]

Again the irony is lost on you how boring you all are

[thesheriff443]

Again the irony is lost on you how boring you all are

Well you better include yourself as boring
Because like I said ,if you are in the thread you are going n the same bed

Haven’t you got nothing better to do than keep coming into these threads to mock tibb members?

[Glenn.]

Well you better include yourself as boring
Because like I said ,if you are in the thread you are going n the same bed

Haven’t you got nothing better to do than keep coming into these threads to mock tibb members?

You literally do the exact same thing…

[thesheriff443]

You literally do the exact same thing…

No I don’t at all if I don’t have an interest in a thread I don’t post in them
My years on the forum and my post count is evidence I’m not a big poster

You have clearly said you have no interest in Meghan and Harry

You are trolling

An admin or mods should ban from those threads because it’s you that causes trouble to get them closed

[Glenn.]

No I don’t at all if I don’t have an interest in a thread I don’t post in them
My years on the forum and my post count is evidence I’m not a big poster

You have clearly said you have no interest in Meghan and Harry

You are trolling

An admin or mods should ban from those threads because it’s you that causes trouble to get them closed

You’ve literally just done it. Come into a thread and moaned about what another poster is posting.
You do it a LOT

[Livia]

The irony of this when the haters dedicate hours of their time obsessively hating them on the internet.

Grow up

Most of us don't give M&H a second thought till they pop up on the forum, that's their impact I guess... You have so little self-awareness that you call people boring for posting while making at least three posts to any other poster's one, and your posts are all about how boring we all are.

Now that's irony.

[Livia]

You’ve literally just done it. Come into a thread and moaned about what another poster is posting.
You do it a LOT

You do nothing else! Read the thread back and see.

[Glenn.]

And sheriffs there right behind me moaning about what I post

[thesheriff443]

You’ve literally just done it. Come into a thread and moaned about what another poster is posting.
You do it a LOT

You are mocking posters who are posting in a thread they have interest in
You don’t have any interest only to mock members and close the threads

[Glenn.]

You are mocking posters who are posting in a thread they have interest in
You don’t have any interest only to mock members and close the threads

Again, it’s exactly what you do to members too…

[rusticgal]

And sheriffs there right behind me moaning about what I post


Oh grow up and just own it....:bored:

[Glenn.]

Why don’t you haters make a social group dedicated to bashing two people you don’t know.?

[thesheriff443]

If josy was active you would be banned
If you have to interest in the thread you shouldn’t be posting in them
You are trolling

[Glenn.]

Members will post what they want when they want about who they want as many times as they want

You can’t seem to grasp the fact that you don’t get to decide what gets posted

[thesheriff443]

Members will post what they want when they want about who they want as many times as they want

You can’t seem to grasp the fact that you don’t get to decide what gets posted

That doesn’t include attacking members

That’s written in the rules Glenn

[Glenn.]

That doesn’t include attacking members

That’s written in the rules Glenn

But you’re ok to attack members though…

[thesheriff443]

Members will post what they want when they want about who they want as many times as they want

You can’t seem to grasp the fact that you don’t get to decide what gets posted

But you’re ok to attack members though…

Am I
I don’t think I am
I’m only here speaking because of your constant attacks on members

[Glenn.]

Am I
I don’t think I am
I’m only here speaking because of your constant attacks on members

By attacking another member

[thesheriff443]

By attacking another member

You mean, me calling you out as a troll is me attacking another member

How strange

[AnnieK]

stop this arguing before another thread is closed please. Stick to the topic - not each other

[thesheriff443]

stop this arguing before another thread is closed please. Stick to the topic - not each other

Well with all due respect you glen is attacking members and you and other are letting him get away with it

In the McCann thread he labelled me as vile for giving an opinion

I call a spade a spade

[The Slim Reaper]

:joker:

[AnnieK]

Well with all due respect you glen is attacking members and you and other are letting him get away with it

In the McCann thread he labelled me as vile for giving an opinion

I call a spade a spade

Use the report button and if rules are being broken they will be dealt with. This tit for tat insulting and arguing is getting ridiculous, especially in these threads.

[thesheriff443]

Use the report button and if rules are being broken they will be dealt with. This tit for tat insulting and arguing is getting ridiculous, especially in these threads.

You are a mod you are aware of the situation

Members should be allowed to be in threads without being insulted

Ask yourself why are the threads being closed because of arguments

It’s because one member is constantly calling members obsessed and many other names

[AnnieK]

You are a mod you are aware of the situation

Members should be allowed to be in threads without being insulted

Ask yourself why are the threads being closed because of arguments

It’s because one member is constantly calling members obsessed and many other names

To have arguments it takes 2 sides. I am working....use the report button and please don't expect mods to see everything, I have just popped on and seen this thread and it's the same people arguing again. It needs to stop.

[thesheriff443]

To have arguments it takes 2 sides. I am working....use the report button and please don't expect mods to see everything, I have just popped on and seen this thread and it's the same people arguing again. It needs to stop.

It’s not rocket science to see who starts it

What’s the point of a report button if your too busy to see it

Banning the trouble makers solves the problem

Mods only in name these days that’s half of the problem

[The Slim Reaper]

You are a mod you are aware of the situation

Members should be allowed to be in threads without being insulted

Ask yourself why are the threads being closed because of arguments

It’s because one member is constantly calling members obsessed and many other names

People can post what they like, in whatever threads they like, but I think other people should also be allowed to comment on that. When it comes to H&M, let's be honest, obsession is a pretty apt descriptor.

Didn't you mock her for making jam a couple of weeks ago? Does that in any sway seem a little...well... obsessed?

I completely understand why it wouldn't be nice to be called out like that, but look in any contentious thread and everyone is being called out by everyone else. I don't understand why you think repeatedly posting the same unknowns about the same couple should be exempt from scrutiny?

[Glenn.]

Well with all due respect you glen is attacking members and you and other are letting him get away with it

In the McCann thread he labelled me as vile for giving an opinion

I call a spade a spade

I said any human being that will defend parents for leaving a child unattended is vile. I don’t even think I quoted you so stop trying to get me banned.

[bots]

Glen and Sheriff, you have been going at each other for weeks, and its very tedious

[The Slim Reaper]

Mods only in name these days that’s half of the problem

We all have different issues, with different mods, at different times (and they with us - it's called being human), but be careful what you wish for. No one should want to go back to the bad old days of 2013 (ish) when modding was ridiculously strict, and at times, frankly, weird.

[Glenn.]

Glen and Sheriff, you have been going at each other for weeks, and its very tedious

Tell me about it. He needs to stay out of my way and I’ll do the same with him. It’s boring as ****

[AnnieK]

It’s not rocket science to see who starts it

What’s the point of a report button if your too busy to see it

Banning the trouble makers solves the problem

Mods only in name these days that’s half of the problem

The point of the report button is surely obvious?
If it happens when we are not here we see it and can deal with it.

You can continue insulting mods if you like....I have actual work to do. Report posts and they will be dealt with.

[thesheriff443]

The point of the report button is surely obvious?
If it happens when we are not here we see it and can deal with it.

You can continue insulting mods if you like....I have actual work to do. Report posts and they will be dealt with.

I’m not insulting mods you are aware of the issue right here and now if you don’t want to take action make admin or the other mods aware of it

No one should be posting in a thread they have no interest in full stop
Ban the person insulting and disrupting threads

[thesheriff443]

Glen and Sheriff, you have been going at each other for weeks, and its very tedious

Open your eyes
He has been insulting jet me cherie lt and rusty and parm livia

Basically the members he hates on here

[Glenn.]

And it seems like a plan is afoot to try and have me banned it seems :joker:

I’m just going to ignore you sheriff. You take my posts however you want. You’re obviously far more fragile than I am.

This will be the last time I engage with you.

[AnnieK]

I’m not insulting mods you are aware of the issue right here and now if you don’t want to take action make admin or the other mods aware of it

No one should be posting in a thread they have no interest in full stop
Ban the person insulting and disrupting threads

You also haven't posted any opinion on the thread topic today...just on another member.

Put him on ignore....report posts....is the way to deal with it.

[jet]

Prince Harry latest:

DM EXCLUSIVE
Harry goes it alone: Experts say prince 'wants more for himself' as he kicks off eight-day visit to New York and London without Meghan
By Martin Robinson, Chief Reporter

[Prince Harry's decision to jet off alone to New York to meet royals and celebrities before a solo trip to Britain shows he is determined to 'carve out' new opportunities and 'assert himself' after turning 40, experts told MailOnline today.

Biographer Phil Dampier, author of Royally Suited: Harry and Meghan In Their Own Words, said: 'Harry sometimes feels like a spare part and he often looks unhappy when he’s out with Meghan at events in California. I think he has reached a point where he wants more for himself. He’s turned 40 and must be asking himself what the future holds….etc]

Seems like the days of "We always move together, like salt and pepper pots", as Meghan said, are over.

[Glenn.]

Or they don’t want to be carting kids around the world…

You know, the most credible reason. Not everything has to be a conspiracy

[jet]

They don't bring the kids anywhere with them, ever. :shrug:

[arista]

[he kicks off eight-day visit to New York and London without Meghan]

Yes,
it will be better that way,
for his charity event.

[Glenn.]

They don't bring the kids anywhere with them, ever. :shrug:

Maybe they don’t want their kids splayed all over the gossip mags for all the weirdos

[jet]

Maybe they don’t want their kids splayed all over the gossip mags for all the weirdos

I think you've missed the point I was making but no matter....:laugh:

[Glenn.]

I think you've missed the point I was making but no matter....:laugh:

I think there’s things they can’t really take children to but you know that

[arista]

Prince Harry arrives
in London for his Charity events,
today


Childrens Charity.

[Beso]

[he kicks off eight-day visit to New York and London without Meghan]

Yes,
it will be better that way,
for his charity event.

She will be busy stuffing the tax money under the mattress.

[Niamh.]

people still ignoring Annies warning, I've deleted some posts but I'm going to start banning people from this thread if you start getting personal/insulting each other

[arista]

Thank you, Niamh
for your time

[Niamh.]

Thank you, Niamh
for your time

:douf:

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/09/30/16/90276135-13907699-image-m-5_1727710275715.jpg
[Harry swept into London's Royal Lancaster Hotel
to meet children, teenagers and their parents
who will be recognised with awards
from the charity WellChild]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13907699/prince-harry-arrives-wellchild-awards-london-meghan-charles-scotland.html

[Glenn.]

Bless him

[Beso]

He looks a lot happier alone, and over here

[arista]

Bless him


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/09/30/17/90277267-13907699-Harry_seen_chatting_to_six_year_old_Noah_who_has_c omplex_medical-m-29_1727712718562.jpg
[Harry seen chatting to six-year-old Noah,
who has complex medical needs,
and his mother Tracy]

[Glenn.]

Such a decent bloke

[rusticgal]

I hope he is safe?…..

[thesheriff443]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/09/30/17/90277267-13907699-Harry_seen_chatting_to_six_year_old_Noah_who_has_c omplex_medical-m-29_1727712718562.jpg
[Harry seen chatting to six-year-old Noah,
who has complex medical needs,
and his mother Tracy]

Harry actually meeting decent people struggling as parents when their kids have complex illnesses

Yes Harry’s stop crying about how bad your millionaire life style is when you are meeting real people with real problems

[jet]

He looks a lot happier alone, and over here

He does look more relaxed and happier when Meghan isn't around, she is always pushing herself forward as the main attraction while Harry stands behind her scowling. It's about time he has grown some balls and gone solo.

[arista]

He has now taken a flight to South Africa
to meet Charity members there

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/10/01/16/90324875-13912315-image-m-36_1727798106418.jpg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13912315/prince-harry-picture-south-africa.html?ito=pull-notification&ci=hQaYXOdQnA&xi=18d6b515-6eb7-4398-b94d-d5214bfe9218&ai=13912315

[thesheriff443]

He has now taken a flight to South Africa
to meet Charity members there

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/10/01/16/90324875-13912315-image-m-36_1727798106418.jpg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13912315/prince-harry-picture-south-africa.html?ito=pull-notification&ci=hQaYXOdQnA&xi=18d6b515-6eb7-4398-b94d-d5214bfe9218&ai=13912315

In this photo harry looks how he did in photos before he met Meghan,
Looks genuinely happy and relaxed

[Jordan.]

Lovely pics, great to see one of the royals is working this year

[Cherie]

Lovely pics, great to see one of the royals is working this year

Hilarious he has had to, given he didn't really want to a few years back ...how times have changed

[thesheriff443]

Lovely pics, great to see one of the royals is working this year

Yes look how happy he is without his wife in the picture

[jet]

Lovely pics, great to see one of the royals is working this year

How silly, and ignorant. The Royals are doing what Harry is doing everyday of the week without fanfare and alerting the press for attention and photo ops.
Harry has put in the equivalent of about 2 week’s work this entire year. :laugh:

Beatrice and Eugenie, who both have full time jobs, have carried out more charity engagements than Harry has.

[Jordan.]

Yes look how happy he is without his wife in the picture

tibb approval rating just sky rocketed

[thesheriff443]

tibb approval rating just sky rocketed

No one on tibb is stopping harry from being happy
But you only have to look at the pictures of him on this trip to see the massive difference in him in those pictures to the ones he is following Meghan around being introduced second while Meghan is the star attraction

[jet]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13925785/Prince-Harrys-bugged-thrown-judge.html

Prince Harry's claims he was 'bugged' and 'tracking' devices were planted to monitor him are thrown out as judge warns Duke over use of court time

Prince Harry's claims that 'bugging' and 'tracking' devices were planted by The Sun to monitor him have been thrown out by a High Court judge.

Mr Justice Fancourt said Harry had provided 'no particulars whatsoever' to back up the assertions in his long-running claim against the publication.

The Duke of Sussex is suing the publisher of The Sun, along with about 40 other claimants, alleging their personal information was hacked or unlawfully obtained to get stories…..

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/10/04/17/90467341-0-image-a-5_1728059294268.jpg
[Duke of Sussex and George Sibotshiwe attend
a Sentebale reception and panel discussion
at The Saxon Hotel in Johannesburg, South Africa]

[Glenn.]

Good old Harry, actually doing something this year

[arista]

Good old Harry, actually doing something this year


Good Point

[arista]

He Phoned Home to his Wife and Kids.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13929899/Prince-Harry-video-calls-Meghan-Archie-Lilibet.html


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/10/06/14/90438677-13929899-Board_Chair_Dr_Sophie_Chandauka_MBE_left_Prince_Ha rry_centre_att-a-8_1728220931388.jpg
[Board Chair Dr. Sophie Chandauka MBE (left)
Prince Harry (centre) attend a Sentebale reception
and panel discussion at The Saxon Hotel
in Johannesburg]

[rusticgal]

He Phoned Home to his Wife and Kids.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13929899/Prince-Harry-video-calls-Meghan-Archie-Lilibet.html


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/10/06/14/90438677-13929899-Board_Chair_Dr_Sophie_Chandauka_MBE_left_Prince_Ha rry_centre_att-a-8_1728220931388.jpg
[Board Chair Dr. Sophie Chandauka MBE (left)
Prince Harry (centre) attend a Sentebale reception
and panel discussion at The Saxon Hotel
in Johannesburg]


Amazing father and husband…I mean who does that :shrug:

[Cherie]

Amazing father and husband…I mean who does that :shrug:

Looks the image of Charles in that photo

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GZr2bH0XsAs3v64?format=jpg&name=small


In LA

[There to support a digital wellness platform
called Social Media U,
Meghan appeared without her husband Harry,
who has been making independent trips
elsewhere in the world]


Daily Mirror

[rusticgal]

Is this where she told them she was the most bullied person in the world?

[Maru]

Looks the image of Charles in that photo

Definitely

[arista]

Prince Harry
London Courts cases against the Sun newspaper.

Judge saying an out-of-court settlement
is being finalised.

He can fly over if wants to
then he can speak in court.

[jet]

Harry is suing NGN for unlawful newsgathering of private information (going back many years ago). They have denied there was any wrongdoing
NGN has settled already on 1300 people, including the likes of Hugh Grant, which has cost a hell of a lot, but it’s buttons to them. Harry is being encouraged to settle to avoid a long and costly trial.
He has previously insisted he won’t, because he wants ‘accountability’ and he vilified William for settling with NGN when he did so years ago.
So I wonder if he will accept and give up on the trial. He thrives on his court cases. :think:

[Glenn.]

Denied any wrongdoing

Settled 1300

Sounds like they DO need to face some accountability as they should. I’m sure everyone can agree on that?

[arista]

"including the likes of Hugh Grant"

He justified taking the Cash
back then,
as the Costs after the case would
destroy Hugh Grant.


But some reports are saying Prince Harry's
Cash is in millions,
That the Sun is offering.


Does Prince Harry have the spare cash
to carry on fighting this case?

[arista]

SkyNewsHD

Now says Prince Harry has Settled
his case with the Sun Newspaper

Live
All Media

https://news.sky.com/story/duke-of-sussex-settles-court-case-with-the-suns-publisher-13294182


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd9qqj3gvv1t

[Ammi]

SkyNewsHD

Now says Prince Harry has Settled
his case with the Sun Newspaper

Live
All Media

https://news.sky.com/story/duke-of-sussex-settles-court-case-with-the-suns-publisher-13294182


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd9qqj3gvv1t

…so it’s all about the money, then…not about the wrongdoing or the morality of anything that it was meant to be about…how disappointing…that settlement comes with an even higher price to pay from Harry, I would say…

[Livia]

Oh please let that be an end to his whining. But it won't be, will it.

[arista]

…so it’s all about the money, then…not about the wrongdoing or the morality of anything that it was meant to be about…how disappointing…that settlement comes with an even higher price to pay from Harry, I would say…


Harry/Meghan
need the Millions of pounds.


The also get a Public Apology from the Sun Newspaper

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gh5FCwoXEAAdO_k?format=jpg&name=small

https://x.com/Peston/status/1882017613317870016

[Ammi]

Harry/Meghan
need the Millions of pounds.


The also get a Public Apology from the Sun Newspaper

Prince Harry had vowed to hold the media to account
The Duke had previously told how he was determined to hold the company to account and was said to be relishing the chance to have his day in open court.

He was due to face several days of “extensive” questioning later in February.

Just last month, he insisted he was determined to pursue his claim to the bitter end in order to achieve closure for the hundreds of others forced to settle, for whom there had been “no justice.”

“The goal is accountability. It’s really that simple,” he told the New York Times’s annual Dealbook summit.

“One of the main reasons for seeing this through is accountability, because I’m the last person that can actually achieve that, and also closure for these 1,300 people and families.

“They’ve settled because they have to settle.”


…there are so many people/members of the public who couldn’t have even financed a single step toward the courtroom and toward ‘accountability’…there Harry was, standing right in the doorway and speaking for those people, apparently…the ‘Joe Public’ that could never have got anywhere near…and he took the dollars….as I say, very disappointing….and his ‘win’ is a huge loss, I would say…pointless…

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gh5OMXtWcAAYtXu?format=jpg&name=small

David Challen QC

[jet]

The judge Mr Justice Fancourt told the court it is “regrettable that this agreement has been reached” at such a late stage just as the trial was due to begin after huge resources have been spent of both public and private money."

[Swan]

Christ they're insufferable.

[thesheriff443]

It does seem this time the news paper group have been tactical in offering them an amount much larger then they would of been awarded

[jet]

Typical. Harry may rightly have wanted to ‘slay the dragons’ who invaded his privacy yet thought nothing of invading the privacy of his own family, over and over again for money while his grandfather lay dying and his grandmother the Queen was seriously ill. The pain he caused them both at the end of their lives is unforgivable.
And what about the privacy of the lady he had sex with in a field? Or the disabled matron (and her family) at his school who he called ‘not hot’ and ‘greasy and ugly’?
He made such a fuss about William accepting ‘hush money’ from NGN too in the past and sneered at it being a ‘secret deal’ between the paper and the Palace which was untrue. William donated every penny of his large settlement to charity. Is he going do do the same, or at least share his hush money with those who he said he was “"doing it for so many victims who don't have money to bring their case to trial"?

[Beso]

Need to change the old saying to, morals of a Harry cat.

[arista]

It does seem this time the news paper group have been tactical in offering them an amount much larger then they would of been awarded


Of course

[Glenn.]

Harry is suing NGN for unlawful newsgathering of private information (going back many years ago). They have denied there was any wrongdoing
NGN has settled already on 1300 people, including the likes of Hugh Grant, which has cost a hell of a lot, but it’s buttons to them. Harry is being encouraged to settle to avoid a long and costly trial.
He has previously insisted he won’t, because he wants ‘accountability’ and he vilified William for settling with NGN when he did so years ago.
So I wonder if he will accept and give up on the trial. He thrives on his court cases. :think:

You said it yourself. They denied any wrongdoing.

They have now admitted it. Your post last night contradicts your post today? You said he thrives on a court case and sneered about it. He’s proved you wrong yet again and now they have accepted responsibility and owned up to it.

Win win

[joeysteele]

He couldn't sue because once they've admitted his accusations were correct.
That's it as far as the law is concerned.

He won.
They backed down and will now have heavy financial penalties likely including costs too.

The group admitted the accusations after denial from them all over this time.
They are the ones that's lost.

It's great to see too because the Sun is a despicable publication and it's a pity it's still bought.
It should have gone the same way as the disgraced News of the World.

[Ammi]

He couldn't sue because once they've admitted his accusations were correct.
That's it as far as the law is concerned.

He won.
They backed down and will now have heavy financial penalties likely including costs too.

The group admitted the accusations after denial from them all over this time.
They are the ones that's lost.

It's great to see too because the Sun is a despicable publication and it's a pity it's still bought.
It should have gone the same way as the disgraced News of the World.

…oh, thank you for explaining with simplicity from a legal perspective, Joey….:lovedup:…

[jet]

NGN has released a statement: They’re saying the apology is for actions taken by News of the World back in 2006 and for unlawful acts by private investigators. They’re also stating that there were no unlawful acts by journalists at The Sun, nor were Harry’s voicemails hacked.

Statement:
Today we have come to agreements with the Duke Of Sussex and Lord Watson to pay damages and to settle their cases. It is in the interests of all the parties to come to a settlement.
This statement is to clarify questions raised after the hearing.

It has long been a matter of record that the Duke of Sussex’s phone was hacked by the News of the World. Two people served criminal sentences for this in 2006 and an apology was given. Today a full and unequivocal apology is given to the Duke of Sussex for the phone hacking, surveillance and misuse of private information by journalists and private investigators instructed by them at the News of the World. Phone hacking at the News of the World was not due to be a part of this trial but it is a part of this settlement.

In the 1990’s and early 2000’s there was widespread use by the broadcast and news media of private investigators. In most cases, their use was for public interest journalism and to obtain information necessary for the purposes of journalism.
Today, our apology to the Duke of Sussex includes an apology for incidents of unlawful activities carried out by private investigators working for The Sun, not by journalists, during the period 1996-2011.

There are strong controls and processes in place at all our titles today to ensure this cannot happen now. There was no voicemail interception on The Sun.

It must also be stressed that allegations that were being made publicly pre trial (and indeed post settlement) that News International destroyed evidence in 2010/11 would have been the subject of significant challenge at trial. These allegations were and continue to be strongly denied. Extensive evidence would have been called in trial to rebut these allegations from senior staff from technology and legal.

After we served our skeleton arguments and evidence for trial including witness statements, the Duke has not sought to pursue these allegations further despite his stated intent and no admission or apology has been made in relation to this. This is significant. This matter was also investigated fully by the police and CPS between 2012-2015, at the conclusion of which it was found that there was no case to answer.

[jet]

You said it yourself. They denied any wrongdoing.

They have now admitted it. Your post last night contradicts your post today? You said he thrives on a court case and sneered about it. He’s proved you wrong yet again and now they have accepted responsibility and owned up to it.

Win win

He does thrive on court cases, this is hardly the one and only. But he likes dollars even more.

[Beso]

Interesting statement.

[jet]

He couldn't sue because once they've admitted his accusations were correct.
That's it as far as the law is concerned.

He won.
They backed down and will now have heavy financial penalties likely including costs too.

The group admitted the accusations after denial from them all over this time.


It seems this isn't the case.

[Glenn.]

The lengths people will go to to have a pop :joker:

NGN lost. Harry won. Put your hatred aside

[joeysteele]

It seems this isn't the case.

It is, no matter how much others may prefer it not to be.

They've admitted the wrongdoing.
They've issued too an unequivocal apology.
After all this time of denying ALL the allegations.

Look up what unequivocal means although I'm sure you know already.
Unequivocal is a strong word I see is left out of the article you post from whenever source that is.

[jet]

It is, no matter how much others may prefer it not to be.

They've admitted the wrongdoing.
They've issued too an unequivocal apology.
After all this time of denying ALL the allegations.

Look up what unequivocal means although I'm sure you know already.
Unequivocal is a strong word I see is left out of the article you post from whenever source that is.

It seems they are saying the apology is for the News of the World behaviour and not so much for the Sun's?
It's all rather confusing, maybe things will become clearer in time.
To be clear on my part, an unequivocal apology is absolutely correct if wrongdoing was carried out, no matter who it comes from. I am no fan of the Sun.

[Glenn.]

The Sun is named in the first paragraph of the apology

[jet]

The Sun is named in the first paragraph of the apology

Yep, and in the NGN statement they are backtracking quite a bit. :conf:

[Glenn.]

Going round the houses to nothing. They lost and Harry won.

[jet]

Going round the houses to nothing. They lost and Harry won.

He won money, yes, but surrendered any integrity or morality. He took the hush money he insisted he never would and which he blasted William for taking. We'll never know the extend of the newspapers devious activities now that Harry has given up on 'full accountability'.
Oh well, it will keep him in polo ponies for another few years. :hehe:

[joeysteele]

It seems they are saying the apology is for the News of the World behaviour and not so much for the Sun's?
It's all rather confusing, maybe things will become clearer in time.
To be clear on my part, an unequivocal apology is absolutely correct if wrongdoing was carried out, no matter who it comes from. I am no fan of the Sun.

Oh I know you're no fan of the Sun too jet.
That's good to know, I admire you for that.

I've detested, and I don't detest very much usually, however I've detested the Sun since I could read almost.

In fact why the group had to scrap the News of the World but then be allowed to print the Sun on Sunday was mystifying to me.
The News of the World was more in my view just the Sun on a Sunday anyhow.

[Glenn.]

God you’re hilarious. You slammed him taking it to court and now you’re slamming him for having no integrity or morals, the very same thing William did but it’s good to finally see you finally admitting William is no better than Harry.

He got the apology he wanted. He won. Admit that. Put your hatred aside.

[Jordan.]

Ecstatic for Harry, fabulous victory :clap1:

[jet]

God you’re hilarious. You slammed him taking it to court and now you’re slamming him for having no integrity or morals, the very same thing William did but it’s good to finally see you finally admitting William is no better than Harry.

He got the apology he wanted. He won. Admit that. Put your hatred aside.

Why can you never see the difference in anything?
William never went on and on about not settling,he didn’t waste time and public money- he gave what he got to charity.
He didn’t whinge non stop about his privacy being invaded and then invade the privacy of his own loved ones.

Hatred? There is a difference between hatred and utter contempt Glenn.
My tolerance for contemptible people is obviously different to yours.
You are entitled to never criticise Harry and Meghan if you feel they never deserve it, I’m entitled to my feelings and responses about them. You need to accept that. Move on.

[Cherie]

I'm more estatic for the people who settled years ago and saved themselves all the undue stress, if he wanted his day in court he should have stuck with it, but it appears he was awarded more than he would have won if he had been successful, so morals put aside, its all about the dollars

[Glenn.]

Why can you never see the difference in anything?
William never went on and on about not settling,he didn’t waste time and public money- he gave what he got to charity.
He didn’t whinge non stop about his privacy being invaded and then invade the privacy of his own loved ones.

Hatred? There is a difference between hatred and utter contempt Glenn.
My tolerance for contemptible people is obviously different to yours.
You are entitled to never criticise Harry and Meghan if you feel they never deserve it, I’m entitled to my feelings and responses about them. You need to accept that. Move on.

Why can’t you ever see past your contempt of Harry and Meghan. It’s not a very good look.

I’m over the moon for Harry! Fantastic win for him

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-1b3e6e69-942d-4268-89e3-d71a181ff993.jpeg

[Crimson Dynamo]

more than worth it

:joker:

made 100 mill

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-cf65339f-134b-4c38-8bac-d00611542e9f.png

[arista]

It is not over.


Now he is to battle the Daily Mail.
who may also settle


Ref: GMBHD itv debate

[joeysteele]

It is not over.


Now he is to battle the Daily Mail.
who may also settle


Ref: GMBHD itv debate

Well good luck to him there too.
I cannot stand the Daily Mail.

I honestly am amazed that people waste money on these misleading and often blatant lying publications as to what the real news is.
The lot of them are biased one way or another.

Plus as to the cost of the garbage too.
I hear and see pensioners moaning at losing winter fuel payments, then buying one or more of these publications.
Spending over £400+ every year on them.

For what.
To have them blackmailing gay people to come out or they'll do a story on them.
Or hound celebrities and public figures to death.
To try to destroy careers and put out distorted or blatantly misleading news.

I'm glad I would never spend one pence on a so called newspaper.
So again good luck to Harry or anyone against the rotten Daily Mail too.
Because I wouldn't even soil my Staffie's mess picking it up with a sheet from the Daily Mail.

[thesheriff443]

Well good luck to him there too.
I cannot stand the Daily Mail.

I honestly am amazed that people waste money on these misleading and often blatant lying publications as to what the real news is.
The lot of them are biased one way or another.

Plus as to the cost of the garbage too.
I hear and see pensioners moaning at losing winter fuel payments, then buying one or more of these publications.
Spending over £400+ every year on them.

For what.
To have them blackmailing gay people to come out or they'll do a story on them.
Or hound celebrities and public figures to death.
To try to destroy careers and put out distorted or blatantly misleading news.

I'm glad I would never spend one pence on a so called newspaper.
So again good luck to Harry or anyone against the rotten Daily Mail too.
Because I wouldn't even soil my Staffie's mess picking it up with a sheet from the Daily Mail.

I get your point but there is always two sides to everything

It was thanks to the sun news paper that the drill artist got put back in jail

As to forcing gay men to come out
With Phil Schofield that needed to happen

And the same way sun news paper printed the story from the lads mum who was sending pictures to Hugh Edward’s the bbc didn’t act on that but the paper got an investigation

There are wrongs and rights in every aspect of life

[Livia]

Well good luck to him there too.
I cannot stand the Daily Mail.

I honestly am amazed that people waste money on these misleading and often blatant lying publications as to what the real news is.
The lot of them are biased one way or another.

Plus as to the cost of the garbage too.
I hear and see pensioners moaning at losing winter fuel payments, then buying one or more of these publications.
Spending over £400+ every year on them.

For what.
To have them blackmailing gay people to come out or they'll do a story on them.
Or hound celebrities and public figures to death.
To try to destroy careers and put out distorted or blatantly misleading news.

I'm glad I would never spend one pence on a so called newspaper.
So again good luck to Harry or anyone against the rotten Daily Mail too.
Because I wouldn't even soil my Staffie's mess picking it up with a sheet from the Daily Mail.

As a matter of interest Joey, what newspapers do you trust?

[joeysteele]

I get your point but there is always two sides to everything

It was thanks to the sun news paper that the drill artist got put back in jail

As to forcing gay men to come out
With Phil Schofield that needed to happen

And the same way sun news paper printed the story from the lads mum who was sending pictures to Hugh Edward’s the bbc didn’t act on that but the paper got an investigation

There are wrongs and rights in every aspect of life

I absolutely concede on the points and cases you mentioned in your post.
So certainly would applaud that being brought about.

Plus too has ITV scrutinized more, then whatever the situation was with Schofield they should have exposed that.
I don't think Schofield being gay however is a matter that the press should be forced out the public domain.
Plus too again, the BBC who have a shocking record over the years and decades of those they've overlooked or even protected.
The BBC SHOULD be made much more accountable as to it's employees.

I can't dispute at all and wouldn't try to, as to your post on those cases.

I still feel myself however that we have a press, indeed a media, who way too often now overstep the acceptable mark way too much and have got worse.

Your last line obviously I agree totally with.